Re: Doxia Versioning (WAS Preparation of Doxia 1.0-beta-1 release)
Hi Vincent, I also think the 1.1-SNAPSHOT could be deployed on http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/. 1.0-beta-1-SNAPSHOT is the only version available there. Juan. On Monday 29 December 2008 10:13:32 Vincent Siveton wrote: > Hi Dennis, > > Thanks for this! > > Vincent > > 2008/12/28, Dennis Lundberg : > > JIRA is done now. I've changed the names of the versions in JIRA in the > > following way, for both DOXIA and DOXIASITETOOLS: > > > > Old version -> New version > > > > 1.0-beta-1 -> 1.1 > > 1.0-beta-2 -> 1.2 > > 1.0 -> 1.3 > > > > I also added a 1.0 version for each project. They currently have no > > issues connected to them. > > > > Vincent Siveton wrote: > > > Hi Dennis, > > > > > > I renamed branches, did an external on the branches, updated some > > > poms. I leave you Jira and the 1.0 release. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Vincent > > > > > > 2008/12/14 Vincent Siveton : > > >> Hi Dennis, > > >> > > >>> 2. Rename > > >>> http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branc > > >>>hes/doxia-sitetools-1.0-alpha-x/ to > > >>> http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branc > > >>>hes/doxia-sitetools-1.0.x/ > > >> > > >> I didn't remember this branch... Thanks to refresh my memory :) > > >> > > >> So, I suggest also to create an external on these branches. I > > >> propose: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/1.0-x with > > >> doxia > > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia/branches/doxia-1.0 > > >>.x/ doxia-sitetools > > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches > > >>/doxia-1.0.x/ > > >> > > >> Also, think to update the scm tag in the poms :) > > >> > > - apply new versioning in pom > > >>> > > >>> Yes, either before the release or during release:prepare, for both > > >>> the branch and trunk. > > >> > > >> Before is better IMHO > > >> > > What else? > > >>> > > >>> For the 1.0 release I think that covers it. > > >>> > > >>> Shall we divide up the work between us Vincent? > > >>> If I do the 1.0 release can you do the 1.1 release? > > >> > > >> Sounds good for me. > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> > > >> Vincent > > > > -- > > > > Dennis Lundberg -- Buenos Aires, Argentinahttp://juan.zauber.com.ar/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Doxia Versioning (WAS Preparation of Doxia 1.0-beta-1 release)
Lukas Theussl wrote: > > One side remark about the site: for doxia-1.1 (was 1.0-beta-1) we have > modified the apt format with the plan to render obsolete the original > apt used in maven 2.0.x. If we are going to support and maintain both > doxia-1.0 (was alpha branch) and doxia-1.1 then we have to keep both > formats documented on the doxia site. It's not a big problem since we > have already separate docs for the old style and the changes in the new > format [1]. I can take care to add notes about the different versions in > those documents, or should we keep two completely different descriptions > of the apt format on the site? Or two different web sites (for 1.0 and > 1.1) altogether? I think one set of documents is enough, if it includes notes about what has changed over time. > -Lukas > > [1] > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/site/src/site/apt/references/ > > > Dennis Lundberg wrote: >> JIRA is done now. I've changed the names of the versions in JIRA in the >> following way, for both DOXIA and DOXIASITETOOLS: >> >> Old version -> New version >> >> 1.0-beta-1 -> 1.1 >> 1.0-beta-2 -> 1.2 >> 1.0 -> 1.3 >> >> I also added a 1.0 version for each project. They currently have no >> issues connected to them. >> >> >> > -- Dennis Lundberg
Re: Doxia Versioning (WAS Preparation of Doxia 1.0-beta-1 release)
JIRA is done now. I've changed the names of the versions in JIRA in the following way, for both DOXIA and DOXIASITETOOLS: Old version -> New version 1.0-beta-1 -> 1.1 1.0-beta-2 -> 1.2 1.0 -> 1.3 I also added a 1.0 version for each project. They currently have no issues connected to them. Vincent Siveton wrote: > Hi Dennis, > > I renamed branches, did an external on the branches, updated some poms. > I leave you Jira and the 1.0 release. > > Cheers, > > Vincent > > 2008/12/14 Vincent Siveton : >> Hi Dennis, >> >>> 2. Rename >>> http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches/doxia-sitetools-1.0-alpha-x/ >>> to >>> http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches/doxia-sitetools-1.0.x/ >> I didn't remember this branch... Thanks to refresh my memory :) >> >> So, I suggest also to create an external on these branches. I propose: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/1.0-x with >> doxia >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia/branches/doxia-1.0.x/ >> doxia-sitetools >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches/doxia-1.0.x/ >> >> Also, think to update the scm tag in the poms :) >> - apply new versioning in pom >>> Yes, either before the release or during release:prepare, for both the >>> branch and trunk. >> Before is better IMHO >> What else? >>> For the 1.0 release I think that covers it. >>> >>> Shall we divide up the work between us Vincent? >>> If I do the 1.0 release can you do the 1.1 release? >> Sounds good for me. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Vincent >> > -- Dennis Lundberg
Re: Doxia Versioning (WAS Preparation of Doxia 1.0-beta-1 release)
Hi Brett, I think we could have the following: Doxia 1.0 should be for Maven 2.0.x Doxia 1.1 should be for Maven 2.1.x/3.x with a fix for MNG-3402 Cheers, Vincent 2008/12/18 Brett Porter : > I have a question about this... > > Does this mean that MNG-3402 should be rescheduled for 2.1.0 now, instead of > 2.0.11? > > I have updated the wiki - and have pushed the upgrade to beta-1 out to > 2.1.0-M3 so that we can push out another milestone in the mean time. > > Cheers, > Brett > > 2008/12/16 Vincent Siveton > Hi Dennis, > > I renamed branches, did an external on the branches, updated some poms. > I leave you Jira and the 1.0 release. > > Cheers, > > Vincent > > 2008/12/14 Vincent Siveton : >> Hi Dennis, >> >>> 2. Rename >>> >>> http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches/doxia-sitetools-1.0-alpha-x/ >>> to >>> >>> http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches/doxia-sitetools-1.0.x/ >> >> I didn't remember this branch... Thanks to refresh my memory :) >> >> So, I suggest also to create an external on these branches. I propose: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/1.0-x with >> doxia >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia/branches/doxia-1.0.x/ >> doxia-sitetools >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches/doxia-1.0.x/ >> >> Also, think to update the scm tag in the poms :) >> - apply new versioning in pom >>> >>> Yes, either before the release or during release:prepare, for both the >>> branch and trunk. >> >> Before is better IMHO >> What else? >>> >>> For the 1.0 release I think that covers it. >>> >>> Shall we divide up the work between us Vincent? >>> If I do the 1.0 release can you do the 1.1 release? >> >> Sounds good for me. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Vincent >> > > > > -- > Brett Porter > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ >
Re: Doxia Versioning (WAS Preparation of Doxia 1.0-beta-1 release)
I have a question about this... Does this mean that MNG-3402 should be rescheduled for 2.1.0 now, instead of 2.0.11? I have updated the wiki - and have pushed the upgrade to beta-1 out to 2.1.0-M3 so that we can push out another milestone in the mean time. Cheers, Brett 2008/12/16 Vincent Siveton Hi Dennis, I renamed branches, did an external on the branches, updated some poms. I leave you Jira and the 1.0 release. Cheers, Vincent 2008/12/14 Vincent Siveton : > Hi Dennis, > >> 2. Rename >> http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches/doxia-sitetools-1.0-alpha-x/ >> to >> http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches/doxia-sitetools-1.0.x/ > > I didn't remember this branch... Thanks to refresh my memory :) > > So, I suggest also to create an external on these branches. I propose: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/1.0-x with > doxia https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia/branches/doxia-1.0.x/ > doxia-sitetools https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches/doxia-1.0.x/ > > Also, think to update the scm tag in the poms :) > >>> - apply new versioning in pom >> >> Yes, either before the release or during release:prepare, for both the >> branch and trunk. > > Before is better IMHO > >>> What else? >> >> For the 1.0 release I think that covers it. >> >> Shall we divide up the work between us Vincent? >> If I do the 1.0 release can you do the 1.1 release? > > Sounds good for me. > > Cheers, > > Vincent > -- Brett Porter http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: Doxia Versioning (WAS Preparation of Doxia 1.0-beta-1 release)
Vincent Siveton wrote: > Some actions items: > - rename the actual doxia branch to 1.0.x and create a new branch for > sitetools (and probably for tools) I propose to use the alpha tag code > to do this. Create a new branch 1.0.x for all doxia projects sounds > better. If we still want to have these as separate parts (and IIRC that is what we want) we need to do this: 1. Rename http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia/branches/doxia-1.0-alpha-x/ to http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia/branches/doxia-1.0.x/ 2. Rename http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches/doxia-sitetools-1.0-alpha-x/ to http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches/doxia-sitetools-1.0.x/ 3. If doxia-tools is used by the current alpha-branches (I don't think it is) we need to create http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-tools/branches/doxia-tools-1.0.x/ > - apply new versioning in pom Yes, either before the release or during release:prepare, for both the branch and trunk. > - update jira I can take care of that. > What else? For the 1.0 release I think that covers it. Shall we divide up the work between us Vincent? If I do the 1.0 release can you do the 1.1 release? > > Cheers, > > Vincent > > 2008/12/13 Vincent Siveton : >> Hi Dennis, >> >> 2008/12/12 Dennis Lundberg : >>> Hi Vincent >>> >>> Can we have a quit poll about version numbering. We have had discussions >>> about this in the past and I'd like to come to a conclusion now that the >>> release is getting closer. >>> >>> The proposal that was made earlier was this: >>> >>> 1. Create an Doxia 1.0 release from the current doxia-1.0-alpha-x branch >> +1 >> >>> 2. Release the current trunk as version 1.1 (currently labeled as >>> 1.0-beta-1 in JIRA) >> +1 >> >>> One reason for this change would be to get out of the alpha/beta mess. >> +1 >> >>> It would also align version numbers nicely with Maven and the Site Plugin. >> hehe it's about dumb luck :) >> >>> We would the have two parallel tracks: >>> >>> Track one: Maven 2.0.x + Doxia 1.0.x + Site Plugin 2.0.x >>> >>> Track two: Maven 2.1.x + Doxia 1.1.x + Site Plugin 2.1.x >>> >>> This also ties in with the Doxia Release Plan [1] >>> >>> I will have some time off from work during the holidays and will be able >>> to help. >>> >>> >>> WDYT? >> Two releases rather one, good xmas presents! >> >> If no objections, I will start to prepare these releases, jump in when >> you are free. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Vincent >> >>> [1] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Doxia+Release+Plan > -- Dennis Lundberg
Re: Doxia Versioning (WAS Preparation of Doxia 1.0-beta-1 release)
Some actions items: - rename the actual doxia branch to 1.0.x and create a new branch for sitetools (and probably for tools) I propose to use the alpha tag code to do this. Create a new branch 1.0.x for all doxia projects sounds better. - apply new versioning in pom - update jira What else? Cheers, Vincent 2008/12/13 Vincent Siveton : > Hi Dennis, > > 2008/12/12 Dennis Lundberg : >> Hi Vincent >> >> Can we have a quit poll about version numbering. We have had discussions >> about this in the past and I'd like to come to a conclusion now that the >> release is getting closer. >> >> The proposal that was made earlier was this: >> >> 1. Create an Doxia 1.0 release from the current doxia-1.0-alpha-x branch > > +1 > >> >> 2. Release the current trunk as version 1.1 (currently labeled as >> 1.0-beta-1 in JIRA) > > +1 > >> >> One reason for this change would be to get out of the alpha/beta mess. > > +1 > >> It would also align version numbers nicely with Maven and the Site Plugin. > > hehe it's about dumb luck :) > >> >> We would the have two parallel tracks: >> >> Track one: Maven 2.0.x + Doxia 1.0.x + Site Plugin 2.0.x >> >> Track two: Maven 2.1.x + Doxia 1.1.x + Site Plugin 2.1.x >> >> This also ties in with the Doxia Release Plan [1] >> >> I will have some time off from work during the holidays and will be able >> to help. >> >> >> WDYT? > > Two releases rather one, good xmas presents! > > If no objections, I will start to prepare these releases, jump in when > you are free. > > Cheers, > > Vincent > >> >> [1] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Doxia+Release+Plan >
Doxia Versioning (WAS Preparation of Doxia 1.0-beta-1 release)
Hi Dennis, 2008/12/12 Dennis Lundberg : > Hi Vincent > > Can we have a quit poll about version numbering. We have had discussions > about this in the past and I'd like to come to a conclusion now that the > release is getting closer. > > The proposal that was made earlier was this: > > 1. Create an Doxia 1.0 release from the current doxia-1.0-alpha-x branch +1 > > 2. Release the current trunk as version 1.1 (currently labeled as > 1.0-beta-1 in JIRA) +1 > > One reason for this change would be to get out of the alpha/beta mess. +1 > It would also align version numbers nicely with Maven and the Site Plugin. hehe it's about dumb luck :) > > We would the have two parallel tracks: > > Track one: Maven 2.0.x + Doxia 1.0.x + Site Plugin 2.0.x > > Track two: Maven 2.1.x + Doxia 1.1.x + Site Plugin 2.1.x > > This also ties in with the Doxia Release Plan [1] > > I will have some time off from work during the holidays and will be able > to help. > > > WDYT? Two releases rather one, good xmas presents! If no objections, I will start to prepare these releases, jump in when you are free. Cheers, Vincent > > [1] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Doxia+Release+Plan
