Re: [Dorset] OT: Sign up to oppose the Digital Economy Bill

2010-03-20 Thread Terry Coles
On Friday 19 Mar 2010, Chris Dennis wrote:
 I've written to Desmond Swayne -- the MP on this side of the border.
 Last time I wrote to him about something (the arms trade) he just
 replied I disagree (embedded in a couple of paragraphs of waffle).

When the big US Corporations were bending all the rules to get software 
patents legal in the EU, I wrote to every one of the South West MEPs.  (I've 
never understood why we are apparently represented by nearly a dozen different 
people.)  The responses were interesting, but not unexpected.  Uncannily they 
all had beliefs that pretty much exactly aligned with those of their party.

Generally the ones who were pro software patent spouted the nonsense about 
rewarding innovation (has any one ever found an innovative software patent?).  
The ones who were opposed seemed to be better informed.  Having read what I 
just said, I suppose some would say 'I would think that wouldn't I'. :-) )

-- 
Terry Coles
64 bit computing with Kubuntu Linux


-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, Wed 2010-04-07 20:00
http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2645413
   Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.orgchannel=%23dorset
   List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset


Re: [Dorset] OT: Sign up to oppose the Digital Economy Bill

2010-03-20 Thread John Palmer
On Saturday 20 March 2010 08:42:27 Terry Coles wrote:
 has any one ever found an innovative software patent?

Wasn't Lempel-Ziv innovative, in its time ? 
  the better points are surely
1 software patents are often not held by the innovators;
2 they last far too long and hamper /further/ innovation;
3 it is impossible in practice to avoid infringing them inadvertently;
4 algorithms are akin to theorems in logic or mathematics.

Best wishes, John

-- 
John Palmer
Preston near Weymouth, Dorset, England
e-mail:  jo...@bcs.org.uk (plain text preferred)
website: http://www.palmyra.uklinux.net/





-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, Wed 2010-04-07 20:00
http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2645413
   Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.orgchannel=%23dorset
   List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset


Re: [Dorset] OT: Sign up to oppose the Digital Economy Bill

2010-03-20 Thread Terry Coles
On Saturday 20 Mar 2010, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
 Yes, HTTP lets clients and servers converse over whether they need to
 fetch a new version of the page to save on needless transfers.  A server
 can use it to help stop the `reload addicts' that keep reloading,
 waiting for the count to go up by one.  :-)

OK.  So I can see why they would want to do this.

 Here's the conversation for the first time it's fetched, some headers
 deleted.  A paragraph of request, another of reply.
 
 GET /Digital-Economy/ HTTP/1.0
 Host: petitions.number10.gov.uk
 Pragma: no-cache
 Cache-Control: no-cache, max-age=259200
 
 HTTP/1.0 200 OK
 Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:12:05 GMT
 Expires: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:12:06 GMT
 Content-Length: 16664
 Last-Modified: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:31:03 GMT
 Cache-Control: max-age=1
 
 The next time the browser asks, including on a reload, it adds the
 `If-Modified-Since' header.
 
 GET /Digital-Economy/ HTTP/1.0
 If-Modified-Since: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:31:03 GMT
 Host: petitions.number10.gov.uk
 Cache-Control: max-age=259200
 
 HTTP/1.0 304 Not Modified
 Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:11:54 GMT

Unless I've misunderstood this, the server is lying!  The browser asks if the 
page has been modified since the last time it got a fresh page and the server 
says no, even though it has.  Seems a pretty poor approach to me, because it 
will make people keep asking and wondering why a page they expect to change 
isn't.

 Hold down Shift in most browsers when clicking the Reload icon to make
 it not do this and really get a fresh version of the page.  But use
 sparingly.  There's a reason it works as above.  You don't want the
 server so heavily loaded that folks don't bother signing.  :-)

That is the bit that confused me.  I thought the reload button on it's own 
gave that behaviour.

-- 
Terry Coles
64 bit computing with Kubuntu Linux


-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, Wed 2010-04-07 20:00
http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2645413
   Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.orgchannel=%23dorset
   List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset