[Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-04-09 Thread Uday S Reddy

Robert Goldman wrote:


Is this really true?  In my days of using VM --- I eventually gave it up for
Thunderbird --- VM never had true IMAP support that could interact with folders
on the server.  All it did was use the IMAP protocol to populate its local mail
directory.  This isn't really full IMAP support, and it's not really adequate if
you want to get at your email from multiple different devices (hence my move to
Thunderbird).

Has this changed?  I used VM for a long time, and wouldn't mind going back to
it, if it could really talk to an IMAP server properly.  I don't see how the
architecture could be fixed to make that possible, though.


Dear Robert, the VM's vm-imap.el file lists a certain Robert P. Goldman as a 
contributor in 2006.  Is that you?

I am not sure what problems you think there are in the architecture of VM, but 
I started working on the IMAP support in 2008 and have been adding to it off 
and on since then.  The current public release (VM 8.1.0) caches an IMAP folder 
locally and sync's it with the server whenever you do 'save'.  I have been 
using this functionality since 2008 without any problems.

Some people say that they have very large IMAP folder and can't download them 
all into local caches.  The current development version (future VM 8.2.0) has 
an experimental implementation of a headers-only mode, whereby you can download 
just the headers.  Message bodies are retrieved as and when you view the 
messages.  This is essentially how Thunderbird works, or Gnus for that matter.

I would welcome you to give it a try and let me know if you face any problems.

Cheers,
Uday



___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-04-01 Thread peter . frings

On 31 Mar 2010, at 21:09, Gary wrote:

 On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:53:17PM +0100, Leo wrote:
 
 although many people have been saying it is
 intimidating, it is not.
 
 Oh yes it is :)

I kind of agree. This brings up another question, related to the recent 
discussion about making a 'ready to fly' emacs/org-mode package, suitable for 
the non-emacs-sapiens that are attracted by org-mode.

I can imagine those people would like to send their carefully crafted org 
buffers by email. Do you expect them to set up gnus/vm/wanderlust/... ? I guess 
not.

So, wouldn't it be good if org could send those nicely formatted emails using 
their mail clients? 'M-x org-send-email' and woosh, there it goes!

Org prepares the body, then tells the mail app to prepare an mail with it. On 
the mac with Mail.app that's fairly easy to do with Applescript, and I guess 
other mac clients provide similar access. On Windows or *nix I don't know, but 
I can only assume similar functionality exists.

Maybe we needs some hooks in some places to encode images and such, and a way 
to deal with the communication with the mail client, ... 

Wooosh, it would be nice.

Cheers,
Peter.

___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-04-01 Thread Eric Schulte
Hi Peter,

peter.fri...@agfa.com writes:


 So, wouldn't it be good if org could send those nicely formatted
 emails using their mail clients? 'M-x org-send-email' and woosh, there
 it goes!


I agree this would be nice, however my initial reaction is that this
will be the sort of project which has to be rewritten/tweaked for each
individual personal system configuration.

That said, since mml is distributed as part of Emacs, then the entire
mime encoding process could end up being relatively easy, the only
question is how to convince guified email clients to send pre-packaged
mime email.  I suspect this will be difficult for most email
applications, and impossible for web email clients (e.g. Gmail).

Also, if user's can send fancy email from civilian email clients why
would they switch to real Emacs based email clients. :)


 Org prepares the body, then tells the mail app to prepare an mail with
 it. On the mac with Mail.app that's fairly easy to do with
 Applescript, and I guess other mac clients provide similar access. On
 Windows or *nix I don't know, but I can only assume similar
 functionality exists.


That's great that this would be easy with Mail.app.  My uneducated guess
is that it will also be fairly easy with *nix clients like Thunderbird,
near impossible with MS Outlook, and fully impossible with web clients.

Hopefully I'm wrong on this, and I'd be happy to work on the org export
and mime-encoding portions of this task.

Cheers -- Eric


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-04-01 Thread Giovanni Ridolfi
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
 peter.fri...@agfa.com writes:
 Org prepares the body, then tells the mail app to prepare an mail with
 it. [...] 
 On Windows or *nix I don't know, but I can only assume similar
 functionality exists.


