[e-gold-list] Re: Charles Evans
>>Can someone explain the facts on this case so we can make a good judgment call. Does someone really know the facts ? Hear hear. For all I know E-gold's charges are quite justified. Is Mr. Evans involved in other online currencies at present? Has he made any statements denying or otherwise the charges? Why were these employees terminated last year anyway? More info would be appreciated. New Books at Discount Prices --- Send the right message --- + Today freemail + Get your free, private email address at http://www.today.com.au --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[e-gold-list] Re: Charles Evans
Read here for some interesting disclosures! http://www.systemics.com/legal/affidavit_BD2.txt and for more: http://www.systemics.com/legal/ --- Ben Legume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Can someone explain the facts on this case so we can make a > good judgment call. Does someone really know the facts ? > > Hear hear. For all I know E-gold's charges are quite justified. Is > Mr. Evans involved in other online currencies at present? Has he made > > any statements denying or otherwise the charges? Why were these > employees terminated last year anyway? > > More info would be appreciated. > > > > > > New Books at Discount Prices > --- Send the right message --- > > + Today freemail + > > Get your free, private email address at >http://www.today.com.au > > --- > You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[e-gold-list] Re: Charles Evans
> > Can someone explain the facts on this case so we can make a > > good judgment call. Does someone really know the facts ? > > Hear hear. For all I know E-gold's charges are quite justified. "A defendant is innocent until proven guilty" only applies in the case of criminal charges. Criminal charges can only be issued by a government. This does not mean that Charles is automatically the 'good guy'. It also means that he isn't automatically the 'bad guy'. Same thing goes for G&SR. Everybody is neutral until we actually get some real facts about what is going on. e-gold ltd. should not be able to file *any* lawsuits. Filing a lawsuit entails taking on liabilities (i.e legal retainers, court fees, etc...), correct? e-gold ltd. cannot, and does not, hold *any* liabilities. Some people seem to be waiting, sitting on the edge of their seat, for e-gold to do something, anything, that they can then rant & rave about. They'll look for any opportunity to declare that e-gold is unfit, unwanted, unusable, unetc... > More info would be appreciated. Why? People seem to be having so much fun ripping into the big, bad, evil e-gold. We wouldn't want actual facts to spoil it all now, would we? Viking Coder Worth Two Cents? http://www.two-cents-worth.com/?VikingCoder --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[e-gold-list] Re: Charles Evans
> e-gold ltd. should not be able to file *any* lawsuits. Filing a lawsuit > entails taking on liabilities (i.e legal retainers, court fees, etc...), > correct? e-gold ltd. cannot, and does not, hold *any* liabilities. > I'll have to disagree on that one. Waiving the right to file _any_ lawsuits puts them in the position of being able to ripped off by anyone without fear of reprisal. It would be the legal equivalent of gun control, b.k.a. victim disarmament. Which is the greater liability--having a bazillion dollars in your house and the possibility of legal reprisal if you shoot someone who breaks in (or who you _think_ is breaking in), or having a bazillion dollars in your basement and letting the whole world know that you refuse to defend it with force? Besides, if legal retainers, courts fees and such things are "liabilities," well, gee wiz doesn't e-gold limited already pay rent, utilities and employee salaries? I also think the lawsuit under discussion was filed by Gold & Silver Reserve, not e-gold, ltd., but that is not relevant to my point. --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
