Re: [Elecraft] T1 Firmware Mod?

2011-03-22 Thread Bruce Beford
> Could the T1 be modified to give CW read out of last freq matched by it?
> Thanks, Danny Dyer, Wb4idu.

Hi, Danny. I saw that you asked this question before, but no one responded.
The T1 does not have the ability to measure the frequency it is matching.
So, the short answer is no, the T1 cannot be modified to "read out" the
frequency in CW. Now that I've gone and said that, Wayne may come up with a
way to sample the VFWD power sample and write new code to cram into the
controller, etc. But, I doubt it is worth the effort required.

I understand you are a non-sighted ham. It sounds like you want some sort of
CW output frequency counter? If you give specifics about your needs, perhaps
someone can suggest possible solutions.

73,
Bruce, N1RX



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] New K144XV firmware released: reduces 2-meter spurious receive signals

2011-03-22 Thread Jan Holmer SM6TUW
Wayne,

The 116/118 MHz PLL can obviously not be locked to the 49 MHz ref as you
mentioned in an early posting
describing the functions of the coming K144XV add-on board.
The present solution of the KREF3 corrects the 49 MHz internally. Which
external ref will be used for the K144XV PLL, a 10 MHz ext ref as well ?

Jan
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Jan Holmer SM6TUW wrote:

> Wayne, David, my question was unclear: I was referring to the  
> optional PCB to
> be installed inside the K144XV on top of the tranverter PCB.
> The K144XV I already have. I am looking forward to the PLL function  
> for
> locking the 116 MHz VCXO to the 49.380MHz.  Is that project ongoing?

In progress.

Wayne
N6KR

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/New-K144XV-firmware-released-reduces-2-meter-spurious-receive-signals-tp5608958p6195981.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] New K144XV firmware released: reduces 2-meter spurious receive signals

2011-03-22 Thread Jan Holmer SM6TUW
Wayne, 

The 116/118 MHz PLL can obviously not be locked to the 49 MHz ref as you
mentioned in an early posting 
describing the functions of the coming K144XV add-on board. 
The present FLL solution of the KREF3 corrects the 49 MHz internally. 
Which external ref will be used for the K144XV PLL, the ext ref (10 MHz)? 

Jan 
SM6TUW


wayne burdick wrote:
> 
> Jan Holmer SM6TUW wrote:
> 
> > Wayne, David, my question was unclear: I was referring to the  
> > optional PCB to
> > be installed inside the K144XV on top of the tranverter PCB.
> > The K144XV I already have. I am looking forward to the PLL function  
> > for
> > locking the 116 MHz VCXO to the 49.380MHz.  Is that project ongoing?
> 
> In progress.
> 
> Wayne
> N6KR
> 
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> 


--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/New-K144XV-firmware-released-reduces-2-meter-spurious-receive-signals-tp5608958p6195991.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] SWL Spotting software?

2011-03-22 Thread Bruce Chadbourne
As the caller says on talk radio "long time first time..."  - I love this
reflector, finally have something to toss into the ragchew...

With the K3's KBF3 general coverage receiver (and the K3's excellent receive
capabilities) I hope to chase some interesting DX of the non-Ham type.
 After all I got my start in this hobby as a teenage SWL 40 years ago.

Recently I've been enjoying N1MM software features with the DX-cluster via
telnet and the thought occurs to me: "is there a corresponding dx-cluster
program for short wave listeners?"  If there is - would someone please
advise ASAP.  Imagine - a low-power pirate shortwave station coming on line
- and the telnet cluster quickly alerting others to tune in.

By the way I have not purchased the KBF3 yet but this would put me over the
edge in a hurry...

-- 
Bruce Chadbourne KE1CY
8 Forest Dr
Merrimack NH 03054
603-429-2943
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Replacement Batteries

2011-03-22 Thread QRZ
Dear Fellow Elecraft Enthusiasts,

 

I know this is off topic but I also know there is a tremendous amount of
experience in this group.

My question is where can one find replacement batteries for handitalkies,
portable phones, etc that don't die in a matter of months?

I have bought from a number of sources each time trying a different company
because the replacements just don't last. The original lasted for 4 years
but the replacement won't last 6 months?? Am I the only one?

I need to try again, but I'm tired of buying junk.

 

Sorry for the off topic post.

You can reply off line to reduce QRM.

Thanks in advance.

 

73.WA1NTA

George Falardeau

Happy Elecraft Owner 

q...@comcast.net

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] New K144XV firmware released: reduces 2-meter spurious receive signals

2011-03-22 Thread Wayne Burdick
We do this in firmware, Jan. 

The K3EXREF module uses the external 10-MHz reference to determine the exact 
frequency of the 49-MHz internal reference. If a K144XV PLL is also installed, 
we know that the 2-meter module is phase-locked to it. We then apply an offset 
to the 10-meter IF mathematically so that the 2-meter frequency is dead on. 
This calculated offset replaces the manually entered offsets in the XVn OFS 
menu entry. 

73,
Wayne
N6KR


http://www.elecraft.com

On Mar 22, 2011, at 6:08 AM, Jan Holmer SM6TUW  wrote:

> Wayne, 
> 
> The 116/118 MHz PLL can obviously not be locked to the 49 MHz ref as you
> mentioned in an early posting 
> describing the functions of the coming K144XV add-on board. 
> The present FLL solution of the KREF3 corrects the 49 MHz internally. 
> Which external ref will be used for the K144XV PLL, the ext ref (10 MHz)? 
> 
> Jan 
> SM6TUW
> 
> 
> wayne burdick wrote:
>> 
>> Jan Holmer SM6TUW wrote:
>> 
>> > Wayne, David, my question was unclear: I was referring to the  
>> > optional PCB to
>> > be installed inside the K144XV on top of the tranverter PCB.
>> > The K144XV I already have. I am looking forward to the PLL function  
>> > for
>> > locking the 116 MHz VCXO to the 49.380MHz.  Is that project ongoing?
>> 
>> In progress.
>> 
>> Wayne
>> N6KR
>> 
>> __
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/New-K144XV-firmware-released-reduces-2-meter-spurious-receive-signals-tp5608958p6195991.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 & S9 43' Vertical

2011-03-22 Thread NZ0T
I have an S9 43' vertical.  You will need the unun to match 60 meters and up. 
The 80M coil works well too.  I ended up building the matchbox that Phil
AD5X designed.  You can see his article here:

http://www.ad5x.com/images/Articles/Match160.pdf

Phil also has a nice presentation on the 43' antenna here:

http://www.ad5x.com/images/Presentations/Vertical43.pdf

It's a great antenna if matched properly.  It must be matched at the base
with a remote tuner, an unun, or coil to work properly.  The unun (on 60M
and up) keeps the SWR down to manageable levels that you can match with a
tuner in the shack with acceptable coax losses.  The SWR gets out of hand
below 60M and must be matched at the base.

