Re: [PSES] Rated Mains Operating Voltage Regional Compatibility [General Use]

2023-05-09 Thread Agar, Philip (Leonardo, UK)
Thank you Bernd, Mike and everyone else who replied with your helpful comments.

I think my dilemma concerns the interpretation of the rated voltage tolerance 
in relation to the consideration of supply voltage for testing under clause 
B.2.3 in IEC62368-1.  The clause looks unchanged since 2014 (if not before) and 
reads:


In determining the most unfavourable supply voltage for a test, the following 
variables shall be taken into account:
– multiple rated voltages;
– extremes of rated voltage ranges; and
– tolerance on rated voltage as declared by the manufacturer.
Unless the manufacturer declares a wider tolerance, the minimum tolerance shall 
be taken as +10 % and −10 % for AC mains and +20 % and −15 % for DC mains. 
Equipment intended by the manufacturer to be restricted to connection to a 
conditioned power supply system (for example, a UPS) may be provided with a 
narrower tolerance if the equipment is also provided with instructions 
specifying such restriction.


The equipment under consideration is rated 100 to 240 Vac.  This range could be 
seen as having a significantly wider tolerance than +10 % and −10 % depending 
upon what AC mains voltage you had in mind, and therefore not be subject to any 
further extension of tolerance according to the above rules, i.e. it would only 
be assessed over the voltage range 100 to 240 Vac.   However, if the 
conventional interpretation is to apply a minimum of +10 % and −10 % to any 
stated voltage then the assessment would be performed over the voltage range 90 
to 264 Vac.  The latter seems a safer way to go but I don't know that I could 
assume it was tested that way and therefore not necessarily suitable for use on 
UK mains with its maximum toleranced voltage of 253 V.

Regards,
Phil

-Original Message-
From: Dürrer Bernd  
Sent: 08 May 2023 09:21
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] AW: [PSES] Rated Mains Operating Voltage Regional Compatibility 
[General Use]

*** WARNING ***

 This message has originated outside your organisation, 
  either from an external partner or the Global Internet. 
  Keep this in mind if you answer this message.
 

Hi Phil,

The concept of rated voltage in standards already includes allowable tolerances 
and adequate tests. For the supply side, EN 50160 "Voltage characteristics of 
electricity supplied by public electricity networks" requires in clause 4.2.2 
that variations of the rated supply voltage should not exceed ±10 % (with 
exceptions for remote grid users, e.g. on islands, where +10 % / -15 % are 
allowable). As Mike already explained, product safety standards require testing 
with the most unfavourable voltage within the tolerance band of the rated 
voltage of the equipment (cf. clause B.2.3 in IEC 62368-1:2018). It is the 
responsibility of the installer and user that the equipment is connected to a 
supply that matches the voltage rating declared by the manufacturer.

Kind regards,

Bernd

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: MIKE SHERMAN 
Gesendet: Samstag, 6. Mai 2023 20:38
An: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Betreff: Re: [PSES] Rated Mains Operating Voltage Regional Compatibility 
[General Use]

[EXTERNAL E-MAIL] This email originated from outside of the organization. Do 
not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Phil --

It is typical for many standards to run voltage sensitive tests (temperature 
rise, for example, as I recall) at the labeled voltage PLUS a percentage (6 to 
10 %, as I recall). That percentage is intended to cover the utility supply 
tolerances.

So a product labeled 100-240 Vac will often face a test at 264 Vac.

Occasionally one might find a product labeled 85-264, but in my opinion that is 
most likely a mistake, because it would need to be tested at 290 Vac for a 
standard that requires a 10% overvoltage test, and I am not aware of any supply 
tolerances that would allow 290 Vac.

Word to the wise: Australia's nominal voltage is now 230 Vac, but it has legacy 
systems that still supply at 240 Vac. So a typical national difference for 
Australia is to perform your tests AS IF the rated voltage was 240 Vac. This 
means an extra test or two if you're taking a product rated for 230 Vac for the 
EU market and want to sell it in Australia.

Mike Sherman
Sherman PSC LLC

> On 05/06/2023 4:09 AM CDT Agar, Philip (Leonardo, UK) 
> <220ac8787b71-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org> wrote:
>
>
> Please could someone advise me on what standard, if any, might compel a 
> manufacturer to rate the operating voltage of their equipment to at least 
> cover the utility supply tolerance of the region in which it is being sold?
> For example, a DoC for an IT item sold in the UK claims conformance with the 
> requirements of LVD Directive 2014/35/EU and EN62368-1:2014+A11:2017 but it 
> is not clear to me that the specified voltage rating of 100 - 240 Vac 
> necessarily covers UK utility supp

[PSES] Rated Mains Operating Voltage Regional Compatibility [General Use]

2023-05-06 Thread Agar, Philip (Leonardo, UK)
Please could someone advise me on what standard, if any, might compel a 
manufacturer to rate the operating voltage of their equipment to at least cover 
the utility supply tolerance of the region in which it is being sold?
For example, a DoC for an IT item sold in the UK claims conformance with the 
requirements of LVD Directive 2014/35/EU and EN62368-1:2014+A11:2017 but it is 
not clear to me that the specified voltage rating of 100 - 240 Vac necessarily 
covers UK utility supply tolerance of up to 253 Vac, or even in much of the EU 
at 243.8 Vac.

Thanks,
Phil Agar
EMC Compliance
  
   
   

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Cantwell 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  
David Heald: 
_
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC=1


[PSES] Non-isolated Solar Invertor EMC emissions

2021-10-12 Thread Agar, Philip (Leonardo, UK)
Background:

I have been installing a recently manufactured 230 Vac 5.5 kW pure sine 
non-isolated solar invertor whose design exploits the PV array input operating 
in the same power domain as the AC mains output, i.e. no isolating 
transformers.  Noticing that my medium wave and long wave reception was now no 
longer possible due to the loud hum received right through the bands, I hung an 
oscilloscope on the mains wiring and noticed a 300 Vpp 50 Hz square wave with 
sharp edges (around 1-5 us order) superimposed (common mode) upon the AC mains 
output.  The AC mains itself is otherwise a well formed near sinusoidal 50 Hz 
waveform with only minor distortion at cross-over. 

Not wishing to cause nuisance interference to myself or others, I read the 
installation manual from cover to cover for guidance on EMC but found nothing 
and so began to try and understand how the issue might be resolved.  
Appreciating that the superimposed waveform might be influenced by the 
parasitic capacitance of the PV array relative to ground, I measured the 
parasitic capacitance as approximately 23 nF (this was not surprising in view 
of the length of underground cabling and PV array size).  I then set to 
introduce Schaffner FN2010-30-08 filters into both the PV array input and AC 
mains output of the invertor but with no significant success.  I am currently 
theorising that the level of the emission is so high that the common mode 
filtering inductor of this filter type is saturating. 

Question:
Is it widely recognised that this type of invertor design is associated with 
high levels of EMC emissions? If so, on what basis might EMC compliance be 
claimed for such a unit?  Perhaps there are specialist EMC filters targeted at 
this kind of invertor design.

Phil 
EMC Engineer
Leonardo UK Ltd

Registered Office: 1 Eagle Place, St James’s, London SW1Y 6AF

A company registered in England & Wales.  Company no. 02426132



This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended

recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended

recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.

You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or

distribute its contents to any other person.




-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas 
Mike Cantwell 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  
David Heald: 


[PSES] ESD Testing Verification Voltmeter

2021-09-16 Thread Agar, Philip (Leonardo, UK)
Hi All,

I would be grateful if someone could share with me their choice of high voltage 
or electrostatic voltmeter when verifying calibration of ESD generator output 
levels under BS EN 61000-4-2:2009 / DEF STAN 59-411 Part 3 Issue 3 / 
MIL-STD-461G ?

Best regards,
Phil Agar
EMC Engineer

Leonardo UK Ltd

Registered Office: 1 Eagle Place, St James’s, London SW1Y 6AF

A company registered in England & Wales.  Company no. 02426132



This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended

recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended

recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.

You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or

distribute its contents to any other person.




-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas 
Mike Cantwell 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  
David Heald: