[DX-CHAT] YX0LIX-QSL

2007-01-13 Thread Georg Einfalt, DL5NO
The YX0LIX-QSL arrived this morning (3 days only from Long Island to Central 
Europe...). Nice 4-sided folded card.


Tnx Steve!

de Georg,
  DL5NO 

Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat


To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org




Re: [DX-CHAT] 4O3T

2006-11-28 Thread Georg Einfalt, DL5NO
I have sent my card to YT6A (directly), and received the 4O3T-card last 
saturday.

You can have a look at the card at http://www.dl5no.de/qsl_gallery.html
73,
Georg, DL5NO


- Original Message - 
From: "harris_ruben" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "dx-chat List" 
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 2:15 PM
Subject: [DX-CHAT] 4O3T



It's 4 months now. Any word on cards from these guys?
--

No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large
number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org 


Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat


To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org




Re: [DX-CHAT] LoTW Another question

2006-09-16 Thread Georg Einfalt

Tom,

PSK3 is not a valid mode-tag within a LOTW-upload. You should use PSK31. The
list of modes, which are accepted by the LOTW, is enclosed below.

I am also logging with DX4WIN, and I remember, that there has been a problem
in the past, but the current version (7.02) exports correctly (PSK31).

If you have invalid PSK3-mode-tags in your ADIF-export, you could modify
these tags with a ASCII-text-editor. Replace PSK3 with
PSK31 for the relevant QSOs, sign the file and resubmit...

73 de Georg, DL5NO



Mode Mode Group
CW   CW
PHONEPHONE
IMAGEIMAGE
DATA DATA
AM   PHONE
FM   PHONE
SSB  PHONE
ATV  IMAGE
FAX  IMAGE
SSTV IMAGE
AMTORDATA
CLOVER   DATA
FSK31DATA
FSK441   DATA
GTOR DATA
HELL DATA
HFSK DATA
JT65 DATA
MFSK16   DATA
MFSK8DATA
MINIRTTY DATA
MT63 DATA
OLIVIA   DATA
PACKET   DATA
PACTOR   DATA
PSK125   DATA
PSK31DATA
PSK63DATA
Q15  DATA
RTTY DATA
THROBDATA



First, thanks to all who answered my other query. Now, hopefully the last 
time I will have to bother you
LOTW rejected all my PSK31 QSOs. I am using DX4WIN v 5.03 and used the 
PSK3 mode for logging. Did I choose the wrong mode?  Thanks again


Tom N4TJ


Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat


To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org




Re: [DX-CHAT] P5, 7O and stuff....

2005-03-06 Thread Georg Einfalt
Dave G0OIL wrote:
As Ron correctly says "Hey folks, it's just DX" - why are ARRL so anal
about all this permission stuff.  Weren't 7O1YGF THERE?  Wasn't
VU4/VU2JPS THERE?  Weren't 7O1A THERE?  What bloody difference does a
scrap of paper from some little power crazed jerk in a peaked cap make?
I remember a statement of the 7O1A crew, that they had at hand a permission
of the Aden office of the Ministry of Communcations and that this paper has
also been presented at Newington. The permission has been revoked by a guy
at the headquarters of the Ministry of Communications in Sanaa weeks after
the operation. Btw...that shows, how weak governmental structures are in 
that kind of countries.

In summer '04 the ARRL announced, that for Somalia written permissions are
accepted "from any recognized authority that is acknowledged to be in
control of a particular region". Authority acknowledged by whom?
Particular regions of Somalia have declared their autonomy or independence,
but as the CIA World Factbook states, these regions are not recognized by
any government. I read, that permissions issued by a development aid
volunteer from Australia should be valid for 6O (is that really true?).
7O1A was there and during the operation, they apparently had a written 
permission. 7O1YGF was there, they had no paper. Both have not been 
accepted. Ed was in P5, he also had no paper. His operation was accepted. 
Nowadays for 6O a kind of "wildcard-solution" is used.

I agree with Dave: What difference do such scraps of paper make? It is about 
time for the league to review some of their decisions...

Georg, DL5NO
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org