73 Bill nz0t


--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-S9-43-Vertical-tp6193993p6196827.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 & S9 43' Vertical

2011-03-22 Thread Lee Buller

There has been a lot written about the 43 foot antenna and the feeding of such 
an animal.  I want to re-iterate the point that radials are so important to any 
vertical antennaunless it is a vertical dipole.  I am using a 33 foot 
vertical for just 40 meters and I have 32 radials and they are of various 
lengths, but more than half are about a quarter wave on 40 meters.

I started out with 4 radials.  It worked but not anything to write about in a 
letter to Grandma.

I added 12 more to 16 radials and the antenna got my attention.  It seem to 
work 
much better. I started working around the country.  I then went to 32 radials.  
Now, I am working worldwide with the lump of aluminum which cost me $14.00 at 
the local surplus house.  Direct feed to ground.  Very good match according to 
the MFJ thingamajig.  This little antenna can really radiate and does quite 
well 
on 40 meter DX

Reading the material from OU4UN...32 radials is about optimum and anymore 
doesn't get you much.  That has been confirmed by many hams who have done the 
empirical study.  Oh yes, and radials on the ground do not have to be "tuned" 
radials.  That's what the studies say.  BUTif you have the vertical raised 
up off the ground...then the radials need to be tuned, but you can get away 
with 
fewer radials.

Radials are importanteven to the old Gotham antennas of yesteryear.

Lee - K0WA



 In our day and age it seems that Common Sense is in short supply.  If you 
don't 
have any Common Sense - get some Common Sense and use it.  If you can't find 
any 
Common Sense, ask for help from somebody who has some Common Sense.  Is Common 
Sense divine?

Common Sense is the image of the Creator expressing revealed truth in my mind. 
-  John W. (Kansas)
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 & Heil headset

2011-03-22 Thread JBaumgarte
This is only if you feel the need to have PTT with the hand trigger.   I 
stick with VOX and just plug everything in to the back connectors.   Really 
neat and avoids the front clutter.  K3 vox is great.  Another  option might be 
to use a foot switch.  
 
John, N0IJ
 
 
In a message dated 3/21/2011 07:27:47 Central Standard Time,  
lcla...@nc.rr.com writes:

Kate

I have your set up and ask Heil this is there reply from  Bob Heil

"You will need the AD-1 K for the K3  (same pin out as  Kenwood).
The headphones are stereo and will work for dual reception PLU  
they have our exclusive Phase Reversal.  Great match for the  K3"

73 Larry K1ZW

-Original Message-
From:  elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net 
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On  Behalf Of Kate
Hutton
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 12:50 AM
To:  elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 & Heil  headset

My new K3 works great on CW - love the way it sounds & the  intuitively
logical controls - but I'm trying to figure out what part I  need if any to
connect my Heil Pro headset, with a PTT hand trigger.   I see a larger 
stereo
plug coming from the PTT switch & a small one  coming from the heaset (1
wire), which currently go to a Yaesu adapter to  my old rig.  The other two
wires to the headset appear to be for the  earphones (small stereo plug).

Can I use "PTT IN", "STEREO PHONES"  & "MIC" on the back & just ignore the
8-pin connector on the  front?

Sorry if it is a dumb question.

73 Kate  K6HTN
__
Elecraft  mailing list
Home:  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:  http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post:  mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by:  http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list:  http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft  mailing list
Home:  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:  http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post:  mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by:  http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list:  http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] EC1 discontinued?

2011-03-22 Thread Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft
Hi Andrew,

Yes. Since the bare enclosure must be ordered as a separate set of metal 
from the fabricator (not the same run as the K1 case) and because demand 
on the bare case has dropped over time, it does not offset the cost of 
ordering and stocking the sheet metal in production quantities.

73, Eric  WA6HHQ


On 3/21/2011 7:06 PM, Andrew Moore wrote:
> Has the EC1 (enclosure to match K1) been discontinued?
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 & S9 43' Vertical

2011-03-22 Thread Julius Fazekas n2wn
Hi Tom,

Check out Phil's, AD5X, site: http://www.ad5x.com/articles.htm

He has written a number of articles related to your questions. Good
information with plenty of "how to" ideas with locally found materials.

Elecraft's Balun kit is also capable of 1:4 unun and will easily work with
any 100 watt rig.

QST has had several items related to the ubiquitous 43' verticals that are
all the rage now. I see at least one person has mentioned radials, which are
a must have to effectively use this antenna on 80-30.

The K3's ATU is very effective, but keep in mind that you will be matching
the feedline and antenna as a unit, versus matching just the antenna. The K3
will most likely find a match most of the time, but you still could be
seriously mismatched at the antenna. It may work, it just won't work well.

GL es 73,
Julius

-
Julius Fazekas
N2WN

Tennessee Contest Group
http://www.k4ro.net/tcg/index.html

Tennessee QSO Party
http://www.tnqp.org/

Elecraft K2#4455
Elecraft K3/100 #366
Elecraft K3/100 #1875
--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-S9-43-Vertical-tp6193993p6197137.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] 43 foot verticals

2011-03-22 Thread joe living
See Phil Salas, AD5X, website for his articles on 43 foot verticals and need 
for radials, unun construction, and base loading. 
 
http://www.ad5x.com/
 
Joe KH6/W3GW
 


  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Heil Traveler & K2

2011-03-22 Thread Larry Kendall
I know this has been asked before, but have not found it in the archives or 
even in my saved email. 

There is a resistor needed on the K2 panel or control board for proper biasing 
to allow use of the Heil Traveler Boom Headset (one side earpiece only.)

Can someone provide the details or a link to this legacy question?

Thanks.

BTW, to follow up on the KNB2, after correcting the solder short between pins 1 
& 2, all seems fine.

LK
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 & S9 43' Vertical

2011-03-22 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
One important thing to note here is that Phil has avoided one of the lossy
gotcha's in his matching for using 43' with 80/160 by using a large (4 inch
OD) and expensive (30 smackers) #2 powdered iron toroid, Amidon's T400-A2.
 Don't try to short cut or cheep cut this step because you are only running
100 watts or QRP.  It's the LOSS AVOIDED by using this toroid that is
actually more important running 100 watts and even more important running
QRP.

If one really wants to know why, you can get down and dirty in Jerry
Sevick's book, where you will find most of the how-come's in chapter 9, and
how he uses a T400-A2 in a bifilar winding that actually performs correctly
at 160.  See figure 9-6 and 9-G on pp. 60, 61 of "Understanding, Building,
and Using Baluns and Ununs -- Theory and Practical Designs for the
Experimenter", Jerry Sevick, W2FMI (SK),  2003, CQ Communications, Inc,
Hicksville, New York.

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Julius Fazekas n2wn
wrote:

> Hi Tom,
>
> Check out Phil's, AD5X, site: http://www.ad5x.com/articles.htm
>
> He has written a number of articles related to your questions. Good
> information with plenty of "how to" ideas with locally found materials.
>
> Elecraft's Balun kit is also capable of 1:4 unun and will easily work with
> any 100 watt rig.
>
> QST has had several items related to the ubiquitous 43' verticals that are
> all the rage now. I see at least one person has mentioned radials, which
> are
> a must have to effectively use this antenna on 80-30.
>
> The K3's ATU is very effective, but keep in mind that you will be matching
> the feedline and antenna as a unit, versus matching just the antenna. The
> K3
> will most likely find a match most of the time, but you still could be
> seriously mismatched at the antenna. It may work, it just won't work well.
>
> GL es 73,
> Julius
>
> -
> Julius Fazekas
> N2WN
>
> Tennessee Contest Group
> http://www.k4ro.net/tcg/index.html
>
> Tennessee QSO Party
> http://www.tnqp.org/
>
> Elecraft K2#4455
> Elecraft K3/100 #366
> Elecraft K3/100 #1875
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-S9-43-Vertical-tp6193993p6197137.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 & S9 43' Vertical

2011-03-22 Thread Paul Christensen
In addition to AD5X's excellent work, anyone considering installation of a 
43' vertical should first read Owen Duffy's (VK1OD) well-researched 
information, especially his information concerning feed-point alternatives:

http://vk1od.net/antenna/multibandunloadedvertical/index.htm

One reason for the 43' vertical's popularity is that typical radiation 
resistance is better than 100 ohms on 40m-10m -- but falls to less than 10 
ohms on 80m and much lower on 160m. On 160m/80m, system losses typically 
drop nearly in half with an ATU placed at the base feed when compared to a 
4:1 current balun feed with ATU at the transmitter.

Paul, W9AC

- Original Message - 
From: "Julius Fazekas n2wn" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 & S9 43' Vertical


> Hi Tom,
>
> Check out Phil's, AD5X, site: http://www.ad5x.com/articles.htm
>
> He has written a number of articles related to your questions. Good
> information with plenty of "how to" ideas with locally found materials.
>
> Elecraft's Balun kit is also capable of 1:4 unun and will easily work with
> any 100 watt rig.
>
> QST has had several items related to the ubiquitous 43' verticals that are
> all the rage now. I see at least one person has mentioned radials, which 
> are
> a must have to effectively use this antenna on 80-30.
>
> The K3's ATU is very effective, but keep in mind that you will be matching
> the feedline and antenna as a unit, versus matching just the antenna. The 
> K3
> will most likely find a match most of the time, but you still could be
> seriously mismatched at the antenna. It may work, it just won't work well.
>
> GL es 73,
> Julius
>
> -
> Julius Fazekas
> N2WN
>
> Tennessee Contest Group
> http://www.k4ro.net/tcg/index.html
>
> Tennessee QSO Party
> http://www.tnqp.org/
>
> Elecraft K2#4455
> Elecraft K3/100 #366
> Elecraft K3/100 #1875
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-S9-43-Vertical-tp6193993p6197137.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] WTB KBPF3

2011-03-22 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
I'm looking for another KBPF3, so that I can hear the same on both main and
subRX outside the ham bands.  Price with shipping off the reflector please.
 Thanks in advance.

73, Guy.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 & S9 43' Vertical

2011-03-22 Thread Lew Phelps K6LMP
I am in the process of installing a 43-foot vertical at my QTH (made by DX 
Engineering, but should be the same for purposes of this discussion).

I have modeled this antenna on all bands assuming a 4:1 Unun at the base of the 
antenna, a 75 foot run of 9913 coax, and a home-brew L antenna at the 
transmitter. TLW (Transmission Line for Windows) calculates the tuner settings 
needed for all bands, and also calculates the loss in the tuner (low) and the 
line.  With severe SWR mismatches on the lower bands, you get 75-85% of the 
transmitter power into the antenna. That is, worst case, if you have 100 watts 
output from your rig, you get 2 watt loss in the tuner and 22 watts loss in the 
transmission line, giving 76 watts out.  this is theoretical calculation, of 
course, but I think it gives a good indication of the order of magnitude of the 
line losses. The longer the line, the greater the line loss, of course. One 
might be able to improve on that with the switchable tuner described by AD5X; 
I'm going to have to look into that!

My UNUN is home-brewed based on a design from Sevick's book on Balun and Unun 
construction.  I can provide details offline to anyone interested. material 
cost is about $40 for toroids and Thermalize wire, and it's capable of handling 
full legal limit, although at the moment I'm running my K3 barefoot 10 watts.

The tuner is a home-brew switchable configuration L tuner. On all bands, the 
"best" configuration is a low pass filter with the shunt capacitor on the input 
(transmitter) side. Inductance and capacitance requirements are well within the 
limits of the tuner on every band.

I'm all done except laying the radials. I'll report back as soon as I'm on the 
air, after having conducted some A/B tests on the air alternating between the 
new vertical and my existing HF antenna, a 40 meter horizontal loop.  I expect 
significantly better DX performance with the vertical, since it puts most of 
the radiated energy out toward the horizon rather than almost straight up.

