Re: [docbook-apps] hyphenation error

2008-02-17 Thread 61Sniper

Hello,

ok it works. I`m very happy about that.

Many thanks




Bob Stayton wrote:
> 
> Or more concisely, see step 6 in:
> 
> http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/InstallingAnFO.html#InstallFop
> 
> Bob Stayton
> Sagehill Enterprises
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Mauritz Jeanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'61Sniper'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
> 
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 9:46 AM
> Subject: RE: [docbook-apps] hyphenation error
> 
> 
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: 61Sniper
>>>
>>> I have got again a problem. During the compilation, I`m
>>> getting following
>>> error
>>> Couldn't find hyphenation pattern
>>>
>>> I saw in google, but I didn`t found any helps.
>>>
>>> What can I do?
>>
>>
>> I suppose you are using FOP. See
>> http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.94/hyphenation.html.
>>
>> /MJ
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/hyphenation-error-tp15488937p15535162.html
Sent from the docbook apps mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[docbook-apps] Re: FW: long Tables in docbook using FOP

2008-02-17 Thread Ron Catterall

Mauritz
Not appeared as yet (10:10 CST, 16:10 GMT).  Do we have another delay 
in the build?

Ron


Mauritz Jeanson wrote, at 2/13/2008 11:35 AM:

I agree. A default value of "auto" for the keep-together.within-column
property in the table.properties attribute-set is more reasonable.


I have changed the default value to "auto" in SVN. This will be in
the next official release (1.74.0), and it works now in a snapshot
release (http://docbook.sourceforge.net/snapshots/).

/MJ






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
Ron Catterall, Phd, DSc email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prolongacion de Hidalgo 140 http://catterall.net/
San Felipe del Agua tel: +52 951 520 1821
Oaxaca  68020   Mexico  fax: +1 530 348 8309

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[docbook-apps] Re: FW: long Tables in docbook using FOP

2008-02-17 Thread Mauritz Jeanson

Brooks Moses wrote:

Mauritz Jeanson wrote, at 2/13/2008 11:35 AM:

I agree. A default value of "auto" for the keep-together.within-column
property in the table.properties attribute-set is more reasonable.

The current default value is "always"; it is inherited from
formal.object.properties.


I'd like to add my voice to the chorus here.  IIUC, we're currently
stuck using 1.69 because of this issue -- because upgrading to the
current version means that our long tables stop working, and even though
it's easy to fix in the current versions of the documents, it would
still break all our archived versions.



I have changed the default value to "auto" in SVN. This will be in
the next official release (1.74.0), and it works now in a snapshot
release (http://docbook.sourceforge.net/snapshots/).

/MJ






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]