I can’t claim that many hours with computer logging, but I just cannot
understand why a $95 program (MacLoggerDX) requires running an external script
by hand to upload contacts to Logbook of the World. That’s crazy. RUMlogNG does
it with one menu pick.
Earlier versions of RUMlog had some odd quirks that were different from
standard Mac programs. My experience with RUMlogNG so far has been seamless.
Sorry, I can’t speak to CW operation.
wunder
K6WRU
CM87wj
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
On Jul 10, 2015, at 6:26 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:
> So many great people sent great responses, thank you. That's how this kind
> of community adds value.
>
> I would summarize the replies as saying MacLogger or RUMlog are the best.
>
> So, now it's down to operating. As a CW operator, I use a keyboard (yikes!)
> and functions keys (op: tnx es 73 gd dx).
>
> So, how does either one make life better real-time? Both are crash-free, I
> hope. No staqggering USB delays, like you-know-who.
>
> 72, Byron NZ3o/qr..p
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to wun...@wunderwood.org
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
