Min n CFA clarification

2001-08-18 Thread Alexandre Moura



Dear Marianne,

this example was extracted from LISREL´s manual 
(Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS command language)on page 
53. 

"(...) There are three sets of parameters in the 
model: (1) the four factor loadings corresponding to the paths from Verbal and 
Math to the observed variables, (2) The correlation between Verbal and Math, and 
(3) the four error variances of the observed variables."




I hope this helps. 

Best 
regards,

Alexandre 
Moura.
P.S. It may help to post your message on SEMNET. 
http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=semnetD=1H=0O=DT=1


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Marianne 
  and Dimitrios 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2001 12:49 
  PM
  Subject: Min n CFA clarification
  Let me clarify my previous posting. I want to do a confirmatory 
  factoranalysis to validate a questionnaire. There are 45 questions 
  (subjectsanswer using a 1-5 scale). Theoretically, there are 3 subscales 
  with15 items on each. In a CFA, that gives me 3 factors, 45 
  error terms,14 factor loadings on each of 3 factors, and 3 covariances. I 
  figurethat gives me 93 parameters. That's the part I need somebody to 
  verifyfor me. Have I counted the number of parameters correctly? If 
  so,then I should have at least a 1:10 and at best a 1:20 ratio 
  ofsubjects to parameters. Hence, the estimate of 930-1860 subjects. 
  Isthis correct?Thanks to all who are helping me with 
  this.Marianne=Instructions 
  for joining and leaving this list and remarks aboutthe problem of 
  INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available 
  at 
  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/=


Confidence interval for Pearson Correlation

2001-07-20 Thread Alexandre Moura

Dear Members,

How can I construct a confidence interval about Pearson correlation using
standard error and t value? What is the formula?

Regards,

Alexandre Moura.




=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=



Re: Factor Analysis

2001-06-16 Thread Alexandre Moura

Dear Haytham,

other issue concern with a measure of the latent construct is the
unidimensionality.  Hair et alli(1998): unidimensionality is an assumption
underlying the calculation of reliability and is demonstraded when
indicators of a construct have acceptable fit on a
single-factor(one-dimensional) model.(...) The use of reliability measures,
such Cronbach´s alpha, does not ensure unidimensionality but instead assumes
it exists. The researcher is encouraged to perform unidimensionality tests
on all multiple-indicator constructs before assessing their reliability.

This reference is very important:

Gerbing, David W., Anderson, James C. An updated paadigm for scale
development incorporating unidimensionality and its assesment.

Best regards,

Alexandre Moura.
P.S. Please accept my apologies for my English mistakes.



- Original Message -
From: haytham siala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 5:40 PM
Subject: Factor Analysis


 Hi,
 I will appreciate if someone can help me with this question: if factors
 extracted from a factor analysis were found to be reliable (using an
 internal consistency test like a Cronbach alpha), can they be used to
 represent a measure of the latent construct? If yes, are there any
 references or books that justify this technique?






 =
 Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
 the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
   http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
 =




=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=



Re: Factor Analysis

2001-06-16 Thread Alexandre Moura

The complete reference:

Gerbing, David W., Anderson, James C. An updated paradigm for scale
development incorporating unidimensionality and its assesment. Journal of
Marketing Research. Vol. XXV (May 1988).

Alexandre Moura.

- Original Message -
From: Alexandre Moura [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: Factor Analysis


 Dear Haytham,

 other issue concern with a measure of the latent construct is the
 unidimensionality.  Hair et alli(1998): unidimensionality is an
assumption
 underlying the calculation of reliability and is demonstraded when
 indicators of a construct have acceptable fit on a
 single-factor(one-dimensional) model.(...) The use of reliability
measures,
 such Cronbach´s alpha, does not ensure unidimensionality but instead
assumes
 it exists. The researcher is encouraged to perform unidimensionality tests
 on all multiple-indicator constructs before assessing their reliability.

 This reference is very important:

 Gerbing, David W., Anderson, James C. An updated paadigm for scale
 development incorporating unidimensionality and its assesment.

 Best regards,

 Alexandre Moura.
 P.S. Please accept my apologies for my English mistakes.



 - Original Message -
 From: haytham siala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 5:40 PM
 Subject: Factor Analysis


  Hi,
  I will appreciate if someone can help me with this question: if factors
  extracted from a factor analysis were found to be reliable (using an
  internal consistency test like a Cronbach alpha), can they be used to
  represent a measure of the latent construct? If yes, are there any
  references or books that justify this technique?
 
 
 
 
 
 
  =
  Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
  the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
  =




 =
 Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
 the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
   http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
 =



=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=