[DXR] DX window
I've read a great deal about DX windows but none of them concern 20 meters. What ever happenned to the gentleman's agreement that US to DX work would be done in the neighborhood of 14.195? I have heard many of our new extras having local QSO's in the morning wiping out any opportunity to hear good DX at that time. Am I wrong or was 14.190 - 14.210 or so the informal DX window on 20? How do we get the word out without on the air arguements? 73, Bruce K1MY Sunny Sun Lakes, Arizona Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-news To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives available at http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net/ This is the DXR reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DXR] FW: 20 meter DX window
Below is a note that I sent to Wayne and his response. An e mail to him at the league might help. Bruce -Original Message- From: Mills, Wayne N7NG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 1:00 PM To: 'Bruce Makas' Subject: RE: 20 meter DX window Bruce: The 20 meter SSB "DX Window" at 14.195 is definitely well established. As you probably know, this was a frequency used by DX back when the US subband started at 14.200. It is interesting that several attempts to establish a new DX window at 14.145 failed, primarily because of an established net on that frequency(!) There is considerable momentum and history involved in using the 14.195 frequency. I don't think the DX community will stand for any significant net activity to be established on that frequency. The League has established bandplans for a variety of bands. These are generally configured following a study involving input from the ham community. I think it would be unwise for the League to unilaterally designate 14.195 part of a bandplan without using a process which would legitimize the results. I will bring it up at the MSC meeting in July, however. Wayne -Original Message- From: Bruce Makas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 12:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 20 meter DX window Wayne, Is there any way that the league, thru QST, could "designate" 14.190 thru 14.200 as a voluntary DX window and encourage operators not to establish nets or schedules there. There is also a significant number of domestic (sometimes local) QSO's there each day. By use of the QST media we might be able to avoid some of the on the air arguements. Last week was a mess with the 3B6 on 14.195 and a 9Y4 net 1 kc below and stateside QSO's sometimes right on top of the 3B6. Of course they can't hear anything and they point out that there are no reserved frequencies. All of this is correct but with a little help from the league we might be able to help this deteriorating situation. thanks, Bruce K1MY Sunny Sun Lakes, Arizona Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-news To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives available at http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net/ This is the DXR reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DXR] DXpeditions
I want to start taping some of the DXpeditions for my library. Anything special that I should look for in a cassette tape recorder? thanks, Bruce, K1MY Sunny Sun Lakes, Arizona Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-news To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives available at http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net/ This is the DXR reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
RE: [DXR] By the Numbers
"A straight pileup allows the loudest and/or the most skillful ops through. " I don't understand the issue; the above is the essence of DXing isn't it? Shouldn't the loudest and/or the strongest prevail? I can think of absolutely no reason to deprive a well engineered station with a skillful operator and the propagation a contact or should we all stand by for the weak and poor operators without propagation? Think about it, Bruce K1MY -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan Zimmerman Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 5:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DXR] By the Numbers I think some of the griping is legitimate. A straight pileup allows the loudest and/or the most skillful ops through. By the numbers COULD allow more DXers to get thru a huge pileup, but only if it is done well and correctly. I would probably have Malpelo Island in the log had he not been operating by numbers, the first time I heard him on 20m. He never got back around to 3's, but he was booming in, and with the number of people he was working in each district, I would have had plenty of time. I would have much preferred a "regular" pileup that night. Couple of nights later, T5W was operating 20 SSB by numbers. He hit 3's, I had no problem (100W + A3S @ 30ft) No gripe there. My biggest problem with operating by numbers is the inconsistency in how it's done. I was pretty frustrated after I sat by the radio for an hour just listening and waiting for 3's to come around for the /0M and he just quit after 0's. If I had know he was going to QRT, I would have spent the time looking for more DX. I agree with the guys and gals that contend that by the numbers should not necessarily be done in numerical order. On the other hand, I can't agree with the people who say to work proportional numbers to the size of the call district, unless the DX is ONLY calling the U.S.A. The fact of the matter is, the 4th call district may be the largest in the U.S., but it's not other places. Just take this area of the world. Let's see. VE4... I think there are a lot more VE7's VE3's and VE2's than there are VE4's. How about an XE4? I've never even heard one. V34? no. 6Y4? TG4? OX4? Not too common. Yes, the few I've mentioned are a smaller fraction of the ham community than the W4's, but we need to let the DX work the DX sometimes. I apologize for picking on the 4's. I don't want to seem like I'm singling out the 4's or attacking the guy who mentioned the 4's before... just an example. I personally think that by the numbers tends to be unfair and frustrate people. You get too many people getting hot under the collar waiting a chance to even TRY to call. You get people in Pennsylvania signing N3xxx/7. That's no good. By the numbers should be used sparingly and with thought but sometimes it's just the default way the DX operates. I try to deal with it as best as I can but I'd rather have a straight pile most of the time. 73, Dan N3UMH _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-news To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives available at http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net/ This is the DXR reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-news To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives available at http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net/ This is the DXR reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
RE: [DXR] By the Numbers
"A straight pileup allows the loudest and/or the most skillful ops through. " I don't understand the issue; the above is the essence of DXing isn't it? Shouldn't the loudest and/or the strongest prevail? I can think of absolutely no reason to deprive a well engineered station with a skillful operator and the propagation a contact or should we all stand by for the weak and poor operators without propagation? Think about it, Bruce K1MY -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan Zimmerman Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 5:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DXR] By the Numbers I think some of the griping is legitimate. A straight pileup allows the loudest and/or the most skillful ops through. By the numbers COULD allow more DXers to get thru a huge pileup, but only if it is done well and correctly. I would probably have Malpelo Island in the log had he not been operating by numbers, the first time I heard him on 20m. He never got back around to 3's, but he was booming in, and with the number of people he was working in each district, I would have had plenty of time. I would have much preferred a "regular" pileup that night. Couple of nights later, T5W was operating 20 SSB by numbers. He hit 3's, I had no problem (100W + A3S @ 30ft) No gripe there. My biggest problem with operating by numbers is the inconsistency in how it's done. I was pretty frustrated after I sat by the radio for an hour just listening and waiting for 3's to come around for the /0M and he just quit after 0's. If I had know he was going to QRT, I would have spent the time looking for more DX. I agree with the guys and gals that contend that by the numbers should not necessarily be done in numerical order. On the other hand, I can't agree with the people who say to work proportional numbers to the size of the call district, unless the DX is ONLY calling the U.S.A. The fact of the matter is, the 4th call district may be the largest in the U.S., but it's not other places. Just take this area of the world. Let's see. VE4... I think there are a lot more VE7's VE3's and VE2's than there are VE4's. How about an XE4? I've never even heard one. V34? no. 6Y4? TG4? OX4? Not too common. Yes, the few I've mentioned are a smaller fraction of the ham community than the W4's, but we need to let the DX work the DX sometimes. I apologize for picking on the 4's. I don't want to seem like I'm singling out the 4's or attacking the guy who mentioned the 4's before... just an example. I personally think that by the numbers tends to be unfair and frustrate people. You get too many people getting hot under the collar waiting a chance to even TRY to call. You get people in Pennsylvania signing N3xxx/7. That's no good. By the numbers should be used sparingly and with thought but sometimes it's just the default way the DX operates. I try to deal with it as best as I can but I'd rather have a straight pile most of the time. 73, Dan N3UMH _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-news To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives available at http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net/ This is the DXR reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-news To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives available at http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net/ This is the DXR reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DXR] Cinch Jones connectors
For those looking for 8 pin Cinch Jones connectors, try: www.tandmelectronics.com They are listed as B754 & B764 for straight male and panel mount female. Cost is $5.75 the pair. I believe they also have other 8 pin configurations in stock. Bruce, K1MY Sunny Sun Lakes, Arizona Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-news To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives available at http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net/ This is the DXR reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DXR] DXCC question
Over the weekend, on the return from a hamfest, I had a debate with a friend about what qualifies as a legitimate contact for DXCC. Several different situations: situation #1. My station (and call) is used for a multi-multi entry by our club in the DX contest. Are those QSL's, when received, valid for my personal DXCC totals even tho I may not have personally made all of the contacts? situation #2. I visit another ham's station and contact a new one using my call. Does this one count for me? I agree that if he uses my call at his station for the QSO, that is unethical and does not count but what if I make the QSO using my own call? That's OK with the FCC, is it good with the ARRL? situation #3. Our club has a club station with a unique callsign where all of our members can operate. Can the club get a DXCC based on the contacts made using the club's callsign. Thanks in advance, a beer depends on your answers. Bruce K1MY Sunny Sun Lakes, Arizona Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-news To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives available at http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net/ This is the DXR reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DXR] DXCC question - the results are in
As I expected, the responses are divided on the three DXCC questions that I asked of the list yesterday. There is some confusion amongst the active DXers as to what QSO's are eligible for DXCC credit. To get the TRUTH, I have asked Wayne Mills, N7NG, (or as a few of you suggested, "the horse's mouth") for the answer. I expect that he will copy this list with his answer. If he doesn't I will. In summary, my questions (and the responses) were: QUESTION: situation #1. My station (and call) is used for a multi-multi entry by our club in the DX contest. Are those QSL's, when received, valid for my personal DXCC totals even though I may not have personally made all of the contacts? RESPONSES: Divided about 60% yes and 40% no. I believe that the older DXCC rules specifically stated that all contacts must be made by the same operator (the answer would then be no) but that the current rules (Rule 10 - see DXCC home page) no longer say that (answer could be yes). If this is true then the DXCC program has, in fact, changed from being an individual licensee focused program to a station program. Didn't we also used to have separate station and personal licenses? I also recall that in the past an operator on a DXpedition could not contact his own home station for credit (even if he needed it), but that this may also have changed. What say Wayne? Several responders even said that although they believe the DXCC rules allow this, they would not use these QSL's as they believe this would not be in the spirit of DXCC (it is an operator program). QUESTION: situation #2. I visit another ham's station and contact a new one using my call. Does this one count for me? I agree that if he uses my call at his station for the QSO, that is unethical and does not count but what if I make the QSO using my own call? That's OK with the FCC, is it good with the ARRL? ANSWER: About 90% of the responders agree that if YOU make the contact from another's station using your call, it is a good counter. Responders are UNANIMOUS in their opinion that if someone else makes the contact from a station that is not yours using your call (the ARRL calls this a "proxy QSO) that this DOES NOT COUNT. It is interesting that if that other operator makes the contact from your station, it does count. Or does it? See the TRUTH from Wayne on question #1. QUESTION: situation #3. Our club has a club station with a unique call sign where all of our members can operate. Can the club get a DXCC based on the contacts made using the club's call sign. ANSWER: Interesting responses. About 75% of responders said that they knew of club stations that had DXCC but fully 25% said that club stations were not eligible for DXCC since the DXCC program is an operator focused program. Good thread, thanks to all who responded. Several criticized me for asking the list this question because all I would get is opinions, not necessarily the truth. They rightly pointed out that if someone needs an answer to a question such as this, it should be directed to the ARRL DXCC desk. I agree but also believe that we have shown that there is some confusion in the DXCC community and that the ARRL could clarify a few of its rules. Thanks again es 73, Bruce K1MY Sunny Sun Lakes, Arizona Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-news To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives available at http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net/ This is the DXR reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DX-NEWS] VP8 South Georgia
Any news on South Georgia? Today? Tomorrow? Bruce, K1MY
[DX-NEWS] South Georgia
Any news? I haven't heard anything. Thanks, Bruce K1MY
Re: [DX-NEWS] YA5T ON-Line Logs
Worked fine for me. Bruce K1MY - Original Message - From: John Warren Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 9:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [DX-NEWS] YA5T ON-Line Logs >Anyone else having a problem accessing ve9dx.com? I will try from>workcould be my home ISP>NF4AYes. Server won't respond.John, NT5C.---Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems, etcDX-NEWS http://njdxa.org/dx-newsDX-CHAT: http://njdxa.org/dx-chatTo post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED]Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net/
[DX-NEWS] Exccel list
I recall that there is an "excell" listing of all DXCC countries available somewhere. Where is that? Bruce K1MY
[DX-NEWS] Excel List of DXCC
Thanks to all who responded. I'm all set now and don't have to do all the typing. 73, Bruce K1MY
[DX-NEWS] KC6 and others
I'm "mining" old cards for awards. KC6 was Eastern Caroline, what is the name of the new country? ZL9CI was an expedition to Campbell Island. What DXCC country does it count for? Is there a web site that has this kind of info? Bruce, K1MY --- Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems, etc DX-NEWS http://njdxa.org/dx-news DX-CHAT: http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net/
[DX-NEWS] amplifier tubes
Where do you buy your amplifier tubes? Is there any difference (other than price) between the Svetlana and Eimac 3CX800A7 tubes? Thanks, Bruce K1MY --- Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems, etc DX-NEWS http://njdxa.org/dx-news DX-CHAT: http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net/
[DX-NEWS] dead
Is the reflecor dead. Nothing heard recently. Bruce K1MY --- Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems, etc DX-NEWS http://njdxa.org/dx-news DX-CHAT: http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net/
[DX-NEWS] Deleted vs Expunged
Apologies to Bernie W3UR and the Daily DX Bulletin but the following is copied from today's edition (you really should subscribe if you are not): -- Reader K9KK, Rick, asks for an explanation of the difference between deleting a DXCC entity and "removing" it. I believe this comes up in connection with the recent discussion of East Timor/Timor-Leste, the operations during the "UNTAET" period and post-UNTAET period. W3UR says this has been asked a lot lately. I'll try my best to explain this, according to my understanding of it. I do think it's kind of hard to understand. First, the way it used to be: When a country ceased to exist, it became a "deleted" country but still counted toward your DXCC grand total of countries. Hence, some old timers have had 390 or so countries, though there currently are only 335 countries in existence. When DXCC was revamped in 2000, that concept was changed to this: When a country ceases to exist it does not go into you "deleted entities" list but is taken away from your all-time total. Hence, there will be no new "deleted" entities that count in your total. Bernie and I both prefer the old way. My comment is that I, and all DXers that I have discussed this with, also agree that the old way is better. I do not see any logical reason to "expunge" (hope the spelling is right) a credit that was earned by a DXer. The only possible reason that I can even think of is so the "new guys", whoever they are, can get at the top of the all time list without having to work at it for years. Seems foolish to me to ignore the accomplishments of a long time DXer and his high "all time count" when the previous "current country count" is also available. Number 1 plaques are available as is top of the honor roll listing for all "current" countries. Keep the all time counts going. Any chance that we can get the League to reverse this absurd position? 73, Bruce K1MY --- Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems, etc DX-NEWS http://njdxa.org/dx-news DX-CHAT: http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net ---
Re: [DX-NEWS] [DX-CHAT] Deleted vs Expunged
Ron, You are right and wrong and this is the mis understanding everyone has. On the one hand, you can work all of the CURRENT countries, qualify for the DXCC honor roll and top of the honor roll (Number 1 plaque) on that basis. On the other hand TOTAL countries is kind of like a "life time achievement score." It recognizes that you were in the hunt for many years and yes, there is always someone out there with more than me and I've been at it for 44 years. That's fine with me, just let me keep my all-time country credits; I earned each one of them. I know that I'll never get to the top of the all time list and, you know what, I don't think that anyone will ever get there. So what? What I've earned is still an accomplishment as far as I'm concerned. Let's keep 2 scores, current and all-time. 73, Bruce K1MY - Original Message - From: "Ron St.Laurent ND5S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "bruce makas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "DX chat submital" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "DX submital" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 6:47 AM Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Deleted vs Expunged > Bruce, > > I may be missing something, but using your logic, a "new guy" could NEVER > get to the top of the all time list as there are entities he couldn't > possibly work as these entities are on the deleted list. The current method > levels the playing field as available entities are available to all. Under > the new rules attrition will eventually take care of the deleted "good ones" > out there. > > Best 73, > > Ron ND5S > > Visit my Website at: > www.qsl.net/nd5s > > - Original Message - > From: "bruce makas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "DX chat submital" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "DX submital" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:42 AM > Subject: [DX-CHAT] Deleted vs Expunged > > > > Apologies to Bernie W3UR and the Daily DX Bulletin but the following is > > copied from today's edition (you really should subscribe if you are not): > > > > -- > > Reader K9KK, Rick, asks for an explanation of the difference between > > deleting a DXCC entity and "removing" it. I believe this comes up in > > connection with the recent discussion of East Timor/Timor-Leste, the > > operations during the "UNTAET" period and post-UNTAET period. W3UR > > says this has been asked a lot lately. I'll try my best to explain > > this, according to my understanding of it. I do think it's kind of > > hard to understand. First, the way it used to be: When a country > > ceased to exist, it became a "deleted" country but still counted > > toward your DXCC grand total of countries. Hence, some old timers > > have had 390 or so countries, though there currently are only 335 > > countries in existence. When DXCC was revamped in 2000, that concept > > was changed to this: When a country ceases to exist it does not go > > into you "deleted entities" list but is taken away from your all-time > > total. Hence, there will be no new "deleted" entities that count in > > your total. Bernie and I both prefer the old way. > > > > > > My comment is that I, and all DXers that I have discussed this with, also > > agree that the old way is better. I do not see any logical reason to > > "expunge" (hope the spelling is right) a credit that was earned by a DXer. > > The only possible reason that I can even think of is so the "new guys", > > whoever they are, can get at the top of the all time list without having > to > > work at it for years. Seems foolish to me to ignore the accomplishments of > a > > long time DXer and his high "all time count" when the previous "current > > country count" is also available. Number 1 plaques are available as is top > > of the honor roll listing for all "current" countries. Keep the all time > > counts going. > > > > Any chance that we can get the League to reverse this absurd position? > > > > 73, Bruce K1MY > > > > > > Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems > > http://njdxa.org/dx-chat > > > > To post a message, DX related items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA > > http://njdxa.org > > > > > > > --- Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems, etc DX-NEWS http://njdxa.org/dx-news DX-CHAT: http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net ---
Re: [DX-NEWS] [DX-CHAT] Deleted vs Expunged
Hi Charlie, That is the way it was . The new way is, from now on, not only to delete a country from the current list but to expunge (I think that is spelled correctly) it from everyone's all-time total. Eventually when we all die off, there will be no difference between current and all-time total and while we are alive, each time a current country is deleted your all time total goes down by one - just as if it never existed. Not right in my opinion. 73, Bruce K1MY - Original Message - From: "Charles Harpole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:23 AM Subject: Re: [DX-NEWS] [DX-CHAT] Deleted vs Expunged > Looks like everyone can be happy IF: old-timers are allowed to keep their > all-time acquired entity number but they and everyone else will be top of > the honor roll only by confirming all CURRENT entities. The honor of > carrying deleted entities remains but does not count toward top of honor > roll. > > > Maybe? > > Charles Harpole > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > --- Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems, etc DX-NEWS http://njdxa.org/dx-news DX-CHAT: http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net ---
Re: [DX-NEWS] 4W1BK cards
Nice job by Stu to get these out in a timely fashion. Thanks, Stu. Bruce K1MY - Original Message - From: "K9AJ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:15 AM Subject: [DX-NEWS] 4W1BK cards > QSP from WA2MOE: > > >Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 16:34:19 -0700 > >From: Stu Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: 4W1BK cards > > > > > >All 4W1BK cards received by Saturday, 2 August, have been answered and are > >in the mail. I'm current. > > > > WA2MOE > > > --- > Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems, etc > DX-NEWS http://njdxa.org/dx-news > DX-CHAT: http://njdxa.org/dx-chat > To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net > --- > --- Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems, etc DX-NEWS http://njdxa.org/dx-news DX-CHAT: http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net ---
