Re: [PATCH] Fix connection problems for XEmacs/MULE.

2000-05-22 Thread Kai Großjohann

"Daniel Pittman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hrm. In that case, since it seems to be biting me, I might put in some
 effort to learning how MULE works and implementing it properly for RCP.
 Assuming you don't object, of course.

I would be very happy if you were to help with that.  Thanks!

kai
-- 
Beware of flying birch trees.




Re: [PATCH] Fix connection problems for XEmacs/MULE.

2000-05-21 Thread Daniel Pittman

On Sun, 21 May 2000, Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Daniel Pittman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Still, I don't want to commit this without knowing that it at least
 works for a few people, and I really /don't/ understand how the MULE
 integration has been done in rcp.
 
 Well, that makes two of us...

Hrm. In that case, since it seems to be biting me, I might put in some
effort to learning how MULE works and implementing it properly for RCP.
Assuming you don't object, of course.

 MULE comes into play in different places, but for the shell buffer,
 I'm basically hoping that the MULE machinery does everything right
 automatically.  

Seems not to, at least for me. It keeps deciding on 'undecided-mac' as
the coding system, which is just wrong.

[...]

 [looks into the code]
 
 Oops!  Where did that `echo foo ; echo bar' go?  Surely searching for
 ^M characters won't work unless there's at least one line ending in
 the buffer.
 
 Will try to change this now -- can you test it to see if it works,
 Daniel?

Er, no. Still fails, in the same way as previously. Darn.

Daniel

-- 
He who cannot change the very fabric of his thought will never be able to
change reality, and will never, therefore, make any progress.
-- Anwaar Sadat