On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 12:10 PM Keith N. McKenna
wrote:
> Jean Weber wrote:
> > I agree. Much easier to follow.
> >
> > BTW, the OOo3 naming convention was for a purpose that is no longer
> > relevant: something intended to be automated but never implemented JHW
> >
> > On Sun, 21 Aug 2022 at 07:40 Keith N. McKenna >
> > wrote:
> >
> Thanks Jean always wondered what that naming convention was for.
>
> Regards
> Keith
>
> >> I am thinking that it might be a good idea to rename the OOo3 ODF files.
> >> The are all in a format nnnAAvv-ChapterName, IE
> 0201WG33-IntroducingWriter.
> >>
> >> As we started off with AOO41GSn for the chapters, I was thinking
> >> following on with that naming sceme for the rest of the quides.
> >>
> >> Please let me know if you agree with this or not.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Keith
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> The proposed new naming scheme is certainly better than the old one.
>
Regards,
Francis
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>
