[Drakelist] R-4C Noise Blankers, Dynamic Range roofing filter mod's

2011-02-02 Thread Don Jones
I agree, when using the 8kHz Drake Roofing filter the 4NB noise blanker will
clean-up some interfering noise sources. But only some of the time.  I (and
many others who have e-mail me privately) have found that you get better
noise reduction by reducing the IF BW's. This would include going to a 600Hz
roofing filter making the 4NB ineffective - but more importantly - NOT
NEEDED.

I look at a hot-rod Sherwood R-4C receiver as a utilitarian tool used to
dig deep down into the noise floor and root out S Unit 0 weak signal DX
stations buried in the midst of QRM. 

I did not completely buy into the wild claims of the users of these
Sherwood R-4C's until I actually used one. All I can say is, Holy Cow! I
am now a convert of the writings W8JI regarding the R-4C in its
un-modified state. This Holy Cow is based upon side by side comparisons to
a stock Drake R-4C to a Sherwood R-4C. Basically all you get is the receiver
performance from a FT101B/E, the only advantage R-4C has is the passband (IF
Shift) tuning.

Conversely if one is rag chewing on SSB with 3kHz wide Hi-Fi SSB (or worse
yet AM), they generally are not concerned about digging out weak CW signals
that are S-0 on the S meter. These users typically are happy campers with a
75M 20+dB over S-9 QSO while running 1.5kW (or more) for a in-state rag
chew. They remain happy campers until someone moves in 2kHz away and is
running similar power. But at least their 4NB noise blanker's work...

BTW, the measured 2kHz Spacing Dynamic Range of a TR-4C is 68dB which is
10dB better than the stock R-4C. Plus the 180W output of the TR-4C will
drive a GG 4-1000A amplifier with 3500Vdc B+ to 2,300W-rms out on 75M SSB. 

73 es Gud DX, 
Don Jones KO7i
Arlington, WA 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] R-4C Noise Blankers, Dynamic Range roofing filter mod's

2011-02-02 Thread wa5pok
I have added external DSP units to help noise. One particular rig I have 
with dual receivers I have one on each channel. It has made the difference 
between Q or no Q. Just a suggestion from here.


73, Mike WA5POK
--
From: Don Jones k...@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 12:01 PM
To: drakelist@zerobeat.net
Subject: [Drakelist] R-4C Noise Blankers,Dynamic Range  roofing filter 
mod's


I agree, when using the 8kHz Drake Roofing filter the 4NB noise blanker 
will
clean-up some interfering noise sources. But only some of the time.  I 
(and

many others who have e-mail me privately) have found that you get better
noise reduction by reducing the IF BW's. This would include going to a 
600Hz

roofing filter making the 4NB ineffective - but more importantly - NOT
NEEDED.

I look at a hot-rod Sherwood R-4C receiver as a utilitarian tool used to
dig deep down into the noise floor and root out S Unit 0 weak signal DX
stations buried in the midst of QRM.

I did not completely buy into the wild claims of the users of these
Sherwood R-4C's until I actually used one. All I can say is, Holy Cow! I
am now a convert of the writings W8JI regarding the R-4C in its
un-modified state. This Holy Cow is based upon side by side comparisons 
to
a stock Drake R-4C to a Sherwood R-4C. Basically all you get is the 
receiver
performance from a FT101B/E, the only advantage R-4C has is the passband 
(IF

Shift) tuning.

Conversely if one is rag chewing on SSB with 3kHz wide Hi-Fi SSB (or 
worse
yet AM), they generally are not concerned about digging out weak CW 
signals
that are S-0 on the S meter. These users typically are happy campers with 
a

75M 20+dB over S-9 QSO while running 1.5kW (or more) for a in-state rag
chew. They remain happy campers until someone moves in 2kHz away and is
running similar power. But at least their 4NB noise blanker's work...

BTW, the measured 2kHz Spacing Dynamic Range of a TR-4C is 68dB which is
10dB better than the stock R-4C. Plus the 180W output of the TR-4C will
drive a GG 4-1000A amplifier with 3500Vdc B+ to 2,300W-rms out on 75M SSB.

73 es Gud DX,
Don Jones KO7i
Arlington, WA



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] R-4C Noise Blankers, Dynamic Range roofing filter mod's

2011-02-02 Thread Jim Shorney
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:01:33 -0800, Don Jones wrote:

Basically all you get is the receiver
performance from a FT101B/E, the only advantage R-4C has is the passband (IF
Shift) tuning.


Yaesus give me headaches, Drakes do not. That's my main performace criterion.

73

-Jim


--
Ham Radio NU0C
Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.S.A.
TR7/RV7/R7A/L7, TR6/RV6, T4XC/R4C/L4B, NCL2000, SB104A, R390A, GT550A/RV550A, 
HyGain 3750, IBM PS/2 - all vintage, all the time!

Give a man a URL, and he will learn for an hour; teach him to Google, and he 
will learn for a lifetime.

HyGain 3750 User's Group - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HyGain_3750/
http://incolor.inetnebr.com/jshorney
http://www.nebraskaghosts.org



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] R-4C Noise Blankers, Dynamic Range roofing filter mod's

2011-02-02 Thread kc9cdt
The truth be known, IMHO, If I just had the Sherwood R-4C, T-4XC, L-4B 
and MN2700...and sold everything else..I could get by quite nicely!

OMG...I would be back in 1974

I have a Collins S line and KWM2, 30-L1
A Hallicrafters SX-115/Ht32B
A Hallicrafters SX-117/HT44
and a TT Orion II and Alpha 91b
I do enjoy them all at times.

Considering everything...may favorites are the C line and Orion II.
The C line will do all most ever need..but the OII is nice for a lot of 
reasons too.


How many radios can you operate at once anyways!

Maybe time to sell some stuff.

73,
Lee





Lee Simmonds
Summit DCS LLC
 
260-799-4077 Office
260-403-6936 Cell


-Original Message-
From: Jim Shorney jshor...@inebraska.com
To: drakelist drakelist@zerobeat.net
Sent: Wed, Feb 2, 2011 8:32 pm
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] R-4C Noise Blankers, Dynamic Range  roofing 
filter mod's



On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:01:33 -0800, Don Jones wrote:


Basically all you get is the receiver
performance from a FT101B/E, the only advantage R-4C has is the 

passband (IF

Shift) tuning.



Yaesus give me headaches, Drakes do not. That's my main performace 
criterion.


73

-Jim


--
Ham Radio NU0C
Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.S.A.
TR7/RV7/R7A/L7, TR6/RV6, T4XC/R4C/L4B, NCL2000, SB104A, R390A, 
GT550A/RV550A,

HyGain 3750, IBM PS/2 - all vintage, all the time!

Give a man a URL, and he will learn for an hour; teach him to Google, 
and he

will learn for a lifetime.

HyGain 3750 User's Group - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HyGain_3750/
http://incolor.inetnebr.com/jshorney
http://www.nebraskaghosts.org



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist