Re: [PATCH] Staging:bcm: Fixes coding style issues in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:37:18PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: On 04/10/2014 07:56 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 07:27:27PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: That's pretty obviously not going to apply properly, you have line-wrapp on. You can't cut-and-paste patches into gmail, see Documentation/email_clients.txt for details. thanks, greg k-h I'm so sorry about that. I already read it and configured Thunderbird as recommended. I just forgot to turn line wrap off. That worked, as this line shows :) But you put the patch at the end of the email, I can't do anything with it, I need it as a clean email, something I don't have to edit by hand when applying. Also... -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); + +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, - struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); What happened to the tabs? And why modify this last line, what was wrong with it? thanks, greg k-h Greg, Where you able to apply the patch successfully? I asked above what happened to the tabs, and why modify that line, so no, I did not apply it, as it doesn't look correct to me. thanks, greg k-h ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH] Staging:bcm: Fixes coding style issues in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:37:18PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: On 04/10/2014 07:56 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 07:27:27PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: That's pretty obviously not going to apply properly, you have line-wrapp on. You can't cut-and-paste patches into gmail, see Documentation/email_clients.txt for details. thanks, greg k-h I'm so sorry about that. I already read it and configured Thunderbird as recommended. I just forgot to turn line wrap off. That worked, as this line shows :) But you put the patch at the end of the email, I can't do anything with it, I need it as a clean email, something I don't have to edit by hand when applying. Also... -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); + +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, - struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); What happened to the tabs? And why modify this last line, what was wrong with it? thanks, greg k-h Greg, Where you able to apply the patch successfully? I asked above what happened to the tabs, and why modify that line, so no, I did not apply it, as it doesn't look correct to me. thanks, greg k-h In the last patch I sent, I believe I addressed the why modify that line issue. However, I just realized that for whatever reason my tabs are being converted to spaces when sending the email. I'll try to work around this. What email client do you recommend for submitting patches? Also, I sent a v2 patch and received and auto response from you. Should I submitted the fixed patch as a v3 or continue in this thread? thanks, marcos ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH] Staging:bcm: Fixes coding style issues in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 02:18:46PM -0400, Marcos Di Pietro wrote: On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:37:18PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: On 04/10/2014 07:56 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 07:27:27PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: That's pretty obviously not going to apply properly, you have line-wrapp on. You can't cut-and-paste patches into gmail, see Documentation/email_clients.txt for details. thanks, greg k-h I'm so sorry about that. I already read it and configured Thunderbird as recommended. I just forgot to turn line wrap off. That worked, as this line shows :) But you put the patch at the end of the email, I can't do anything with it, I need it as a clean email, something I don't have to edit by hand when applying. Also... -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); + +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, - struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); What happened to the tabs? And why modify this last line, what was wrong with it? thanks, greg k-h Greg, Where you able to apply the patch successfully? I asked above what happened to the tabs, and why modify that line, so no, I did not apply it, as it doesn't look correct to me. thanks, greg k-h In the last patch I sent, I believe I addressed the why modify that line issue. However, I just realized that for whatever reason my tabs are being converted to spaces when sending the email. I'll try to work around this. What email client do you recommend for submitting patches? mutt. Also, I sent a v2 patch and received and auto response from you. Should I submitted the fixed patch as a v3 or continue in this thread? What auto response? That the patch was applied, or not? I'm totally lost, sorry. greg k-h ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH] Staging:bcm: Fixes coding style issues in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c
On 04/16/2014 02:25 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 02:18:46PM -0400, Marcos Di Pietro wrote: On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:37:18PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: On 04/10/2014 07:56 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 07:27:27PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: That's pretty obviously not going to apply properly, you have line-wrapp on. You can't cut-and-paste patches into gmail, see Documentation/email_clients.txt for details. thanks, greg k-h I'm so sorry about that. I already read it and configured Thunderbird as recommended. I just forgot to turn line wrap off. That worked, as this line shows :) But you put the patch at the end of the email, I can't do anything with it, I need it as a clean email, something I don't have to edit by hand when applying. Also... -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); + +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, - struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); What happened to the tabs? And why modify this last line, what was wrong with it? thanks, greg k-h Greg, Where you able to apply the patch successfully? I asked above what happened to the tabs, and why modify that line, so no, I did not apply it, as it doesn't look correct to me. thanks, greg k-h In the last patch I sent, I believe I addressed the why modify that line issue. However, I just realized that for whatever reason my tabs are being converted to spaces when sending the email. I'll try to work around this. What email client do you recommend for submitting patches? mutt. Also, I sent a v2 patch and received and auto response from you. Should I submitted the fixed patch as a v3 or continue in this thread? What auto response? That the patch was applied, or not? I'm totally lost, sorry. greg k-h From c9ce378f0e47e2de37d8650762183000b4a31938 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:21:17 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Fixes code style errors in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c Patch submitted as part of the Eudyptula Challenge Signed-off-by: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c | 7 +-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c index 4f31583..9ddb20c 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c +++ b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c @@ -4,8 +4,11 @@ This file contains the routines related to Quality of Service. */ #include headers.h -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); -- 1.8.3.2 ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH] Staging:bcm: Fixes coding style issues in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 07:39:06PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: On 04/16/2014 02:25 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 02:18:46PM -0400, Marcos Di Pietro wrote: On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:37:18PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: On 04/10/2014 07:56 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 07:27:27PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: That's pretty obviously not going to apply properly, you have line-wrapp on. You can't cut-and-paste patches into gmail, see Documentation/email_clients.txt for details. thanks, greg k-h I'm so sorry about that. I already read it and configured Thunderbird as recommended. I just forgot to turn line wrap off. That worked, as this line shows :) But you put the patch at the end of the email, I can't do anything with it, I need it as a clean email, something I don't have to edit by hand when applying. Also... -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); + +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, - struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); What happened to the tabs? And why modify this last line, what was wrong with it? thanks, greg k-h Greg, Where you able to apply the patch successfully? I asked above what happened to the tabs, and why modify that line, so no, I did not apply it, as it doesn't look correct to me. thanks, greg k-h In the last patch I sent, I believe I addressed the why modify that line issue. However, I just realized that for whatever reason my tabs are being converted to spaces when sending the email. I'll try to work around this. What email client do you recommend for submitting patches? mutt. Also, I sent a v2 patch and received and auto response from you. Should I submitted the fixed patch as a v3 or continue in this thread? What auto response? That the patch was applied, or not? I'm totally lost, sorry. greg k-h From c9ce378f0e47e2de37d8650762183000b4a31938 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:21:17 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Fixes code style errors in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c Patch submitted as part of the Eudyptula Challenge Signed-off-by: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c | 7 +-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) As Dan points out, I can't take this as-is, sorry. Please send as a separate email, I can't edit every single patch that people send me by hand to apply them properly, I don't scale that way at all. greg k-h ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH] Staging:bcm: Fixes coding style issues in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c
On 04/10/2014 07:56 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 07:27:27PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: That's pretty obviously not going to apply properly, you have line-wrapp on. You can't cut-and-paste patches into gmail, see Documentation/email_clients.txt for details. thanks, greg k-h I'm so sorry about that. I already read it and configured Thunderbird as recommended. I just forgot to turn line wrap off. That worked, as this line shows :) But you put the patch at the end of the email, I can't do anything with it, I need it as a clean email, something I don't have to edit by hand when applying. Also... -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); + +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, - struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); What happened to the tabs? And why modify this last line, what was wrong with it? thanks, greg k-h Greg, Where you able to apply the patch successfully? regards, marcos ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH] Staging:bcm: Fixes coding style issues in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c
This isn't the right way to send a v2 patch. Please resend it. https://www.google.com/search?q=how+to+send+a+v2+patch regards, dan carpenter ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH] Staging:bcm: Fixes coding style issues in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c
On 04/10/2014 04:14 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 01:55:47PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: Fixes code style errors in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c Patch submitted as part of the Eudyptula Challenge. Signed-off-by: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c | 13 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c index 4f31583..e7fccbc 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c +++ b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c @@ -4,11 +4,14 @@ This file contains the routines related to Quality of Service. */ #include headers.h -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); - -static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, - struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); + +static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); static VOID PruneQueue(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, INT iIndex); For some reason this patch doesn't apply at all to my tree, can you redo it and resend? thanks, greg k-h Which tree are you using? Is there a way I could pull from a tree that best resembles yours? thanks, marcos ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH] Staging:bcm: Fixes coding style issues in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 04:22:13PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: On 04/10/2014 04:14 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 01:55:47PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: Fixes code style errors in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c Patch submitted as part of the Eudyptula Challenge. Signed-off-by: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c | 13 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c index 4f31583..e7fccbc 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c +++ b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c @@ -4,11 +4,14 @@ This file contains the routines related to Quality of Service. */ #include headers.h -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); - -static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, - struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); + +static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); static VOID PruneQueue(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, INT iIndex); For some reason this patch doesn't apply at all to my tree, can you redo it and resend? thanks, greg k-h Which tree are you using? Is there a way I could pull from a tree that best resembles yours? Try it against Linus's tree right now, that's where I tried to apply it as my tree is empty right now. thanks, greg k-h ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH] Staging:bcm: Fixes coding style issues in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c
On 04/10/2014 04:55 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 04:22:13PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: On 04/10/2014 04:14 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 01:55:47PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: Fixes code style errors in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c Patch submitted as part of the Eudyptula Challenge. Signed-off-by: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c | 13 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c index 4f31583..e7fccbc 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c +++ b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c @@ -4,11 +4,14 @@ This file contains the routines related to Quality of Service. */ #include headers.h -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); - -static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, - struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); + +static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); static VOID PruneQueue(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, INT iIndex); For some reason this patch doesn't apply at all to my tree, can you redo it and resend? thanks, greg k-h Which tree are you using? Is there a way I could pull from a tree that best resembles yours? Try it against Linus's tree right now, that's where I tried to apply it as my tree is empty right now. thanks, greg k-h From 6e6efa45b862042e30308dc9512a5af877c53f2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:33:21 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Fixes code style errors in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c Patch submitted as part of the Eudyptula Challenge. Signed-off-by: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c | 10 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c index 4f31583..b64d0b6 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c +++ b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c @@ -4,11 +4,15 @@ This file contains the routines related to Quality of Service. */ #include headers.h -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); + +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, - struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); static VOID PruneQueue(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, INT iIndex); -- 1.8.3.2 ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH] Staging:bcm: Fixes coding style issues in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:56:01PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: On 04/10/2014 04:55 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 04:22:13PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: On 04/10/2014 04:14 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 01:55:47PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: Fixes code style errors in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c Patch submitted as part of the Eudyptula Challenge. Signed-off-by: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c | 13 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c index 4f31583..e7fccbc 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c +++ b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c @@ -4,11 +4,14 @@ This file contains the routines related to Quality of Service. */ #include headers.h -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); - -static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, - struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); + +static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); static VOID PruneQueue(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, INT iIndex); For some reason this patch doesn't apply at all to my tree, can you redo it and resend? thanks, greg k-h Which tree are you using? Is there a way I could pull from a tree that best resembles yours? Try it against Linus's tree right now, that's where I tried to apply it as my tree is empty right now. thanks, greg k-h From 6e6efa45b862042e30308dc9512a5af877c53f2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:33:21 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Fixes code style errors in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c Patch submitted as part of the Eudyptula Challenge. Signed-off-by: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com Why add this to the end of an email? I need a fresh email in order to not have to edit this by hand :( --- drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c | 10 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c index 4f31583..b64d0b6 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c +++ b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c @@ -4,11 +4,15 @@ This file contains the routines related to Quality of Service. */ #include headers.h -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); That's pretty obviously not going to apply properly, you have line-wrapp on. You can't cut-and-paste patches into gmail, see Documentation/email_clients.txt for details. thanks, greg k-h ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH] Staging:bcm: Fixes coding style issues in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c
On 04/10/2014 07:27 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:56:01PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: On 04/10/2014 04:55 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 04:22:13PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: On 04/10/2014 04:14 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 01:55:47PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: Fixes code style errors in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c Patch submitted as part of the Eudyptula Challenge. Signed-off-by: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c | 13 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c index 4f31583..e7fccbc 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c +++ b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c @@ -4,11 +4,14 @@ This file contains the routines related to Quality of Service. */ #include headers.h -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); - -static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, - struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); + +static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); static VOID PruneQueue(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, INT iIndex); For some reason this patch doesn't apply at all to my tree, can you redo it and resend? thanks, greg k-h Which tree are you using? Is there a way I could pull from a tree that best resembles yours? Try it against Linus's tree right now, that's where I tried to apply it as my tree is empty right now. thanks, greg k-h From 6e6efa45b862042e30308dc9512a5af877c53f2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:33:21 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Fixes code style errors in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c Patch submitted as part of the Eudyptula Challenge. Signed-off-by: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com Why add this to the end of an email? I need a fresh email in order to not have to edit this by hand :( --- drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c | 10 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c index 4f31583..b64d0b6 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c +++ b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c @@ -4,11 +4,15 @@ This file contains the routines related to Quality of Service. */ #include headers.h -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); That's pretty obviously not going to apply properly, you have line-wrapp on. You can't cut-and-paste patches into gmail, see Documentation/email_clients.txt for details. thanks, greg k-h I'm so sorry about that. I already read it and configured Thunderbird as recommended. I just forgot to turn line wrap off. Let's try it again. From 6e6efa45b862042e30308dc9512a5af877c53f2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:33:21 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Fixes code style errors in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c Patch submitted as part of the Eudyptula Challenge. Signed-off-by: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c | 10 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c index 4f31583..b64d0b6 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c +++ b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c @@ -4,11 +4,15 @@ This file contains the routines related to Quality of Service. */ #include headers.h -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); + +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); static
Re: [PATCH] Staging:bcm: Fixes coding style issues in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 07:27:27PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: That's pretty obviously not going to apply properly, you have line-wrapp on. You can't cut-and-paste patches into gmail, see Documentation/email_clients.txt for details. thanks, greg k-h I'm so sorry about that. I already read it and configured Thunderbird as recommended. I just forgot to turn line wrap off. That worked, as this line shows :) But you put the patch at the end of the email, I can't do anything with it, I need it as a clean email, something I don't have to edit by hand when applying. Also... -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); + +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, - struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); What happened to the tabs? And why modify this last line, what was wrong with it? thanks, greg k-h ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH] Staging:bcm: Fixes coding style issues in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c
On 04/10/2014 07:56 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 07:27:27PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: That's pretty obviously not going to apply properly, you have line-wrapp on. You can't cut-and-paste patches into gmail, see Documentation/email_clients.txt for details. thanks, greg k-h I'm so sorry about that. I already read it and configured Thunderbird as recommended. I just forgot to turn line wrap off. That worked, as this line shows :) But you put the patch at the end of the email, I can't do anything with it, I need it as a clean email, something I don't have to edit by hand when applying. Also... -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); + +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, - struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); What happened to the tabs? And why modify this last line, what was wrong with it? thanks, greg k-h There's nothing wrong with it. I was just trying to make it consistent with the formatting I gave the other function definitions. I'll go ahead and remove those changes and send it as a clean email. Thanks for your patience! Marcos ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH] Staging:bcm: Fixes coding style issues in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c
On 04/10/2014 07:27 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:56:01PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: On 04/10/2014 04:55 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 04:22:13PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: On 04/10/2014 04:14 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 01:55:47PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: Fixes code style errors in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c Patch submitted as part of the Eudyptula Challenge. Signed-off-by: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c | 13 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c index 4f31583..e7fccbc 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c +++ b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c @@ -4,11 +4,14 @@ This file contains the routines related to Quality of Service. */ #include headers.h -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); - -static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, - struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); + +static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); static VOID PruneQueue(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, INT iIndex); For some reason this patch doesn't apply at all to my tree, can you redo it and resend? thanks, greg k-h Which tree are you using? Is there a way I could pull from a tree that best resembles yours? Try it against Linus's tree right now, that's where I tried to apply it as my tree is empty right now. thanks, greg k-h From 6e6efa45b862042e30308dc9512a5af877c53f2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:33:21 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Fixes code style errors in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c Patch submitted as part of the Eudyptula Challenge. Signed-off-by: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com Why add this to the end of an email? I need a fresh email in order to not have to edit this by hand :( --- drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c | 10 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c index 4f31583..b64d0b6 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c +++ b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c @@ -4,11 +4,15 @@ This file contains the routines related to Quality of Service. */ #include headers.h -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); That's pretty obviously not going to apply properly, you have line-wrapp on. You can't cut-and-paste patches into gmail, see Documentation/email_clients.txt for details. thanks, greg k-h Fixes code style errors in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c Patch submitted as part of the Eudyptula Challenge Signed-off-by: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c | 7 +-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c index 4f31583..9ddb20c 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c +++ b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c @@ -4,8 +4,11 @@ This file contains the routines related to Quality of Service. */ #include headers.h -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); -- 1.8.3.2 ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
[PATCH] Staging:bcm: Fixes coding style issues in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c
Fixes code style errors in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c Patch submitted as part of the Eudyptula Challenge. Signed-off-by: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c | 13 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c index 4f31583..e7fccbc 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c +++ b/drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c @@ -4,11 +4,14 @@ This file contains the routines related to Quality of Service. */ #include headers.h -static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); -static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct sk_buff* skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); - -static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, - struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); +static void EThCSGetPktInfo(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + PVOID pvEthPayload, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo); +static bool EThCSClassifyPkt(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, struct bcm_eth_packet_info *pstEthCsPktInfo, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule, B_UINT8 EthCSCupport); + +static USHORT IpVersion4(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, struct iphdr *iphd, + struct bcm_classifier_rule *pstClassifierRule); static VOID PruneQueue(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, INT iIndex); -- 1.8.3.2 ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH] Staging:bcm: Fixes coding style issues in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 01:55:47PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: Fixes code style errors in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c Patch submitted as part of the Eudyptula Challenge. Signed-off-by: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c | 13 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Always properly cc: the relevant maintainers involved in a driver/file. scripts/get_maintainer.pl can help you here. I'll queue this up after the merge window is over (i.e. after 3.15-rc1 is out). Don't worry, it's not lost. thanks, greg k-h ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH] Staging:bcm: Fixes coding style issues in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c
Thank you for the advise and the heads up. On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 01:55:47PM -0400, Marcos A. Di Pietro wrote: Fixes code style errors in drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c Patch submitted as part of the Eudyptula Challenge. Signed-off-by: Marcos A. Di Pietro marcos...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/bcm/Qos.c | 13 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Always properly cc: the relevant maintainers involved in a driver/file. scripts/get_maintainer.pl can help you here. I'll queue this up after the merge window is over (i.e. after 3.15-rc1 is out). Don't worry, it's not lost. thanks, greg k-h ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel