Re: [elrepo] Should I be able to get a kernel dump from kernel-lt on CentOS 5.X
Thanks Alan. Understood. I'll build a debug version. It's just so nice
to install the RPM instead of doing a compile on my slow test machine.
Thanks for the reply and all you guys do.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Alan Bartlett a...@elrepo.org wrote:
On 17 April 2014 02:32, Antonio Dupont anto...@moosefactory.com wrote:
I've installed kernel-lt-3.2.57-1.el5.elrepo.i686.rpm on my CentOS 5.5
system because I'm trying to troubleshoot a third party USB hardware
issue
that causes the system to hang. If I issue the commands:
echo 1 /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq
echo c /proc/sysrq-trigger
The system looks like it's starting to capture the dump information, but
complains about many kernel-module version mismatches and the kernel
that it
says it's mismatching is cryptic. For example:
Mounting sysfs filesystem
Creating /dev
Creating inital device notes
Loading scsi_mod.ko module
insmod: kernel-module version mismatch
/lib/modules/3.2.57-1.el5.elrepo/scsi_mod.ko was compiled for kernel
version
M?**=a while this kernel is version 3.2.57-1.el5.elrepo
The M?**=a is the cryptic part. The ** are actually suppose to be boxes,
but I don't know how to make that system.
With the latest CentOS 5.X debug kernel (kernel-debug-2.6.18-371.6.1.el5)
when I issue those commands kdump starts and captures system information
in
a vmcore file.
Does kernel-lt-3.2.57-1.el5.elrepo have the capability to capture kernel
dump information? If so, any appearant indications of what I am doing
wrong. If no, I will work on compiling my own 3.2.57 kernel with the
necessary parameters. Any suggestions are appreciated.
Thanks for you help in advance.
Regards,
Antonio
Sorry but kernel-lt-3.2.57-1.el5.elrepo is just a standard kernel
package and not a debug kernel package. The ELRepo Project does not
build any kernel-{lt|ml}-debug packages.
To use the CentOS/RHEL analogy, the standard kernel package is
kernel-2.6.18-371.6.1.el5 and the debug kernel package is
kernel-debug-2.6.18-371.6.1.el5 Notice the difference in the package
names?
Alan.
___
elrepo mailing list
elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo
___
elrepo mailing list
elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo
[elrepo] Should I be able to get a kernel dump from kernel-lt on CentOS 5.X
I've installed kernel-lt-3.2.57-1.el5.elrepo.i686.rpm on my CentOS 5.5 system because I'm trying to troubleshoot a third party USB hardware issue that causes the system to hang. If I issue the commands: echo 1 /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq echo c /proc/sysrq-trigger The system looks like it's starting to capture the dump information, but complains about many kernel-module version mismatches and the kernel that it says it's mismatching is cryptic. For example: Mounting sysfs filesystem Creating /dev Creating inital device notes Loading scsi_mod.ko module insmod: kernel-module version mismatch /lib/modules/3.2.57-1.el5.elrepo/scsi_mod.ko was compiled for kernel version M?**=a while this kernel is version 3.2.57-1.el5.elrepo The M?**=a is the cryptic part. The ** are actually suppose to be boxes, but I don't know how to make that system. With the latest CentOS 5.X debug kernel (kernel-debug-2.6.18-371.6.1.el5) when I issue those commands kdump starts and captures system information in a vmcore file. Does kernel-lt-3.2.57-1.el5.elrepo have the capability to capture kernel dump information? If so, any appearant indications of what I am doing wrong. If no, I will work on compiling my own 3.2.57 kernel with the necessary parameters. Any suggestions are appreciated. Thanks for you help in advance. Regards, Antonio ___ elrepo mailing list elrepo@lists.elrepo.org http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo
Re: [elrepo] How long does kernel release stay in the downloads area?
Hello Alan, I see that there are now a few previous versions of the El Repo built kernel and wanted to thank you. This really helps in the verification of my builds against a third party since they are able to test with the same kernel I used when I made my build. This is very much appreciated. And I understand these kernels are for development purposes and will do heavy testing if I use otherwise. Thank you and best regards, Antonio On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Alan Bartlett a...@elrepo.org wrote: A couple of quick comments from me. An upstream bug-fix to kernel-ml-3.5.4-1.el6.elrepo, that is kernel-ml-3.5.5-1.el6.elrepo, is currently in the build-queue and will be released later today. The successor to the kernel-ml-3.5.x package, kernel-ml-3.6.0-1.el6.elrepo is currently being configured, verified, etc, and, all being well, should be released this week. Hence the kernel-ml package is one that constantly evolves and progresses in a forwards direction. Alan. ___ elrepo mailing list elrepo@lists.elrepo.org http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo ___ elrepo mailing list elrepo@lists.elrepo.org http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo
