Re: Bad Fuse vs. Good Fuse

2003-05-25 Thread bob

I have seen one instance where a fuse opened during a vibration test. I 
think that was a BAD FUSE.

Best Regards

Bob Schlentz






This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   emc_p...@symbol.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc



RE: Use of a triangle on warning labels

2003-05-25 Thread James, Chris
European Community Safety Signs Directive (EEC/92/58)
 
Warning - black bordered triangle with yellow back ground and black symbol
Prohibition - red circle and red diagonal line, white background, black symbol
Mandatory - circle, blue background, white symbol
Information - square, green background
 
For UK refer  to HS Safety signs and signals regs 1996.
 
 

Regards, 

Chris 
___ 
Chris James 
Engineering Services Manager 
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (UK) 

Direct: 01793 842136


From: POWELL, DOUG [mailto:doug.pow...@aei.com] 
Sent: 13 May 2003 00:53
To: EMC-PSTC (E-mail)
Subject: Use of a triangle on warning labels


Hello group,
 
It has become apparent to me that various standards require triangles at times
when others do not.  For example, IEC 61010-1 Table 1 only indicates 3 symbols
that have the triangle enclosing the symbol.  While, IEC 60417 does not
indicate this.  One that seems to be missing from IEC 61010-1 is the
exclamation point in triangle.  I've reviewed IEC 60204-1, EN50178, EN60950 as
well and I find varying requirements, some more than others.  SEMI S2 seems to
indicate that nearly every symbol belongs in a triangle.
 
I'm guessing that if it is an informational symbol, you do not use the
triangle, but countering this, I have seen the hearing protection warning in a
circle without the triangle.  Does anyone know of a reliable rule-of-thumb for
when to use a triangle on an IEC/ISO international warning symbol?
 
By the way, here's a trivia question to which I do know the answer:
 
On the circle-bar label warning, which angle does the slash take, from 10:00
to 4:00 or from 2:00 to 8:00 on the clock face?
 
 
thanks,
 
-doug
 
Douglas E. Powell 
Regulatory Compliance Engineer 
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. 
Fort Collins, CO 80535 USA 

 
 
___
This message, including any attachments, may contain information
that is confidential and proprietary information of Advanced 
Energy Industries, Inc.  The dissemination, distribution, use 
or copying of this message or any of its attachments is 
strictly prohibited without the express written consent of 
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.


This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are not the intended
recipient, delete this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
disclosing, copying, distributing, or taking any action based on this message
is strictly prohibited.





Re: Use of Voltage Probe

2003-05-25 Thread John Woodgate

I read in !emc-pstc that ITL-EMC User Group itl-...@itl.co.il wrote
(in 2D1037012914D4118DB8204C4F4F5020275AD1@ITLLTD01) about 'Use of
Voltage Probe' on Sun, 25 May 2003:

According to Section 4.1.3 Voltage probes of ANSI C63.4, A voltage probe
may be used for radio-noise voltage measurements when measurements are made
at a user's installation (see 5.6) or when the ac current level exceeds the
current-carrying capability of commercially available LISNs. For such
measurements, the method shown on Figure 4 may be used. Special precautions
shall be taken to establish a reference ground for the measurements.

This is an example of useless wording in a standard. What 'special
precautions' did the authors have in mind? To achieve or avoid what?
They don't tell us, and coyness is definitely not a virtue in such a
case. All it does is create confusion, as we see here.

Accord to Section 5.6 Testing at manufacturer's location or user's
installation, The voltage probe (see 4.1.3) shall be used for ac powerline
conducted emission measurements. (See IEEE Std 13-1988 for additional
information.) Neither a reference groundplane nor an LISN shall be installed
for user's installation testing unless one or both are to be a permanent
part of the installation.
The above sections seem to me to contradict one another regarding the
reference groundplane.

No, because you have no 'grounds' (ouch!) for assuming that the 'special
precautions' imply 'use a ground plane'.

Can we interpret the above (Section 4.1.3 Special precautions shall be
taken to establish a reference ground for the measurements.) to be
applicable only when testing in the laboratory and the ac current level
exceeds the current-carrying capability of commercially available LISNs?
Please comment.

No, it is reasonable and technically correct to pay attention to where
you ground the voltmeter connected to the probe, wherever the
measurements are carried out. It would be logical to connect it to the
enclosure of the EUT, if it is metal, with the shortest practicable
lead. 
-- 
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk 
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to 
http://www.isce.org.uk
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!


This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   emc_p...@symbol.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc



Use of Voltage Probe

2003-05-25 Thread ITL-EMC User Group

Dear all,
According to Section 4.1.3 Voltage probes of ANSI C63.4, A voltage probe
may be used for radio-noise voltage measurements when measurements are made
at a user's installation (see 5.6) or when the ac current level exceeds the
current-carrying capability of commercially available LISNs. For such
measurements, the method shown on Figure 4 may be used. Special precautions
shall be taken to establish a reference ground for the measurements.
Accord to Section 5.6 Testing at manufacturer's location or user's
installation, The voltage probe (see 4.1.3) shall be used for ac powerline
conducted emission measurements. (See IEEE Std 13-1988 for additional
information.) Neither a reference groundplane nor an LISN shall be installed
for user's installation testing unless one or both are to be a permanent
part of the installation.
The above sections seem to me to contradict one another regarding the
reference groundplane.
Can we interpret the above (Section 4.1.3 Special precautions shall be
taken to establish a reference ground for the measurements.) to be
applicable only when testing in the laboratory and the ac current level
exceeds the current-carrying capability of commercially available LISNs?
Please comment.
Thank you in advance
 David Shidlowsky
 Technical Writer
 EMC Laboratory
 ITL (Product Testing) Ltd.
 Kfar Bin Nun
 Israel
 Tel: +972-8-9797799
 Fax: +972-8-9797702
 Email: dav...@itl.co.il
 http://www.itl.co.il
 http://www.i-spec.com
 This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If
 you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use,
 disseminate, distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in
 any way. If you received this e-mail message in error, please return by
 forwarding the message and its attachments to the sender.
 
 


This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   emc_p...@symbol.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc