Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-antispam-1.3 multiple plugin load
I need to detect when a mail is moved to a specific folder.
It's mail is moved to folder1, then exec script 1
It's mail is moved to folder2, then exec script 2
One of this scripts it's a mark as ham, It removes -SPAM- mark from
subject, pass to spamassassin to learn as harm and then, leave the
mail where it came from, or inbox.
2010/10/24 Eugene Paskevich eug...@raptor.kiev.ua:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 02:20:03AM +0200, Antonio Perez-Aranda wrote:
I have running dovecot-1.2.15 and I try whith dovecot-antispam-1.3 and
1.2-* if it's running for me.
I use mailtrain backend to call a script when I move a mail to a
specific folder. Then, I set allow_append_to_spam: yes
At .config for Make dovecot-antispam. I set the plugin's name to:
PLUGINNAME=isspam
An then, I have another copy of the sources and .config with plugin's
name set to:
PLUGINNAME=nospam
With this. If I put on dovecot.conf
protocol imap {
...
mail_plugins = isspam nospam
...
}
When I try to login, the connection is aborted and dovecot connection
die with coredump
Are there are any people with similar settings ?
(doble instance of antispam plugin)
Could you please elaborate why you need to load multiple plugin instances
simultaneously?
--
Eugene Paskevich | *==)--- | Plug me into
eug...@raptor.kiev.ua | ---(==* | The Matrix
Re: [Dovecot] Maintenance instance
and gives any user logging in a canned mail (e.g. We're doing maintenance, go away) Wouldn't a client that keeps local copies of all IMAP boxes then synchronize to that canned state, i.e., delete all locally cached mails?
Re: [Dovecot] Maintenance instance
* Edgar Fuß e...@math.uni-bonn.de: and gives any user logging in a canned mail (e.g. We're doing maintenance, go away) Wouldn't a client that keeps local copies of all IMAP boxes then synchronize to that canned state, i.e., delete all locally cached mails? See Alerts in http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PostLoginScripting. p...@rick -- state of mind Digitale Kommunikation http://www.state-of-mind.de Franziskanerstraße 15 Telefon +49 89 3090 4664 81669 München Telefax +49 89 3090 4666 Amtsgericht MünchenPartnerschaftsregister PR 563
Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-antispam-1.3 multiple plugin load
Well,
At present, I modify dovecot-antispam-1.3 for dovecot-1.2 to allow a
nospam folder, and it's running.
I think, that a plugin that catch moved to a specific folder or assign
a keyword and exec script could be useful for anyone.
NOTE: It's my first code change on any dovecot/plugins code.
2010/10/24 Antonio Perez-Aranda aperezara...@yaco.es:
I need to detect when a mail is moved to a specific folder.
It's mail is moved to folder1, then exec script 1
It's mail is moved to folder2, then exec script 2
One of this scripts it's a mark as ham, It removes -SPAM- mark from
subject, pass to spamassassin to learn as harm and then, leave the
mail where it came from, or inbox.
2010/10/24 Eugene Paskevich eug...@raptor.kiev.ua:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 02:20:03AM +0200, Antonio Perez-Aranda wrote:
I have running dovecot-1.2.15 and I try whith dovecot-antispam-1.3 and
1.2-* if it's running for me.
I use mailtrain backend to call a script when I move a mail to a
specific folder. Then, I set allow_append_to_spam: yes
At .config for Make dovecot-antispam. I set the plugin's name to:
PLUGINNAME=isspam
An then, I have another copy of the sources and .config with plugin's
name set to:
PLUGINNAME=nospam
With this. If I put on dovecot.conf
protocol imap {
...
mail_plugins = isspam nospam
...
}
When I try to login, the connection is aborted and dovecot connection
die with coredump
Are there are any people with similar settings ?
(doble instance of antispam plugin)
Could you please elaborate why you need to load multiple plugin instances
simultaneously?
--
Eugene Paskevich | *==)--- | Plug me into
eug...@raptor.kiev.ua | ---(==* | The Matrix
[Dovecot] different certificates on different services ?
Hi, on dovecot 2.0.x, is it possible to serve different certificates on different services (pops,imaps) with one dovecot instance ? regards, Christoph Kuchenbuch
Re: [Dovecot] Maintenance instance
* Edgar Fuß e...@math.uni-bonn.de: and gives any user logging in a canned mail (e.g. We're doing maintenance, go away) Wouldn't a client that keeps local copies of all IMAP boxes then synchronize to that canned state, i.e., delete all locally cached mails? Well, I don't know. Some clients see the absence of the IMAP server as an opportunity to ask the user if the saved password is still correct. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebra...@charite.de | http://www.charite.de
Re: [Dovecot] Maintenance instance
* Patrick Ben Koetter p...@state-of-mind.de: * Edgar Fuß e...@math.uni-bonn.de: and gives any user logging in a canned mail (e.g. We're doing maintenance, go away) Wouldn't a client that keeps local copies of all IMAP boxes then synchronize to that canned state, i.e., delete all locally cached mails? See Alerts in http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PostLoginScripting. Not all clients show the alerts, even though IMAP RFC requires it. let me guess: Outlook is one of those? If so: Useless. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebra...@charite.de | http://www.charite.de
Re: [Dovecot] different certificates on different services ?
hi, on dovecot 2.0.x, is it possible to serve different certificates on different services (pops,imaps) with one dovecot instance ? tamsy pointet me to the dovecot wiki: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/SSL/DovecotConfiguration thanks, and sorry for not looking there.. regards, Christoph
Re: [Dovecot] Maintenance instance
* Ralf Hildebrandt dovecot@dovecot.org: * Patrick Ben Koetter p...@state-of-mind.de: * Edgar Fuß e...@math.uni-bonn.de: and gives any user logging in a canned mail (e.g. We're doing maintenance, go away) Wouldn't a client that keeps local copies of all IMAP boxes then synchronize to that canned state, i.e., delete all locally cached mails? See Alerts in http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PostLoginScripting. Not all clients show the alerts, even though IMAP RFC requires it. let me guess: Outlook is one of those? If so: Useless. Test it. p...@rick -- state of mind Digitale Kommunikation http://www.state-of-mind.de Franziskanerstraße 15 Telefon +49 89 3090 4664 81669 München Telefax +49 89 3090 4666 Amtsgericht MünchenPartnerschaftsregister PR 563
Re: [Dovecot] fallocate and glibc 2.10
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 15:10:08 +0100 Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi articulated: On 22.10.2010, at 19.22, Paul Howarth wrote: In glibc 2.10 (32 bit) fallocate() exists but fallocate64() doesn't. When _FILE_OFFSET_BITS==64, fallocate() is a redirect to fallocate64() and the program can't be linked (fails to find symbol fallocate64). See http://bugzilla.redhat.com/500487 Yeah, I knew about it happening also on Ubuntu 9.10. Attached patch detects fallocate() more robustly to guard against this problem. A lot of code just to work around a bug that apparently only exists in Ubuntu 9.10 and Fedora 11. Is there a reason for anyone to be actually using either of them? I was thinking about just ignoring this problem. Assuming that this is truly an isolated issue; it is my belief that creating a specific patch to address this issue might lead to a regression error at some point down the line. I would suggest that you simply ignore the issue and let the end user properly update his system to eliminate the problem. Perhaps placing something in the Dovecot documentation to this effect would be advisable. If the end user wishes to patch their system to do an end run around this issue, they are free to do so. However, they should be forewarned that they are doing so at their own peril and sans any support from you if a problem(s) occur. Just my 2¢. -- Jerry ✌ dovecot.u...@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __
Re: [Dovecot] fallocate and glibc 2.10
On 24/10/2010 15:10, Timo Sirainen wrote: A lot of code just to work around a bug that apparently only exists in Ubuntu 9.10 and Fedora 11. Is there a reason for anyone to be actually using either of them? I was thinking about just ignoring this problem. I thought you were fixing bugs coming out of running Dovecot over BSDI in order to make Dovecot *generally* more robust. (Well that was the only explanation I could think of for adding support for a dead OS...) I would imaging Ubuntu 9.10 and Fedora 11 to be, much less dead than BSDI. You may find that hosting providers only have support for certain spot versions of distros, and besides people may have reasons to stick with the distro they are on. So it may be worth just doing it, especially if the reporter has supplied a patch! Bill
Re: [Dovecot] Maintenance instance
On 24.10.2010, at 11.36, Edgar Fuß wrote: and gives any user logging in a canned mail (e.g. We're doing maintenance, go away) Wouldn't a client that keeps local copies of all IMAP boxes then synchronize to that canned state, i.e., delete all locally cached mails? I'm pretty sure they will. I'm not aware of any good way to handle this, other than ALERTs.
Re: [Dovecot] Maintenance instance
* Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi: On 24.10.2010, at 11.36, Edgar Fuß wrote: and gives any user logging in a canned mail (e.g. We're doing maintenance, go away) Wouldn't a client that keeps local copies of all IMAP boxes then synchronize to that canned state, i.e., delete all locally cached mails? I'm pretty sure they will. I'm not aware of any good way to handle this, other than ALERTs. Hm, OK. Maybe the alert idea is the best idea so far. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebra...@charite.de | http://www.charite.de
Re: [Dovecot] Maintenance instance
Quoting Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi: On 24.10.2010, at 11.36, Edgar Fuß wrote: and gives any user logging in a canned mail (e.g. We're doing maintenance, go away) Wouldn't a client that keeps local copies of all IMAP boxes then synchronize to that canned state, i.e., delete all locally cached mails? I'm pretty sure they will. I'm not aware of any good way to handle this, other than ALERTs. Isn't this the exact reason to return the UNAVAILABLE response (RFC 5530)? UNAVAILABLE Temporary failure because a subsystem is down. For example, an IMAP server that uses a Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) or Radius server for authentication might use this response code when the LDAP/Radius server is down. C: a LOGIN fred foo S: a NO [UNAVAILABLE] User's backend down for maintenance
[Dovecot] Public Folders for spam/nospam - don't get it
hi,
Dovecot: 2.0.5
I want to use public folders (maildir), for my spam mails to feed
spamassassin, but I don't get it working. My Evolution 2.28.3 (nothing
else tested) can't subscribe the folders:
namespace {
hidden = no
inbox = yes
list = yes
location =
prefix = INBOX/
separator = /
subscriptions = yes
type = private
}
namespace {
hidden = no
inbox = no
list = children
location = maildir:/home/vmail/public:LAYOUT=fs
prefix = public/
separator = /
subscriptions = no
type = public
}
angelica:/etc/dovecot/conf.d# ls -l /home/vmail/public/
total 24
-rw-r--r-- 1 vmail vmail 11 Oct 23 14:14 dovecot-acl
-rw--- 1 vmail vmail 45 Oct 23 13:56 dovecot-acl-list
-rw--- 1 vmail vmail 48 Oct 24 19:22 dovecot.mailbox.log
drwxr-xr-x 2 vmail vmail 4096 Oct 23 14:03 nospam
drwxr-xr-x 2 vmail vmail 4096 Oct 23 14:03 spam
-rw--- 1 vmail vmail 12 Oct 24 19:22 subscriptions
# cat /home/vmail/public/dovecot-acl
anyone lrp, also in subfolders spam/nospam
I tested several configurations, but nothing works. Sometimes I can see
the folders, but can't subscribe them (invalid/unknown namespace),
sometime I don't see the folders ...
does anyone has an answer for me ?
cu denny
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Re: [Dovecot] fallocate and glibc 2.10
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:26:51 +0100 Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: On 24.10.2010, at 20.16, Paul Howarth wrote: A lot of code just to work around a bug that apparently only exists in Ubuntu 9.10 and Fedora 11. Is there a reason for anyone to be actually using either of them? I was thinking about just ignoring this problem. Don't know about Ubuntu but Fedora 11 is already EOL'ed so there's no need to fix it for that. Didn't realise that glibc 2.10 was that rare. So how did you notice this problem then, and do you really care if I fix it? :) I noticed it because I build dovecot packages for lots of Fedora and Red Hat releases, including some EOL ones (http://mirror.city-fan.org/ftp/contrib/mail/) and the 32-bit Fedora 11 build fell over due to this problem. I'm not too bothered if it doesn't get fixed as clearly I'm able to work around the issue. Currently I'm using the patch I posted earlier as that was an upstreamable fix but I'll probably end up with a quick, simpler hack specific to Fedora 11 32-bit if you decide not to fix it. Paul.
Re: [Dovecot] fallocate and glibc 2.10
Paul Howarth put forth on 10/24/2010 2:16 PM: Don't know about Ubuntu but Fedora 11 is already EOL'ed so there's no need to fix it for that. Didn't realise that glibc 2.10 was that rare. How old is glibc 2.10? I thought Debian Lenny (which I use) was old. It's approaching two years since release. It currently has glibc 2.7, which was apparently released in 2007, 3 years ago. This would lead me to belive that glibc 2.10 is _very_ old. I'm not very familiar with glibc. Maybe age doesn't matter? -- Stan
Re: [Dovecot] fallocate and glibc 2.10
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 18:02 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Don't know about Ubuntu but Fedora 11 is already EOL'ed so there's no
need to fix it for that. Didn't realise that glibc 2.10 was that rare.
How old is glibc 2.10?
I thought Debian Lenny (which I use) was old. It's approaching two
years since release. It currently has glibc 2.7, which was apparently
released in 2007, 3 years ago. This would lead me to belive that glibc
2.10 is _very_ old. I'm not very familiar with glibc. Maybe age
doesn't matter?
It's a version number, generally major.minor.micro. It's not a floating
point number.
7 10, and thus 2.7 is older than 2.10.
--
char *t=\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4;
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1:
(c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
Re: [Dovecot] fallocate and glibc 2.10
Karsten Bräckelmann put forth on 10/24/2010 6:34 PM: On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 18:02 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Don't know about Ubuntu but Fedora 11 is already EOL'ed so there's no need to fix it for that. Didn't realise that glibc 2.10 was that rare. How old is glibc 2.10? I thought Debian Lenny (which I use) was old. It's approaching two years since release. It currently has glibc 2.7, which was apparently released in 2007, 3 years ago. This would lead me to belive that glibc 2.10 is _very_ old. I'm not very familiar with glibc. Maybe age doesn't matter? It's a version number, generally major.minor.micro. It's not a floating point number. 7 10, and thus 2.7 is older than 2.10. Ahh, thanks for pointing out my error. I was thinking 2.1 not 2.10. So I'm on a much older version of glibc. I guess since I stick with distro packages I'm safe from this particular problem, since such packages are compiled against the glibc 2.7 of the distro. -- Stan
