I can’t claim that many hours with computer logging, but I just cannot understand why a $95 program (MacLoggerDX) requires running an external script by hand to upload contacts to Logbook of the World. That’s crazy. RUMlogNG does it with one menu pick.
Earlier versions of RUMlog had some odd quirks that were different from standard Mac programs. My experience with RUMlogNG so far has been seamless. Sorry, I can’t speak to CW operation. wunder K6WRU CM87wj http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) On Jul 10, 2015, at 6:26 PM, Byron Peebles <n...@arrl.net> wrote: > So many great people sent great responses, thank you. That's how this kind > of community adds value. > > I would summarize the replies as saying MacLogger or RUMlog are the best. > > So, now it's down to operating. As a CW operator, I use a keyboard (yikes!) > and functions keys (op: tnx es 73 gd dx). > > So, how does either one make life better real-time? Both are crash-free, I > hope. No staqggering USB delays, like you-know-who. > > 72, Byron NZ3o/qr..p > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to wun...@wunderwood.org ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
