Re: [Dorset] New BOINC project that does computing for COVID-19
On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 07:22, Terry Coles wrote: > However, there is a new posting on the Ibercivis Message Board that says > they > now have a new version of the app on the server which is supposed to fix > the > checkpointing problem (but not the computation issue). > Ah, yes: https://boinc.ibercivis.es/ibercivis/forum_thread.php?id=49#289 Thanks for the tip! I'll let these VM tasks drain until I see v0.02 tasks come in. Still curious about how the VM tasks actually perform in KVM. Tim. */ -- Next meeting: Online, Jitsi, Tuesday, 2020-06-02 20:00 Check to whom you are replying Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk
Re: [Dorset] New BOINC project that does computing for COVID-19
On Thursday, 14 May 2020 09:59:24 BST Tim Waugh wrote: > Thanks for the tip! I'll let these VM tasks drain until I see v0.02 tasks > come in. Still curious about how the VM tasks actually perform in KVM. I've been puzzling over that posting since I first read it. At the start of it they say: 'We have uploaded a new Covid -Phym version (v0.2). In this new version: - We have eliminated unnecessary files - We have uploaded a new version of gen_wrapper - We are able to to checkpointing' Then at the end of the posting they say: 'We are doing checkpointing after each of these lines (in version 0.02 and in workunits like 13052020 or higher)' So do they mean v0.2 or v0.02? Also five of my six new Tasks have workunits in the range _5202 and up (no mention of the 130 prefix) and one has the workunit _2270. All of them have 0.02 in the Application column. BTW all my earlier Tasks have shot up to exactly 60% of Progress with around 8 hours to complete. -- Terry Coles -- Next meeting: Online, Jitsi, Tuesday, 2020-06-02 20:00 Check to whom you are replying Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk