Re: [Elecraft] [K2] Question about cheap and dirty signal tracing

2010-01-12 Thread Don Wilhelm
Kevin,

It is normal to see a higher response touching a random, wire to C6 
compared to touching the same wire to W6.  The C6 location is a high 
impedance point while the W6 and D6 locations are low impedance - the 
capacitive dividers (C7,8 and C4,5) reduce the impedance.
The end of a random wire is a high impedance and matches better at C6.  
If you were connecting the center conductor and ground the shield of a 
properly matched feedline close to the test point, you would likely find 
a better response at W6 than at C6.
That is why that testing technique is called Cheap and Dirty - it does 
have some eccentricities that the user needs to be aware of (like this 
one), but overall is a quick troubleshooting aid.

If you are getting about the same response at D6 and W6, then the 
bandpass filter is probably OK.

73,
Don W3FPR

Kevin Cozens wrote:
 Greetings.

 I have barely used my K2 going on about two years now. It seemed to work 
 well when I first got it off the person who had assembled it. I got 
 occasional comments about good audio when operating on SSB. I then 
 started applying the mods to bring it in line with the post 3000 serial 
 number units, applied the PLL stability mode, and replaced the crystals 
 with a more closely matching set, and completely re-aligned the radio.

 Since then, the radio seems to have become slightly deaf, and I also 
 have some issues with transmit audio. I've considered selling it to 
 someone who could fix it and starting over. Having acquired a good 
 digital storage oscilloscope some months back, I'm going to have another 
 shot at trying to fix the problems. I'll start by working on the receive 
 issues.

 I'm planning to get one of the Elecraft signal generator kits to help 
 with tracking down the receiver issues. Since I don't currently have 
 one, I'm starting with the cheap and dirty signal tracing notes from 
 Tom, N0SS. I pulled out the KSB2 and disconnected the KAT2 to eliminate 
 them as a source of problem. I have noticed one odd thing when using a 
 random length of wire and touching one end of it to the indicated test 
 points.

 Touching the wire to either side of C6 (RF Board page 3), the S meter 
 reading on the front panel goes up by about 2 LED's. What is odd is that 
 if I touch W6, or either end of D6 (the previous and next points in the 
 signal chain) I don't see this level of increase in signal level.

 This isn't making sense to me right now. I would think I would get the 
 same signal level increase at either W6, or D6, but not at neither point 
 compared to both sides of C6. Could this indicate bad, or wrong value 
 caps, for C5 and/or C7? Any other thoughts about this rather odd 
 behaviour? Seems to be pointing towards something to investigate further 
 but I hope I don't have to removed that bottom rear panel as its more of 
 a pain to remove.
   

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] [K2] Question about cheap and dirty signal tracing

2010-01-12 Thread Kevin Cozens
Thank you Don, and Tom, for your replies.

Don Wilhelm wrote:
 It is normal to see a higher response touching a random, wire to C6 
 compared to touching the same wire to W6.  The C6 location is a high 
 impedance point while the W6 and D6 locations are low impedance - the 
 capacitive dividers (C7,8 and C4,5) reduce the impedance.

That makes sense. I knew something was odd when the signal levels at the 
test points before and after C6 gave the same but lower audible signal.

 If you are getting about the same response at D6 and W6, then the 
 bandpass filter is probably OK.

It would be nice to get my problems resolved in time for the local 
provincial QSO party which takes place around the third weekend in 
April. I think the only way to be sure whether the receiver of my K2 is 
up to snuff or not is to order an XG2 signal generator kit. That will 
help me to get a more accurate idea on the receivers sensitivity when 
running with and without the KAT2 (in case the KAT2 has been 
contributing in any way to apparent sensitivity problems).


If the cheap and dirty tracing doesn't seem to turn up any issues I'll 
have to start getting in there with the scope and check the voltage 
measurements at various points noted in the manual.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html