Re: [O] org-babel for prolog

2015-05-17 Thread Bjarte Johansen

 On 16 May 2015, at 15:31, Lawrence Bottorff borg...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 No worries. I can wait. Thanks again for your efforts.

I had some spare time today that I didn’t expect. I believe I have fixed the 
bug.

Kind regards,
Bjarte



Re: [O] org-babel for prolog

2015-05-16 Thread Lawrence Bottorff
No worries. I can wait. Thanks again for your efforts.

On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Bjarte Johansen 
bjarte.johan...@infomedia.uib.no wrote:


 On 16 May 2015, at 15:00, Lawrence Bottorff borg...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm just a Prolog beginner, but this:

 #+begin_src prolog
 edge(a,b).
 edge(a,e).
 edge(b,d).
 edge(b,c).
 edge(c,a).
 edge(e,b).
 tedge(Node1,Node2) :-
 edge(Node1,SomeNode),
 edge(SomeNode,Node2).
 #+end_src

 keeps giving me this:

 executing Prolog code block...
 executing Prolog source code block
 org-babel-execute:prolog: Wrong type argument: char-or-string-p, ni


 Thank you for reporting a bug. I think I see what the problem is. You
 haven't defined a goal for the source block and ob-prolog doesn't guard for
 that. It should be easy to fix, but I am not sure if I will be able to do
 that before next week. If you want you can try to fix it yourself and send
 a PR on GitHub or a patch here.

 BTW, should it be

 (eval-after-load 'org
   '(require 'ob-prolog))

 or

 (eval-after-load org
   '(require 'ob-prolog))

 . . . org in quotes?


 I think both should work. I can't check right now as I only have my phone
 with me right now.


 On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Bjarte Johansen 
 bjarte.johan...@infomedia.uib.no wrote:


  On 14 May 2015, at 20:22, Puneeth Chaganti puncha...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Lawrence Bottorff borg...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  Confused by the requirement:
 
  ;; To activate ob-prolog add the following to your init.el file:
  ;;
  ;;  (eval-after-load 'org
  ;;'(require 'org-prolog))
 
 
  I'm guessing its a typo and should be ob-prolog. The file provides
 ob-prolog.

 Yes, I typed it wrong. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. I also
 discovered that it is better to use `org-babel-do-load-languages’ instead
 as well. I will change the recommendation tomorrow.

 Regards,
 Bjarte





Re: [O] org-babel for prolog

2015-05-16 Thread Lawrence Bottorff
I'm just a Prolog beginner, but this:

#+begin_src prolog
edge(a,b).
edge(a,e).
edge(b,d).
edge(b,c).
edge(c,a).
edge(e,b).
tedge(Node1,Node2) :-
edge(Node1,SomeNode),
edge(SomeNode,Node2).
#+end_src

keeps giving me this:

executing Prolog code block...
executing Prolog source code block
org-babel-execute:prolog: Wrong type argument: char-or-string-p, ni

BTW, should it be

(eval-after-load 'org
  '(require 'ob-prolog))

or

(eval-after-load org
  '(require 'ob-prolog))

. . . org in quotes?

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Bjarte Johansen 
bjarte.johan...@infomedia.uib.no wrote:


  On 14 May 2015, at 20:22, Puneeth Chaganti puncha...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Lawrence Bottorff borg...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  Confused by the requirement:
 
  ;; To activate ob-prolog add the following to your init.el file:
  ;;
  ;;  (eval-after-load 'org
  ;;'(require 'org-prolog))
 
 
  I'm guessing its a typo and should be ob-prolog. The file provides
 ob-prolog.

 Yes, I typed it wrong. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. I also
 discovered that it is better to use `org-babel-do-load-languages’ instead
 as well. I will change the recommendation tomorrow.

 Regards,
 Bjarte


Re: [O] org-babel for prolog

2015-05-14 Thread Lawrence Bottorff
Thanks for your great effort, BTW.

Confused by the requirement:

;; To activate ob-prolog add the following to your init.el file:
;;
;;  (eval-after-load 'org
;;'(require 'org-prolog))

My Emacs ( 24.5.1) gives an error with this line. I know I'm probably
missing something obvious, but what is org-prolog?

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Bjarte Johansen 
bjarte.johan...@infomedia.uib.no wrote:

 I thought you should know that I moved the project here:
 https://github.com/ljos/ob-prolog This makes it a bit easier for me to
 track issues and do proper commit-messages etc.

 I have now implemented the session stuff properly (I think). I still have
 to implement the variable stuff and expansion of the body (or I can perhaps
 just use the generic function).


 19. des. 2014 kl. 16.25 skrev Bjarte Johansen 
 bjarte.johan...@infomedia.uib.no:

 I just wanted to report that it is now possible to evaluate prolog code
 and it should return the correct result. Both as a call to the executable
 and in a session. When calling a goal in a session, I add a cut at the end
 of the goal so that prolog doesn’t ask if you want to get the next possible
 answer. I am not sure if this is the best approach.

 I haven’t implemented variable assignment yet because I haven’t decided
 how it should do that considering how prolog uses variables. If someone has
 any ideas for this I would be glad to hear them. I have considered entering
 the variables into the prolog database with the record predicates or
 replacing all prolog variables with the same name as in the var declaration
 with the value. The last one I don’t think is a particularly good idea,
 except if we only replace the free variables.

 Regards,
 Bjarte


 10. des. 2014 kl. 18.20 skrev Bjarte Johansen 
 bjarte.johan...@infomedia.uib.no:

 Hi,

 I have started to implement org-babel support for (swi-)prolog. I have
 gotten to the point where I can execute a goal in an external process and
 have the result show up in the org file. I am now working on getting the
 session to work correctly. It runs and prints, but it doesn’t do the
 correct thing in the inferior-mode-buffer and the output is garbled. I
 still have some work ahead of me.

 I just thought I would let you know in case someone was interested in
 following the progress or maybe also in helping me. I have the mode hosted
 in its current state here
 https://gist.github.com/ljos/2e346333e1b7bfd56d05 .

 And before you ask, yes, if I get this into a working order, I would
 eventually be interested in getting this into either contrib or core.

 Regards,
 Bjarte






Re: [O] org-babel for prolog

2015-05-14 Thread Puneeth Chaganti
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Lawrence Bottorff borg...@gmail.com wrote:

 Confused by the requirement:

 ;; To activate ob-prolog add the following to your init.el file:
 ;;
 ;;  (eval-after-load 'org
 ;;'(require 'org-prolog))


I'm guessing its a typo and should be ob-prolog. The file provides ob-prolog.



Re: [O] org-babel for prolog

2015-05-14 Thread Bjarte Johansen

 On 14 May 2015, at 20:22, Puneeth Chaganti puncha...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Lawrence Bottorff borg...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Confused by the requirement:
 
 ;; To activate ob-prolog add the following to your init.el file:
 ;;
 ;;  (eval-after-load 'org
 ;;'(require 'org-prolog))
 
 
 I'm guessing its a typo and should be ob-prolog. The file provides ob-prolog.

Yes, I typed it wrong. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. I also 
discovered that it is better to use `org-babel-do-load-languages’ instead as 
well. I will change the recommendation tomorrow.

Regards,
Bjarte


Re: [O] org-babel for prolog

2015-01-02 Thread Bjarte Johansen
I thought you should know that I moved the project here: 
https://github.com/ljos/ob-prolog https://github.com/ljos/ob-prolog This 
makes it a bit easier for me to track issues and do proper commit-messages etc.

I have now implemented the session stuff properly (I think). I still have to 
implement the variable stuff and expansion of the body (or I can perhaps just 
use the generic function). 


 19. des. 2014 kl. 16.25 skrev Bjarte Johansen 
 bjarte.johan...@infomedia.uib.no:
 
 I just wanted to report that it is now possible to evaluate prolog code and 
 it should return the correct result. Both as a call to the executable and in 
 a session. When calling a goal in a session, I add a cut at the end of the 
 goal so that prolog doesn’t ask if you want to get the next possible answer. 
 I am not sure if this is the best approach.
 
 I haven’t implemented variable assignment yet because I haven’t decided how 
 it should do that considering how prolog uses variables. If someone has any 
 ideas for this I would be glad to hear them. I have considered entering the 
 variables into the prolog database with the record predicates or replacing 
 all prolog variables with the same name as in the var declaration with the 
 value. The last one I don’t think is a particularly good idea, except if we 
 only replace the free variables.
 
 Regards,
 Bjarte
 
 
 10. des. 2014 kl. 18.20 skrev Bjarte Johansen 
 bjarte.johan...@infomedia.uib.no mailto:bjarte.johan...@infomedia.uib.no:
 
 Hi,
 
 I have started to implement org-babel support for (swi-)prolog. I have 
 gotten to the point where I can execute a goal in an external process and 
 have the result show up in the org file. I am now working on getting the 
 session to work correctly. It runs and prints, but it doesn’t do the correct 
 thing in the inferior-mode-buffer and the output is garbled. I still have 
 some work ahead of me.
 
 I just thought I would let you know in case someone was interested in 
 following the progress or maybe also in helping me. I have the mode hosted 
 in its current state here https://gist.github.com/ljos/2e346333e1b7bfd56d05 
 https://gist.github.com/ljos/2e346333e1b7bfd56d05 . 
 
 And before you ask, yes, if I get this into a working order, I would 
 eventually be interested in getting this into either contrib or core.
 
 Regards,
 Bjarte
 



Re: [O] org-babel for prolog

2014-12-19 Thread Bjarte Johansen
I just wanted to report that it is now possible to evaluate prolog code and it 
should return the correct result. Both as a call to the executable and in a 
session. When calling a goal in a session, I add a cut at the end of the goal 
so that prolog doesn’t ask if you want to get the next possible answer. I am 
not sure if this is the best approach.

I haven’t implemented variable assignment yet because I haven’t decided how it 
should do that considering how prolog uses variables. If someone has any ideas 
for this I would be glad to hear them. I have considered entering the variables 
into the prolog database with the record predicates or replacing all prolog 
variables with the same name as in the var declaration with the value. The last 
one I don’t think is a particularly good idea, except if we only replace the 
free variables.

Regards,
Bjarte


 10. des. 2014 kl. 18.20 skrev Bjarte Johansen 
 bjarte.johan...@infomedia.uib.no:
 
 Hi,
 
 I have started to implement org-babel support for (swi-)prolog. I have gotten 
 to the point where I can execute a goal in an external process and have the 
 result show up in the org file. I am now working on getting the session to 
 work correctly. It runs and prints, but it doesn’t do the correct thing in 
 the inferior-mode-buffer and the output is garbled. I still have some work 
 ahead of me.
 
 I just thought I would let you know in case someone was interested in 
 following the progress or maybe also in helping me. I have the mode hosted in 
 its current state here https://gist.github.com/ljos/2e346333e1b7bfd56d05 
 https://gist.github.com/ljos/2e346333e1b7bfd56d05 . 
 
 And before you ask, yes, if I get this into a working order, I would 
 eventually be interested in getting this into either contrib or core.
 
 Regards,
 Bjarte



[O] org-babel for prolog

2014-12-10 Thread Bjarte Johansen
Hi,

I have started to implement org-babel support for (swi-)prolog. I have gotten 
to the point where I can execute a goal in an external process and have the 
result show up in the org file. I am now working on getting the session to work 
correctly. It runs and prints, but it doesn’t do the correct thing in the 
inferior-mode-buffer and the output is garbled. I still have some work ahead of 
me.

I just thought I would let you know in case someone was interested in following 
the progress or maybe also in helping me. I have the mode hosted in its current 
state here https://gist.github.com/ljos/2e346333e1b7bfd56d05 
https://gist.github.com/ljos/2e346333e1b7bfd56d05 . 

And before you ask, yes, if I get this into a working order, I would eventually 
be interested in getting this into either contrib or core.

Regards,
Bjarte