Two things about learning code:
1) It gets much harder after age 16, but
2) the development of Morse training software has made it MUCH easier than it
was in the pre-computer age.
I just wish they could stop publishing those stupid charts that show the
characters as dots and dashes. IMHO memorizing the code that way does a lot of
damage.
Vic 4X6GP
(CWops CWA advisor)
> On 15 Nov 2017, at 6:36, Walter Underwood wrote:
>
> Thank you for all the work you put into that.
>
> My story is a lot like some others, but I got my Novice license during the
> “two years and out” era (fall 1970). I didn’t make 13 wpm and I couldn’t
> renew the license, so I was out of the hobby until 2009. Meanwhile, I got an
> electrical engineering degree in signals and systems, with classes from some
> of the pioneers in DSP. I worked in that field for a few years, then moved to
> networking.
>
> Without code, I came back to amateur radio, first with General and then with
> Amateur Extra. I’m part of our local em-comm group and head up the Radio
> Scouting activities for the Boy Scouts in our area. When I can get on a
> summit, I do SOTA. A couple of times, I’ve made a stab at re-learning Morse,
> but it is really, really hard. For me, it is like doing taxes while drunk.
> Not pleasant. And don’t talk to me about “music and Morse”, because I’ve sung
> in church choirs for over twenty years. I’ll try again.
>
> wunder
> K6WRU
> Walter Underwood
> CM87wj
> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
>
>> On Nov 14, 2017, at 3:52 PM, Ken G Kopp wrote:
>>
>> After reading all the comments on the subject, I'd like to
>> offer the following ...
>>
>> I was one of the six people responsible for the "No Code
>> License". I consider it an honor to have been chosen as
>> a member of the study committee by the ARRL. FWIW,
>> each member of the committee was a dedicated CW
>> operator.
>>
>> It had nothing to do with "incentive licensing". We were told
>> by the both the FCC and the ARRL that some form of a code
>> free license -was- coming and they wanted to give the amateur
>> radio community a "say" in the matter.
>>
>> Our committee was widely publicized in the hobby's media
>> and we all received -lots- of correspondence, both pro and
>> con. I still have two cartons of letters in my attic. FWIW, the
>> letters are about 50/50 in favor and against.
>>
>> What eventually became the "no code license" differs a bit
>> from what was we proposed ... think 160M and 6M for example.
>> It was thought that because of TVI that 6M would not be a
>> good place to put inexperienced new hams and the lack of
>> activity and LORAN A on 160M was a detriment.
>>
>> The jury will always be out on whether "no code" has been
>> good for the hobby or not, but it was felt that the resulting
>> increase in the number of licenses may have "saved" the
>> hobby from the spectrum wolves on the prowl at the time.
>>
>> Trivia: We determined that if a person said they couldn't
>> learn the code there was no way to disprove that.
>>
>> One can -always- find a CW QSO to enjoy. I've been essentially
>> CW only since my Novice license in 1951 (WN5TKI) ... one of the
>> first issued ... and the FCC only came to Oklahoma City once a
>> year in those days. My SK Elmer (W5ADC) drove this 13 year
>> old kid the 90 miles to take the exam.
>>
>> 66 years have passed ... such changes I've seen.
>>
>> 73!
>>
>> Ken Kopp - K0PP
>> (Not a vanity call ... a story unto itself.)
>>
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com