73,

Lew K6LMP




On Mar 22, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Julius Fazekas n2wn wrote:

> Hi Tom,
> 
> Check out Phil's, AD5X, site: http://www.ad5x.com/articles.htm
> 
> He has written a number of articles related to your questions. Good
> information with plenty of "how to" ideas with locally found materials.
> 
> Elecraft's Balun kit is also capable of 1:4 unun and will easily work with
> any 100 watt rig.
> 
> QST has had several items related to the ubiquitous 43' verticals that are
> all the rage now. I see at least one person has mentioned radials, which are
> a must have to effectively use this antenna on 80-30.
> 
> The K3's ATU is very effective, but keep in mind that you will be matching
> the feedline and antenna as a unit, versus matching just the antenna. The K3
> will most likely find a match most of the time, but you still could be
> seriously mismatched at the antenna. It may work, it just won't work well.
> 
> GL es 73,
> Julius
> 
> -
> Julius Fazekas
> N2WN
> 
> Tennessee Contest Group
> http://www.k4ro.net/tcg/index.html
> 
> Tennessee QSO Party
> http://www.tnqp.org/
> 
> Elecraft K2#4455
> Elecraft K3/100 #366
> Elecraft K3/100 #1875
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-S9-43-Vertical-tp6193993p6197137.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 & S9 43' Vertical

2011-03-22 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
The trick is that a match to 43' on 160 must be its own setting, and the
same taps CANNOT be used for both 160 and 80. AND as you specify the
matching toroid device MUST be at the base of the antenna.  Please not the
toroid is NOT wired as a balun, but is really a tuned transformer, where the
very large capacitive reactance of the antenna on 80 and 160 is tuned out by
the selection of the top taps, and the step down impedance by the selection
of the mid taps. At the tuned frequencies, the coax is MATCHED and not
subject to the worrisome (and accurate) loss graph on the VK1OD site.

With a DPDT relay to select top and mid taps, AND with "dense" on/in-ground
radials, this becomes an elegantly simple and efficient short antenna for a
somewhat narrow single band of frequencies on 80 and 160.  The efficiency
WILL go down as you move away from the tuned frequencies, and if your
operating habits cover all of 3.5-4 and 1.8-2, you should invest in the auto
tuner at the base and resign yourself to not running 1500 watts, unless you
have the smackers to invest in one of those military KW CCS matchers.

Phil's solution WILL handle 1500 watts at the selected 80/160 tuned
frequencies. And the T400-A2
will not be smoked.

73, Guy.

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Paul Christensen  wrote:

> In addition to AD5X's excellent work, anyone considering installation of a
> 43' vertical should first read Owen Duffy's (VK1OD) well-researched
> information, especially his information concerning feed-point alternatives:
>
> http://vk1od.net/antenna/multibandunloadedvertical/index.htm
>
> One reason for the 43' vertical's popularity is that typical radiation
> resistance is better than 100 ohms on 40m-10m -- but falls to less than 10
> ohms on 80m and much lower on 160m. On 160m/80m, system losses typically
> drop nearly in half with an ATU placed at the base feed when compared to a
> 4:1 current balun feed with ATU at the transmitter.
>
> Paul, W9AC
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Julius Fazekas n2wn" 
> To: 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 12:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 & S9 43' Vertical
>
>
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > Check out Phil's, AD5X, site: http://www.ad5x.com/articles.htm
> >
> > He has written a number of articles related to your questions. Good
> > information with plenty of "how to" ideas with locally found materials.
> >
> > Elecraft's Balun kit is also capable of 1:4 unun and will easily work
> with
> > any 100 watt rig.
> >
> > QST has had several items related to the ubiquitous 43' verticals that
> are
> > all the rage now. I see at least one person has mentioned radials, which
> > are
> > a must have to effectively use this antenna on 80-30.
> >
> > The K3's ATU is very effective, but keep in mind that you will be
> matching
> > the feedline and antenna as a unit, versus matching just the antenna. The
> > K3
> > will most likely find a match most of the time, but you still could be
> > seriously mismatched at the antenna. It may work, it just won't work
> well.
> >
> > GL es 73,
> > Julius
> >
> > -
> > Julius Fazekas
> > N2WN
> >
> > Tennessee Contest Group
> > http://www.k4ro.net/tcg/index.html
> >
> > Tennessee QSO Party
> > http://www.tnqp.org/
> >
> > Elecraft K2#4455
> > Elecraft K3/100 #366
> > Elecraft K3/100 #1875
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-S9-43-Vertical-tp6193993p6197137.html
> > Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > __
> > Elecraft mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Field Day

2011-03-22 Thread Terry Schieler
I worked Eric about six months ago.  Sent him a QSL card because I wanted to
confirm working K3.Serial number ONE!  Never got a reply.  But that's
OK, cause he must get tons of mail and I'd rather he spend his time doing
more of what those guys do best!

73,

Terry, W0FM



-Original Message-
From: Tony Estep [mailto:estept...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 4:20 PM
To: Elecraft
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Field Day

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Wayne Burdick  wrote:

> ...Anyone can work Eric, with his monster antenna, seaside QTH, and 500
> W. If you really want to impress people, try working mea random wire
20
> feet off the roof, with power lines nearby


This is an awesome post, which I am gonna save.  These are the conditions
for which a really cool radio should be designed. You certainly reach the
largest audience with a radio that copes with all that. The next challenge
will be one that will work VU4 with that setup.

73,
Tony KT0NY


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] (no subject)

2011-03-22 Thread Edward R. Cole
He! He!  Well, if Eric is God then that makes you the "dawg"!

I get into the Elecraft 20m-SSB net just fine with my K3/10.  Of 
course I cheat and use a Hygain TH3mk4 tribander.  But I am up under 
the aurora so that compensates with one-way prop.

March 11 was the 1st anniversary for my K3/10 (4340).  I'm lovin it!

Ed - KL7UW

--

Message: 12
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:24:36 -0700
From: Wayne Burdick 
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Field Day
To: Gary Gregory 
Cc: Elecraft 
Message-ID: <91326628-92e4-4c67-941c-3da8f47f0...@elecraft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes

Gary Gregory wrote:

 > I am very proud to announce that God spoke to me yesterday on 10M
 > with a K3 and a KPA-500 I can tell you all, Eric has a superb
 > signal...I was knocked for six when he came up on frequency

Gary,

Anyone can work Eric, with his monster antenna, seaside QTH, and 500
W. If you really want to impress people, try working me. I always
operate under extreme conditions to inspire our staff to create better
tools for handing QRM and QRN: 10 watts into a random wire 20 feet off
the roof, with power lines nearby, cats prowling my workbench, and my
high-energy 6-year-old son throwing paper airplanes at me.

Wayne
N6KR

P.S. No one informed me that Eric was God. I suppose I'd better



73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
==
BP40IQ   500 KHz - 10-GHz   www.kl7uw.com
EME: 144-1.4kw, 432-100w, 1296-testing*, 3400-winter?
DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubus...@hotmail.com
==
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Field Day

2011-03-22 Thread Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft
Hi Terry,

I do try to reply to all QSL requests, but sometimes they get misplaced 
or I get busy here. I'll recheck my inbox of cards to see if I have 
yours. I know I'm behind a bit ;-)

73, Eric


On 3/22/2011 10:53 AM, Terry Schieler wrote:
> I worked Eric about six months ago.  Sent him a QSL card because I wanted to
> confirm working K3.Serial number ONE!  Never got a reply.  But that's
> OK, cause he must get tons of mail and I'd rather he spend his time doing
> more of what those guys do best!
>
> 73,
>
> Terry, W0FM
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Estep [mailto:estept...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 4:20 PM
> To: Elecraft
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Field Day
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Wayne Burdick  wrote:
>
>> ...Anyone can work Eric, with his monster antenna, seaside QTH, and 500
>> W. If you really want to impress people, try working mea random wire
> 20
>> feet off the roof, with power lines nearby
>
> This is an awesome post, which I am gonna save.  These are the conditions
> for which a really cool radio should be designed. You certainly reach the
> largest audience with a radio that copes with all that. The next challenge
> will be one that will work VU4 with that setup.
>
> 73,
> Tony KT0NY
>
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 & S9 43' Vertical

2011-03-22 Thread george fritkin
When I was going to engineering school one of the toughest courses was wave 
theory.  The course included a lot of antenna studies.  Not to brag, but I got 
the highest grade on the final.  It was 45. That was the highest mark in the 
class and thank goodness the course was graded on a curve.  I asked the 
professor if anyone ever received a passing grade not using grade curving.  His 
response was.I have been teaching the class for 10 years and nobody ever 
got as high as 70.
My point is that antenna theory is a complicated study and the study of 
vertical antenna theory is more complex since we have the ground as an 
important factor in most cases.  
So I caution anyone to do your research and do not listen to "old wive's tales" 
about specific antenna installations. 
73deGeorge, W6GFProduct owner of a ZEROFIVE 43 footer

--- On Tue, 3/22/11, NZ0T  wrote:

From: NZ0T 
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 & S9 43' Vertical
To: 
Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2011, 8:41 AM

I have an S9 43' vertical.  You will need the unun to match 60 meters and up. 
The 80M coil works well too.  I ended up building the matchbox that Phil
AD5X designed.  You can see his article here:

http://www.ad5x.com/images/Articles/Match160.pdf

Phil also has a nice presentation on the 43' antenna here:

http://www.ad5x.com/images/Presentations/Vertical43.pdf

It's a great antenna if matched properly.  It must be matched at the base
with a remote tuner, an unun, or coil to work properly.  The unun (on 60M
and up) keeps the SWR down to manageable levels that you can match with a
tuner in the shack with acceptable coax losses.  The SWR gets out of hand
below 60M and must be matched at the base.

73 Bill nz0t


--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-S9-43-Vertical-tp6193993p6196827.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Using WriteLog to control KDVR3

2011-03-22 Thread Fred Atchley
Has anyone used WriteLog to trigger the KDVR3? According to Steve, N9OH
(WriteLog), it is possible now with WL version 10.80 by inserting a K3 macro
into writelog.ini file and the designating a "control key" (i.e. F10.) 

It seems likely, then, that every time you tap the "control key" you will
send the macro to the K3. Does this mean that the same macro will be invoked
regardless of whether the K3 is in SSB or CW?

 

73, Fred, AE6IC, K3#2241, P3#100

 

" Do or Do-not. There is no 'Try'..." ~ Yoda

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 & S9 43' Vertical

2011-03-22 Thread Tony Estep
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Lee Buller  wrote:

> ...went to 32 radials. Now, I am working worldwide with the lump of
> aluminum which cost me $14.00


My clubmate NI0C who appears sometimes on this reflector is on the Honor
Roll, has 5 band DXCC, and is 2 zones away from 5BWAZ with an antenna like
yours. Verticals have a bad rep but can deliver the goods if set up right.

Tony KT0NY
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Carrying case for a K3?

2011-03-22 Thread Shel Radin KF0UR
I have the same question, and while I haven't bought one yet, the front
runner for me so far is the Seahorse SE-920. 
http://www.carrycasesplus.com/se-920-p29908.html   It's ~$97 with foam and
shipping.

It's a hard case like the Pelican (but less expensive), comes with or
without foam and looks like it'll have room for the K3, P3, power supply,
cables, etc.   They make smaller versions, but I like this size (inside
22.24 x 13.66 x 8.5) as I've grown attached to the P3 and want to be able to
take it as well.

It's classified as a carry-on.  If I'm going to put something in an overhead
bin, I'd prefer to have some protection from my fellow passengers stuffing
things in there.  Plus for local outings like Field Day, it'll be protected
as I stuff the car (protection from myself :-) ).

GL,

Shel  KF0UR


--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Carrying-case-for-a-K3-tp6192458p6197918.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Carrying case for a K3?

2011-03-22 Thread Mike Fatchett W0MU
That case looks almost identical to the pelican. 1510.  The dimensions 
for the Pelican are 22.00" x 13.81" x 9.00".  The Seahorse is 23.96" x 
16" x 10.01" which is a few inches bigger.  You might want to check with 
your airlines to see if the Seahorse can be carried on.  With everyone 
dragging all their belongings inside the cabin of the planes instead of 
checking bags the airlines have been getting more particular with what 
you bring on.

BTW charging for bags was stupid.  Now the luggage hold is empty and the 
cabin is jammed with stuff.

On 3/22/2011 2:55 PM, Shel Radin KF0UR wrote:
> I have the same question, and while I haven't bought one yet, the front
> runner for me so far is the Seahorse SE-920.
> http://www.carrycasesplus.com/se-920-p29908.html   It's ~$97 with foam and
> shipping.
>
> It's a hard case like the Pelican (but less expensive), comes with or
> without foam and looks like it'll have room for the K3, P3, power supply,
> cables, etc.   They make smaller versions, but I like this size (inside
> 22.24 x 13.66 x 8.5) as I've grown attached to the P3 and want to be able to
> take it as well.
>
> It's classified as a carry-on.  If I'm going to put something in an overhead
> bin, I'd prefer to have some protection from my fellow passengers stuffing
> things in there.  Plus for local outings like Field Day, it'll be protected
> as I stuff the car (protection from myself :-) ).
>
> GL,
>
> Shel  KF0UR
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Carrying-case-for-a-K3-tp6192458p6197918.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Using WriteLog to control KDVR3

2011-03-22 Thread Fabio IZ4AFW / NZ1W
Hi Fred,
I used it just one time but it seems to work ok.
I went to "Writelog Keyboard shortcuts" and then assigned the key F1 to 
Rig1Command(n) , Rig Command Number 10.

Then, I edited the Writelog.ini file in C:\Windows, adding the following 
lines:

[Elecraft_K3_commands]
Macro_10=SWT21;

This way, when I press F1 on my keyboard, the DVR starts sending the 
message recorded in memory #1. This can be automated by using the "Timed 
CQ" function inside Writelog.

Bye,
Fabio
  IZ4AFW / NZ1W

Il 22/03/2011 21.17, Fred Atchley ha scritto:
> Has anyone used WriteLog to trigger the KDVR3? According to Steve, N9OH
> (WriteLog), it is possible now with WL version 10.80 by inserting a K3 macro
> into writelog.ini file and the designating a "control key" (i.e. F10.)
>
> It seems likely, then, that every time you tap the "control key" you will
> send the macro to the K3. Does this mean that the same macro will be invoked
> regardless of whether the K3 is in SSB or CW?
>
>
>
> 73, Fred, AE6IC, K3#2241, P3#100
>
>
>
> " Do or Do-not. There is no 'Try'..." ~ Yoda
>
>
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Carrying case for a K3?

2011-03-22 Thread David Christ
The usual carryon max is 22 x 14 x 9  which is 45 unified inches. 
The Pelican just makes this but the Seahorse is 5 inches over.  The 
overhead bins in the larger planes are made for the Pelican sized 
roll-on.  The Seahorse might not fit quite as easily.  I have rarely 
been challenged at the check in counter or the gate but have been 
asked to slide my bag in their sizing frame.  In Frankfort the 
scanners had a hole in the front so if your bag didn't fit through 
the hole you didn't get through security.

Not to discourage you from the Seahorse but you do take your chances 
small as they may be.

David  K0LUM

At 3:04 PM -0600 3/22/11, Mike Fatchett W0MU wrote:
>That case looks almost identical to the pelican. 1510.  The dimensions
>for the Pelican are 22.00" x 13.81" x 9.00".  The Seahorse is 23.96" x
>16" x 10.01" which is a few inches bigger.  You might want to check with
>your airlines to see if the Seahorse can be carried on.  With everyone
>dragging all their belongings inside the cabin of the planes instead of
>checking bags the airlines have been getting more particular with what
>you bring on.
>
>BTW charging for bags was stupid.  Now the luggage hold is empty and the
>cabin is jammed with stuff.
>
>On 3/22/2011 2:55 PM, Shel Radin KF0UR wrote:
>>  I have the same question, and while I haven't bought one yet, the front
>>  runner for me so far is the Seahorse SE-920.
>>  http://www.carrycasesplus.com/se-920-p29908.html   It's ~$97 with foam and
>>  shipping.
>>
>>  It's a hard case like the Pelican (but less expensive), comes with or
>>  without foam and looks like it'll have room for the K3, P3, power supply,
>>  cables, etc.   They make smaller versions, but I like this size (inside
>>  22.24 x 13.66 x 8.5) as I've grown attached to the P3 and want to be able to
>>  take it as well.
>>
>>  It's classified as a carry-on.  If I'm going to put something in an overhead
>>  bin, I'd prefer to have some protection from my fellow passengers stuffing
>>  things in there.  Plus for local outings like Field Day, it'll be protected
>>  as I stuff the car (protection from myself :-) ).
>>
>>  GL,
>>
>>  Shel  KF0UR
>>
>>
>>  --
>>  View this message in context: 
>>http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Carrying-case-for-a-K3-tp6192458p6197918.html
>>  Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>  __
>>  Elecraft mailing list
>>  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>  Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>
>>  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>  Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>__
>Elecraft mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] New K144XV firmware released: reduces 2-meterspurious receive signals

2011-03-22 Thread Jeff Cochrane - VK4BOF
Hi Wayne and all,
I have just installed the latest production firmware (4.30) and my 2M S meter 
readings have reverted back to the old (pre beta 4.29) behaviour. (ie: the S 
meter reads S 4 for a S 9 repeater signal.)
Can anyone else confirm this?
TIA


Jeff Cochrane - VK4BOF
Elecraft K3 # 4257
  - Original Message - 
  From: Wayne Burdick 
  To: Jan Holmer SM6TUW 
  Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 12:11 AM
  Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New K144XV firmware released: reduces 2-meterspurious 
receive signals


  We do this in firmware, Jan. 

  The K3EXREF module uses the external 10-MHz reference to determine the exact 
frequency of the 49-MHz internal reference. If a K144XV PLL is also installed, 
we know that the 2-meter module is phase-locked to it. We then apply an offset 
to the 10-meter IF mathematically so that the 2-meter frequency is dead on. 
This calculated offset replaces the manually entered offsets in the XVn OFS 
menu entry. 

  73,
  Wayne
  N6KR

  
  http://www.elecraft.com

  On Mar 22, 2011, at 6:08 AM, Jan Holmer SM6TUW  wrote:

  > Wayne, 
  > 
  > The 116/118 MHz PLL can obviously not be locked to the 49 MHz ref as you
  > mentioned in an early posting 
  > describing the functions of the coming K144XV add-on board. 
  > The present FLL solution of the KREF3 corrects the 49 MHz internally. 
  > Which external ref will be used for the K144XV PLL, the ext ref (10 MHz)? 
  > 
  > Jan 
  > SM6TUW
  > 
  > 
  > wayne burdick wrote:
  >> 
  >> Jan Holmer SM6TUW wrote:
  >> 
  >> > Wayne, David, my question was unclear: I was referring to the  
  >> > optional PCB to
  >> > be installed inside the K144XV on top of the tranverter PCB.
  >> > The K144XV I already have. I am looking forward to the PLL function  
  >> > for
  >> > locking the 116 MHz VCXO to the 49.380MHz.  Is that project ongoing?
  >> 
  >> In progress.
  >> 
  >> Wayne
  >> N6KR
  >> 
  >> __
  >> Elecraft mailing list
  >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
  >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
  >> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
  >> 
  >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
  >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
  >> 
  > 
  > 
  > --
  > View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/New-K144XV-firmware-released-reduces-2-meter-spurious-receive-signals-tp5608958p6195991.html
  > Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
  > __
  > Elecraft mailing list
  > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
  > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
  > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
  > 
  > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
  > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
  __
  Elecraft mailing list
  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
  Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
  Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Carrying case for a K3?

2011-03-22 Thread Shel Radin KF0UR
I agree.  While the website says it meets carry on regulations, it clearly
doesn't.  So, if flying with this as carry-on luggage is planned, the
Pelican 1510 is a safer bet.  It's about $60 more.But that might not be
a big deal if it saves you from paying baggage fees because it's a little
too big to carry on.

--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Carrying-case-for-a-K3-tp6192458p6198319.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 speaker reflector

2011-03-22 Thread Shel Radin KF0UR
Same for me.  I've inquired about it with the Elecraft folks, but haven't
received a reply yet.  It would make a nice addition.

--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-speaker-reflector-tp6183227p6198333.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Thanks, another question, and a little background.

2011-03-22 Thread Dan B Dyer Jr,/Danny
First, thanks to Wayne, Don, Bruce, and Jeff, for your helpful notes and 
answers to yesterdays inquiries.  *I was afraid those answers would actually be 
pretty much set in software and or stone, but I can dream can't I?
At any rate, thanks for a great product and group.
*Question, is there room in the T1 for a Piezo to work in concert with or 
instead of the lites, to give audible cw readout?
*In terms of freq read out, I have an MCount, Freqmite, StingerSinger, and 
Millenium QSYER, but wanting to work ped mobile with my 817ND, small 
antenna/MFJ1899T and some of the  MFJ and or Maldol Monobanders,/and i know 
they're all compromise ants, but my expectations are pretty much in line with 
physics.  Anyway, being blind as the proverbial bat/no hearts and flowers, just 
fact, I figure as few extra little boxes as possible between the rig and 
antenna, is the goal here.
But if all else fails, one of my counters in a shirt pocket, with a short wire 
running from counters' ant jack  and wound around the base of the rigs' antenna 
should make it happen well enough to make a go.  *I have a number of memories 
programmed into the radio separated by Broadcast stations to divide groups, 
and this has been, and will continue to be a great adventure.  Again, thanks to 
all, Danny Dyer, Wb4idu, Toccoa, GA, USA.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Carrying case for a K3?

2011-03-22 Thread Ralph Parker
I have used the Pelican 1510, but I had to remove the K3 handle, and even
then only had 1/2" to spare - a snug fit with a little token foam. I
certainly wouldn't ship it that way as checked baggage. The 1510 does have
room for a p/s, headset, etc., in the long dimension. I carried it onto the
big airplanes (tnx goodness for the wheels), but I had to give it to
baggage handlers for one short leg on a Twin Otter. Otherwise, I would have
used my Rose case, which is a much better choice if you are able to carry
it on every flight, IMHO. 

Ralph, VE7XF

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3 freq. stability question?

2011-03-22 Thread ac5p
Other than the 49MHz REF OSC, what hardware determines or effects the frequency 
accuracy and stability in the K3?

Thanks and 73,
Mike  AC5P
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3 DSP Upgrade

2011-03-22 Thread Mike Fatchett W0MU
Is it worth it?  I have seen some people say yes and others that say no.

What is involved with the swap out.  (read too lazy to read manual)
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3 DSP Upgrade

2011-03-22 Thread Johnny Siu
Hello Mike,

The upgrade is a 'must'.  I sold my K3#46 and bought back a much newer one with 
latest DSP installed.  I noted that improvement was far more than described 
in Elecraft web page.

The upgrading work is not difficult and well within your expertise.

 cheers, 


Johnny VR2XMC 





寄件人﹕ Mike Fatchett W0MU 
收件人﹕ elecraft@mailman.qth.net
傳送日期﹕ 2011/3/23 (三) 9:53:50 AM
主題: [Elecraft] K3 DSP Upgrade

Is it worth it?  I have seen some people say yes and others that say no.

What is involved with the swap out.  (read too lazy to read manual)
__



  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] K3 DSP Upgrade

2011-03-22 Thread Edward Dickinson III
Hi Mike,

 

If you have an appreciation for the elimination of high end artifacts and
overall smother sound, the answer is clearly, 'Yes, it is worth it.'  Prior
to the upgrade, I kept the top edge of the filter about 2.35 kHz as that was
about all I could take.  Now I have no problem running the 2.7 stock filter
at full open for SSB listening.  There is also improvement on the lower end
of the spectrum.  I tend to run my lo cut at 100 Hz.  The overall comfort
level is improved appreciably.  

 

I use my system with Line with Speaker Out, stereo into the input of my
computer soundcard.  From there it goes to an external Hi-Fi receiver via
optical and digital cable.  The sound is somewhat reminiscent of the old
console shortwave receivers of long ago.

 

My DSP upgrade came from Elecraft.  It is evidently an highbred with the
piggy-backed LP filer and assumedly the rest of the upgrades to the DSP
board.  Other off-DSP board audio updates have been done by myself.

 

When I sent my card in, with previous notification, the replacement was back
in my hands within about 5 or 6 calendar days including a weekend.

 

 

Good lucky & 73,

Dick - KA5KKT

 

  _  

Is it worth it?  I have seen some people say yes and others that say no.

 

What is involved with the swap out.  (read too lazy to read manual)

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 DSP Upgrade Correction

2011-03-22 Thread Edward Dickinson III
"I use my system with Line with Speaker Out" - should read, 'I use my system
with Speaker out through a matching network to line in on my computer sound
card.'  The matching network is a $20 item from an auto sound store and is
used to cut speaker level down to line level.

 

 

73,

Dick - KA5KKT

 

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 freq. stability question?

2011-03-22 Thread Wayne Burdick
All signal sources are phase locked to this reference, Mike.

The other factor is synth DDS resolution, which is about 1/5th Hz, and  
can lead to about a +/- 1 Hz error, worst case, during operation.  
However, in diversity mode, both synths are set to the same DDS  
digital word, so there's zero offset. (This is not true of some other  
radios claiming to do diversity.)

73,
Wayne
N6KR



On Mar 22, 2011, at 6:31 PM, a...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

> Other than the 49MHz REF OSC, what hardware determines or effects  
> the frequency
> accuracy and stability in the K3?
>
> Thanks and 73,
> Mike  AC5P
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



Re: [Elecraft] K3 DSP Upgrade Correction

2011-03-22 Thread Jim Brown
On 3/22/2011 7:24 PM, Edward Dickinson III wrote:
> The matching network is a $20 item from an auto sound store and is
> used to cut speaker level down to line level.

You just spent $20 on something that you could have done equally well 
with two 5-cent resistors, AND that probably was not needed in the first 
place.

Study the part of http://audiosystemsgroup.com/HamInterfacing.pdf that 
talks about audio levels.  Also see the Appendix on audio that is part 
of http://audiosystemsgroup.com/RFI-Ham.pdf

The executive summary -- most computer sound cards clip at about 1 volt 
sine wave. A 2-watt power amp, typical for ham gear, would clip at about 
2 volts, and that only occurs on very loud audio peaks. All that's 
required to prevent clipping of the sound card input is to turn the 
speaker output gain down a bit.

A simple voltage divider (the two resistors) IS needed to drive a MIC 
level input.

73, Jim K9YC


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Carrying case for a K3?

2011-03-22 Thread Mike Fatchett W0MU
I found the Pelican at Amazon.com for $134.22 and the lid organizer for 
$19.99.

On 3/22/2011 5:14 PM, Shel Radin KF0UR wrote:
> I agree.  While the website says it meets carry on regulations, it clearly
> doesn't.  So, if flying with this as carry-on luggage is planned, the
> Pelican 1510 is a safer bet.  It's about $60 more.But that might not be
> a big deal if it saves you from paying baggage fees because it's a little
> too big to carry on.
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Carrying-case-for-a-K3-tp6192458p6198319.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 DSP Upgrade Correction

2011-03-22 Thread Don Wilhelm
  Jim and all,

Some just have not "gotten it".  The K3 is soundcard digital ready.  
Just connect the computer Line in to the K3 rear panel Line Out, and the 
computer Line Out to the K3 Line In, and set the "mic sel" menu for data 
modes to Line In.

Yes, if you only have speaker out level from your computer (most have 
line level out), then a resistive divider is in order - nothing exotic - 
as Jim pointed out, two resistors will do the job.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 3/22/2011 11:01 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> On 3/22/2011 7:24 PM, Edward Dickinson III wrote:
>> The matching network is a $20 item from an auto sound store and is
>> used to cut speaker level down to line level.
> You just spent $20 on something that you could have done equally well
> with two 5-cent resistors, AND that probably was not needed in the first
> place.
>
> Study the part of http://audiosystemsgroup.com/HamInterfacing.pdf that
> talks about audio levels.  Also see the Appendix on audio that is part
> of http://audiosystemsgroup.com/RFI-Ham.pdf
>
> The executive summary -- most computer sound cards clip at about 1 volt
> sine wave. A 2-watt power amp, typical for ham gear, would clip at about
> 2 volts, and that only occurs on very loud audio peaks. All that's
> required to prevent clipping of the sound card input is to turn the
> speaker output gain down a bit.
>
> A simple voltage divider (the two resistors) IS needed to drive a MIC
> level input.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] marine frequencies and k3

2011-03-22 Thread George A. Thornton
I know someone who is about to embark on an around the world sailboat
cruise.  She is not currently licensed on HAM frequencies but is going
to have a marine operator license.  She is about to acquire a marine SSB
radio.  Most of those radios are also capable of operation on HAM
frequencies.  

 

I was trying to figure out if it was possible to legally communicate
with her using my K3 from home.  

 

Can the K3 be modified to permit transmission on marine bands?

 

I want to emphasize that I am not looking for an opportunity to use the
radio for any illegal purpose.  I am only interested in operating on
marine frequencies for which I would have a valid license.  

 

Beyond this, it seems there is a potential marketing opportunity for
Elecraft in the marine community.   Ocean sailors use SSB and many of
them also end up getting a HAM license so they can also use HAM
frequencies on voyages.  The Elecraft K2 and K3 are in some ways ideal
for marine use because they are small and have relatively low power
consumption.  

 

The stresses on a marine radio are huge and most of them have been made
water  and shock resistant.  Also, marine radios require extreme
simplicity of operation because they occasionally have to be used by an
inexperienced operator during an emergency.  

 

Maybe none of this makes practical sense.  

 

Someone educate me, that is what this forum is about.

 

de George AE7G

 

 

 

 

 

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] marine frequencies and k3

2011-03-22 Thread Jim Wiley

Unfortunately, even if the K3 could be made to operate on marine 
frequencies, unless if is type accepted by the FCC for that service, it 
is still not legal to use it, whether or not you have a license.  As far 
as I know, the K3 could not pass the acceptance requirement in it's 
present form.  The primary objection would have to do with VFO frequency 
control, which is not permitted on the marine bands.  There may be others. 


It is legal to use a marine SSB transceiver on the ham bands, where type 
acceptance is not required, but the reverse is not true.  Wayne or Eric 
can amplify this if they wish, but that is the gist of the argument.


- Jim, KL7CC



George A. Thornton wrote:
>  
>
> I was trying to figure out if it was possible to legally communicate
> with her using my K3 from home.  
>
>  
> 
>   

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Re: marine frequencies and k3

2011-03-22 Thread Johnny Siu
Also for practical reasons, the popular marine bands is near to the I.F. of 
K3.  
Using K3 for marine communication seems not quite appropriate.

 cheers, 


Johnny VR2XMC 





寄件人﹕ Jim Wiley 
收件人﹕ George A. Thornton 
副本(CC) Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
傳送日期﹕ 2011/3/23 (三) 1:30:12 PM
主題: Re: [Elecraft] marine frequencies and k3


Unfortunately, even if the K3 could be made to operate on marine 
frequencies, unless if is type accepted by the FCC for that service, it 
is still not legal to use it, whether or not you have a license.  As far 
as I know, the K3 could not pass the acceptance requirement in it's 
present form.  The primary objection would have to do with VFO frequency 
control, which is not permitted on the marine bands.  There may be others. 


It is legal to use a marine SSB transceiver on the ham bands, where type 
acceptance is not required, but the reverse is not true.  Wayne or Eric 
can amplify this if they wish, but that is the gist of the argument.


- Jim, KL7CC



George A. Thornton wrote:
>  
>
> I was trying to figure out if it was possible to legally communicate
> with her using my K3 from home.  
>
>  
> 
>  

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html