  My uneducated guess is that it will [...]
 near impossible with MS Outlook

My workflow for Outlook Express (6.00.29)  + (Windows XP SP 3) is: 

+ open  a html formatted message in outlook express (oe)
+ switch to Emacs and
+ export my email text (mainly quotations, with tables!) in a html file, 
+ view it in Firefox,
+ select with the mouse
+ cut  paste in the oe message

cheers,
Giovanni


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-04-01 Thread Henri-Paul Indiogine
Giovanni Ridolfi giovanni.rido...@yahoo.it writes:
 Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
 peter.fri...@agfa.com writes:
 Org prepares the body, then tells the mail app to prepare an mail with
 it. [...] 
 On Windows or *nix I don't know, but I can only assume similar
 functionality exists.

Just a suggestion from an almost beginner:

All Gnu Emacs distributions include both org-mode and gnus by default.
Maybe we could provide and .emacs file with code for org-mode and gnus
for IMAP and POP3 commented out in sections.  Then we could explain that
in case you need A and B you un-comment these sections and fill in the
appropriate data and so on. Or if you need A and C then you un-comment 

It still would require some basic editing of a text file, but since
someone has already decided to use a text editor that should not be a
major impediment.

I know it would have helped me immensely when I started out.


-- 
Henri-Paul Indiogine
Email: hindiog...@gmail.com
Skype: hindiogine
Website: http://www.coe.tamu.edu/~enrico


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-04-01 Thread Daniel Goldin
I too am a non-programmer-type who loves emacs/org-mode. I second this
approach. I don't think it will ever be possible -- nor desirable -- to
create a pure out-of-the-box setup as in window's programs -- but this
approach would work well for those of us able to tinker and learn a
little but not quick enough to build from scratch. A good initial
setup(s) and a good manual entry should suffice.

d.

On Thu, 01 Apr 2010, Henri-Paul Indiogine wrote:

 Giovanni Ridolfi giovanni.rido...@yahoo.it writes:
  Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
  peter.fri...@agfa.com writes:
  Org prepares the body, then tells the mail app to prepare an mail with
  it. [...] 
  On Windows or *nix I don't know, but I can only assume similar
  functionality exists.
 
 Just a suggestion from an almost beginner:
 
 All Gnu Emacs distributions include both org-mode and gnus by default.
 Maybe we could provide and .emacs file with code for org-mode and gnus
 for IMAP and POP3 commented out in sections.  Then we could explain that
 in case you need A and B you un-comment these sections and fill in the
 appropriate data and so on. Or if you need A and C then you un-comment 
 
 It still would require some basic editing of a text file, but since
 someone has already decided to use a text editor that should not be a
 major impediment.
 
 I know it would have helped me immensely when I started out.
 
 

-- 
Daniel Goldin 
213.926.1960


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-03-31 Thread Robert Goldman
Manuel Hermenegildo herme at fi.upm.es writes:

 
 
 I have to say in VM's defense that it is working very well for me (and
 has supported IMAP for a very long time) 

Is this really true?  In my days of using VM --- I eventually gave it up for
Thunderbird --- VM never had true IMAP support that could interact with folders
on the server.  All it did was use the IMAP protocol to populate its local mail
directory.  This isn't really full IMAP support, and it's not really adequate if
you want to get at your email from multiple different devices (hence my move to
Thunderbird).

Has this changed?  I used VM for a long time, and wouldn't mind going back to
it, if it could really talk to an IMAP server properly.  I don't see how the
architecture could be fixed to make that possible, though.





___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-03-31 Thread Nick Dokos
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:

 Manuel Hermenegildo herme at fi.upm.es writes:
 
  
  
  I have to say in VM's defense that it is working very well for me (and
  has supported IMAP for a very long time) 
 
 Is this really true?  In my days of using VM --- I eventually gave it up for
 Thunderbird --- VM never had true IMAP support that could interact with 
 folders
 on the server.  All it did was use the IMAP protocol to populate its local 
 mail
 directory.  This isn't really full IMAP support, and it's not really adequate 
 if
 you want to get at your email from multiple different devices (hence my move 
 to
 Thunderbird).
 
 Has this changed?  I used VM for a long time, and wouldn't mind going back to
 it, if it could really talk to an IMAP server properly.  I don't see how the
 architecture could be fixed to make that possible, though.
 
 

From the VM manual:

,
| IMAP Folders
| 
| VM's traditional mode of operation is to treat all remote mail sources
| as spool files, pulling all mail down from remote sources into local
| folders and deleting the remote copies. But sometimes it is more
| convenient to treat a remote mail source as a folder instead of a spool
| file, manipulating the remote source as if it were a folder instead of
| just a holding area for incoming messages.
| 
| The command vm-visit-imap-folder allows you to visit a IMAP mailbox as
| if it were a folder. When you visit a IMAP folder, VM will download
| copies of the messages that it finds there for you to read. If you
| delete and expunge messages in the local copy of the folder, the
| corresponding messages on the IMAP server will be removed when you save
| the changes with vm-save-folder.
| 
| Message attributes (new, replied, filed, etc.) are stored on the IMAP
| server and are also cached locally. Labels cannot be stored on the IMAP
| server but you can use them lcoally.
| 
| In order for VM to know about IMAP servers that you can access, you must
| declare them by setting the variable vm-imap-server-list. The variable's
| value should be a list of the form:
| 
|  (IMAPDROP IMAPDROP ...)
| 
| IMAPDROP is a IMAP maildrop specification in the same format used by
| vm-spool-files.
| 
| For example:
| 
| (setq vm-imap-server-list '(
|   imap-ssl:mail.foocorp.com:993:inbox:login:becky:*
|   imap:crickle.lex.ky.us:143:inbox:login:becky:* ) )
| 
| The mailbox (`inbox' in the example) is ignored; when when
| vm-visit-imap-folder asks for a folder name you can enter any folder
| that is acessible to you on the IMAP server.
`

HTH,
Nick


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-03-31 Thread Nick Dokos
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:

 Thanks for the news.  I'm looking forward to having a new look at VM, if
 it works well with IMAP now.
 
 Unfortunately, at least the documentation on the emacs wiki for how to
 use IMAP is badly ambiguous.  There's a paragraph on the distinction
 between the use of local folders and server folders, but no discussion
 of how to get the server folder behavior, and there's no discussion of
 how to configure to use server folders, although there's very detailed
 discussion of how to configure given that one is using remote folders
 

Robert,

I got the snippet out of the VM manual at

   http://www.wonderworks.com/vm/user-manual

Maybe that is more detailed/less ambiguous than the emacs wiki?

Nick

PS. BTW, I'm an MH-E user, so I know very little about VM.





___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-03-31 Thread Gary
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:53:17PM +0100, Leo wrote:

 although many people have been saying it is
 intimidating, it is not.

Oh yes it is :)

I fondly[1] remember spending *ages* trying to find out how to set the
citation line (you don't, you setq message-citation-line-function
'my-message-insert-citation-line instead).

[1] That may not be entirely true...

Anyway, isn't this all rather OT for this list? There is a *very* good
gnus list over there -


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-03-30 Thread Scott Brim
Simon Brown simon at cliffestones.demon.co.uk writes:

 
 Hi all,
 
 I currently use mutt as my email client but I'm looking for greater
 emacs integration and better html support. Org mode supports at least
 gnus, vm and wanderlust. Can anybody advise on the relative pros and
 cons? My main restriction is that I don't want to break my mutt setup,
 so the client must be able to work with my current collection of mbox
 files. I also have 3 IMAP accounts. Using emacs 23 and current org-mode.
 
 Simon

Wanderlust seems best at IMAP -- I would go there first, but if you've 
tolerated 
mutt's IMAP support this long, maybe you don't need good IMAP support.  VM 
has nice integration with w3m for HTML.  IMHO don't start on gnus if you've 
never used it.  Then there's MEW, which is also a good one.  They all work with 
mbox-style mail files.





___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-03-30 Thread Simon Brown
* Scott Brim (s...@employees.org) wrote:
 Wanderlust seems best at IMAP -- I would go there first, but if you've 
 tolerated 
 mutt's IMAP support this long, maybe you don't need good IMAP support.  VM 
 has nice integration with w3m for HTML.  IMHO don't start on gnus if you've 
 never used it.  Then there's MEW, which is also a good one.  They all work 
 with 
 mbox-style mail files.
I'm trying Wanderlust, but I've started to wonder if it's worth the
effort. I've moved from mbox to Maildirs but wanderlust doesn't seem
to be able to recognise the subdirectories. I don't want to be
changing config everytime I change a list subscription. I also have
yet to get it to successfully autheniticate with any imap server. 

I've got nowhere near trying the org integration. I might try
installing vm 8.1 but at the moment I've already squandered far too
much time on this.

Thanks

Simon
-- 
Simon Brown


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-03-30 Thread Richard Riley
Simon Brown si...@cliffestones.demon.co.uk writes:

 * Richard Riley (rileyrg...@gmail.com) wrote:
 This is pretty fanboi of me but its really simple : use Gnus. It can
 do imap fine (you can always move to using a local dovecot
 server and use offlineimap to sync if performance is a problem).
 I've had a quick look at the gnus manual and it seems to depend upon
 importing your mail which rules it out for me. I'm not prepared to
 start collecting mail in a mail reader specific way. Most of my mail
 is collected by fetchmail, the IMAP accounts are quite low traffic.

 Simon

I'm not sure I understand. Just point it at your mbox. Nothing to
import. Nothing at all is mail reader specific with regard to your
actual email as far as I know. Or did I misunderstand when you mentioned
importing email?

Even if you use fetchmail (I do too), you can fetchmail into maildir
(for example) and have something like dovecot serve it via IMAP. This
can be really handy for remote access.



___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-03-30 Thread Eric Schulte
At this point it feels somewhat more like voting rather than a
discussion, but I feel compelled to say...

  +1 for gnus!

Gnus has far and away the biggest user base, the best support, and is
the most actively developed (as far as I can tell VM -- which I used for
a couple of years-- is a dead project).  Gnus is distributed with Emacs
and all of it's mime and message handling libraries are distributed with
Emacs.

The config can be daunting if you don't have any help, however there are
many friendly people on this list who I'm sure would be happy to share
their gnus imap config (please feel free to contact me off list), and
once you have the basics working it's really a joy to use.

Just my personal subjective biased opinion :) -- Eric

Simon Brown si...@cliffestones.demon.co.uk writes:

 * Scott Brim (s...@employees.org) wrote:
 Wanderlust seems best at IMAP -- I would go there first, but if you've 
 tolerated 
 mutt's IMAP support this long, maybe you don't need good IMAP support.  VM 
 has nice integration with w3m for HTML.  IMHO don't start on gnus if you've 
 never used it.  Then there's MEW, which is also a good one.  They all work 
 with 
 mbox-style mail files.
 I'm trying Wanderlust, but I've started to wonder if it's worth the
 effort. I've moved from mbox to Maildirs but wanderlust doesn't seem
 to be able to recognise the subdirectories. I don't want to be
 changing config everytime I change a list subscription. I also have
 yet to get it to successfully autheniticate with any imap server. 

 I've got nowhere near trying the org integration. I might try
 installing vm 8.1 but at the moment I've already squandered far too
 much time on this.

 Thanks

 Simon


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-03-30 Thread Richard Riley
Simon Brown si...@cliffestones.demon.co.uk writes:

 * Scott Brim (s...@employees.org) wrote:
 Wanderlust seems best at IMAP -- I would go there first, but if you've 
 tolerated 
 mutt's IMAP support this long, maybe you don't need good IMAP support.  VM 
 has nice integration with w3m for HTML.  IMHO don't start on gnus if you've 
 never used it.  Then there's MEW, which is also a good one.  They all work 
 with 
 mbox-style mail files.
 I'm trying Wanderlust, but I've started to wonder if it's worth the
 effort. I've moved from mbox to Maildirs but wanderlust doesn't seem
 to be able to recognise the subdirectories. I don't want to be

Maybe its like dovecot  - the . prefix on the mailboxes.

 changing config everytime I change a list subscription. I also have

What do you mean by that? Why would you need to reconfigure each and
every time?

 yet to get it to successfully autheniticate with any imap server. 

 I've got nowhere near trying the org integration. I might try
 installing vm 8.1 but at the moment I've already squandered far too
 much time on this.

If you decided to move to maildir I'm wondering why you then decided to
use Wanderlust. Do you have your own IMAP server serving up from a maildir?


 Thanks

 Simon

Gnus has excellent maildir support ...



___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-03-30 Thread Manuel Hermenegildo

I have to say in VM's defense that it is working very well for me (and
has supported IMAP for a very long time) and there are indeed people
working actively it. The old 7.19 version has indeed been frozen for a
long time, but I am using the latest versions out of the repo on
Launchpad and Savannah,

https://launchpad.net/vm
https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/viewmail/ 

with emacs 23. While it is clear that it does not have a huge team
behind it, as you can see there Uday S. Reddy and Ulrich Mueller are
quite active maintainers (there were 28 commits in March, for
example).

VM provides all the functionality I need (including very good MIME and
html support, interacting very well with w3w) with an interface that
is very natural to emacs users (similar to rmail) and which avoids the
complications of gnus.  There is a good interface to maildir for
example, and also to org mode. The virtual folder mechanism is really
very good.

The only missing thing for me is direct support for maildir but the VM
maintainers are currently working on it.

Manuel

-- 
---
 Manuel Hermenegildo | Prof., C.S.Dept., T.U. Madrid (UPM)
 Director, IMDEA Software and CLIP Group | +34-91-336-7435 (W) -352-4819 (Fax)
---



___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-03-30 Thread Dan Davison
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:

 At this point it feels somewhat more like voting rather than a
 discussion, but I feel compelled to say...

   +1 for gnus!

Hi Simon,

I use gnus, and received help from people on the list. Here's a small
contribution if you do get going with it:

The listing of emails in the summary buffer will look *terrible* with
the default settings. But you can make it look really nice using unicode
characters for arrows etc. (Example settings below, screenshot at
http://www.princeton.edu/~ddavison/gnus.png)

(Plus, if you use gnus you don't have to see these ridiculous
Kindergarten-style dotted lines and scissors that people put in
emails :) )

Dan

--8---cut here---start-8---
;; 
http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.emacs.gnus/browse_thread/thread/a673a74356e7141f
(when window-system
  (setq gnus-sum-thread-tree-indent   )
  (setq gnus-sum-thread-tree-root ) ;; ● )
  (setq gnus-sum-thread-tree-false-root ) ;; ◯ )
  (setq gnus-sum-thread-tree-single-indent ) ;; ◎ )
  (setq gnus-sum-thread-tree-vertical│)
  (setq gnus-sum-thread-tree-leaf-with-other ├─► )
  (setq gnus-sum-thread-tree-single-leaf ╰─► ))

(setq gnus-summary-line-format
  (concat
   %0{%U%R%z%}
   %3{│%} %1{%d%} %3{│%} ;; date
 
   %4{%-20,20f%}   ;; name
 
   %3{│%}

   %1{%B%}
   %s\n))

(setq gnus-summary-display-arrow t)
--8---cut here---end---8---




 Gnus has far and away the biggest user base, the best support, and is
 the most actively developed (as far as I can tell VM -- which I used for
 a couple of years-- is a dead project).  Gnus is distributed with Emacs
 and all of it's mime and message handling libraries are distributed with
 Emacs.

 The config can be daunting if you don't have any help, however there are
 many friendly people on this list who I'm sure would be happy to share
 their gnus imap config (please feel free to contact me off list), and
 once you have the basics working it's really a joy to use.

 Just my personal subjective biased opinion :) -- Eric

 Simon Brown si...@cliffestones.demon.co.uk writes:

 * Scott Brim (s...@employees.org) wrote:
 Wanderlust seems best at IMAP -- I would go there first, but if you've 
 tolerated 
 mutt's IMAP support this long, maybe you don't need good IMAP support.  VM 
 has nice integration with w3m for HTML.  IMHO don't start on gnus if you've 
 never used it.  Then there's MEW, which is also a good one.  They all work 
 with 
 mbox-style mail files.
 I'm trying Wanderlust, but I've started to wonder if it's worth the
 effort. I've moved from mbox to Maildirs but wanderlust doesn't seem
 to be able to recognise the subdirectories. I don't want to be
 changing config everytime I change a list subscription. I also have
 yet to get it to successfully autheniticate with any imap server. 

 I've got nowhere near trying the org integration. I might try
 installing vm 8.1 but at the moment I've already squandered far too
 much time on this.

 Thanks

 Simon


 ___
 Emacs-orgmode mailing list
 Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
 Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
 http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-03-30 Thread Henri-Paul Indiogine
Dan Davison davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk writes:
 http://www.princeton.edu/~ddavison/gnus.png)

Thanks for the .gnus code.  Actually, I do not use .gnus and place all
in .emacs but I do not think that matters.

I run Ubuntu Karmic + Gnu Emacs 23.  Both updated

Anyway, now my summary buffer looks very much like the image that you placed
on-line. However I have some differences:

1. I do not have the arrows.  Does that have to do with some unicode
settings that I may have to change?

2. This is my old gnus-summary-line-format:

'(gnus-summary-line-format %U%R%z%user-date;%(%[: %-23,23f%]%) %s)

I liked the user-date because it would display the time of today's
emails that dates for older ones.

3. There are also color differences:  I do not have the dates colored
blue as you have.  My subject lines are colored green, red, white and
blue according to the marks that they have.  I find that useful and
would like to keep those colors.

Thanks,

-- 
Henri-Paul Indiogine
Email: hindiog...@gmail.com
Skype: hindiogine
Website: http://www.coe.tamu.edu/~enrico


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-03-30 Thread Dan Davison
Henri-Paul Indiogine hindiog...@gmail.com writes:

 Dan Davison davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk writes:
 http://www.princeton.edu/~ddavison/gnus.png)

 Thanks for the .gnus code.  Actually, I do not use .gnus and place all
 in .emacs but I do not think that matters.

 I run Ubuntu Karmic + Gnu Emacs 23.  Both updated

 Anyway, now my summary buffer looks very much like the image that you placed
 on-line. However I have some differences:

 1. I do not have the arrows.  Does that have to do with some unicode
 settings that I may have to change?

Ah, sorry, I think I should have included the following two variable
settings:

(setq gnus-thread-sort-functions
  '(gnus-thread-sort-by-number
gnus-thread-sort-by-most-recent-date))

(setq gnus-summary-thread-gathering-function
  'gnus-gather-threads-by-references)

Does that do it?

[...]

 3. There are also color differences:  I do not have the dates colored
 blue as you have.  My subject lines are colored green, red, white and
 blue according to the marks that they have.  I find that useful and
 would like to keep those colors.

These settings don't alter the faces, just the text. The colours in my
image are whatever color-theme-charcoal-black gave me (in the
color-themes package.)

Dan

So the full settings, including the ones I originally posted are:


--8---cut here---start-8---
(setq gnus-thread-sort-functions
  '(gnus-thread-sort-by-number
gnus-thread-sort-by-most-recent-date))

(setq gnus-summary-thread-gathering-function
  'gnus-gather-threads-by-references)

(setq gnus-summary-line-format
  (concat
   %0{%U%R%z%}
   %3{│%} %1{%d%} %3{│%} ;; date
 
   %4{%-20,20f%}   ;; name
 
   %3{│%}

   %1{%B%}
   %s\n))
(setq gnus-summary-display-arrow t)
;; 
http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.emacs.gnus/browse_thread/thread/a673a74356e7141f
(when window-system
  (setq gnus-sum-thread-tree-indent   )
  (setq gnus-sum-thread-tree-root ) ;; ● )
  (setq gnus-sum-thread-tree-false-root ) ;; ◯ )
  (setq gnus-sum-thread-tree-single-indent ) ;; ◎ )
  (setq gnus-sum-thread-tree-vertical│)
  (setq gnus-sum-thread-tree-leaf-with-other ├─► )
  (setq gnus-sum-thread-tree-single-leaf ╰─► ))
--8---cut here---end---8---



 Thanks,



___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-03-30 Thread Leo
On 2010-03-30 18:34 +0100, Manuel Hermenegildo wrote:
 I have to say in VM's defense that it is working very well for me (and
 has supported IMAP for a very long time) and there are indeed people
 working actively it. The old 7.19 version has indeed been frozen for a
 long time, but I am using the latest versions out of the repo on
 Launchpad and Savannah,

 https://launchpad.net/vm
 https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/viewmail/ 

 with emacs 23. While it is clear that it does not have a huge team
 behind it, as you can see there Uday S. Reddy and Ulrich Mueller are
 quite active maintainers (there were 28 commits in March, for
 example).

 VM provides all the functionality I need (including very good MIME and
 html support, interacting very well with w3w) with an interface that
 is very natural to emacs users (similar to rmail) and which avoids the
 complications of gnus.  There is a good interface to maildir for
 example, and also to org mode. The virtual folder mechanism is really
 very good.

 The only missing thing for me is direct support for maildir but the VM
 maintainers are currently working on it.

 Manuel

Now that message mode has become the default mailer in Emacs 23.2+
unless people are already using a mua that they like, it is highly
advisable to use Gnus, which although many people have been saying it is
intimidating, it is not.

It is intimidating only because it is like org, it can do so many things
related to email/news but you don't need to do them all at the
beginning. Give it a news server such as news.gmane.org then you can
start using it on browsing mailing lists of projects of your interest
including this one.

Leo

-- 
H A P P Y  H O L I D A Y S!


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-03-30 Thread Geralt
Hi,

wow, that looks really great, thanks :-)!



Do you know by chance if it's possible to link sent mails in threads?
I'm using Gmail and all my sent mail is in a folder called INBOX and
it would be really great if I could see my own messages in the
threads.




Geralt.


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-03-29 Thread Richard Riley
Simon Brown si...@cliffestones.demon.co.uk writes:

 Hi all,

 I currently use mutt as my email client but I'm looking for greater
 emacs integration and better html support. Org mode supports at least
 gnus, vm and wanderlust. Can anybody advise on the relative pros and
 cons? My main restriction is that I don't want to break my mutt setup,
 so the client must be able to work with my current collection of mbox
 files. I also have 3 IMAP accounts. Using emacs 23 and current org-mode.

 Simon

This is pretty fanboi of me but its really simple : use Gnus. It can
do imap fine (you can always move to using a local dovecot
server and use offlineimap to sync if performance is a problem).

While I personally detest html email of any kind I understand that we
need to, at least, receive it ;) Gnus does that nicely with w3m
rendering if necessary.

I use maildir : you could always (should you want of course) simply move
all messages from an mbox group to a maildir inside gnus. While I cant
attest to Gnus and mbox, the documentation indicates full support.

Mairix also works well in gnus for fast indexed mail search.

The only thing I would say is that Gnus  can be quite daunting to start
with but if you're familiar with Emacs and Elisp then there's nothing
insurmountable and its a question of getting the basics right at the
start. It also has quite amazingly (complex!) powerful spam handling
which I finally got working only recently...

Nothing really relative there but my gut feeling is that the other
clients are pretty minimally supported these days and not in the same
league regarding general functionality but obviously have their own
strengths - Wanderlust in particular has far better Imap support I am
told. But the person who told me that also claimed that Gnus could not
do IMAP which is not correct.

Gnus also works well with things like gpg-agent and gnupgp for reading of 
encrypted
files. e.g My local imap connection

,
|(add-to-list 'gnus-secondary-select-methods 
|'(nnimap mymail
|(nnimap-stream network)
|(nnimap-address offlineimap)
|(nnimap-authinfo-file ~/.authinfo.gpg)
|(nnir-search-engine imap)))
`

Feel free to drop me a line when you get started if you need a shove.

Oh ...  And it reads News 




___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-03-29 Thread Simon Brown
* Richard Riley (rileyrg...@gmail.com) wrote:
 This is pretty fanboi of me but its really simple : use Gnus. It can
 do imap fine (you can always move to using a local dovecot
 server and use offlineimap to sync if performance is a problem).
I've had a quick look at the gnus manual and it seems to depend upon
importing your mail which rules it out for me. I'm not prepared to
start collecting mail in a mail reader specific way. Most of my mail
is collected by fetchmail, the IMAP accounts are quite low traffic.

Simon
-- 
Simon Brown


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: Org mode and emacs email

2010-03-29 Thread Łukasz Stelmach
Simon Brown si...@cliffestones.demon.co.uk writes:

 * Richard Riley (rileyrg...@gmail.com) wrote:
 This is pretty fanboi of me but its really simple : use Gnus. It can
 do imap fine (you can always move to using a local dovecot
 server and use offlineimap to sync if performance is a problem).
 I've had a quick look at the gnus manual and it seems to depend upon
 importing your mail which rules it out for me. I'm not prepared to
 start collecting mail in a mail reader specific way. Most of my mail
 is collected by fetchmail, the IMAP accounts are quite low traffic.

This is not a problem. I've used (or do I still do it?) gnus with
fetchmail witho no trouble whatsoever. As it's been stated geting Gnus
set and ready may take some time but its worth it. Gnus supports mbox
quite well with nnfolder backend.

-- 
Miłego dnia,
Łukasz Stelmach



___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode