Re: [Dorset] iPad Petition by 'Defective by Design'

2010-01-29 Thread Dan Dart
Similar reasons. Why I regret buying an ipod. But at least I can run
bash on it now.

On 29 January 2010 09:10, Robert Bronsdon reash...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:16:59 -, Sean Gibbins s...@funkygibbins.me.uk
 wrote:

 Good luck with that Terry, both genuinely and also in that slightly
 sarcastic tone that suggests you are peeing in the wind.

 I don't think a campaign can ever be dropped because its not likely to do
 much.

 It's a good thing that you and your fellow petition signers are letting
 them know you disapprove, but I suspect the rush of eager fan-boys (and
 girls!) will make more of a statement to Apple on launch day than your
 petition ever will.

 I don't know how much I agree with the petition. I feel the petition is a
 bit of a rush job by the FSF and things like this could well damage them
 more than help.

 Instead of giving people the freedom to choose if the DRM will harm them,
 the FSF is telling people it will. I'd much prefer too see people educated
 as too why its damaging and to leave people too choose.

 It's for similar reasons I will not buy an iPod.

 And that would be the choice they should make. To buy or not to buy.

 I also feel that if the FSF just sat back and attempted to educate people
  from afar, they wouldn't get through too any more than the people that are
 already interested in listening (aka. us).

 Maybe the campaing will bring some attention to the FSF and the cause in
 general. Like I said earlier, not sure. I'm just worried the impact of
 campaigns like this could leave more members of the FSF looking like
 screaming FOSS fanboys and damage the whole argument.


 --
 Using Opera M2: http://www.opera.com/mail/

 --
 Next meeting: Bournemouth, Wed 2010-02-03 20:00
 http://dorset.lug.org.uk/     http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2645413
   Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.orgchannel=%23dorset
           List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset




-- 
Dan Dart
_
Need a website? Want some music tailored to you? Visit http://www.dandart.co.uk

-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, Wed 2010-02-03 20:00
http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2645413
   Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.orgchannel=%23dorset
   List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset

Re: [Dorset] iPad Petition by 'Defective by Design'

2010-01-29 Thread Tim
On Friday 29 January 2010 10:19:57 Dan Dart wrote:
 Similar reasons. Why I regret buying an ipod. But at least I can run
 bash on it now.

 On 29 January 2010 09:10, Robert Bronsdon reash...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:16:59 -, Sean Gibbins
  s...@funkygibbins.me.uk
 
  wrote:
  Good luck with that Terry, both genuinely and also in that slightly
  sarcastic tone that suggests you are peeing in the wind.
 
  I don't think a campaign can ever be dropped because its not likely to do
  much.
 
  It's a good thing that you and your fellow petition signers are letting
  them know you disapprove, but I suspect the rush of eager fan-boys (and
  girls!) will make more of a statement to Apple on launch day than your
  petition ever will.
 
  I don't know how much I agree with the petition. I feel the petition is a
  bit of a rush job by the FSF and things like this could well damage them
  more than help.
 
  Instead of giving people the freedom to choose if the DRM will harm them,
  the FSF is telling people it will. I'd much prefer too see people
  educated as too why its damaging and to leave people too choose.
 
  It's for similar reasons I will not buy an iPod.
 
  And that would be the choice they should make. To buy or not to buy.
 
  I also feel that if the FSF just sat back and attempted to educate people
   from afar, they wouldn't get through too any more than the people that
  are already interested in listening (aka. us).
 
  Maybe the campaing will bring some attention to the FSF and the cause in
  general. Like I said earlier, not sure. I'm just worried the impact of
  campaigns like this could leave more members of the FSF looking like
  screaming FOSS fanboys and damage the whole argument.
 
