Re: [Elecraft] Re： Raves about the K3
Or how about this. You could buy a pretty much loaded K3 *AND* a 7700 for what a 7800 costs. I hate to open up the K4 discussion again, but a K3,P3,KPA500, wrapped up in a QRO box with more spread out switchcraft, large dual speakers, and band buttons seems like a no brainer. I would sell my 9000D for one, and keep my K3 for backup, and field use. 73 Jeff kb2m -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Johnny Siu Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2010 18:45 PM To: ed.cie...@verizon.net; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Re： Raves about the K3 Hello Ed, I am also using IC7700. Could you please share your comments in the IC7700 yahoo mail reflector group? I don't want to cross post your message in that group without your permission. cheers, Johnny VR2XMC - 郵件原件 寄件人﹕ Ed Cienki ed.cie...@verizon.net 收件人﹕ elecraft@mailman.qth.net 傳送日期﹕ 2010/12/12 (日) 1:42:55 AM 主題： [Elecraft] Raves about the K3 This is my first post to this reflector and would like to share some of my observations. First. I have a 4xxx series K3, built by Elecraft that is fully outfitted and filtered running LP-Pan, an EMU-0202 and a MicroHam Station Master. Second, I have been operating an IC-7700 for the past 2 yrs. That being said I have run both rigs side-by-side into a IC-PW1 and Palstar AT-Auto. I must say that each radio has its own benefits and is outstanding to operate, but here is where the K3 shines: 1. True dual VFO/dual receive; 2. Easy MARS modification (yes, I am a licensed AF MARS Operator); 3. IF out. LP-Pan and PowerSDR are outstanding; 4. ESSB - of course with the proper filtering being installed; 5. Tx Eq and Noise Gate - No out-board W2IHY EQ is needed (sorry Julius); 6. Light weight; 7. Unbelievable receive audio with the appropriate filtering; 8. Menu flexibility;and 9. Easy updating of firmware. Candidly, I still love and use the IC-7700, but more and more I am utilizing the K3. The K3 is an outstanding value and robust transceiver. As a separate matter (a bit of a rant here), and for example having seen the ARRL and Sherwood engineering reports regarding the FTDX-5000. We as hams are always in search of nirvana. While I have heard the issues regarding the FTDX-5000 design that have not made the mainstream press, the issue here is not to bash Yaesu, but to congratulate and thank Wayne and Eric for the OUTSTANDING job, not only with the design and operation of the K3, but their support of the user group to identify issues and improvements and their outstanding customer support when you call them for assistance. Kudos to Elecraft. Best, 73, Ed, N2EAC __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Re： Raves about the K3
Hi Johnny: I have read your posts, private emails to me and I certainly respect your opinions. Like I've said below, I love each radio for different reasons. But, I am not looking to nit-pick either radio. I was just stating some of the more pronounced differences that I find favorable with the K3 and why I purchased it over any other radio as a second radio in my shack alongside of my IC-7700. Candidly, I am not interested in cross-posting my comments to the IC-7700 reflector or granting copyright to permit any cross-posting. These are my opinions about 2 very different radio's at 2 very different price points and I am very happy with the functionality of each of them in different settings. In the US the K3 fully outfitted and built by Elecraft is between $2,000 and $2,500 less than the IC-7700. So there is a big price difference. On HF, other than operating on the AF MARS frequencies, I am predominantly a rag-chewer (mainly on 160m very late at night), non-contester/Non-Dx'er (although not my passion, I will chase some rare Dx), conversational CW operator (20m - albeit about 17 wpm). My raves are about the K3 are intended to let the K3 community (and especially Wayne and Eric) know what features are desirable, why they are desirable and to assist and give them some direction from the user community. Best 73, Ed, N2EAC -Original Message- From: Johnny Siu [mailto:vr2...@yahoo.com.hk] Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2010 6:45 PM To: ed.cie...@verizon.net; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re： [Elecraft] Raves about the K3 Hello Ed, I am also using IC7700. Could you please share your comments in the IC7700 yahoo mail reflector group? I don't want to cross post your message in that group without your permission. cheers, Johnny VR2XMC - 郵件原件 寄件人﹕ Ed Cienki ed.cie...@verizon.net 收件人﹕ elecraft@mailman.qth.net 傳送日期﹕ 2010/12/12 (日) 1:42:55 AM 主題： [Elecraft] Raves about the K3 This is my first post to this reflector and would like to share some of my observations. First. I have a 4xxx series K3, built by Elecraft that is fully outfitted and filtered running LP-Pan, an EMU-0202 and a MicroHam Station Master. Second, I have been operating an IC-7700 for the past 2 yrs. That being said I have run both rigs side-by-side into a IC-PW1 and Palstar AT-Auto. I must say that each radio has its own benefits and is outstanding to operate, but here is where the K3 shines: 1. True dual VFO/dual receive; 2. Easy MARS modification (yes, I am a licensed AF MARS Operator); 3. IF out. LP-Pan and PowerSDR are outstanding; 4. ESSB - of course with the proper filtering being installed; 5. Tx Eq and Noise Gate - No out-board W2IHY EQ is needed (sorry Julius); 6. Light weight; 7. Unbelievable receive audio with the appropriate filtering; 8. Menu flexibility;and 9. Easy updating of firmware. Candidly, I still love and use the IC-7700, but more and more I am utilizing the K3. The K3 is an outstanding value and robust transceiver. As a separate matter (a bit of a rant here), and for example having seen the ARRL and Sherwood engineering reports regarding the FTDX-5000. We as hams are always in search of nirvana. While I have heard the issues regarding the FTDX-5000 design that have not made the mainstream press, the issue here is not to bash Yaesu, but to congratulate and thank Wayne and Eric for the OUTSTANDING job, not only with the design and operation of the K3, but their support of the user group to identify issues and improvements and their outstanding customer support when you call them for assistance. Kudos to Elecraft. Best, 73, Ed, N2EAC Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Re： Raves about the K3
Jeff, Since the K3, P3 and KPA500 are the same height, you may want to figure out how to attach one to the other (metal strips on the bottom come to mind), so it is all one big unit. Then you could have all that functionality in one package. I will keep mine as separate assemblies, thank you. I know that is not what you meant, but I just could not resist - I see no advantage to having all that in one single enclosure. 73, Don W3FPR On 12/12/2010 9:20 AM, Jeff KB2M wrote: Or how about this. You could buy a pretty much loaded K3 *AND* a 7700 for what a 7800 costs. I hate to open up the K4 discussion again, but a K3,P3,KPA500, wrapped up in a QRO box with more spread out switchcraft, large dual speakers, and band buttons seems like a no brainer. I would sell my 9000D for one, and keep my K3 for backup, and field use. 73 Jeff kb2m .html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Re： Raves about the K3
and then, to make it all weigh more, stick some Dynamat Xtreme in the boxes. At about 0.5lb/ft^2 you should be able to increase the weight on your desk by several pounds. 73, Byron N6NUL On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote: Since the K3, P3 and KPA500 are the same height, you may want to figure out how to attach one to the other (metal strips on the bottom come to mind), so it is all one big unit. -- - Northern California Contest Club - CU in the 2011 Cal QSO Party 1-2 Oct 2011 - www.cqp.org __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Re： Raves about the K3
Hey, now what about a custom desktop case made to match the Elecraft K series equipment with slide in/out drawers (lockable via spring loaded screws) so that one BIG box shack becomes a reality. The huge advantage is IF an issue arises, simply 'pull' the defective item from the box and do what needs to be done but still have a somewhat functional rig IF the K3 is not at fault. I might even consider doing this myself so that for portable use I have just one box to pack up when on the move. Maybe a part number could be K3LB-500...:-) K3 = Radio LB = Large Box 500 = Total output power Aaaah...nice to dream eh? Now to think of a way to install a 'swing lifter' to heave the box from storage to desk...:-( 73's Gary On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Byron Servies by...@servies.us wrote: and then, to make it all weigh more, stick some Dynamat Xtreme in the boxes. At about 0.5lb/ft^2 you should be able to increase the weight on your desk by several pounds. 73, Byron N6NUL On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote: Since the K3, P3 and KPA500 are the same height, you may want to figure out how to attach one to the other (metal strips on the bottom come to mind), so it is all one big unit. -- - Northern California Contest Club - CU in the 2011 Cal QSO Party 1-2 Oct 2011 - www.cqp.org __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -- Gary VK4FD - Motorhome Mobile http://www.qsl.net/vk4fd/ K3 #679, P3 #546 For everything else there's Mastercard!!! __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] Re： Raves about the K3
Hello Ed, I am also using IC7700. Could you please share your comments in the IC7700 yahoo mail reflector group? I don't want to cross post your message in that group without your permission. cheers, Johnny VR2XMC - 郵件原件 寄件人﹕ Ed Cienki ed.cie...@verizon.net 收件人﹕ elecraft@mailman.qth.net 傳送日期﹕ 2010/12/12 (日) 1:42:55 AM 主題： [Elecraft] Raves about the K3 This is my first post to this reflector and would like to share some of my observations. First. I have a 4xxx series K3, built by Elecraft that is fully outfitted and filtered running LP-Pan, an EMU-0202 and a MicroHam Station Master. Second, I have been operating an IC-7700 for the past 2 yrs. That being said I have run both rigs side-by-side into a IC-PW1 and Palstar AT-Auto. I must say that each radio has its own benefits and is outstanding to operate, but here is where the K3 shines: 1. True dual VFO/dual receive; 2. Easy MARS modification (yes, I am a licensed AF MARS Operator); 3. IF out. LP-Pan and PowerSDR are outstanding; 4. ESSB - of course with the proper filtering being installed; 5. Tx Eq and Noise Gate - No out-board W2IHY EQ is needed (sorry Julius); 6. Light weight; 7. Unbelievable receive audio with the appropriate filtering; 8. Menu flexibility;and 9. Easy updating of firmware. Candidly, I still love and use the IC-7700, but more and more I am utilizing the K3. The K3 is an outstanding value and robust transceiver. As a separate matter (a bit of a rant here), and for example having seen the ARRL and Sherwood engineering reports regarding the FTDX-5000. We as hams are always in search of nirvana. While I have heard the issues regarding the FTDX-5000 design that have not made the mainstream press, the issue here is not to bash Yaesu, but to congratulate and thank Wayne and Eric for the OUTSTANDING job, not only with the design and operation of the K3, but their support of the user group to identify issues and improvements and their outstanding customer support when you call them for assistance. Kudos to Elecraft. Best, 73, Ed, N2EAC Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
