[Drakelist] FS: R-4B and a T-4XB

2012-01-06 Thread W8NJR
The R-4B and T-4XB are sold. Thanks for the interest.
 
73,  Terry - W8NJR
 ___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] FS: R-4B and a T-4XB

2012-01-05 Thread W8NJR
I am downsizing and selling some of my drake collection. I have the  
following FS:
 
R-4B receiver. working and recently re-aligned. Cabinet has been repainted  
and looks good. 
Price...   $225.00 plus shipping
 
T-4XB transmitter.  working and puts out 120 watts on 80m. Cabinet has  
been repainted.
Price.  $125.00 plus shipping
 
I will sell both units together for ... $325.00 plus shipping.
 
Because of it's age the Rx and Tx are being sold as is.  If  interested, 
please contact _w8njr@arrl.net_ (mailto:w8...@arrl.net)   .
 
More gear to follow.  73,
 
Terry  - W8NJR
 ___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] FS: R-4B and a T-4XB

2012-01-05 Thread John Hudson
Has the transmitter been modified to present a normal AM carrier or original?


From: w8...@aol.com [mailto:w8...@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 05:12 AM
To: drakelist@zerobeat.net drakelist@zerobeat.net
Subject: [Drakelist] FS: R-4B and a T-4XB

I am downsizing and selling some of my drake collection. I have the following 
FS:

R-4B receiver. working and recently re-aligned. Cabinet has been repainted and 
looks good.
Price...  $225.00 plus shipping

T-4XB transmitter.  working and puts out 120 watts on 80m. Cabinet has been 
repainted.
Price. $125.00 plus shipping

I will sell both units together for ... $325.00 plus shipping.

Because of it's age the Rx and Tx are being sold as is.  If interested, please 
contact w8...@arrl.netmailto:w8...@arrl.net .

More gear to follow.  73,

Terry - W8NJR

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] FS: R-4B and a T-4XB

2012-01-05 Thread Don Cunningham
John,
Normal AM carrier can only be had with a true, plate modulated rig.  The 
Drakes don't have enough iron or a heavy enough modulator to do much more than 
controlled carrier.  I've seen mods, but.  I sure wouldn't do it to 
my Drakes.
73,
Don, WB5HAK___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] FS: R-4B and a T-4XB

2012-01-05 Thread Richard Knoppow


- Original Message - 
From: Don Cunningham d...@martineer.net
To: John Hudson john.hud...@calema.ca.gov; 
w8...@aol.com; drakelist@zerobeat.net

Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] FS: R-4B and a T-4XB


John,
Normal AM carrier can only be had with a true, plate 
modulated rig.  The Drakes don't have enough iron or a heavy 
enough modulator to do much more than controlled carrier. 
I've seen mods, but.  I sure wouldn't do it to my 
Drakes.

73,
Don, WB5HAK
There is another reason for using controlled carrier; 
the resultant signal can be amplified by a  linear amplifier 
designed for SSB  wtihout exceeding its limits. This is true 
for both the linear in the rig and any external linear that 
may be used.


 I disagree only that true AM can be had with other 
than plate modulated transmitters; there have been many 
low-level modulated AM transmitters using linear amplifiers. 
However, a linear will have quite low average efficiency 
when used for AM.  The estimate for old broadcast 
transmitters using linear amplifiers was an all day 
efficiency of around 33%. A reasonable plate modulated 
transmitter has at least twice this. Modern AM transmitters 
can exceed the old limit for efficiency by various 
methods, mostly by running the RF stage as nearly a pulse 
amplifier.


Controlled carrier AM works fine for communication use 
but can be difficult to listen to on a receiver with a fast 
release AVC. Also, measuring modulation percentage is not as 
straight forward as for a conventional transmitter.


If one wants real AM its better to get or build a 
dedicated transmitter but Drake makes it possible to 
communicate with those who may not have SSB receivers (who 
would that be?).





--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
dickb...@ix.netcom.com


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] FS: R-4B and a T-4XB

2012-01-05 Thread kc9cdt

As to AM plate modulated TX...
What transmitters are preferred??

And how much power is reasonable to use on AM...that is effective for 
communications.

I see some of the TX's (DX-60, Ranger etc) are only 50-70 watts out.

73,
Lee



-Original Message-
From: Richard Knoppow 1oldle...@ix.netcom.com
To: Don Cunningham d...@martineer.net; John Hudson 
john.hud...@calema.ca.gov; W8NJR w8...@aol.com; drakelist 
drakelist@zerobeat.net

Sent: Thu, Jan 5, 2012 2:08 pm
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] FS: R-4B and a T-4XB


- Original Message -
From: Don Cunningham d...@martineer.net
To: John Hudson john.hud...@calema.ca.gov;
w8...@aol.com; drakelist@zerobeat.net
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] FS: R-4B and a T-4XB


John,
Normal AM carrier can only be had with a true, plate
modulated rig.  The Drakes don't have enough iron or a heavy
enough modulator to do much more than controlled carrier.
I've seen mods, but.  I sure wouldn't do it to my
Drakes.
73,
Don, WB5HAK
There is another reason for using controlled carrier;
the resultant signal can be amplified by a  linear amplifier
designed for SSB  wtihout exceeding its limits. This is true
for both the linear in the rig and any external linear that
may be used.

 I disagree only that true AM can be had with other
than plate modulated transmitters; there have been many
low-level modulated AM transmitters using linear amplifiers.
However, a linear will have quite low average efficiency
when used for AM.  The estimate for old broadcast
transmitters using linear amplifiers was an all day
efficiency of around 33%. A reasonable plate modulated
transmitter has at least twice this. Modern AM transmitters
can exceed the old limit for efficiency by various
methods, mostly by running the RF stage as nearly a pulse
amplifier.

Controlled carrier AM works fine for communication use
but can be difficult to listen to on a receiver with a fast
release AVC. Also, measuring modulation percentage is not as
straight forward as for a conventional transmitter.

If one wants real AM its better to get or build a
dedicated transmitter but Drake makes it possible to
communicate with those who may not have SSB receivers (who
would that be?).




--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
dickb...@ix.netcom.com


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] FS: R-4B and a T-4XB

2012-01-05 Thread Don Cunningham
Oh, good grief.  I'm outa here.  You all have a nice year and CU some other 
time.

Opinions are worth about what you pay for them.
Later,
Don, WB5HAK 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] FS: R-4B and a T-4XB

2012-01-05 Thread John Hudson
That's why I own a Viking II, but I've seen guys modify the Drakes..


From: Don Cunningham [mailto:d...@martineer.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 10:24 AM
To: John Hudson; w8...@aol.com w8...@aol.com; drakelist@zerobeat.net 
drakelist@zerobeat.net
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] FS: R-4B and a T-4XB

John,
Normal AM carrier can only be had with a true, plate modulated rig.  The 
Drakes don't have enough iron or a heavy enough modulator to do much more than 
controlled carrier.  I've seen mods, but.  I sure wouldn't do it to 
my Drakes.
73,
Don, WB5HAK
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] FS: R-4B and a T-4XB

2012-01-05 Thread Garey Barrell

Lee -

First thing to remember is that AM 'PEP' is four times the carrier power.  So a Viking II at 100 W 
AM output has a peak power equivalent to a 400W SSB signal.  Likewise, the Ranger, etc. are 
equivalent to a 200W SSB transmitter.  The Ranger is a particularly nice transmitter, capable of 
full 100% modulation, which many of the other rigs cannot match.  The Rangers were kinda like the 
Drakes, i.e., when you heard one on the air, you could tell by the signal quality that it was a 
Ranger / Drake.


The Viking II and Heath DX-100/B are probably the 'standards' in their class.  The Collins 32V 
series are great transmitters, but expensive and hard to work on, (assuming you're strong enough to 
move them to the bench!)  The Viking II and DX-100/B both use a pair of 6146s in the PA, the 32V-2/3 
uses a 4D32 in the PA.


The AM in the DX-40, DX-60, and other Screen modulated transmitters is a step down from Plate 
Modulation.  The max modulation capability is around 60-70% as I recall, resulting in a steady 
carrier with weak audio.   With a decent signal strength, the listener hears silence with low audio 
level.


The T-4X is Carrier Controlled AM, which is similar to Screen modulation, with the exception that 
the carrier is reduced when there is no modulation, reducing the dissipation of the PA stage.  The 
variation in carrier level can be irritating on a receiver with no slow AVC capability as the 
receiver noise comes up between words, etc.  There have been a couple of mods published that convert 
the T-4X to more of a Screen modulation technique, but the resultant increase in AVERAGE power is 
tough on PA(s) and Linear amps.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 2-C/2-NT, 4-A, 4-B, C-Line
and TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com


kc9...@aol.com wrote:

As to AM plate modulated TX...
What transmitters are preferred??

And how much power is reasonable to use on AM...that is effective for 
communications.
I see some of the TX's (DX-60, Ranger etc) are only 50-70 watts out.

73,
Lee




___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] FS: R-4B and a T-4XB

2012-01-05 Thread Curt
FWIW, I've been having lot of fun with a Globe Scout 40A (Heising plate 
modulation) at about 20W out on 40M.  Use the T-4X (controlled carrier) 
also, believe it puts out about 25W and has worked fine for me.  Would love 
to own a Ranger but they've become too expensive lately.


Routinely have QSOs during the day on 40M over 100-300 miles.  Some of the 
folks drive linears with their 25W, but I don't own one. 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] FS: R-4B and a T-4XB Is this the topic?

2012-01-05 Thread Kris Merschrod
Hey guys/gals,  how about changing the subject line to fit the topic?  


Kris KM2KM

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] FS: R-4B and a T-4XB

2012-01-05 Thread Steve Wedge
I had a Ranger and it was nice.  Sold it last fall, though, as I hadn't used 
it in quite some time.  It and my SX-101 were taking up too much precious 
space, so I sold them and used part of the money towards some of my current 
Drake stuff.


The Rangers sound great on AM and mine was hi-fi'ed by WA1HZK to a lot of 
the Timtron mods plus a few special ones that Keith had been working on. 
The problem is that it turned it into a Johnny One-Note in that you could 
only use it on AM (CW had been removed to make room for PTT circuits and the 
like).  I wanted some old rigs that could be used on - and do a respectable 
job on - CW.


I've thought about doing the K1JJ mod to the AM modulator and will probably 
do it first in Keith's T-4X, once I have it up on my bench again.  I believe 
that mod is the one Garey was referring to in that it turns the transmitter 
more into a normal screen-modulated configuration.


We'll see.

Now that the thread has been hijacked, I wonder if the B-Line has sold ;-) 
I'd be interested but am holding out for some C's.  That is a good price - 
especially for anyone looking for a T-4XB!


73,

Steve Wedge, W1ES/4

Live free or die: Death is not the worst of evils.
John Stark.

All my computers have my signature with various pearls of wisdom appended 
thereto.



--
From: Curt rhule...@comcast.net
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 4:06 PM
To: drakelist@zerobeat.net; kc9...@aol.com
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] FS:  R-4B and a T-4XB

FWIW, I've been having lot of fun with a Globe Scout 40A (Heising plate 
modulation) at about 20W out on 40M.  Use the T-4X (controlled carrier) 
also, believe it puts out about 25W and has worked fine for me.  Would 
love to own a Ranger but they've become too expensive lately.


Routinely have QSOs during the day on 40M over 100-300 miles.  Some of the 
folks drive linears with their 25W, but I don't own one.


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist