RE: FW: [Fwd: [SI-LIST] : Copper balance] {Venting of PCBs}

2001-01-27 Thread Cortland Richmond

Larry,

I had no idea there even WAS such a standard.
Interesting, the things it's possible to learn
here; an assemblage of experts, indeed!

Thanks!

Cortland

== Original Message Follows 

  Date:  24-Jan-01 15:19:07  MsgID: 1078-329  ToID: 72146,373
From:  Larry Merchell INTERNET:lmerch...@t-yuden.com
Subj:  RE: FW: [Fwd: [SI-LIST] : Copper balance] {Venting of PCBs}
Chrg:  $0.00   Imp: Norm   Sens: StdReceipt: NoParts: 1

From: Larry Merchell lmerch...@t-yuden.com
Subject: RE: FW: [Fwd: [SI-LIST] : Copper balance] {Venting of PCBs}
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:10:35 -0800
Reply-To: Larry Merchell lmerch...@t-yuden.com
 

Cortland,

The holes or slots may also be required to
meet the Maximum unpierced conductor area
requirement of UL796 Standard for Printed-
Wiring Boards for your particular PWB supplier.
In the UL Recognized Component Directory (vol.
3, ZPMV2) it is listed as Maximum, Area,
Diameter, Inches.

Regards,

Larry Merchell
Taiyo Yuden (USA), Inc.
San Marcos, CA

== End of Original Message =

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



RE: FW: [Fwd: [SI-LIST] : Copper balance] {Venting of PCBs}

2001-01-24 Thread Larry Merchell

Cortland,

The holes or slots may also be required to meet the Maximum unpierced
conductor area requirement of UL796 Standard for Printed-Wiring Boards for
your particular PWB supplier. In the UL Recognized Component Directory (vol.
3, ZPMV2) it is listed as Maximum, Area, Diameter, Inches.

Regards,

Larry Merchell
Taiyo Yuden (USA), Inc.
San Marcos, CA


-Original Message-
From: Cortland Richmond [mailto:72146@compuserve.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 8:38 AM
To: Debbie Mallory; ieee pstc list
Subject: Re: FW: [Fwd: [SI-LIST] : Copper balance]



Debbie,

Doug Powell explained it as venting, where slots or holes are added to a
plane in order to let vapor out. However, it is my belief that this is also
done to keep copper balanced during the etching process. I may well be
mistaken, but the EMI and signal integrity concerns we have with the
practice are all valid.

Cheers,

Cortland

== Original Message Follows 

  Date:  23-Jan-01 07:25:06  MsgID: 1077-23952  ToID: 72146,373
From:  Debbie Mallory INTERNET:debbie.mall...@fibre.com
Subj:  FW: [Fwd: [SI-LIST] : Copper balance]
Chrg:  $0.00   Imp: Norm   Sens: StdReceipt: NoParts: 1

From: Debbie Mallory debbie.mall...@fibre.com
Subject: FW: [Fwd: [SI-LIST] : Copper balance]
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 07:21:35 -0800
 
Cortland,

I, too, am having problems passing radiated emissions because of 350Mz
originating from a 50MHz processor that uses a 50MHz oscillator.  I thought
I understood thieving until you said you have to put it on the ground plane
also.  Can you explain further why and how thieving is applied to the
ground plane?  

Thanks.

Regards,

Debbie Mallory
Advanced Fibre Communications
Largo, FL


== End of Original Message =

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



Re: FW: [Fwd: [SI-LIST] : Copper balance]

2001-01-24 Thread Cortland Richmond

Debbie,

Doug Powell explained it as venting, where slots or holes are added to a
plane in order to let vapor out. However, it is my belief that this is also
done to keep copper balanced during the etching process. I may well be
mistaken, but the EMI and signal integrity concerns we have with the
practice are all valid.

Cheers,

Cortland

== Original Message Follows 

  Date:  23-Jan-01 07:25:06  MsgID: 1077-23952  ToID: 72146,373
From:  Debbie Mallory INTERNET:debbie.mall...@fibre.com
Subj:  FW: [Fwd: [SI-LIST] : Copper balance]
Chrg:  $0.00   Imp: Norm   Sens: StdReceipt: NoParts: 1

From: Debbie Mallory debbie.mall...@fibre.com
Subject: FW: [Fwd: [SI-LIST] : Copper balance]
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 07:21:35 -0800
 
Cortland,

I, too, am having problems passing radiated emissions because of 350Mz
originating from a 50MHz processor that uses a 50MHz oscillator.  I thought
I understood thieving until you said you have to put it on the ground plane
also.  Can you explain further why and how thieving is applied to the
ground plane?  

Thanks.

Regards,

Debbie Mallory
Advanced Fibre Communications
Largo, FL


== End of Original Message =

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



Re: Copper balance

2001-01-20 Thread Cortland Richmond

Logically, if it can make emissions worse, it can make them better, too.
Suppose your original board exhibited some resonance, and thieving changed
it. That would certainly lower emissions due to a resonant board. Anything
that resonates will radiate, and this can even be a whole board in its
slot.  So the answer is yes, it CAN help. But I'd not count on random
thieving to cut overall emissions!  On the other had, I like the idea of
ground-fill, well tied to an underlying plane. This should provide an
on-board return path for fields than otherwise would return through more
distant conductors.

Cortland
== Original Message Follows 

  Date:  17-Jan-01 12:18:24  MsgID: 1077-21792  ToID: 72146,373
From:  David Gelfand INTERNET:gelf...@memotec.com
Subj:  Re: Copper balance
Chrg:  $0.00   Imp: Norm   Sens: StdReceipt: NoParts: 1

From: David Gelfand gelf...@memotec.com
Subject: Re: Copper balance
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:18:44 -0500
 
Can thieving reduce emissions even if they are floating?  I have two
different versions of a board, the one without thieving is much noisier
than the other.

Thanks,

David.

David Gelfand
Regulatory Approvals
Memotec Communications Inc.
Montreal Canada



== End of Original Message =

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



Re: [Fwd: [SI-LIST] : Copper balance]

2001-01-17 Thread Perry Qu

Hi! Cortland:

Thanks for your comments. In your experience, does  the size/spacing of the
copper dots or islands matter as long as their dimension is much smaller than
the wavelength for the highest possible frequency on the card ? Any special
considerations other than that ?

Regards

Perry

Cortland Richmond wrote:

 Yes indeed. My preference is for thieving to be done with dots or
 islands small with respect to the shortest wavelength of concern. This is
 because thieving can be constructed so as to resonate and aggravate an EMI
 problem.

 Some years ago, at an employer far away (grin), we had obtained compliance
 on a computer using a plug-in processor board.  On testing the first
 production items, we found they were some dB over -- at 350 Mhz! It took
 some time, but I found the PWB manufacturer had added a ring of thieving
 material around the board. This ring was resonating at 350 Mhz and
 significantly increasing the shielding required.

 Chopping it up into strips made the problem go away.

 (Many devices use so-called ESD traces to protect board-mounted devices
 from being affected by ESD during maintenance. Unless care is taken with
 these, they can act the same way as thieving copper above.)

 Cortland

 (cortland.richm...@usa.alcatel.com)

 The post above does not represent my employer's opinions or policies

 ==  (some snipped)  

 Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:10:43 -0500
 From: Perry Qu perry...@alcatel.com
 Organization: Alcatel CID
 Subject: [Fwd: [SI-LIST] : Copper balance]
 Reply-To: Perry Qu perry...@alcatel.com

 Hi!

 We are looking for some advice on copper thieving on the PCB. The
 concern is  the EMC impact of the floating copper.  Anyone is willing to
 share his/her experience on the best configuration for high percentage
 of copper coverage and low EMI at the same time ? Refer to the post to
 SI list by my colleague Dorin on this issue.

 Any advice on this will be greatly appreciated.

 Regards

 Perry Qu


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



Re: [Fwd: [SI-LIST] : Copper balance]

2001-01-17 Thread Cortland Richmond

Yes indeed. My preference is for thieving to be done with dots or
islands small with respect to the shortest wavelength of concern. This is
because thieving can be constructed so as to resonate and aggravate an EMI
problem.

Some years ago, at an employer far away (grin), we had obtained compliance
on a computer using a plug-in processor board.  On testing the first
production items, we found they were some dB over -- at 350 Mhz! It took
some time, but I found the PWB manufacturer had added a ring of thieving
material around the board. This ring was resonating at 350 Mhz and
significantly increasing the shielding required.

Chopping it up into strips made the problem go away.

(Many devices use so-called ESD traces to protect board-mounted devices
from being affected by ESD during maintenance. Unless care is taken with
these, they can act the same way as thieving copper above.)

Cortland 

(cortland.richm...@usa.alcatel.com)

The post above does not represent my employer's opinions or policies


==  (some snipped)  



List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:10:43 -0500
From: Perry Qu perry...@alcatel.com
Organization: Alcatel CID
Subject: [Fwd: [SI-LIST] : Copper balance]
Reply-To: Perry Qu perry...@alcatel.com
 
Hi!

We are looking for some advice on copper thieving on the PCB. The
concern is  the EMC impact of the floating copper.  Anyone is willing to
share his/her experience on the best configuration for high percentage
of copper coverage and low EMI at the same time ? Refer to the post to
SI list by my colleague Dorin on this issue.

Any advice on this will be greatly appreciated.

Regards

Perry Qu

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org