Re: v2.2.15 - make check - Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value
On 11/30/2014 05:53 AM, AMM wrote: __strspn_sse42 (in /lib64/libc-2.14.90.so) Is it possible that you are encountering this issue? https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=270925 Either way, the error seems to stem from your libc implementation (if it is not the valgrind bug). If possible, upgrade your valgrind, libc etc. br, Teemu Huovila
Re: v2.2.15 - make check - Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value
On Monday 01 December 2014 03:41 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote: On 11/30/2014 05:53 AM, AMM wrote: __strspn_sse42 (in /lib64/libc-2.14.90.so) Is it possible that you are encountering this issue? https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=270925 Either way, the error seems to stem from your libc implementation (if it is not the valgrind bug). If possible, upgrade your valgrind, libc etc. br, Teemu Huovila Thank you for reply. But Dovecot 2.2.10 (and earlier versions) were not throwing this error. Can I can ignore it by NOT doing make check? OR is it something serious that if I ignore it can corrupt mailboxes? Unfortunately for some reasons I can not update libc or valgrind. Amm
SORT capability
Hi, why I don't see SORT capability on my dovecot server? # telnet localhost 143 Trying ::1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-MD5] Dovecot ready. 1 capability * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-MD5 1 OK Capability completed. a logout * BYE Logging out a OK Logout completed. Connection closed by foreign host. I am using # dovecot --version 2.0.9 default CentOS rpm package. Thank you
Re: SORT capability
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:19 schrieb absolutely_f...@libero.it: why I don't see SORT capability on my dovecot server? # telnet localhost 143 Trying ::1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-MD5] Dovecot ready. 1 capability * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-MD5 1 OK Capability completed. a logout * BYE Logging out a OK Logout completed. Connection closed by foreign host DUNNO mabye output of dovecot -n knows signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: SORT capability
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:32 schrieb absolutely_f...@libero.it: # dovecot -n |grep -i sort (nothing) i meant post the complete output you can't grep for something not existing but you or some config-include may set something wrong Maybe to full list is only available after authentication? likely # telnet localhost 143 Trying ::1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-MD5] Dovecot ready. a login XXX a OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS MULTIAPPEND UNSELECT CHILDREN NAMESPACE UIDPLUS LIST-EXTENDED I18NLEVEL=1 CONDSTORE QRESYNC ESEARCH ESORT SEARCHRES WITHIN CONTEXT=SEARCH LIST-STATUS] Logged in Messaggio originale Da: h.rei...@thelounge.net Data: 01/12/2014 12.21 A: dovecot@dovecot.org Ogg: Re: SORT capability Am 01.12.2014 um 12:19 schrieb absolutely_f...@libero.it: why I don't see SORT capability on my dovecot server? # telnet localhost 143 Trying ::1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-MD5] Dovecot ready. 1 capability * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-MD5 1 OK Capability completed. a logout * BYE Logging out a OK Logout completed. Connection closed by foreign host DUNNO mabye output of dovecot -n knows signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
R: Re: SORT capability
Here's my conf:
# dovecot -n
# 2.0.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS release 6.6 (Final)
auth_mechanisms = plain login digest-md5 cram-md5
disable_plaintext_auth = no
first_valid_gid = 89
first_valid_uid = 89
mail_gid = 89
mail_location = maildir:/coraid-s2l2/domains
mail_uid = 89
maildir_very_dirty_syncs = yes
managesieve_notify_capability = mailto
managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character
vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy
include variables body enotify environment mailbox date imapflags notify
mbox_write_locks = fcntl
namespace {
inbox = yes
location =
prefix = INBOX.
separator = .
type = private
}
passdb {
args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext
driver = sql
}
passdb {
args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql-crypt.conf.ext
driver = sql
}
plugin {
sieve = ~/.dovecot.sieve
sieve_dir = ~/sieve
sieve_extensions = +notify +imapflags
sieve_max_script_size = 1M
}
protocols = imap pop3 lmtp sieve
service imap-login {
service_count = 0
}
service pop3-login {
service_count = 0
}
ssl_cert = /etc/nginx/ssl/wildcard.crt
ssl_key = /etc/nginx/ssl/wildcard.key
userdb {
args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext
driver = sql
}
protocol lmtp {
mail_plugins =
}
protocol lda {
mail_plugins =
}
protocol pop3 {
pop3_client_workarounds = outlook-no-nuls oe-ns-eoh
}
Messaggio originale
Da: h.rei...@thelounge.net
Data: 01/12/2014 12.37
A: dovecot@dovecot.org
Ogg: Re: SORT capability
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:32 schrieb absolutely_f...@libero.it:
# dovecot -n |grep -i sort
(nothing)
i meant post the complete output
you can't grep for something not existing
but you or some config-include may set something wrong
Maybe to full list is only available after authentication?
likely
# telnet localhost 143
Trying ::1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE
STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-MD5] Dovecot
ready.
a login XXX
a OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE
SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS MULTIAPPEND UNSELECT
CHILDREN
NAMESPACE UIDPLUS LIST-EXTENDED I18NLEVEL=1 CONDSTORE QRESYNC ESEARCH ESORT
SEARCHRES WITHIN CONTEXT=SEARCH LIST-STATUS] Logged in
Messaggio originale
Da: h.rei...@thelounge.net
Data: 01/12/2014 12.21
A: dovecot@dovecot.org
Ogg: Re: SORT capability
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:19 schrieb absolutely_f...@libero.it:
why I don't see SORT capability on my dovecot server?
# telnet localhost 143
Trying ::1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE
IDLE
STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-MD5] Dovecot
ready.
1 capability
* CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE
STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-MD5
1 OK Capability completed.
a logout
* BYE Logging out
a OK Logout completed.
Connection closed by foreign host
DUNNO
mabye output of dovecot -n knows
Re: v2.2.15 - make check - Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value
On 12/01/2014 12:41 PM, AMM wrote: On Monday 01 December 2014 03:41 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote: But Dovecot 2.2.10 (and earlier versions) were not throwing this error. This test was added in Dovecot version 2.2.14. It is also the only reference to strspn() in the whole project. Can I can ignore it by NOT doing make check? I would say you can safely ignore it, but I can give no guarantee. I have no access to a Fedora 16 system, so I can not verify it, but I would say this is most likely a manifestation of the valgrind bug I linked in my first email. You could try verification yourself, by using the Steps to Reproduce in the linked issue tracker. br, Teemu Huovila
Re: v2.2.15 - make check - Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value
On Monday 01 December 2014 05:24 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote: On 12/01/2014 12:41 PM, AMM wrote: On Monday 01 December 2014 03:41 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote: But Dovecot 2.2.10 (and earlier versions) were not throwing this error. This test was added in Dovecot version 2.2.14. It is also the only reference to strspn() in the whole project. ... You could try verification yourself, by using the Steps to Reproduce in the linked issue tracker. br, Teemu Huovila Verified it. It is indeed valgrind bug. Thanks for the help. Amm.
Dovecot Director and Dovecot proxy
Hi, Dovecot Director is used to keep a temporary user - Dovecot backend server mapping. So, Director decides which backend handles each user and the user is always redirected to the same server. All user data is stored in shared storage (NFS). The Dovecot presentation featured during this webinar http://knowledgebase.open-xchange.com/fileadmin/user_upload/open-xchange/misc/webinar/2013_21_08/Dovecot_Webinar_21.08.2013.pdf mentions (slide 7) a Dovecot proxy cluster (doing credentials and user info lookup) behind the LB device (F5 Big-IP) Why Dovecot Director server isn't used to perform this without Dovecot proxy ? Thus, the load balancer (F5 Big-IP) can distribute requests based on IMAP protocol to Dovecot Director cluster. Thx so much. gdrub
Re: best file system ?
Il 01/12/2014 17:24, absolutely_f...@libero.it ha scritto: Hi, I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k). It's a network attached storage (Coraid). In your opinion, what is the best file system for mail server (pop3/imap/webmail) purpose? Thank you Hi, XFS, if you can use RHEL/CentOS 6, ext4 with others distro. I used XFS (with 20k users) until I switched to a NetApp (and now I'm really happy). Ciao
Re: best file system ?
I used XFS (with 20k users) until I switched to a NetApp (and now I'm really happy). Yes, I'd say NetApp is pretty good, we are using this type of storage at work. Regards -- CHUNKZ.NET - casual fiddler and computer technician Bertrand Caplet, Flers (FR) Feel free to send encrypted/signed messages Key ID: FF395BD9 GPG FP: DE10 73FD 17EB 5544 A491 B385 1EDA 35DC FF39 5BD9 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Dovecot Director and Dovecot proxy
Il 01/12/2014 17:11, rub zorghy ha scritto: Why Dovecot Director server isn't used to perform this without Dovecot proxy ? Thus, the load balancer (F5 Big-IP) can distribute requests based on IMAP protocol to Dovecot Director cluster. I think that the slide is just one example of a scenario ,very complex. In real world, unless you do not have to segment users (some users use Exchange, others use Dovecot, but all user use imap.corporate.com, the proxy, for login) you don't need a Proxy in front of Director. Load balancer is only for HA. Ciao
Re: best file system ?
On 01 Dec 2014, at 18:24, absolutely_f...@libero.it wrote: Hi, I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k). It's a network attached storage (Coraid). In your opinion, what is the best file system for mail server (pop3/imap/webmail) purpose? Depends on what OS you have chosen, or if OS is not the limiter I would go with ZFS. Sami
Re: Dovecot 2.2.15, Panic: file mbox-sync.c: line 152 (mbox_sync_read_next_mail): assertion failed:
On 12/01/2014 12:56 AM, Teemu Huovila wrote: Please see http://dovecot.markmail.org/thread/xqu3yr52c6hjxqk2 Thank you. I'll install the patches. Since the Panic is very rare on my server, I won't really know if they help, but this look like my issue. -- Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.netThe highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
Re: Dovecot Director and Dovecot proxy
On 2014-12-01 19:56, anon_u...@openmailbox.org wrote: Il 01/12/2014 17:11, rub zorghy ha scritto: Why Dovecot Director server isn't used to perform this without Dovecot proxy ? Thus, the load balancer (F5 Big-IP) can distribute requests based on IMAP protocol to Dovecot Director cluster. I think that the slide is just one example of a scenario ,very complex. In real world, unless you do not have to segment users (some users use Exchange, others use Dovecot, but all user use imap.corporate.com, the proxy, for login) you don't need a Proxy in front of Director. Load balancer is only for HA. Ciao Hello, So, dovecot director can work without dovecot proxy ? Thanks.
Re: SORT capability
Quoting absolutely_f...@libero.it: why I don't see SORT capability on my dovecot server? # telnet localhost 143 Trying ::1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-MD5] Dovecot ready. 1 capability * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-MD5 1 OK Capability completed. Because you are not authenticated. SORT isn't used in the not authenticated state. michael
Re: best file system ?
W dniu 2014-12-01 o 18:19, Alessio Cecchi pisze: Il 01/12/2014 17:24, absolutely_f...@libero.it ha scritto: Hi, I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k). It's a network attached storage (Coraid). In your opinion, what is the best file system for mail server (pop3/imap/webmail) purpose? Thank you Hi, XFS, if you can use RHEL/CentOS 6, ext4 with others distro. Hi! Does XFS works better on RHEL than on others distro?;)
Re: best file system ?
Am 01.12.2014 um 21:13 schrieb Marcin Mirosław: W dniu 2014-12-01 o 18:19, Alessio Cecchi pisze: Il 01/12/2014 17:24, absolutely_f...@libero.it ha scritto: Hi, I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k). It's a network attached storage (Coraid). In your opinion, what is the best file system for mail server (pop3/imap/webmail) purpose? Thank you Hi, XFS, if you can use RHEL/CentOS 6, ext4 with others distro. Hi! Does XFS works better on RHEL than on others distro?;) XFS is the default system of *RHEL7/CentOS7* no idea from where it comes that is is recommended for CentOS6 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: best file system ?
Am 2014-12-01 um 21:16 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 01.12.2014 um 21:13 schrieb Marcin Mirosław: W dniu 2014-12-01 o 18:19, Alessio Cecchi pisze: Il 01/12/2014 17:24, absolutely_f...@libero.it ha scritto: Hi, I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k). It's a network attached storage (Coraid). In your opinion, what is the best file system for mail server (pop3/imap/webmail) purpose? Thank you Hi, XFS, if you can use RHEL/CentOS 6, ext4 with others distro. Hi! Does XFS works better on RHEL than on others distro?;) XFS is the default system of *RHEL7/CentOS7* no idea from where it comes that is is recommended for CentOS6 definitely ZFS on BSD or on Solaris. And ECC Ram on the Server. check it out : http://serverfault.com/questions/190/zfs-vs-xfs and http://louwrentius.com/please-use-zfs-with-ecc-memory.html
Re: best file system ?
Am 01.12.2014 um 17:24 schrieb absolutely_f...@libero.it: Hi, I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k). It's a network attached storage (Coraid). In your opinion, what is the best file system for mail server (pop3/imap/webmail) purpose? Thank you If it is a NAS, as you state, then you don't have to think about the filesystem, because the storage unit does not provide block devices for filesystem creation. Else - in case you get block storage instead of NAS - best filesystem depends on a lot of parameters. If there would be a best one, then there wouldn't be room for several choices. Alexander
Adding extra fields from an external source
Hi, I have an existing (Open)LDAP which I'm using with dovecot and I would like to implement quotas. I have global quotas working, but I would like per user quotas similar to what is described in the wiki (http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Quota/Configuration#LDAP) My problem is that there is no obvious attribute in the schemas shipped in the RHEL/Centos 6 to hold the quota string. Is it possible to get User database extra fields from an external source? e.g. flat file or MySQL table. I would like to pull everything else from LDAP but just fill out quota_rule from a different source. I realize I could expand my LDAP but I'm wary of just importing some random schema. I've had mixed results doing that in the past (the qmail schema (http://www.zytrax.com/books/ldap/ape/qmail.html) was incompatible with my existing structure, and at the moment I'm using a hacked version of the linux quota project's LDAP schema (http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxquota/) - I'd rather have something a bit more official). If there is a recommended schema that you guys use which is stable and works well I would like to give that a try. -Thanks, Ian.
disabling certain ciphers
Can you use both ssl_protocols *and* ssl_cipher_list in the same config (in a way that's sane)? ssl_protocols (= 2.1) and ssl_cipher_list co-exist, or are they mutually exclusive? I have a Dovecot 2.2.13 system, and I tried setting: I also tried things like ssl_cipher_list = HIGH or ssl_cipher_list = HIGH:!MEDIUM:!LOW however, doing this seems to make v3 still work unless I explicitly do !SSLv3 in ssl_cipher_list in addition to disabling it in $ssl_protocols. This is different from Apache, which has similar parameters, but where disabling the protocol takes precedence. If I just do: ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3 I still get some ciphers that show up as weak, e.g., | SSLv3: | ciphers: | TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA - strong | TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA - strong | TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA - strong | TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA - weak [] | TLS_RSA_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA - weak Is there a way to exclude these ciphers, while still keeping my config easy to parse and avoiding duplicative or deprecated configs? The behavior is also pretty strange; if I have something like one of the following, with or without $ssl_protocols set to exclude SSLv2 and SSLv3: ssl_cipher_list = HIGH:!MEDIUM:!LOW:!SSLv3 ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!ADH:!LOW:!SSLv2:!SSLv3:!EXP:!aNULL:+HIGH:!MEDIUM TLS v1.0 and v1.1 get disabled as well. I also can't seem to explicitly enable TLS 1.0 or 1.1 in $ssl_cipher_list. w
Re: disabling certain ciphers
On 12/1/2014 4:43 PM, Will Yardley wrote: Can you use both ssl_protocols *and* ssl_cipher_list in the same config (in a way that's sane)? Is there a way to exclude these ciphers, while still keeping my config easy to parse and avoiding duplicative or deprecated configs? Yes to both. If you need to support older clients: ssl_cipher_list = HIGH:!RC4:!MD5:!SRP:!PSK:!aNULL:@STRENGTH ssl_dh_parameters_length = 2048 ssl_parameters_regenerate = 0 ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3 TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2 If your userbase is limited to current clients and OSes, you can take it a bit further: ssl_cipher_list = HIGH+kEECDH:HIGH+kEDH:!3DES:!aNULL:@STRENGTH ssl_dh_parameters_length = 4096 ssl_parameters_regenerate = 0 ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3 TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2 This drops 3DES support and makes forward secrecy mandatory.
Re: disabling certain ciphers
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:27:48PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote: On 12/1/2014 4:43 PM, Will Yardley wrote: Can you use both ssl_protocols *and* ssl_cipher_list in the same config (in a way that's sane)? Is there a way to exclude these ciphers, while still keeping my config easy to parse and avoiding duplicative or deprecated configs? Yes to both. If you need to support older clients: ssl_cipher_list = HIGH:!RC4:!MD5:!SRP:!PSK:!aNULL:@STRENGTH ssl_dh_parameters_length = 2048 ssl_parameters_regenerate = 0 ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3 TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2 But why does ssl_protocols behave differently depending on if $ssl_cipher_list is defined? Shouldn't !SSLv2 and !SSLv3 be sufficient? It seems that if ssl_cipher_list is defined, ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3 results in TLS1.2 being the only one active, but if it is defined, 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2 are all active? w
Re: best file system ?
El 01/12/14 a las 18:45, Sami Ketola escribió: On 01 Dec 2014, at 18:24, absolutely_f...@libero.it wrote: Hi, I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k). It's a network attached storage (Coraid). In your opinion, what is the best file system for mail server (pop3/imap/webmail) purpose? Depends on what OS you have chosen, or if OS is not the limiter I would go with ZFS. Have you any performance comparison with xfs? I'm running two imap servers. One with about 9k accounts and 3.5TB of storage, and another with 55k accounts and 2TB of storage with XFS, and I'm thinking about migrating them from XFS to ZFS but I'm concern about IO performance of ZFS. When we developed these two servers, I remember reading some zfs performance problems in comparison with xfs (I have lost the link) and that was the reason to finally use xfs, but now we are having problems with LVM snapshots and we also like some zfs features (like replication) so we are thinking about the change. -- Angel L. Mateo Martínez Sección de Telemática Área de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA) http://www.um.es/atica Tfo: 868887590 Fax: 86337
Re: best file system ?
El 01/12/14 a las 17:24, absolutely_f...@libero.it escribió: Hi, I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k). It's a network attached storage (Coraid). In your opinion, what is the best file system for mail server (pop3/imap/webmail) purpose? Thank you And another related question... Does anybody of you have any experience with distributed filesystems like lustre or ceph? How is the performance of them in comparison with legacy filesystems like xfs? -- Angel L. Mateo Martínez Sección de Telemática Área de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA) http://www.um.es/atica Tfo: 868887590 Fax: 86337
Re: best file system ?
Il 01/12/2014 21:13, Marcin Mirosław ha scritto: W dniu 2014-12-01 o 18:19, Alessio Cecchi pisze: Il 01/12/2014 17:24, absolutely_f...@libero.it ha scritto: Hi, I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k). It's a network attached storage (Coraid). In your opinion, what is the best file system for mail server (pop3/imap/webmail) purpose? Thank you Hi, XFS, if you can use RHEL/CentOS 6, ext4 with others distro. Hi! Does XFS works better on RHEL than on others distro?;) Yes, because in the kernel of RHEL (= 6) there are some patchs/options (like delaylog) not present in others distro (like Debian 6) with default kernel.
