Re: [Dri-devel] MGA on 2.2, backport drm ?
I'm using gcc-2.95 (2.95.4.ds1-0.010407), and I should have packages compiled with a current CVS tomorrow, going to sleep now. Zephaniah E. Hull. On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:26:01PM +0200, Ard van Breemen wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 11:47:14PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:08:20PM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: > > > Ouch, you're going to be annoyed that you missed this, but .debs are > > > already available[0], still a little rough. (I need to generate the > > > module source packages, and get it building somewhere via cron.) > > I did not miss it, that is the basis :). > BTW: what compiler are you using. > If I use your basis to compile the 2001-4-18 snapshot, I get a really > weird font problem. As if 32 pixels are interchanged with the next 32, > and within the 32 that 16 pixels are interchanged with the next 16. > Hmmm, actually sound very endianesq. > But I need a clean .deb package to work on a back port for the > modules... > -- > mail up 21+05:22, 5 users, load 0.00, 0.07, 0.05 > mistar1 up 14:40, 4 users, load 2.08, 1.86, 1.07 > Let your government know you value your freedom: sign the petition: > http://petition.eurolinux.org > -- PGP EA5198D1-Zephaniah E. Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-GPG E65A7801 Keys available at http://whitestar.soark.net/~warp/public_keys. CCs of replies from mailing lists are encouraged. incidental damages. -- Logan Shaw on ASR. PGP signature
Re: [Dri-devel] MGA on 2.2, backport drm ?
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 11:47:14PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:08:20PM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: > > Ouch, you're going to be annoyed that you missed this, but .debs are > > already available[0], still a little rough. (I need to generate the > > module source packages, and get it building somewhere via cron.) > I did not miss it, that is the basis :). BTW: what compiler are you using. If I use your basis to compile the 2001-4-18 snapshot, I get a really weird font problem. As if 32 pixels are interchanged with the next 32, and within the 32 that 16 pixels are interchanged with the next 16. Hmmm, actually sound very endianesq. But I need a clean .deb package to work on a back port for the modules... -- mail up 21+05:22, 5 users, load 0.00, 0.07, 0.05 mistar1 up 14:40, 4 users, load 2.08, 1.86, 1.07 Let your government know you value your freedom: sign the petition: http://petition.eurolinux.org ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] MGA on 2.2, backport drm ?
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:08:20PM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 08:13:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I have a G450 card at work. > > Currently I am trying to build the latest drivers into a deb package, > > which painfully (took me a week :() succeeded. > Ouch, you're going to be annoyed that you missed this, but .debs are > already available[0], still a little rough. (I need to generate the > module source packages, and get it building somewhere via cron.) I did not miss it, that is the basis :). There were only so much patches that did not work, and stupid me did it on my workstation (128MB, single ide), instead of the development server (dual smp, 1GB, soft raid 5, 4 disks). Each run takes a considerable amount of time, before finding out something is wrong :( I am not completely apt-get into it ;) > > Now I have installed the stuff, and surprise surprise, it does want a > > new kernel module... 3.0.x, and not 2.0.0. > > Major trouble, since there is a rule not to switch workstations from 2.2 > > to 2.4 unless it is stable enough... > > The new drm code is very 2.4 centric, so I wondered: > > 1) Are people busy with a 2.2. backport? > Not that I know of, sadly. > > 2) Is there interest > Probably quite a bit actually. At least by me :) > Zephaniah E. Hull. > (Debian developer.) Me: debian user ;) > 0: For /etc/apt/sources.list > > deb http://people.debian.org/~warp/dri/ ./ > deb-src http://people.debian.org/~warp/dri/ ./ Not up to 18-4 :) Hmmm, if you do the patcheing etc. (which you already do), I do the backport ;) I need at least a .deb package of a stable mga implementation that I can work on. (I mean, the 2d has to work, and it has to have the recent mga rework of gareth). -- mail up 18+14:43, 3 users, load 0.00, 0.02, 0.00 mistar1 up3+00:07, 8 users, load 2.87, 2.77, 2.72 Let your government know you value your freedom: sign the petition: http://petition.eurolinux.org ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] MGA on 2.2, backport drm ?
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 08:13:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > I have a G450 card at work. > Currently I am trying to build the latest drivers into a deb package, > which painfully (took me a week :() succeeded. Ouch, you're going to be annoyed that you missed this, but .debs are already available[0], still a little rough. (I need to generate the module source packages, and get it building somewhere via cron.) > Now I have installed the stuff, and surprise surprise, it does want a > new kernel module... 3.0.x, and not 2.0.0. > Major trouble, since there is a rule not to switch workstations from 2.2 > to 2.4 unless it is stable enough... > The new drm code is very 2.4 centric, so I wondered: > 1) Are people busy with a 2.2. backport? Not that I know of, sadly. > 2) Is there interest Probably quite a bit actually. Zephaniah E. Hull. (Debian developer.) 0: For /etc/apt/sources.list deb http://people.debian.org/~warp/dri/ ./ deb-src http://people.debian.org/~warp/dri/ ./ > I'm starting with a backport right now, so any hints will be greately > appreciated... > -- > mail up 18+11:13, 4 users, load 0.40, 0.14, 0.08 > mistar1 up2+20:37, 8 users, load 2.00, 2.00, 2.00 > Let your government know you value your freedom: sign the petition: > http://petition.eurolinux.org > > > > ___ > Dri-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel > -- PGP EA5198D1-Zephaniah E. Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-GPG E65A7801 Keys available at http://whitestar.soark.net/~warp/public_keys. CCs of replies from mailing lists are encouraged. "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity" - Hanlon's Razor PGP signature
[Dri-devel] MGA on 2.2, backport drm ?
Hi, I have a G450 card at work. Currently I am trying to build the latest drivers into a deb package, which painfully (took me a week :() succeeded. Now I have installed the stuff, and surprise surprise, it does want a new kernel module... 3.0.x, and not 2.0.0. Major trouble, since there is a rule not to switch workstations from 2.2 to 2.4 unless it is stable enough... The new drm code is very 2.4 centric, so I wondered: 1) Are people busy with a 2.2. backport? 2) Is there interest I'm starting with a backport right now, so any hints will be greately appreciated... -- mail up 18+11:13, 4 users, load 0.40, 0.14, 0.08 mistar1 up2+20:37, 8 users, load 2.00, 2.00, 2.00 Let your government know you value your freedom: sign the petition: http://petition.eurolinux.org ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel