Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-30 Thread Douglas
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:49:08 -0500
From: Curt rhule...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A
To: drakelist@zerobeat.net


I'll never again buy vacuum tubes off of the internet, after buying from a 
regular store on the auction site two matched 6JB6s, both soft as 
pillows and useless above 40M.  Of course, everything there is always 
as-is.  I'll also never buy anything from a big tube seller in Florida who 
is a small-time liar and crook.  Only bonafide companies for me, the 
products are no more expensive, and at least its a big outfit ripping me 
off.

Good to know that a 6GJ5 is equal to a 6JB6, surprised had never read that 
before.  Unfortunately, maybe most tubes sold are pretty much worn out. 
Even most of the companies selling tubes draw the line at providing much 
warranty for sweep tubes ( 10 days conditional from the outfit I use a 
lot ).

Curt KB5JO 
--

A 6GJ5 is not quite equivalent to a 6JB6.
There is a pin difference. That caused problems with National transceivers such 
as the NCX-5 and the NCX-3 that used 6GJ5's. The 6GJ5 internally ties its 
suppressor grid to the cathode, the 6JB6 does not. The Nationals used one base 
pin as a tie point, that had to be separated out when tube types were swapped. 
Since I don't know how the Drakes are wired, I'm not sure if a similar problem 
exists. There are other minor differences between the tubes.

73,

Doug/WA1TUT



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-30 Thread john

Hi Doug

Yes, as I mentioned, there is no effect in the Drake transmitter. To quote 
Garey some years ago:



NO modifications are needed to either the T-4(any) or the TR-4(any) to
 use the 6GJ5s.

 Pin 3 in the Drake 4 Line transmitters is the cathode of the final
 tubes.  Pin 8 in the transmitters is grounded at the socket.

 With 6JB6s, K is connected internally to Pin 3, and G3 is connected
 internally to Pin 8.

 With 6GJ5s, K AND G3 are connected internally to Pin 3, AND there is
 _NO_  connection to Pin 8.

 So everything works the same, except G3 is connected directly to K
 rather than via a 15 ohm and 3.3 ohm resistor.

 The only difference is the interelectrode capacitance, which is small
 enough (0.5 pF) that the neutralization circuit is able to take care of
it.



I stocked a lifetime supply of these tubes NOS at $2 and $3 ea some years 
ago.and they are to me, indistinguishable from the JB6s.


John k5mo


At 02:25 AM 9/30/2010, Douglas wrote:

Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:49:08 -0500
From: Curt rhule...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A
To: drakelist@zerobeat.net


I'll never again buy vacuum tubes off of the internet, after buying from a
regular store on the auction site two matched 6JB6s, both soft as
pillows and useless above 40M.  Of course, everything there is always
as-is.  I'll also never buy anything from a big tube seller in 
Florida who

is a small-time liar and crook.  Only bonafide companies for me, the
products are no more expensive, and at least its a big outfit ripping me
off.

Good to know that a 6GJ5 is equal to a 6JB6, surprised had never read that
before.  Unfortunately, maybe most tubes sold are pretty much worn out.
Even most of the companies selling tubes draw the line at providing much
warranty for sweep tubes ( 10 days conditional from the outfit I use a
lot ).

Curt KB5JO
--

A 6GJ5 is not quite equivalent to a 6JB6.
There is a pin difference. That caused problems with National transceivers 
such as the NCX-5 and the NCX-3 that used 6GJ5's. The 6GJ5 internally ties 
its suppressor grid to the cathode, the 6JB6 does not. The Nationals used 
one base pin as a tie point, that had to be separated out when tube types 
were swapped. Since I don't know how the Drakes are wired, I'm not sure if 
a similar problem exists. There are other minor differences between the tubes.


73,

Doug/WA1TUT



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-30 Thread Gary Poland
I own a few pairs of 6GJ5's, one pair is too high to fit into the 4-line PA 
compartment. Neither set of tubes would neutralize in a T-4XC. I havent 
tried adding or removing capacitance to the neutalizing trimmer to see if I 
could get them to work. Just a heads up.


73, Gary 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-30 Thread Garey Barrell

Gary -

I have run into the size problem also.  The RCA manual specifies outline 
18A and 32 for the 6GJ5 and 6GJ5A respectively.  As discussed yesterday, 
I have also seen 6JB6(A) that were too tall, but not of the 'four' 
brands.  Do you have a transmitter open where you can measure the ACTUAL 
internal height of the cage.  I've done it before, but can't find the info.


I have NOT run into the failure to neutralize though, but I stick to the 
'four'.  Some 6JB6(A) of off brands will not neutralize, and I assume 
the GJ's that fail are made by the same manufacturer!


It's perhaps possible to neutralize these by adding or subtracting the 
neutralizing capacitance, but I figure if they need that, then there may 
well be something else that could cause trouble later.  Bottom line is 
these are 15 kHz tubes, NOT 30 MHz tubes.!


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 2-C/2-NT, 4-B, C-Line
TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com


Gary Poland wrote:
I own a few pairs of 6GJ5's, one pair is too high to fit into the 
4-line PA compartment. Neither set of tubes would neutralize in a 
T-4XC. I havent tried adding or removing capacitance to the 
neutalizing trimmer to see if I could get them to work. Just a heads up.


73, Gary



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-30 Thread Jose V. Gavila
Hello!

Just to complicate a bit more this subject ;-), some years ago I worked on a
TR-4C which had 6JM6 tubes on it. You can read about that here:

http://jvgavila.com/dktr4c_1.htm

They had a professional-looking adaptor on their bases but, definitely, worked.
And were labeled as 6JB6A!

So it seems that, with some imagination, you can get a Drake transmitter working
with slightly different tubes. Of course, I would stick with 6JB6 while they
last.

Regards,

JOSE

--
 73 EB5AGV - JOSE V. GAVILA - IM99sm La Canyada - Valencia(SPAIN) 
 Vintage Radio and Test Equipment... http://jvgavila.com
 RadioRepair BLOG... http://radiorepair.blogspot.com


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-30 Thread Gary Poland
I have both, a BK emisions tester and a Hickok 6000A transconductance tester. 
The emisions tester is useless for testing 6JB6's beyond shorts or open 
filaments. Over the years I kept most of the 6JB6 pulls from my Drakes and 
others I repaired. With the Hickok I was able to go through them and pickout 
the ones with some life left and match them up. Its amazing how unevenly some 
pairs ( or three's ) aged and weakened. 
I suggest you buy tubes from RF Parts, Antique Radio Supply, Tube Depot, or 
SND. Do not buy used 6JB6's.

73, Gary___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-30 Thread K8AC
?A comment regarding the height of various tube brands:  A few years back, I 
bought a new set of 6550 finals for a CE 100V transmitter I was restoring. 
Unfortunately, they were too tall for the final cage.  When I called the 
company I bought them from (Antique Electronic Supply in Arizona), they were 
extremely helpful and called me back after measuring the height of each of 
the various brands of 6550s they had in stock.  Only one of the current 
manufacturers (Svetlana at that time) had the same height as the original 
tubes and AES happily exchanged my tubes for a pair of those.  So, if you 
have problems with the physical size of any tube substitutes, it may be 
worth a call to AES to see if they have a brand that will fit.


73, Floyd - K8AC

- Original Message - 
From: Garey Barrell k4...@mindspring.com

To: drakelist Drakelist@zerobeat.net
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A



Gary -

I have run into the size problem also.  The RCA manual specifies outline 
18A and 32 for the 6GJ5 and 6GJ5A respectively.  As discussed yesterday, I 
have also seen 6JB6(A) that were too tall, but not of the 'four' brands. 
Do you have a transmitter open where you can measure the ACTUAL internal 
height of the cage.  I've done it before, but can't find the info.


I have NOT run into the failure to neutralize though, but I stick to the 
'four'.  Some 6JB6(A) of off brands will not neutralize, and I assume the 
GJ's that fail are made by the same manufacturer!


It's perhaps possible to neutralize these by adding or subtracting the 
neutralizing capacitance, but I figure if they need that, then there may 
well be something else that could cause trouble later.  Bottom line is 
these are 15 kHz tubes, NOT 30 MHz tubes.!


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA




___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-30 Thread Gary Poland
6JB6's can be matched with a Drake transmitter. Set the bias on the AC-4 and 
leave it be. Then measure the voltage drop across each cathode resistor with 
the PTT keyed, no mic. Use ohms law to figure the current of each tube. You 
probably would want to check the resistance of each cathode resistor first.

73, Gary___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-30 Thread Gary Poland

Garey,
 A TR-4 PA cage ( without the top cover installed ) is 3 3/8 inches tall. 
I have had good luck with GE's, Zenith, RCA, and Sylvania's of course. I 
hadn't seen any that were too tall, at least not yet, HI HI. The 6GJ5's are 
worth a try if you can find they cheap. I have a few that came from hamfest 
tube caddies. No one had grabbed them thinking they were of no use. Most 
tube caddies are picked through before I get to them.


73, Gary 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-30 Thread Don Cunningham
Yes, I really should do that, John.  Bob was a Collins engineer and had many 
interesting experiences.  I'll put that on the to do list.
73,
Don, WB5HAK___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-30 Thread m coffey
Boy that was the first time I posted to the list. Thanks for all the
info Mike, KB1EZL
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-30 Thread LEE BAHR
Many years ago, just before Drake stopped accepting TR-4 s for repair, my 
neighbor, WA5VGO sent his TR-4 to Drake for some repair.  The radio came 
back with three different final tubes then when shipped to Drake.  One of 
the three new tubes was as you described.  A sweep tube with a printed 
circuit on the bottom changing the pin out of the tube.  I don't know if it 
was a 6JM6 or not.  However, the tube was put in there by Drake.  Also, the 
three new tubes were taller then original and Drake had dimpled the top tube 
cage cover to accommodate the extra height of the new tubes.  Strange 
indeed, but the radio worked just fine with these tubes.


Lee, w0vt




Hello!

Just to complicate a bit more this subject ;-), some years ago I worked on 
a

TR-4C which had 6JM6 tubes on it. You can read about that here:

http://jvgavila.com/dktr4c_1.htm

They had a professional-looking adaptor on their bases but, definitely, 
worked.

And were labeled as 6JB6A!

So it seems that, with some imagination, you can get a Drake transmitter 
working
with slightly different tubes. Of course, I would stick with 6JB6 while 
they

last.

Regards,

JOSE

--
73 EB5AGV - JOSE V. GAVILA - IM99sm La Canyada - Valencia(SPAIN)




___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-30 Thread Curt Nixon
Upgrading to real RF-service tubes (6146's come to mind :)  kinda pales 
when compared to that kind of mod.


Curt



LEE BAHR wrote:
Many years ago, just before Drake stopped accepting TR-4 s for repair, 
my neighbor, WA5VGO sent his TR-4 to Drake for some repair.  The radio 
came back with three different final tubes then when shipped to 
Drake.  One of the three new tubes was as you described.  A sweep tube 
with a printed circuit on the bottom changing the pin out of the 
tube.  I don't know if it was a 6JM6 or not.  However, the tube was 
put in there by Drake.  Also, the three new tubes were taller then 
original and Drake had dimpled the top tube cage cover to accommodate 
the extra height of the new tubes.  Strange indeed, but the radio 
worked just fine with these tubes.


Lee, w0vt




___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-29 Thread m coffey
Thanks for the info on 6jb6 vs. 6JB6A. I have seen a few 6JB6 of both
varieties on line, often advertised as MATCHED. I wonder how they have
matched them as some have listed an emmisson only tube tester as the match
unit. I am very leary of these so called matched tubes! Even the ones from
the large tube sellers may be useless! I was given a T4-R4 set which I took
to WB4HFN. He went over them and said that I would need a new set of finals
after I had used them for awhile. I am having some trouble getting a wire up
for them, but I keeping my eyes open for a nice set of 6JB6 s. Mike, KB1EZL
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-29 Thread Edward Swynar
Hi Mike,

From a thread re. Drake finals here of some two years ago, there was mention 
of the fact that the 6GJ5 is a direct substitute for the 6JB6, if you have no 
luck finding that latter tube...

~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ





  - Original Message - 
  From: m coffey 
  To: drakelist@zerobeat.net 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:56 PM
  Subject: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A


  Thanks for the info on 6jb6 vs. 6JB6A. I have seen a few 6JB6 of both 
varieties on line, often advertised as MATCHED. I wonder how they have matched 
them as some have listed an emmisson only tube tester as the match unit. I am 
very leary of these so called matched tubes! Even the ones from the large tube 
sellers may be useless! I was given a T4-R4 set which I took to WB4HFN. He went 
over them and said that I would need a new set of finals after I had used them 
for awhile. I am having some trouble getting a wire up for them, but I keeping 
my eyes open for a nice set of 6JB6 s. Mike, KB1EZL



--


  ___
  Drakelist mailing list
  Drakelist@zerobeat.net
  http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-29 Thread Richard Palmer
Sylvania 6JB6's are on ebay, eham and QRZ normally for $25.00 each. I
believe if the tubes have the same date code they are matched.



On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Edward Swynar gswy...@durham.net wrote:

  *Hi Mike,*

 From a thread re. Drake finals here of some two years ago, there was
 mention of the fact that the *6GJ5* is a *direct substitute* for the 6JB6,
 if you have no luck finding that latter tube...

 *~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ*


 



 - Original Message -
 *From:* m coffey r79b...@gmail.com
 *To:* drakelist@zerobeat.net
 *Sent:* Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:56 PM
 *Subject:* [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

 Thanks for the info on 6jb6 vs. 6JB6A. I have seen a few 6JB6 of both
 varieties on line, often advertised as MATCHED. I wonder how they have
 matched them as some have listed an emmisson only tube tester as the match
 unit. I am very leary of these so called matched tubes! Even the ones from
 the large tube sellers may be useless! I was given a T4-R4 set which I took
 to WB4HFN. He went over them and said that I would need a new set of finals
 after I had used them for awhile. I am having some trouble getting a wire up
 for them, but I keeping my eyes open for a nice set of 6JB6 s. Mike, KB1EZL

 --

 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-29 Thread john

Hi Eddy,

It's the identical tube with the supressor grid internally connected.

I've used them in several Drake Xmtrs with fine results. Others have 
reported difficulty with neutralization...but I've never seen that. The 
specs as I recall, were not close, they were identical.


John K5MO



At 07:53 PM 9/29/2010, Edward Swynar wrote:

Hi Mike,

From a thread re. Drake finals here of some two years ago, there was 
mention of the fact that the 6GJ5 is a direct substitute for the 6JB6, if 
you have no luck finding that latter tube...


~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ





- Original Message -
From: mailto:r79b...@gmail.comm coffey
To: mailto:drakelist@zerobeat.netdrakelist@zerobeat.net
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:56 PM
Subject: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

Thanks for the info on 6jb6 vs. 6JB6A. I have seen a few 6JB6 of both 
varieties on line, often advertised as MATCHED. I wonder how they have 
matched them as some have listed an emmisson only tube tester as the match 
unit. I am very leary of these so called matched tubes! Even the ones from 
the large tube sellers may be useless! I was given a T4-R4 set which I 
took to WB4HFN. He went over them and said that I would need a new set of 
finals after I had used them for awhile. I am having some trouble getting 
a wire up for them, but I keeping my eyes open for a nice set of 6JB6 s. 
Mike, KB1EZL



--
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-29 Thread Don Cunningham
The same date code doesn't have much to do with matching, Richard, but they 
probably are close.  There is a proceedure used for matching, but you'd have to 
have a basketfull of them to use it anymore.  Drake original tubes have a 
number written on top of them in magic marker.  I've been lucky enough over the 
years to find several of those.  They are NEVER in a box, usually wrapped up in 
some paper like wrap and in a nondescrete box.  If you spot those, with 
matching numbers at an estate sale or hamfest, GRAB THEM.  I got three pairs 
with a radio set just because they weren't in a box, they were considered 
used!!!
73,
Don, WB5HAK___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-29 Thread Chuck Grandgent
I have a matched pair (GE) from RF Parts I got maybe 10 years ago, packed in
a wooden salt cod box.  Counting on the sale proceeds to fund my retirement
when I get to my 90's :)

   Chuck, K1OM

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Don Cunningham wb5...@martineer.netwrote:

  The same date code doesn't have much to do with matching, Richard, but
 they probably are close.  There is a proceedure used for matching, but you'd
 have to have a basketfull of them to use it anymore.  Drake original tubes
 have a number written on top of them in magic marker.  I've been lucky
 enough over the years to find several of those.  They are NEVER in a box,
 usually wrapped up in some paper like wrap and in a nondescrete box.  If
 you spot those, with matching numbers at an estate sale or hamfest, GRAB
 THEM.  I got three pairs with a radio set just because they weren't in a
 box, they were considered used!!!
 73,
 Don, WB5HAK

 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-29 Thread Curt
I'll never again buy vacuum tubes off of the internet, after buying from a 
regular store on the auction site two matched 6JB6s, both soft as 
pillows and useless above 40M.  Of course, everything there is always 
as-is.  I'll also never buy anything from a big tube seller in Florida who 
is a small-time liar and crook.  Only bonafide companies for me, the 
products are no more expensive, and at least its a big outfit ripping me 
off.


Good to know that a 6GJ5 is equal to a 6JB6, surprised had never read that 
before.  Unfortunately, maybe most tubes sold are pretty much worn out. 
Even most of the companies selling tubes draw the line at providing much 
warranty for sweep tubes ( 10 days conditional from the outfit I use a 
lot ).


Curt KB5JO 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-29 Thread Don Cunningham
If they were Sylvania, Chuck, you probably could, but GE's?  I don't know 
about that.  I think that's one of the brands that sometimes won't neutralize.  
I may be wrong, and it may be RCA, but some of them don't seem to make it.
73,
Don, WB5HAK___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-29 Thread Chuck Grandgent
Of course this was only tongue-in-cheek.  I plan on checking out in 2025,
long before I get to my 90's.

   Chuck

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Don Cunningham wb5...@martineer.netwrote:

  If they were Sylvania, Chuck, you probably could, but GE's?  I don't
 know about that.  I think that's one of the brands that sometimes won't
 neutralize.  I may be wrong, and it may be RCA, but some of them don't seem
 to make it.
 73,
 Don, WB5HAK

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-29 Thread Chuck Grandgent
Meant to add, QCWA, 45 years.

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Chuck Grandgent ch...@chuckg.com wrote:

 Of course this was only tongue-in-cheek.  I plan on checking out in 2025,
 long before I get to my 90's.

Chuck


 On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Don Cunningham wb5...@martineer.netwrote:

  If they were Sylvania, Chuck, you probably could, but GE's?  I don't
 know about that.  I think that's one of the brands that sometimes won't
 neutralize.  I may be wrong, and it may be RCA, but some of them don't seem
 to make it.
 73,
 Don, WB5HAK



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-29 Thread Don Cunningham
And, as always, my snide comment was tongue FIRMLY planted in the cheek.  Don't 
check out too early Chuck.  I have a good friend in Richardson, TX, K5AY, in 
his 90's and you don't want to either challenge him to an electronic or antenna 
question, or challenge him to a CW speed run.  He WILL win both.  Sharp as a 
tack.  Hope I'm half as sharp in the 80's, hi.
73, and good to see you on here,
Don, WB5HAK___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-29 Thread W4AWM
 
Hi Don,
 
Why not videotape an interview with this great OT and post it  somewhere 
where we can all enjoy it.  I have seen several similar  interviews and they 
are really great.
 
73,
 
John,  W4AWM
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-28 Thread m coffey
Although I have been a member of the list for a while now, this is the first
time that I have tried to post to it, so I hope that I have done this
correctly!
  My question is that I have seen 6JB6A (vs. straight 6JB6) tubes listed
for sale. I am wondering what difference(s) there are between the two and if
eigther is suitable for use in the T4X series (or TR4s). Also, is a fairly
close reading in mutual conductance ( ie. on my Heathkit TT1) consider as
indicating a true match on the tubes? Mike, KB1EZL
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-28 Thread Garey Barrell

Mike -

The 6JB6A is identical to the 6JB6 with the exception that the A 
version is spec'd for 11 second filament warmup.  This was a spec that 
came along because many TV sets were series filament strings, (which is 
also where the 3, 16, 19, etc. filament tubes came from,) and tubes 
warming up at different rates stressed the filaments of other tubes.  
Either is suitable for the Drake 4 Series transmitters.


I don't think Sylvania ever made an A version, the only ones I've seen 
are RCA and GE among the 'preferred' brands.  One caveat, some of the 
later manufacture tubes were too tall to fit into the PA cages of the 
Drake transmitters.  Despite the fact that the 6JB6 was specified as 
2.91 - 3.17 seated height, and the 6JB6A as 2.875 - 3.125 my 
experience has been that just about all of the non-A tubes were toward 
the smaller size of their spec, while the A's seemed to be toward the 
high end of their spec.  Just be aware that some tubes are too tall to 
fit.  I don't recall what the exact height of the cage is, but it's 
right at 3 .


Mutual conductance matching is good, but the final test is the bias 
voltage vs cathode current.  Just the idle current exceeds the rated 
plate dissipation rating of the tubes, so you want them to be as close 
as possible.  With a fixed bias voltage select two that draw between 32 
and 38 mA each.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 2-C/2-NT, 4-B, C-Line
TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com


m coffey wrote:
Although I have been a member of the list for a while now, this is the 
first time that I have tried to post to it, so I hope that I have done 
this correctly!
  My question is that I have seen 6JB6A (vs. straight 6JB6) tubes 
listed for sale. I am wondering what difference(s) there are between 
the two and if eigther is suitable for use in the T4X series (or 
TR4s). Also, is a fairly close reading in mutual conductance ( ie. on 
my Heathkit TT1) consider as indicating a true match on the tubes? 
Mike, KB1EZL
   


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist