Re: [Elecraft] Puffing to keep up with the Nanofarads...

2004-12-17 Thread Larry Phipps


Yes, this does seem logical... I have a kit of precision resistors 
that's at least 15 years old that is marked in that way... so it's not 
new. I know there have been recent attempts to standardize on a new 
system for parts... put forth by CCIR or IEEE or someone.


I guess I can deal with change, but there's something comforting about 
the system that was in place when I used to flip through the Allied and 
Lafayette catalogs as a youth... when the warm glow of vacuum tubes 
permeated the shack, when we used to have to trudge through a mile of 6' 
deep snow to go to school, when an atom was only made up of protons, 
neutrons and electrons... and when Superman stood for Truth, Justice and 
the American way ;-)


Larry N8LP


In Europe at least things seem to have gone another step forward in some  
quarters with what was expressed as 4.7nF (0.0047uF) now often written as 4n7.  
This follows through in other decades as 4p7 for 4.7pF, 4u7 for 4.7uF and so 
on.  The idea also seems to have been used with resistors where a 0.47 ohm is 
seen as  R47, a 4.7 ohm is now seen as 4R7, a 4.7K ohm as 4K7 and a 4.7M ohm as  
4M7.


The method has less chance of misinterpretation it would seem.

The biggest change on my part was going from metres to kc/s and the like,  
kc/s to kHz not really representing a problem.


Bob, G3VVT
 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Puffing to keep up with the Nanofarads...

2004-12-17 Thread Mike S
At 09:06 PM 12/16/2004, Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 wrote...
And cycles for frequency, by itself means very little.  The proper
term was cycles per second, which is what Hertz replaces, not just
cycles 

I don't think Mr. Hertz used cycles since he was a scientist, and
would think accuracy of expression was important, but he probably used
cycles per second.

One might presume so, incorrectly. It was common convention to use kilocycles 
(KC) and megacycles (MC), excluding any reference to per second.

Here's an ARC-5 transmitter, showing same: http://hug-a-bug.com/arc5b.jpg

This convention also carried over into more formal texts: 
http://www.nj7p.org/manuals/arc-5/arc-5.html#_Toc460591310

Hertz himself, although occasionally making reference to times per second, 
more often used period of oscillation and usually used wavelength, which 
makes sense, since this was much easier to measure at the time. Here's a brief 
portion of Electrical Waves: 
http://historical.library.cornell.edu/gifcache/cdl/cdl334/00134.TIF6.gif


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Puffing to keep up with the Nanofarads...

2004-12-16 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Larry, N8LP wrote:

Oops... it was pointed out to me off-list that the required cap is 4.7 
nf... not the 4.7 pf I misread it as. I would expect 4.7 nf more 
commonly to be written as .0047 uf, but maybe it's an international thing.


Your age is showing Larry. Even though I do it every day, day in and day
out, nf just isn't intuitive to me. I constantly do a double-take and
mentally shift that decimal point over three spaces. 

But we're doomed. The engineering schools today use nf just as often as my
instructors used pf and ufd. My capacitor meter even defaults to the nf
scale!!!

Shoot, I remember when pf was never seen in electronics. Picofarad was
written micro-microfarad or uufd.

Sometimes I feel like I'm puffing along to keep up, Hi!  

Ron AC7AC





___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Puffing to keep up with the Nanofarads...

2004-12-16 Thread Larry Phipps
Guilty on the age charge! I also remember uufd... and what's this 
newfangled Hz thing? Hi Hi.


Larry N8LP


Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:


Larry, N8LP wrote:

Oops... it was pointed out to me off-list that the required cap is 4.7 
nf... not the 4.7 pf I misread it as. I would expect 4.7 nf more 
commonly to be written as .0047 uf, but maybe it's an international thing.



Your age is showing Larry. Even though I do it every day, day in and day
out, nf just isn't intuitive to me. I constantly do a double-take and
mentally shift that decimal point over three spaces. 


But we're doomed. The engineering schools today use nf just as often as my
instructors used pf and ufd. My capacitor meter even defaults to the nf
scale!!!

Shoot, I remember when pf was never seen in electronics. Picofarad was
written micro-microfarad or uufd.

Sometimes I feel like I'm puffing along to keep up, Hi!  


Ron AC7AC





___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Puffing to keep up with the Nanofarads...

2004-12-16 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Larry, N8LP wrote:

Guilty on the age charge! I also remember uufd... and what's this 
newfangled Hz thing? Hi Hi.



That hurts too (pun intended). 

Ron (often found around 7,035 or 3,545 kc/s) AC7AC


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


FW: [Elecraft] Puffing to keep up with the Nanofarads...

2004-12-16 Thread Dan Barker
Hertz's is kinda like cycles. When you hear 4 MHz, think 4000 KCS.

Dan / WG4S / K2 #2456

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Larry Phipps
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 1:49 PM
Cc: 'Elecraft@Mailman.Qth.Net'
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Puffing to keep up with the Nanofarads...


Guilty on the age charge! I also remember uufd... and what's this 
newfangled Hz thing? Hi Hi.

Larry N8LP
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: FW: [Elecraft] Puffing to keep up with the Nanofarads...

2004-12-16 Thread Kurt Cramer
Mr. Hertz called them cycles !!!

73, Kurt

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Puffing to keep up with the Nanofarads...

2004-12-16 Thread Paul Saville
My old physics professor made anyone using the term kilocycles ride one three 
times around the campus.

 Mr. Hertz called them cycles !!!


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Puffing to keep up with the Nanofarads...

2004-12-16 Thread Fred Jensen
Not to rain on anyone's parade, but I think I remember the terms and
abbreviations were:

Microfarads (mf) as in a 0.1mf wax impregnated paper condenser

Micromicrofarads (mmf) as in a 3-section 365mmf air variable condenser
for the TRF receiver.

As I recall, it generally was kilocycles (kc or kcs) through ten meters,
and thereafter megacycles (mc or mcs) up to what is now known as 1GHz
(which was called a kilomegacycle [kmcs]).  Anything above a few
kilomegacycles hadn't been invented yet.

I have learned to begin with I think I remember, because often I
really don't remember.

73 and Happy Holidays to all

Fred K6DGW
Auburn CA CM98lw

Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
 
 Larry, N8LP wrote:
 
 Guilty on the age charge! I also remember uufd... and what's this
 newfangled Hz thing? Hi Hi.
 
 
 
 That hurts too (pun intended).
 
 Ron (often found around 7,035 or 3,545 kc/s) AC7AC
 
 ___

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Puffing to keep up with the Nanofarads...

2004-12-16 Thread Larry Phipps
I agree with all that, although I remember referring to GHz as gc (as in 
2.1 gee-cee for 2.1 GHz).


My profs only knew Hertz as a radio pioneer... not a term... and my 
textbooks as well (still have them).


Larry N8LP


Fred Jensen wrote:


Not to rain on anyone's parade, but I think I remember the terms and
abbreviations were:

Microfarads (mf) as in a 0.1mf wax impregnated paper condenser

Micromicrofarads (mmf) as in a 3-section 365mmf air variable condenser
for the TRF receiver.

As I recall, it generally was kilocycles (kc or kcs) through ten meters,
and thereafter megacycles (mc or mcs) up to what is now known as 1GHz
(which was called a kilomegacycle [kmcs]).  Anything above a few
kilomegacycles hadn't been invented yet.

I have learned to begin with I think I remember, because often I
really don't remember.

73 and Happy Holidays to all

Fred K6DGW
Auburn CA CM98lw

Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
 


Larry, N8LP wrote:

Guilty on the age charge! I also remember uufd... and what's this
newfangled Hz thing? Hi Hi.



That hurts too (pun intended).

Ron (often found around 7,035 or 3,545 kc/s) AC7AC

___
   



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Puffing to keep up with the Nanofarads...

2004-12-16 Thread Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604
   Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 17:40:39 -0800
   From: Fred Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   Not to rain on anyone's parade, but I think I remember the terms and
   abbreviations were:

   Microfarads (mf) as in a 0.1mf wax impregnated paper condenser

Actually, what you're showing as an m was a lower-case Greek Mu.
m means milli, an order of magnitude different.

   Micromicrofarads (mmf) as in a 3-section 365mmf air variable condenser
   for the TRF receiver.

   As I recall, it generally was kilocycles (kc or kcs) through ten meters,
   and thereafter megacycles (mc or mcs) up to what is now known as 1GHz
   (which was called a kilomegacycle [kmcs]).  Anything above a few
   kilomegacycles hadn't been invented yet.

And cycles for frequency, by itself means very little.  The proper
term was cycles per second, which is what Hertz replaces, not just
cycles 

I don't think Mr. Hertz used cycles since he was a scientist, and
would think accuracy of expression was important, but he probably used
cycles per second.

73, doug

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Puffing to keep up with the Nanofarads...

2004-12-16 Thread David A. Belsley

That's why it was named **after** Hertz.




On Dec 16, 2004, at 6:47 PM, Kurt Cramer wrote:


Mr. Hertz called them cycles !!!

73, Kurt

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com