 
  --
  Using Opera M2: http://www.opera.com/mail/
 
  --
  Next meeting: Bournemouth, Wed 2010-02-03 20:00
  http://dorset.lug.org.uk/     http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2645413
    Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.orgchannel=%23dorset
            List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset

 --
 Dan Dart
 _
 Need a website? Want some music tailored to you? Visit
 http://www.dandart.co.uk

I was given an iPod shuffle once, never again, a good idea badly implmented

Tim

-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, Wed 2010-02-03 20:00
http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2645413
   Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.orgchannel=%23dorset
   List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset

Re: [Dorset] iPad Petition by 'Defective by Design'

2010-01-29 Thread Terry Coles
On Friday 29 Jan 2010, Robert Bronsdon wrote:
 On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:16:59 -, Sean Gibbins s...@funkygibbins.me.uk
 wrote:
  Good luck with that Terry, both genuinely and also in that slightly
  sarcastic tone that suggests you are peeing in the wind.
 
 I don't think a campaign can ever be dropped because its not likely to do
 much.

I agree, although I think the phrase should be 'I don't think a campaign 
*should* ever be dropped because its not likely to do much.'

There are plenty of causes that are abandoned because they are perceived to be 
'lost'.  In this case, at least one of the objectives is to spread the word, 
not to bring down Apple.
 
  It's a good thing that you and your fellow petition signers are letting
  them know you disapprove, but I suspect the rush of eager fan-boys (and
  girls!) will make more of a statement to Apple on launch day than your
  petition ever will.
 
 I don't know how much I agree with the petition. I feel the petition is a
 bit of a rush job by the FSF and things like this could well damage them
 more than help.

I did read the petition very carefully and could see that some would perceive 
it that way.  Even so, I felt the point was correct.

 Instead of giving people the freedom to choose if the DRM will harm them,
 the FSF is telling people it will. I'd much prefer too see people educated
 as too why its damaging and to leave people too choose.
 
  It's for similar reasons I will not buy an iPod.
 
 And that would be the choice they should make. To buy or not to buy.

Agreed.
 
 I also feel that if the FSF just sat back and attempted to educate people
  from afar, they wouldn't get through too any more than the people that are
 already interested in listening (aka. us).
 
 Maybe the campaing will bring some attention to the FSF and the cause in
 general. Like I said earlier, not sure. I'm just worried the impact of
 campaigns like this could leave more members of the FSF looking like
 screaming FOSS fanboys and damage the whole argument.

That is always the danger.  However to the rest of the software fanboys in the 
world, FOSS users will always be thought of in that way.

-- 
Terry Coles
64 bit computing with Kubuntu Linux


-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, Wed 2010-02-03 20:00
http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2645413
   Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.orgchannel=%23dorset
   List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset


Re: [Dorset] iPad Petition by 'Defective by Design'

2010-01-29 Thread Peter Merchant
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 18:24 +, Terry Coles wrote:
 The pressure group is raising a petition: 
 http://www.defectivebydesign.org/ipad, because the new iPad is full of DRM 
 which basically stops users from doing anything with it except things that 
 are 
 'approved' by Apple.
 
 Personally, I might have bought one eventually, but not if I can't install 
 software on it that isn't rubber-stamped by Apple.  What if I wanted to write 
 my own App?  There are few computing devices these days, (except single-
 function gadgets), that don't allow Apps to be installed by users.  I accept 
 that this probably won't bother the vast majority of users, but it bothers me.
 
 Please consider signing.
 
 -- 
   Terry Coles
   64 bit computing with Kubuntu Linux
 
 

Job done, sorry it's not Jobs is done. 

P.


-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, Wed 2010-02-03 20:00
http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2645413
   Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.orgchannel=%23dorset
   List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset


[Dorset] iPad Petition by 'Defective by Design'

2010-01-28 Thread Terry Coles
The pressure group is raising a petition: 
http://www.defectivebydesign.org/ipad, because the new iPad is full of DRM 
which basically stops users from doing anything with it except things that are 
'approved' by Apple.

Personally, I might have bought one eventually, but not if I can't install 
software on it that isn't rubber-stamped by Apple.  What if I wanted to write 
my own App?  There are few computing devices these days, (except single-
function gadgets), that don't allow Apps to be installed by users.  I accept 
that this probably won't bother the vast majority of users, but it bothers me.

Please consider signing.

-- 
Terry Coles
64 bit computing with Kubuntu Linux


-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, Wed 2010-02-03 20:00
http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2645413
   Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.orgchannel=%23dorset
   List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset