Re: [ECOLOG-L] Exclusive homosexuality

2013-03-28 Thread David V Howe
Female maternal relatives of gay men have higher fecundity, thus providing a 
genetic mechanism for the inclusive fitness hypothesis.
See the work of  Andrea Camperio Ciani and others:
for example: 
Factors associated with higher fecundity in female maternal relatives of 
homosexual men. The Journal of Sexual Medicine 2012.




 From: Culliney, Thomas W - APHIS thomas.w.culli...@aphis.usda.gov
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU 
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Exclusive homosexuality
  
Not every trait need be for some purpose (i.e., an adaptation). Human 
sexuality is complex, and homosexuality is a facet of it. Perhaps it has 
something to do with the fact that humans are sexually receptive at all times 
and engage in sex not only for procreation, but also for recreation.

Tom Culliney


-Original Message-
From: Mitch Cruzan [mailto:cru...@pdx.edu] 
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:31 PM
To: Culliney, Thomas W - APHIS
Cc: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Exclusive homosexuality


This neglects that fact that homosexuality is not an accident of history or 
just a artifact of modern human societies.  This trait is too widespread and 
occurs at too high a frequency in human populations to be explained by chance 
- there must have been a selective advantage in the past.  The widespread 
nature of this trait across human populations suggests that it must have been 
present in the human lineage by at least the time of the second major 
migration of hominids out of Africa around
60,000 ybp.  The inclusive fitness argument mentioned several times by 
contributors to this listserve is probably the best explanation for the 
maintenance of homosexuality in human populations.

Mitch Cruzan

On 3/28/2013 7:46 AM, Culliney, Thomas W - APHIS wrote:
 I was referring to strict homosexuality in humans. Granted, there probably 
 are cases in which children of a (perhaps deceased) sibling or other close 
 relative would be raised by a homosexual, thus raising his or her inclusive 
 fitness, but such cases would be rare. The Darwinian fitness of a strict 
 homosexual is, as a rule, zero. Helpers at the nest do forgo their own 
 reproduction to help relatives raise offspring, but, as far as I know, there 
 is no requirement for them to be homosexual.

 Tom Culliney

 From: Jonathan Colburn [mailto:col...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:05 AM
 To: Culliney, Thomas W - APHIS
 Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Exclusive homosexuality


 Hi Tom,

 Respectfully, the Darwinian fitness sounds like inclusive fitness, which is 
 often measured by reproductive success.  However, reproductive success of a 
 homosexual is not always a good measure of their inclusive fitness (e.g. 
 helpers at the nest).  Ultimately, any action that staves off fixation of 
 alleles to zero is about as close as we can come to determining that 
 something is inclusively fit...
 On Mar 28, 2013 9:20 AM, Culliney, Thomas W - APHIS 
 thomas.w.culli...@aphis.usda.govmailto:thomas.w.culli...@aphis.usda.gov 
 wrote:
 I note that the albatross article mentioned the words natural and 
 normal. Homosexuality certainly is natural, as it occurs in nature, in 
 animals from groups ranging from arthropods to mammals (who knows what goes 
 on in the plant kingdom?). In all cases, there appears to be an adaptive 
 reason for the behavior. However, in its reproductive consequences, 
 exclusive or strict homosexuality, as exhibited in humans, cannot be 
 considered normal sexual behavior. The Darwinian fitness of homosexuals is 
 zero. To the extent that there is a genetic component to the behavior in 
 humans, with their diverse sexuality, the trait undoubtedly persists in the 
 population largely through the actions of bisexual individuals leading to 
 the production of offspring.

 The above is an argument strictly from a biological perspective, and is not 
 a moral judgment. What two consenting adults do in private is their own 
 business and no one else's.

 Tom Culliney

 -Original Message-
 From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news 
 [mailto:ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDUmailto:ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU] 
 On Behalf Of Kristen Dybala
 Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:55 PM
 To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDUmailto:ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Expedition notice and question

 Laysan albatrosses are a fairly well-known example. Here's a (lengthy) 
 article describing it:
 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/04/magazine/04animals-t.html?pagewanted
 =all

 -Kristen


 On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Merav Vonshak 
 merav...@gmail.commailto:merav...@gmail.com wrote:

 This story reminds me of a similar story - a male pair of Griffon 
 vultures (Gyps fulvus). They incubated eggs and reared other pairs'
 youngs as part of a breeding in captivity effort in Israel some years ago.
 Merav

 Merav Vonshak
 Postdoctoral Fellow
 Gordon Laboratory
 Department of 

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Jordan's rule

2012-08-29 Thread David V Howe
this appears to be the source:
Jordan, D.S. (1891) Temperature and vertebrae: a study in evolution. 
Wilder-Quarter Century Books, New York. 



 From: Lyndell Bade lyndell.b...@gmail.com
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU 
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Jordan's rule
  
I agree with Dr. Resetarits.  It seems to me that it would be associated
with David Starr Jordan.  Please see:

http://vertebrates.si.edu/fishes/ichthyology_history/ichs_colls/jordan_david.html


http://www25-temp.uua.org/uuhs/duub/articles/davidstarrjordan.html

(The wikipedia page on him does not appear to be complete and needs
editing.  I caught some mistakes just scrolling through it.)

Best,
Lyndell


On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Resetarits, William 
william.resetar...@ttu.edu wrote:

 I have no direct info on this, but it seems the most likely scenario is a
 connection to the famous Ichthyologist and Evolutionary biologist David
 Starr Jordan.

 William J. Resetarits, Jr
 Professor
 Department of Biological Sciences
 Texas Tech University
 Lubbock, Texas  79409-3131
 Phone: (806) 742-2710, ext.300
 Fax (806) 742-2963




 On 8/29/12 9:25 AM, Jan Ygberg jygb...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dear all
 
 Maybe this one? :
 
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan_algebra
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascual_Jordan
 
 Cheers
 
 
 Jan H. N. Ygberg
 Public Relations
 Resident Naturalists Programme Coordinator
 
                                  EXPLORER'S INN
                                            in the
                      TAMBOPATA NATIONAL RESERVE
 A PERUVIAN SAFARIS ECO LODGE ­ A LODGE WITH A DIFFERENCE
 Since 1976 A SHOWCASE OF THE AMAZON RAINFOREST
 Peruvian Safaris S.A
 Alcanfores 459 - Miraflores
 Lima 18 - Peru
 Phone: (51 1) 447 
 Fax: (51 1) 241 8427
 E-mail: safa...@amauta.rcp.net.pe / sa...@explorersinn.com
 Web Site: http://www.explorersinn.com/
 Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/explorerslodge
 Twitter: @explorersinn
 
 2012/8/28 Philippe Golay g...@geneva-link.ch
 
  Dear all,
 
  do you know who coined the expression « Jordan¹s rule » or « Jordan¹s
 law »
  (fish species develop more vertebrae in a cold environment than in a
 warm
  one) ?
 
  Thank you in advance.
  Truly yours.
 
  Philippe
 
  
 
  Philippe GOLAY
  elapsoïdea
  21, chemin du Moulin
  CH ­ 1233 Bernex
  tel : +41(0)22 7771131
  mail : g...@geneva-link.ch
 
  
  L¹autre jour, au fond d¹un vallon, Un serpent piqua Jean Fréron. Que
  pensez-vous qu¹il arriva? Ce fut le serpent qui creva.. (Voltaire,
 Poésies
  mêlées)
 
 
 
 
 --






Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are ecologists the problem?

2009-09-13 Thread David V Howe
Here is a recent and relevant study:
Harold J Marlow, William K Hayes, Samuel Soret, Ronald L Carter, Ernest R 
Schwab and Joan Sabaté. (2009) Diet and the environment: does what you eat 
matter?
Am J Clin Nutr 89: 1699S-1703S.





From: malcolm McCallum malcolm.mccal...@herpconbio.org
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2009 4:07:02 PM
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are ecologists the problem?

Wayne,
You nailed it.  I doubt if anyone has, but, I suspect that there would
just be different environmental problems not a reduction.  It is
inevitable that every action has a reaction.

(also, the previous post was not a response to your email, I just
posted on your thread!)

M

On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Wayne Tyson landr...@cox.net wrote:
 Ecolog:

 What would the actual effect on species diversity of universal
 vegetarianism? Has anyone done the math?

 WT


 - Original Message - From: James J. Roper jjro...@gmail.com
 To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
 Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 11:58 AM
 Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are ecologists the problem?


 A well-known statistic is that there are as many domestic animals bred
 for food for people as there are people in the world, or more.  If we
 consider a 10% conversion of food to mass of the consumer, the logic is
 undeniable that if all ate lower on the food chain, we could use less
 land to do it with.  Also, we could do it with less energy.  Another
 detail is that more land is used to grow food for those animals than to
 grow food for people. Just switching the land to grow food for people
 instead of animals would mean that we could do this on much less land.
 Habitat loss is one of the driving forces of extinctions world wide.
 But also, pollution from high efficiency animal production is another
 huge issue (pigs and chickens). Not to mention land degradation due to
 grazing.

 Also well known - vegetarian diets can provide all the nutrients that
 normal people need.

 QED - a vegetarian diet would be better for the planet (and we would
 have much smaller problems with obesity!).

 Cheers,

 Jim

 malcolm McCallum wrote on 09-Sep-09 0:50:

 I tend to believe that any absolute answer that is declared an end all
 answer
 is probably not the answer.  For example, I'm not convinced that everyone
 jumping into a vegetarian diet is going to suddenly or even slowly
 save the world.
 Especially, considering that some of these stats are based on unrealistic
 estimates.

 For example, suggesting that x acres of corn would feed x number of cows
 and
 that would feed x number of people whereas the x acres of corn would feed
 way
 more people is flawed.  Humans cannot survive on a corn diet.  Even if
 we expanded
 this to grains and soybeans, humans cannot survive on a corn-soybean
 diet.
 Why?  because vegetables in general are low in two or three essential
 amino acids
 that humans must get in their diet.  those amino acids are produced by
 animals
 and so you must ultimately get them from animals or artificially
 produced products.



 



 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.91/2363 - Release Date: 09/11/09
 09:15:00




-- 
Malcolm L. McCallum
Associate Professor of Biology
Managing Editor,
Herpetological Conservation and Biology
Texas AM University-Texarkana
Fall Teaching Schedule:
Vertebrate Biology - TR 10-11:40; General Ecology - MW 1-2:40pm;
Forensic Science -  W 6-9:40pm
Office Hourse- TBA

1880's: There's lots of good fish in the sea  W.S. Gilbert
1990's:  Many fish stocks depleted due to overfishing, habitat loss,
            and pollution.
2000:  Marine reserves, ecosystem restoration, and pollution reduction
          MAY help restore populations.
2022: Soylent Green is People!

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any
attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not
the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and
destroy all copies of the original message.



[ECOLOG-L] Polgar Fellows sought

2009-06-15 Thread David V Howe
The Hudson River Foundation is developing a directory of Tibor T. Polgar 
Fellows.
If you are a past participant, please email Helena: hel...@hudsonriver.org or 
call 212-483-7667. 
If you know any former Fellows, please pass on this information.
Thank you.


[ECOLOG-L] Postdoc position: Research in ecology education/curriculum design, New Jersey

2009-03-26 Thread David V Howe
The Rutgers University Graduate School of Education is seeking to fill a 
postdoctoral position in ecology education/curriculum design.  This 
position is part of a 3 year IES funded project:  “Systems and Cycles: 
Using Structure-Behavior-Function Thinking as a Conceptual Tool for 
Understanding Complex Natural Systems in Middle School Science.” This is 
an interdisciplinary project across the Graduate School of Education and 
School of Environmental and Biological Sciences at Rutgers University and 
the College of Computing at Georgia Institute of Technology.

Responsibilities include taking a leadership role in designing and 
packaging curriculum units, developing teacher materials and professional 
development, and coordinating classroom research and data analysis. This 
individual will be a collaborator on our research team who will be fully 
involved in research and writing.  The successful candidate will have 
demonstrated success in research and scholarly publication in the areas of 
science education and curriculum design.

Qualifications: PhD required. Must have experience with curriculum design 
and technology-enhanced learning environments. Strong background in 
biology or environmental science preferred.

Start date: June 1, 2009
Interested candidates should send a letter of inquiry and CV to Dr. Cindy 
Hmelo-Silver (cindy.hmelo-sil...@gse.rutgers.edu) or Dr Rebecca Jordan 
(rebeccacjor...@yahoo.com).


Re: [ECOLOG-L] Freeware for undergrad ecology course?

2009-02-08 Thread David V Howe
Have you tried Populus?
http://www.cbs.umn.edu/populus/index.html

~David Howe
Rutgers University
Lecturer, Department of Ecology, Evolution,  Natural Resources
Educational Technologist, Program in Science Learning


- Original Message 
From: Schlosser Jacqueline (seal) s...@zhaw.ch
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2009 10:56:23 AM
Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Freeware for undergrad ecology course?

Dear Ecologger

I'm looking for a free and easy to use software to use in my ecology course. 
For one lab exercice, my students have to fill in cohort tables (survivorship, 
mortality, fecundity etc.) to draw different survivorship curves. To make this 
exercice more interesting and applied, I'd like to find a program that would 
allow the students to enter this data and get a graph back, that shows them the 
popultation increas/decrease over the next 100-200 years. With this program 
they could play with the data and see what implications different management 
decisions (ie protecting early life stage vs. late life stages) would have for 
this population. 

Does anyone know of such a free/shareware? I appreciate your help.
Sincerely,
__

Jacqueline Schlosser, Ph.D.
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences 
Institut of Natural Resource Sciences
Grüental, Postfach 335
CH-8820 Wädenswil


Telefon +41 (0)58 934 5792
Fax +41 (0)58 934 5853

www.cascadesystems.ch 
www.unr.ch
www.lsfm.zhaw.ch