Re: [O] [PATCH] org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Remove code duplication

2014-05-15 Thread Bastien
Hi Albert,

Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:

 Albert Krewinkel writes:
 Done.  As an aside: I did sign the copyright assignment papers to be
 able to contrivute to Gnus, but that probably wouldn't help much, as
 Org is a different project.  Is that correct?

 If you assigned copyright just for Gnus, then you'd have to do it again
 for Org.

I've just checked and yes, Albert's assignment is made for EMACS/GNUS.

So I'm afraid Albert you have to go through the process of assigning
your copyright again for Emacs :/

You can use the form here:

http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/plain/request-assign-future.txt

HTH,

-- 
 Bastien



Re: [O] [PATCH] org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Remove code duplication

2014-05-11 Thread Albert Krewinkel
Hi Bastien,

Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
 Albert Krewinkel tar...@moltkeplatz.de writes:

 * org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Use `org-any-link-re' to avoid
   code duplication.

 This is not really code duplication, as the output of `org-any-link-re'
 is different from the output of the current sexp in the code.

I'm not exactly sure what you mean, are you referring to the variables'
different representation in the source?  I double checked that

(string-equal re org-any-link-re) = t

when `re' is set to the old value (as of commit 7c8559e).

 That said, the change looks good anyway.  Can you double-check there
 cannot be any problem with the value of `org-any-link-re'?

The variable is only ever changed when calling `org-make-link-regexps',
so I'm quite positive that the change does not have any unintended side
effects.  The test suite passes, too.

 This is a TINYCHANGE.

 (TINYCHANGE should stand alone on the line.)

Done.  As an aside: I did sign the copyright assignment papers to be
able to contrivute to Gnus, but that probably wouldn't help much, as
Org is a different project.  Is that correct?

 Thanks!

No, thank you all for all the work you put into this!  It is truly
amazing!

Albert Krewinkel (1):
  org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Reuse global variable

 lisp/org.el | 7 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

-- 
2.0.0.rc0




Re: [O] [PATCH] org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Remove code duplication

2014-05-11 Thread Achim Gratz
Albert Krewinkel writes:
 Done.  As an aside: I did sign the copyright assignment papers to be
 able to contrivute to Gnus, but that probably wouldn't help much, as
 Org is a different project.  Is that correct?

If you assigned copyright just for Gnus, then you'd have to do it again
for Org.  If instead you've assigned it for Emacs, then everything
is already OK, just let Bastien know and perhaps give him the number of
your assignment so it's easier for him to check.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]+

Waldorf MIDI Implementation  additional documentation:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfDocs




Re: [O] [PATCH] org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Remove code duplication

2014-05-06 Thread Bastien
Hi Albert,

thanks for the patch.

Albert Krewinkel tar...@moltkeplatz.de writes:

 * org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Use `org-any-link-re' to avoid
   code duplication.

This is not really code duplication, as the output of `org-any-link-re'
is different from the output of the current sexp in the code.

That said, the change looks good anyway.  Can you double-check there
cannot be any problem with the value of `org-any-link-re'?

 The `re' variable defined in function `org-offer-links-in-entry' is
 string-equal to `org-any-link-re' and is hence replaced by the latter.

 This is a TINYCHANGE.

(TINYCHANGE should stand alone on the line.)

Thanks!

-- 
 Bastien