Re: [ECOLOG-L] fixed vs. random effects in field research

2016-05-17 Thread Gabriel Barros
Hi Dr. Grossman,

The definition of fixed and random independent variables is really an
eternal struggle.
I believe the book of Tony Underwood might help you someway.

Underwood, A.J. Experiments in ecology: their logical design and
interpretation using analysis of variance, xviii, 504p. Cambridge
University Press, 1996.

Best regards,

Gabriel

*Gabriel Barros Gonçalves de Souza*
Biologist - M.Sc. in Ecology and Biomonitoring
PhD Candidate in Ecology at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
Laboratory of Fishery Biology and Technology
CRBio: 59.707/05-D
Cel: +55 (71) 99187-9065
CV Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/4012374701934609

2016-05-17 15:12 GMT-03:00 Gary Grossman <gdgross...@gmail.com>:

> I'm having a bit of difficulty getting a clear understanding of what
> should be considered a fixed vs. a random effect in a linear mixed model
> analysis of field data. Even the statisticians seem to say "it depends on
> who's defining it" or "sometimes the same treatment/variable can be
> either". Some examples may help, let's say I collected samples annually in
> three sites and wanted to test for the effect of daily rainfall, daily
> temperature, and density, on recruitment of individuals in the following
> year. Using the lmer function in R which of these would be fixed effects
> and which would be random? A reference or two would help. I really couldn't
> find much in a google search on field studies, but I didn't go to anything
> like zoological abstracts. TIA, g2
>
> --
> Gary D. Grossman, PhD
> Fellow, American Fisheries Soc.
>
> Professor of Animal Ecology
> Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources
> University of Georgia
> Athens, GA, USA 30602
>
> Website - Science, Art (G. Grossman Fine Art) and Music
> www.garygrossman.net
>
> Board of Editors - Animal Biodiversity and Conservation
> Editorial Board - Freshwater Biology
> Editorial Board - Ecology Freshwater Fish
>
> Hutson Gallery Provincetown, MA - www.hutsongallery.net/artists.html
>
>
>


Re: [ECOLOG-L] Community Analysis Hypothesis Tests

2011-04-10 Thread Gabriel Barros
Hi Travis,

I believe that the use of ANOSIM or MANOVA (I do prefer PERMANOVA) depends
of your question.
The multivariate Analysis of variance will test the significance in the
difference among location (means). Thus, you could test if sites are
significant differents (sum or average of years) or test if there are
significant differences among years (sum or average of sites).
Using ANOSIM you could test the same things, but this analysis will test the
similarity (through a similarity matrix using a distance index) among
factors defined a priori (years or sites).
Using MDS will allow you to observe the possible configurations of the
groups tested in ANOSIM (different years or sites). Following the Tony
Underwood's opinion: MDS is just a graph.
I think that sounds pretty enough. The use of Canonical Correspondence
Analysis depends if you have abiotic data and if you want to test the
relationship among biotic and abiotic variables.
I agree with James Novak about the importance of statistical tests.
Regards.

*Gabriel Barros Gonçalves de Souza*
Bachelor in Biological Sciences
Master in Ecology and Biomonitoring
CRBio: 59.707/05-D
Cel: (71) 8744-5246
CV Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/4012374701934609
---
Laboratório de Ecologia Bentônica (LEB)
Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)


2011/4/2 Isabelle Wolf easyw...@web.de

 Hi Travis, I concur with using PRIMER ver 6 and the two manuals that come
 with it for the proposed analysis. Further to this, I highly recommend
 using
 PERMANOVA+, an add-on to Primer ver 6, and its manual. It accommodates very
 complex designs and any number of factors and should be well suited for your
 purpose.

 Dr. Isabelle Wolf
 *
 Research and Analysis Officer
 Parks and Wildlife Group
 Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water (NSW)
 Level 2, Hurstville, NSW 2220
 isabelle.w...@environment.nsw.gov.au
 Ph: 02 9585 6672
 Fax: 02 9585 6601


 - Original Message - From: Liz Pryde elizabethpr...@gmail.com

 To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
 Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 8:01 PM

 Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Community Analysis Hypothesis Tests


 Hi Travis,

 As it is a community comparison I think ANOSIM is still widely accepted to
 test for differences between treatments/time, particularly in the marine
 literature. Manuel is correct, it will not tell you the biological reason
 behind a difference and cannot really give a magnitude of difference per se
 (depending on the design of the study) but it does give a meaningful p
 value
 based on permutations of configurations of the presence-absence matrix. In
 this way its limitations are analogous with ANOVAs. As this is a
 comparative
 study I would think that a statistically significant p value would be
 meaningful.

 However, teasing out the question why the difference requires closer
 examination and comparisons between the community matrices and say,
 environmental variables. Examples of these types of further analyses can be
 found in the PRIMER manuals (ver 6) and in the extensive literature that
 can
 be found on the PRIMER-E website.

 Hope that helps,
 Liz



 On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Manuel Spínola mspinol...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Hi Travis,

 I don't think that a p-value is going to tell you if there is a biological
 meaningful difference between community.

 What will be the metrics that you are planning to use with ANOSIM ?

 Without seeing the data I can tell you that there is a difference between
 communities, but the important question is how different they are, so you
 can assess a practical or biological significance and a p-value is not
 going
 to tell you that.

 Best,

 Manuel


 On 28/03/2011 07:14 a.m., T. Travis Brown wrote:

  Hello,  I am trying to determine the best way to test for a difference in
 the overall mussel community found in a stream between 1980 and 2008.  I
 have seven sites with presence/absence data.  In addition to various
 descriptive statistics and graphs (nonmetric multidimensional scaling) I
 would like to use ANOSIM because it offers a P-value, and answers the
 question: well, is there a difference or not?.  I am not as up-to-date
 on
 this literature as I would like to be.  Does anyone know if this is still
 an
 accepted test?  Would some type of multi-response permutation procedure
 be
 better?


 T. Travis Brown
 travisbrow...@excite.com



 --
 *Manuel Spínola, Ph.D.*
 Instituto Internacional en Conservación y Manejo de Vida Silvestre
 Universidad Nacional
 Apartado 1350-3000
 Heredia
 COSTA RICA
 mspin...@una.ac.cr
 mspinol...@gmail.com
 Teléfono: (506) 2277-3598
 Fax: (506) 2237-7036
 Personal website: Lobito de río 
 https://sites.google.com/site/lobitoderio/
 Institutional website: ICOMVIS http://www.icomvis.una.ac.cr/




 --
 Liz Pryde
 PhD Candidate (off-campus)
 School