RE: General Product Safety and Liability Directives

2000-06-21 Thread Dick Grobner

Here's my 2 cents:
In Webster's II New Riverside Dictionary the definition of Consumer is:
1)one that consumes 2) A buyer of goods and services
Thus - Wouldn't one of our customers who buys our goods and services, say a
hospital, thus be a consumer! 

-Original Message-
From: wo...@sensormatic.com [mailto:wo...@sensormatic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 3:45 PM
To: t...@world.std.com; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: General Product Safety and Liability Directives



Articles 2 and 3 of the General Product Directive specifically mention
consumers. Check also, the fourth whereas which mentions consumers.

Likewise, many of the whereas clauses of the Liability Directive mention
consumers. Article 9(b)(I) indicates that the products are for private use
or consumption.

All of above leads me to my conclusion that both directives are intended for
consumer products.

Richard Woods

--
From:  Ron Pickard [SMTP:rpick...@hypercom.com]
Sent:  Tuesday, June 20, 2000 1:47 PM
To:  wo...@sensormatic.com
Cc:  t...@world.std.com; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject:  Re: General Product Safety and Liability Directives


Hi Richard,

I disagree with you regarding your claim about these two directives
only
being applicable to consumer products.

The General Product Safety Directive (GPSD) is focused towards
product
where no other directives apply. The GPSD states


 Article 1

 1. The purpose of the provisions of this Directive is to ensure
that   
 products placed on the market are safe.

 2. The provisions of this Directive shall apply in so far as there
are no  
 specific provisions in rules of Community law governing the safety
of the  
 products concerned.



 It is agreed that as time moves on, there will be more product
family  
 specific directives put into force effectively limiting the scope
of the   
 GPSD.






The Liability Directive (LD) title is focused to ... concerning
liability
for defective products. And, Article 1 of the LD states The
producer
shall be liable for damage caused by a defect in his product. This
directive, in fact, deals with the liabilities of defective products
regardless of market focus.




 As can be plainly seen, neither directive is focused toward
consumer   
 products. In fact, they reference to no particular product areas.
However, 
 the GPSD appears to be a catchall where no other directive applies.



 Well, so much for my 2 cents worth of opinions. Comments?



 Best regards,

 Ron Pickard

 rpick...@hypercom.com












WOODS@Sensormatic

.com To:
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org, t...@world.std.com 
Sent by: cc:

treg-approval@worSubject: General
Product Safety and Liability Directives
ld.std.com





06/20/00 07:58 AM

Please respond to

WOODS








In the following discussion, I am interested in determining the
legal
aspects only.

The General Product Safety Directive and the Liability Directives
apply to
consumer products and not to products used in the workplace.
Consider
electrical products that would otherwise be subject to the Low
Voltage
Directive but operate below the lower voltage limits of the
directive. The
safety of such products intended for use in the workplace are
subject only
to non-harmonized national regulations concerning worker safety. Do
these
national regulations make the assumption that such equipment must
comply
with the applicable essential requirements that are normally
associated
with
equipment covered by the LVD?

Richard Woods




---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org

RE: General Product Safety and Liability Directives

2000-06-20 Thread WOODS
Articles 2 and 3 of the General Product Directive specifically mention
consumers. Check also, the fourth whereas which mentions consumers.

Likewise, many of the whereas clauses of the Liability Directive mention
consumers. Article 9(b)(I) indicates that the products are for private use
or consumption.

All of above leads me to my conclusion that both directives are intended for
consumer products.

Richard Woods

--
From:  Ron Pickard [SMTP:rpick...@hypercom.com]
Sent:  Tuesday, June 20, 2000 1:47 PM
To:  wo...@sensormatic.com
Cc:  t...@world.std.com; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject:  Re: General Product Safety and Liability Directives


Hi Richard,

I disagree with you regarding your claim about these two directives
only
being applicable to consumer products.

The General Product Safety Directive (GPSD) is focused towards
product
where no other directives apply. The GPSD states


 Article 1

 1. The purpose of the provisions of this Directive is to ensure
that   
 products placed on the market are safe.

 2. The provisions of this Directive shall apply in so far as there
are no  
 specific provisions in rules of Community law governing the safety
of the  
 products concerned.



 It is agreed that as time moves on, there will be more product
family  
 specific directives put into force effectively limiting the scope
of the   
 GPSD.






The Liability Directive (LD) title is focused to ... concerning
liability
for defective products. And, Article 1 of the LD states The
producer
shall be liable for damage caused by a defect in his product. This
directive, in fact, deals with the liabilities of defective products
regardless of market focus.




 As can be plainly seen, neither directive is focused toward
consumer   
 products. In fact, they reference to no particular product areas.
However, 
 the GPSD appears to be a catchall where no other directive applies.



 Well, so much for my 2 cents worth of opinions. Comments?



 Best regards,

 Ron Pickard

 rpick...@hypercom.com












WOODS@Sensormatic

.com To:
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org, t...@world.std.com 
Sent by: cc:

treg-approval@worSubject: General
Product Safety and Liability Directives
ld.std.com





06/20/00 07:58 AM

Please respond to

WOODS








In the following discussion, I am interested in determining the
legal
aspects only.

The General Product Safety Directive and the Liability Directives
apply to
consumer products and not to products used in the workplace.
Consider
electrical products that would otherwise be subject to the Low
Voltage
Directive but operate below the lower voltage limits of the
directive. The
safety of such products intended for use in the workplace are
subject only
to non-harmonized national regulations concerning worker safety. Do
these
national regulations make the assumption that such equipment must
comply
with the applicable essential requirements that are normally
associated
with
equipment covered by the LVD?

Richard Woods





Re: General Product Safety and Liability Directives

2000-06-20 Thread Ron Pickard

Hi Richard,

I disagree with you regarding your claim about these two directives only
being applicable to consumer products.

The General Product Safety Directive (GPSD) is focused towards product
where no other directives apply. The GPSD states

 Article 1  
 1. The purpose of the provisions of this Directive is to ensure that   
 products placed on the market are safe.
 2. The provisions of this Directive shall apply in so far as there are no  
 specific provisions in rules of Community law governing the safety of the  
 products concerned.

 It is agreed that as time moves on, there will be more product family  
 specific directives put into force effectively limiting the scope of the   
 GPSD.  



The Liability Directive (LD) title is focused to ... concerning liability
for defective products. And, Article 1 of the LD states The producer
shall be liable for damage caused by a defect in his product. This
directive, in fact, deals with the liabilities of defective products
regardless of market focus.


 As can be plainly seen, neither directive is focused toward consumer   
 products. In fact, they reference to no particular product areas. However, 
 the GPSD appears to be a catchall where no other directive applies.

 Well, so much for my 2 cents worth of opinions. Comments?  

 Best regards,  
 Ron Pickard
 rpick...@hypercom.com  








 
WOODS@Sensormatic   
 
.com To: 
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org, t...@world.std.com 
Sent by: cc:
 
treg-approval@worSubject: General Product 
Safety and Liability Directives
ld.std.com  
 

 

 
06/20/00 07:58 AM   
 
Please respond to   
 
WOODS   
 

 

 



In the following discussion, I am interested in determining the legal
aspects only.

The General Product Safety Directive and the Liability Directives apply to
consumer products and not to products used in the workplace. Consider
electrical products that would otherwise be subject to the Low Voltage
Directive but operate below the lower voltage limits of the directive. The
safety of such products intended for use in the workplace are subject only
to non-harmonized national regulations concerning worker safety. Do these
national regulations make the assumption that such equipment must comply
with the applicable essential requirements that are normally associated
with
equipment covered by the LVD?

Richard Woods





General Product Safety and Liability Directives

2000-06-20 Thread WOODS
In the following discussion, I am interested in determining the legal
aspects only.

The General Product Safety Directive and the Liability Directives apply to
consumer products and not to products used in the workplace. Consider
electrical products that would otherwise be subject to the Low Voltage
Directive but operate below the lower voltage limits of the directive. The
safety of such products intended for use in the workplace are subject only
to non-harmonized national regulations concerning worker safety. Do these
national regulations make the assumption that such equipment must comply
with the applicable essential requirements that are normally associated with
equipment covered by the LVD?

Richard Woods