Re: [Elecraft] Code Buddy

2005-12-06 Thread Dave Sublette

Jeff,

I wish I were close to you so that I could help, but KY to the West 
Coast is a bit far. I would, however, like to commend and encourage you 
to work on your code speed. On the air experience is great, but there 
are alternatives. Some keyers have an option to send random code groups. 
Also, there are computer programs to help you train for increased speed. 
Just a couple of hints from an old guy who has been at it over 50 years 
now:


1) There is no magice formula, no tricky technique that will get you 
there quicker, regardless of what some advertisements say. Regular 
practice, daily if possible, is the method to do it. Steady and sure 
progress, sometimes frustrating, will get you there. The catch here is 
that, as adults, we have other responsibilities tht demand our time. It 
will take a disiplined approach to keep a schedule of practice. Some 
folks listen to code tapes (or CDs) in the car during a long commute to 
work.


2) You may have to take a break after a bit. Perhaps you will have to 
limit your practice sessions to 15 minutes or so. This is tiring stuff 
and the mind gets saturated easily.


3) If you use a computer, set the character speed at 18 to 20 wpm, even 
if the code speed is lower. Learning to hear and recognize the 
characters at speed will help the ability to copy when the space between 
characters shortens as the overall spped of transmisson increases.


4) Spend a little time working contests. You don't have to enter. Most 
contest exchanges are simple and repetitive and everyone sends fast. It 
will help contition your ear and brain to comprehend faster code, but 
only a few characters at a time.


5) Are you a musician or do you like to listen to music? Try listening 
to some Bach or Motzart for a few minutes before your code sessions. I 
believe that will help.


Good luck Jeff. Learning the code is its own reward. It /IS/ like riding 
a bicycle. I go away for weeks at a time, on occasion, and when I get 
back to it, I am back to full speed within minutes.


73,

Dave, K4TO
j s wrote:


I've been copying/sending at about 9 wpm for too long.
I very much want to increase my speed, but I need
someone who is patient to help me do that.  If you are
interested and in the western U.S., especially
California, please email me.
 -Jeff




__ 
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. 
Just $16.99/mo. or less. 
dsl.yahoo.com 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


FW: [Elecraft] Code Buddy (Motzart = better CW)

2005-12-06 Thread Darwin, Keith

Dave, you may be right but, as one who doesn't like classical music, I
read your music tip a bit differently.

I'm thinking ... yea, listen to classical music for a while.  After
that CW will be like music to your ears and you'll be able to tolerate a
longer practice session.  In fact, if you want to listen to CW all day
and not be irritated, precede it with 10 minutes of Bagpipe music!
After 10 minutes anything will sound good!

Sorry, couldn't resist ...

Speaking of bagpipes, do you know why pipers walk while they play?  To
get away from the sound!

- Keith KD1E -

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Sublette

*snip*

5) Are you a musician or do you like to listen to music? Try listening
to some Bach or Motzart for a few minutes before your code sessions. I
believe that will help.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] No matter what I do... Cake!

2005-12-06 Thread Darwin, Keith
Thanks Vin!

While driving to church one day, I spotted a car at a red light.  The
driver was a retired man in a suit and tie.  His passenger was a well
dressed lady in her mid 60's.  I concluded they were on their way to
church, just like my family and me.  On the roof of the car, right above
the driver's head was a home-made layer cake on a plate with cellophane
wrap around it and tooth picks to keep the cellophane off the frosting.
The light turned green and off he went before I had a chance to signal
to him.

That was almost 10 years ago.  I wonder if she is speaking to him yet?

- Keith -

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of V Cortina
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 8:32 PM
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] No matter what I do...

Since I had placed the box on the right side of the roof ...

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Code Buddy (Motzart = better CW)

2005-12-06 Thread Dave Sublette

Hi Keith,

Yup, I know that joke about the pipers. I have friends who are pipers. I 
am a trumpet player. I enjoy many types of music, but my favorite is big 
band music from the 20's 30's and 40's. I play lead trumpet in a 16 
piece big band. We are all retired and we play in retirement homes, 
nursing homes, senior centers, etc. We played 41 times last year. We 
play a one hour show and, on occasion, a two hour show.


I have a nephew and his wife who are both pipers. I have a picture, 
taken from behind two of my grandchildren who are sitting and listening 
to them play the pipes, with both hands over their ears. It is a 
classic. I show it to my piper friends often.


There is nothing better to me than ballet without the dancing and opera 
without the singing.


73,

Dave

Darwin, Keith wrote:


Dave, you may be right but, as one who doesn't like classical music, I
read your music tip a bit differently.

I'm thinking ... yea, listen to classical music for a while.  After
that CW will be like music to your ears and you'll be able to tolerate a
longer practice session.  In fact, if you want to listen to CW all day
and not be irritated, precede it with 10 minutes of Bagpipe music!
After 10 minutes anything will sound good!

Sorry, couldn't resist ...

Speaking of bagpipes, do you know why pipers walk while they play?  To
get away from the sound!

- Keith KD1E -

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Sublette

*snip*

5) Are you a musician or do you like to listen to music? Try listening
to some Bach or Motzart for a few minutes before your code sessions. I
believe that will help.


 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] KXOD1 paddle testing

2005-12-06 Thread kurt wetter
Hello Elecraft,

if still  a tester needed for the paddle, i would be interested.

I am an active CW op on the SOTA (summits on the air) programm in central 
europe on 7030 kc.

using K2.
 73 kurt HB9AFI
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Soler Controllers

2005-12-06 Thread Don Brown
Hi

I have been supplying a Solar Charge Controller Kit for several years. This
controller will keep a SLA or LA 12 volt battery charged from solar panels
of 3 to about 150 watts. Batteries of 2 amp hour to 110 amp hour have been
used with these controllers.

The new batch of circuit boards I received had a problem from the board 
supplier and had to be made over. This delayed shipment on a few orders but 
I have the corrected circuit boards now and all orders have shipped. (The 
silk screen was on the wrong side of the board.. go figure.)

The kit is $30 or two for $50 check or money order and includes all the 
parts and
documentation required to build the controller, less a box to mount it into.

I also still have about 8-10 of the low power controller. This
controller will handle up to 1.5 amps or about 20 watts. This version will
power a KX1, K1 or QRP K2. The price for this version is $16

order from:

Don Brown
KD5NDB
19132 Falls Creek Drive
Flint, Texas 75762

The price includes US postage

Thanks

Don 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Solar Controllers

2005-12-06 Thread paul hendershott
I built 2 of Don's controllers for Field Day a while back and they worked 
great! Simple to build and an excellent value in my opinion!  
   
  73
  Paul
  w9bbr
   
   
   
   
  Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi

I have been supplying a Solar Charge Controller Kit for several years. This
controller will keep a SLA or LA 12 volt battery charged from solar panels
of 3 to about 150 watts. Batteries of 2 amp hour to 110 amp hour have been
used with these controllers.

The new batch of circuit boards I received had a problem from the board 
supplier and had to be made over. This delayed shipment on a few orders but 
I have the corrected circuit boards now and all orders have shipped. (The 
silk screen was on the wrong side of the board.. go figure.)

The kit is $30 or two for $50 check or money order and includes all the 
parts and
documentation required to build the controller, less a box to mount it into.

I also still have about 8-10 of the low power controller. This
controller will handle up to 1.5 amps or about 20 watts. This version will
power a KX1, K1 or QRP K2. The price for this version is $16

order from:

Don Brown
KD5NDB
19132 Falls Creek Drive
Flint, Texas 75762

The price includes US postage

Thanks

Don 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
  

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] ARRL 160

2005-12-06 Thread Tom Althoff
If anyone needs a QSL from Orange County, NY for the ARRL 160M test (or any
other QSO's for that matter) send SASE and I'll get one out to you.

Tom K2TA
K2/AT/100  #1117

Tom Althoff
PO Box 1259
Greenwood Lake, NY 10925

- Original Message - 
From: J F [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 7:38 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] ARRL 160


 Greetings All,

 I'd like to collect QSLs from everyone using an
 Elecraft in the contest this past weekend. I managed
 to work all 50 states and thought it would be really
 neat it they were all Elecraft users.

 There are some really outstanding scores from K2 users
 posted on 3830 already.

 This was the first time I used the Rx Antenna feature
 and it was invaluable.

 Thanks to everyone for a great 'test!

 73,
 Julius
 n2wn
 K2/100 #3311
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] FS Like new Palm Tungsten E2

2005-12-06 Thread Rod N0RC

Pictures and details at: http://users.frii.com/rwc/fs/

--
73, Rod N0RC

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] N8LP wattmeter kits

2005-12-06 Thread Larry Phipps



Just in time for Christmas... sort of.  For all of you who expressed 
interest in the LP-200 project, I have added Buy Now PayPal buttons on 
the LP-200 webpage. Deliveries will start in early January, due to 
manufacturing lead time on the PCB and bottom plate.


I made some small changes, which include adding the HP dual Schottky 
diode detector, which eliminates diode matching and some of the 
calibration procedure... and I also changed some of the cal screens, 
adding a second gain screen for high power, and an offset screen for 
zero'ing out the opamp offset error.


I have also started a new wattmeter project, the LP-300, which is a 
handheld, battery operated directional wattmeter with digital readout. 
The project is in the prototype/testing phase, and should be ready in 
2-3 weeks. It borrows heavily from the LP-100 and LP-200, has digital 
readout and a number of features important for portable use. I mention 
this only because I thought you should all know about it in case you 
feel it is better suited to your needs than the LP-200. I believe the 
three wattmeters provide different needs, but there is obviously some 
overlap of features since they are all wattmeters ;-)


I have also added a webpage with a comparison matrix of the three 
projects. If you go to my home page, www.telepostinc.com, you will find 
links in the LATEST NEWS section to the LP-200, comparison matrix and a 
preliminary look at the LP-300. 


73,
Larry N8LP
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] ARRL 160 Rx antenna

2005-12-06 Thread Able2fly
 
Julius,
 
Would you (or anyone) please elaborate on the use  of an Rx antenna? 
 
Thanks
Bill  K3UJ


This was  the first time I used the Rx Antenna feature
and it was  invaluable.

Thanks to everyone for a great  'test!

73,
Julius
n2wn
K2/100 #3311


 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] ARRL 160 Rx antenna

2005-12-06 Thread Don Wilhelm
Bill,

Often low efficiency antennas make great low noise receiving antennas -
example is a multiturn loop which can be quite directional, but transmit
efficincy would be almost 'zip'.  Another example is traveling wave antennas
such as the Beverage - which also are directional, but the efficiency is low
and therefore unsuitable for transmitting.

By using the K2 Rant, one can automatically select the Rx antenna on any
band separate from the selection of the transmitting antenna.

This is often used with great success on 160 (and 80 meters) where a low
noise directional antenna is used for receiving and a vertical is used for
transmitting.

73,
Don W3FPR

 -Original Message-

 Julius,

 Would you (or anyone) please elaborate on the use  of an Rx antenna?

 Thanks
 Bill  K3UJ
 

 This was  the first time I used the Rx Antenna feature
 and it was  invaluable.

 Thanks to everyone for a great  'test!

 73,
 Julius
 n2wn
 K2/100 #3311



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Using Separate Rx and Tx Antennas (WAS: ARRL 160 Rx antenna)

2005-12-06 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
It allows you to use a separate antenna for receiving. Often such an antenna
can provide a superior signal-to-noise ratio than the main antenna,
especially if you're using a vertical for transmitting. I have a wire a
couple of feet above the ground running along my fence that often provides
superior reception over the doublet up high, especially on the
lower-frequency bands where QRN is more of an issue. QRN, especially
man-made QRN, is less pronounced down near the ground.

Of course, such an antenna has a lot less gain than a wire up high, which
means it's not so good for transmitting, but gain is not a concern in
receiving on the HF bands. The rig (especially the K2) has far more gain
than necessary to overcome the losses in almost any antenna. So the whole
story is in the signal-to-noise ratio. The better the S/N ratio, the better
your K2 will hear, regardless of the gain of the antenna. 

Some dedicated people have even built underground doublets, letting the
ground shield them from QRN while signals, although attenuated, are cut much
less allowing them to hear signals their huge skywire up high couldn't
detect. 

Of course such underground antennas are well insulated from the earth, often
placed inside water-tight pipes. 

Other options are to use a small rotatable loop that allows you to null out
QRM and peak the signal. 

Just because a transmitting antenna hears as well as it radiates does not
mean that it's optimum for receiving! 

Ron AC7AC

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 5:27 Pme 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] ARRL 160  Rx antenna


 
Julius,
 
Would you (or anyone) please elaborate on the use  of an Rx antenna? 
 
Thanks
Bill  K3UJ


This was  the first time I used the Rx Antenna feature
and it was  invaluable.

Thanks to everyone for a great  'test!

73,
Julius
n2wn
K2/100 #3311


 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Swap IC-271H for Elecraft kits

2005-12-06 Thread Kalkwarf Robert
Hi,  I have a very nice IC-271H that is fresh from the factory after  
being updated and aligned.  .2uv RX and 105 Watts Xmt.  I would like  
to offer for unfinished or unbuilt or excess Elecraft kits that would  
match in value. $425 or so.  Pix at www.kalkwarf.com/k7rlk


Bob k7rlk (k2-5036)

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K2 BFO Test

2005-12-06 Thread wongtheo
I am in the process of testing the BFO on page 62.  Everything tested fine up 
to this point but now I can not get the proper BFO range.  The BFO high 
frequency is 4917.56 and the BFO low frequency is 4914.26.  This provides a BFO 
range of 3.2 kHz. It appears that I can not the the BFO low frequency below 
4912.7 as specified in the manual.  I checked L33 to make sure R116 is not 
shorting any turns.  Should I troubleshoot this problem before proceding?  If 
so where else should I look.  Thanks.

Ted K6OI
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K2 to K2 DX QSL received

2005-12-06 Thread Bob Nielsen
I got an envelope of QSL cards from the bureau today and one of them  
was for a contact I made on vacation in France last year with OH0EC  
(DL1EKC) in the Aland Islands.  I was running my K2 and MP-1 from my  
hotel room in Tourcoing and he was running a K2-100.  Thanks, Marcus!


Bob
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K2 for sale

2005-12-06 Thread Ron Hauser
Greetings Elecrafters!

Bought this built, it is in excellent condition.  I have been using it daily
for several months and made hundreds of QSOs on all bands.  I wouldn't part
with it but I have to sell something to get something new, and I want to try
building my own.

K2 Serial Number:  389
Firmware 1.04C 1.02
KSB option included
KBT2 option included
Unbuilt KNB2 included.

rhauser (at) americaningredients (dot) com -- work, preferred
eichmann (at) kc (dot) rr (dot) com -- personal

73
--Ron
KC0TLN

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] I'll be joining you soon!

2005-12-06 Thread Kevin Shaw
Craig,

 What prompted you to get back into the fray?

Well, a few months ago I received a QSL card from Canada in the mail by
mistake. Looking at the card, I started thinking about the old days. I
haven't been on the air since around 1981 or so.

Then, a week or so ago, the subject of Heathkit (of all things) came up in a
discussion with my wife. I can't remember what we were talking about.
Anyway, I was curious to see if Heathkit was still in business (in some
form) so I got on the internet and started searching. Heathkit is no more --
but I did find the Elecraft website during my search. I did some research
and I was impressed with the reviews on the K2. QRP CW sounded interesting
to me so I checked to make sure my license was still valid (yes!). Then I
went online to join the ARRL again and to order the Operating Manual and
The ARRL Handbook to bone up on what has changed in all these years. 

This afternoon I ordered the K2 with the auto tuner and RS232 interface. It
should be here on Thursday. 

I still need to get some QSL cards made up and find a suitable power supply.
Then I need to tackle the issue of an antenna. It needs to be something I
can attach to the solar panels on the roof. I thought about attaching a
dipole of some form to the pipes with cable ties. It should be almost
invisible to the eye (deed restrictions :( ). Plus the fact that we have all
woods out back makes it very unlikely anyone will see it. I just hope it
works decently :)

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: Craig D. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 11:22 PM
To: 'Kevin Shaw'
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] I'll be joining you soon!

Kevin ...

Glad to know that I'm not alone with this reentry into ham radio.  The K2
looks like a great rig and I think we will both enjoy building and using
them.  

I installed a stealth random wire antenna up on the ridgeline of my roof as
others in the neighborhood were installing Xmas lights (think I got away
with it).  Seems to work OK on receive, and hopefully will be able to make
some contacts with it.  I used to be a CW contester at heart, so may get
frustrated with the antenna situation here, but should be fun anyhow.  They
have QRP divisions, now they just need to have an indoor antenna division
too  ;)

Also plan to install radials in the back yard (definitely invisible!) and
make a tripod mounted vertical that I can put out on special occasions
and/or after dark.  The new automatic tuners should make this type of thing
easier than it used to be.

Plan to order my K2 with the auto tuner, noise blanker and 160 meter option
and then get the DSP filter and perhaps SSB later in 2006.  Look for me in
Sweepstakes next November for sure!

What prompted you to get back into the fray?


 Best Regards
 ... Craig

Craig D. Smith
PowerSmith Consulting
1009 Alder Way
Longmont, CO  80503
phone:  303-678-7958
email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:  www.PowerSmithConsulting.com
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Kevin Shaw
 Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 7:52 PM
 To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: RE: [Elecraft] I'll be joining you soon!
 
 
 
  After 18 years of inactivity and a lapsed license,
  I've joined the ranks of hamdom again.
 
 I too am in the process of getting back into ham radio after about 22
years.
 I plan on ordering a K2 in a few days and trying my hand at some CW.
 Hopefully I won't be too rusty :)
 
  I'm looking forward to a fun construction project,
  the challenge of working QRP CW with extreme antenna
  restrictions from my HOA
 
 I have the same problem here. We have solar panels on the roof for the
 swimming pool. I was thinking about attaching a dipole to the pipes that
run
 along the roof. The pipes are long enough for a DX-CC dipole and should
be
 almost invisible. It's less than optimal, but it's better than nothing.
 
 73s
 
 Kevin Shaw
 N8IQ/4
 Trinity, Florida
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig D. Smith
 Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 3:17 PM
 To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: [Elecraft] I'll be joining you soon!
 
 After 18 years of inactivity and a lapsed license, I've joined the ranks
of
 hamdom again.  Took elements 2, 3 and 4 on Saturday and now am waiting
for
 my new (and much longer) call from the FCC.
 
 I started exploring what's new in amateur radio a couple months ago, and
my
 most exciting discovery was Elecraft and the enthusiasm and support of
this
 Email list.  I like the product designs and the prospect of building and
 servicing my own equipment like we did back in the day.  I wasn't sure
if
 that was still a practical possibility, but with Elecraft it certainly
is.
 Without Elecraft, I probably wouldn't have taken the plunge again.
 
 Just treated myself to a new Weller WESD51 soldering station with all the
 trimmings - decided that my 1966 soldering iron wasn't 

Re: [Elecraft] ARRL 160 Rx antenna

2005-12-06 Thread Bill Coleman


On Dec 6, 2005, at 8:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Would you (or anyone) please elaborate on the use  of an Rx antenna?


The fundamental problem on the low bands is the high noise level. A  
good transmitting antenna can often have S6-9 noise, or worse. It's  
hard to hear weak signals with all that noise.


As W8JI would put it, the characteristics of a good transmitting  
antenna and a good receiving antenna aren't the same. A transmitting  
antenna should have gain in a particular direction (and angle) in  
order to place the most signal into the target area. For receive, at  
least until you get into the upper VHF region, gain isn't really  
important. The problem is noise -- you can pick up the ambient noise  
on the band with barely any antenna at all -- all that gain just  
brings more noise into the radio.


For receive, the important thing isn't gain, but antenna pattern. An  
antenna with a good pattern will ignore noise (and QRM) from  
directions outside the target area. Less noise means better signal to  
noise ratio. Signals that aren't audible on the transmitting antenna  
are then audible on the receiving antenna.


There are many designs for effective low-band receiving antennas.  
These are quite lossy, having gain 20-30 dB below that of a  
transmitting antenna. Examples include Beverage antennas, Flags,  
Pennants, EWEs, K9AY loops. Despite being lossy, they can have quite  
sharp patterns, especially the Beverage antenna.




Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASELMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quote: Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!
-- Wilbur Wright, 1901

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] ARRL 160 Rx antenna

2005-12-06 Thread Mark Schreiner

Bill and others,

The explanations by Don  Ron were as always right on and very helpful.  
I already knew the answers but enjoyed reading the replies anyway.  I 
still have questions, though, too, so please continue to read on (we get 
there eventually). 

I would like to point out a couple of resources for more info on the 
topic.  First is a book by John Devoldere, ON4UN called 80m DXing, 
oops, sorry, I'm showing my age, it is now called Low Band DXing or 
Antennas and Techniques on Low Band DXing.  I did a quick Google 
search and guess I should pick up a more up to date version of the 
book.  The copy I have is from 1978 and was an excellent resource at 
that time.  Recently looking through it some info is obviously dated 
(comparison of different radios now considered to be vintage although 
still excellent rigs even compared to today's newer radios, such as the 
Drake R4B/C, Kenwood TS820, Collins  S-Line/KWM2, Signal One CX7, 
Collins R390, Heath SB101, etc) while other information is timeless 
(theoretical and practical info on the antennas for the most part as 
well as operating practices).  It gives lots of great info on these 
subjects with practical examples from a time honored expert. 

Another book that is about 10 years newer for the copy I have which is a 
2nd edition, although it looks like the latest release that is still 
available is the 3rd edition, but I'm not sure when it came out, is 
called The Beverage Antenna Handbook by Victor Misek, W1WCR.  This 
book includes topics on single wire Travelling Wave Antennas  multiple 
wire Steerable Wave Antennas.  As is the case for most ham related books 
it is mostly practical and only moderately theoretical.


Both of the above examples require a bit of real estate, or at least a 
cooperative neighbor.  I convinced my neighbor at one time that the wire 
I proposed to run out onto his property was only used for Rx and I 
guaranteed to him that *it* would not cause interference.  This 
negotiation worked and my neighbor and I still have a good relationship 
to this day (long after I've moved away, although my moving away is not 
the reason for our good relationship these days!).  I've seen other 
installations that have also taken advantage of a good neighbor 
policy.  Try it, it works! 

Other Rx antennas that are popular lately and work almost as well 
without nearly as much real estate which you should be able to find more 
info on the web include the EWE Array or K9AY loops.  I'm currently 
investigating the latter along with a small magnetic loop (oh, I thought 
it was small for 160m at about 12' diameter, maybe I should make it 
smaller yet!).


Okay, now for the questions that I have.  Having recently worked several 
stations surprisingly easily with my K2 at 5W during the recent Top Band 
contests (both the ARRL as well as the less active QRP ARCI a few days 
before) I am intrigued with possibilities of a Rx Only antenna.  I know 
the old saying that You gotta hear 'em before you can work 'em surely 
applies, however, I think that especially when running QRP the station 
on the other end has much more work to be able to hear your signal, so 
they need to likely have an even better Rx station than you have.  There 
were several stations which I couldn't work that had moderate (not 
strong and not weak) signals during this past weekend.  Maybe if they 
had better Rx antennas I could have worked them.  I tried several 
different times hoping that conditions maybe had improved.  Generally 
this was on Friday night while at my QTH Saturday night didn't seem as 
good.  However, my questions (finally) are these:  If I have a great Rx 
only antenna won't I be able to hear many more stations that I probably 
won't be able to work?  Okay, so there is a possibility that some of 
those stations will also have great Rx antennas and so between the two 
of us we may be able to work where previously I may not have been able 
to hear (and hence work) them.  But does anyone have any experience with 
this and care to comment?  I'm not trying to gather this information to 
discourage the attemps, just looking for some practical experience on 
this as part of a reality check.  I have only so far worked one 
European station and heard very few on 160m, but my experiences on 160m 
with the K2 are just beginning.  The guy I worked in Greece was using a 
1000' Beverage for the USA (one and the longest of 4 that he had total) 
and I think was running about 800W.  With my Carolina Windom at about 
45' that I used on both Tx  Rx I was barely able to copy him initially, 
then as his signal finally improved so that I could copy so-so, good 
enough to copy his callsign after enough times of him calling CQ or a 
few people now and again answering him (while there was several big 
pileups a few kHz above).  Finally when I was sure of his call I called 
him and he came back and fairly quickly the QSO was in the logbook!  I 
remember giving him a 559, which was