RE: Layered Reinforced Insulation

2002-10-29 Thread Peter Merguerian

Richard,

From UL's database, the CL3P cable is a Power Limited Cable - Indicates
cable intended for use in Class 2 or Class 3 circuits within buildings in
ducts or plenums or other spaces used for environmental air in accordance
with Section 725.61(A) of the NEC. This cable exhibits a maximum peak
optical density of 0.5 a maximum average optical density of 0.15, and a
maximum flame spread distance of 5 ft, when tested per NFPA 262, Standard
Method of Test for Flame Travel and Smoke of Wires and Cables for Use in
Air-Handling Spaces.

If the use of this cable is for Class 2 and Class 3 circuits, then per the
NEC maximum allowed voltage is 150 V. Assuming your circuit was Limited
Current (see 2.4 of  60950), there is no need for the reinforced insulation
requirements since the hazardous circuit becomes a Limited Current Circuit.

All the Best,



This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If
you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, disseminate,
distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in any way. If you
received this e-mail message in error, please return by forwarding the
message and its attachments to the sender.






PETER S. MERGUERIAN
Technical Director
I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd.
26 Hacharoshet St., POB 211
Or Yehuda 60251, Israel
Tel: + 972-(0)3-5339022  Fax: + 972-(0)3-5339019
Mobile: + 972-(0)54-838175
http://www.itl.co.il
http://www.i-spec.com





-Original Message-
From: richwo...@tycoint.com [mailto:richwo...@tycoint.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 7:48 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Layered Reinforced Insulation



OK, I'll get more specific. I have an external interconnecting cable that
contains hazardous voltages.  Because of the application, in the USA I must
use UL Listed CL3P cable which is rated for use in risers and air handling
spaces (smoke requirements of the National Electrical Code). The insulation
system of a standard CL3P cable consists of the wire insulation and external
jacket, and the sum thickness is 0.4 mm. It is not clear that the insulation
parts are constructed of the same material. I must determine if the cable
complies with the reinforced insulation requirements of UL60950/EN60950, or
if I need to have a special cable constructed. Someone mentioned that the
two insulations must be the same material in order for the system to be
classified as reinforced. I cannot find that requirement in the standard.
Nor can I find any statement that says that a two part insulation system
must consider one part to be basic insulation and the other part to be
supplementary insulation. Frankly, I can find nothing in the standard that
indicates why the particular construction of this cable is not allowed to be
considered as reinforced insulation. The only issue at hand, it appears, is
that it must be shown that the insulation is mechanically durable in the
intended application. That is where I rely upon the the UL Listing - they
seem to believe that it is perfectly acceptable for a 300V interconnection
application - at least the kind that my equipment will employ. 

Your comments would be appreciated.

Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International




---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: Layered Reinforced Insulation

2002-10-29 Thread Chris Maxwell

I too have had some struggles with this concept.

I now tend to think of Basic, Reinforced and Double more in terms of an 
insulation strength as opposed to an actual material.  For instance, Double 
insulation can be provided by a properly set and maintained distance through 
air, i.e no material at all.  You could also call this a Reinforced 
insulation, since it is made up of one layer of air reinforced by more air.   

Of course, there are certain rules that the standards apply if you do use an 
actual insulator to provide Basic, Reinforced and/or Double insulation.  
These rules mostly dictate that:
a.   The insulation be strong enough to provide the required insulation 
strength.
b.  The insulation can withstand the temperatures to be expected in the product.
c.  The insulation is thick enough or constructed with enough layers to prevent 
an accidental breach from either a pinhole or a void.
d.  The insulation won't change its properties in the presence of humidity.  
(No plywood insulation!!!  :-) )
e.  The insulation won't wear off, crack, peel or abrade under reasonably 
foreseeable circumstances.   

What I'm saying is...call the insulation whatever you want.  Just make sure 
that it works.

Chris Maxwell | Design Engineer - Optical Division
email chris.maxw...@nettest.com | dir +1 315 266 5128 | fax +1 315 797 8024

NetTest | 6 Rhoads Drive, Utica, NY 13502 | USA
web www.nettest.com | tel +1 315 797 4449 | 




Chris Maxwell | Design Engineer - Optical Division
email chris.maxw...@nettest.com | dir +1 315 266 5128 | fax +1 315 797 8024

NetTest | 6 Rhoads Drive, Utica, NY 13502 | USA
web www.nettest.com | tel +1 315 797 4449 | 



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


Re: Layered Reinforced Insulation

2002-10-28 Thread John Woodgate

I read in !emc-pstc that richwo...@tycoint.com wrote (in 846BF526A205F8
4BA2B6045BBF7E9A6A046758DF@flbocexu05) about 'Layered Reinforced
Insulation' on Mon, 28 Oct 2002:

 Someone mentioned that the
two insulations must be the same material in order for the system to be
classified as reinforced. I cannot find that requirement in the standard.
Nor can I find any statement that says that a two part insulation system
must consider one part to be basic insulation and the other part to be
supplementary insulation. 

These requirements may have been in *an* edition of the standard, but it
has changed a lot over the years. You need to look at the latest
edition, IEC 60950-1.
-- 
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk 
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to 
http://www.isce.org.uk
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: Layered Reinforced Insulation

2002-10-28 Thread richwoods

OK, I'll get more specific. I have an external interconnecting cable that
contains hazardous voltages.  Because of the application, in the USA I must
use UL Listed CL3P cable which is rated for use in risers and air handling
spaces (smoke requirements of the National Electrical Code). The insulation
system of a standard CL3P cable consists of the wire insulation and external
jacket, and the sum thickness is 0.4 mm. It is not clear that the insulation
parts are constructed of the same material. I must determine if the cable
complies with the reinforced insulation requirements of UL60950/EN60950, or
if I need to have a special cable constructed. Someone mentioned that the
two insulations must be the same material in order for the system to be
classified as reinforced. I cannot find that requirement in the standard.
Nor can I find any statement that says that a two part insulation system
must consider one part to be basic insulation and the other part to be
supplementary insulation. Frankly, I can find nothing in the standard that
indicates why the particular construction of this cable is not allowed to be
considered as reinforced insulation. The only issue at hand, it appears, is
that it must be shown that the insulation is mechanically durable in the
intended application. That is where I rely upon the the UL Listing - they
seem to believe that it is perfectly acceptable for a 300V interconnection
application - at least the kind that my equipment will employ. 

Your comments would be appreciated.

Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International




---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: Layered Reinforced Insulation

2002-10-28 Thread FastWave

I certainly agree that reinforced can be a solid insulation - hence the 0.4.
mm thickness requirement. Sorry if my memo gave you a different impression.

Bill Bisenius
bi...@productsafet.com

 -Original Message-
From:   owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]  On Behalf Of Peter L. Tarver
Sent:   Friday, October 25, 2002 4:41 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject:RE: Layered Reinforced Insulation


Bill  -

This is not quite correct.  Reinforced Insulation may also
be a single piece of insulation (I do note you used may).
There's no definition, per se, of multiple layers, except
for the case of thin sheet material.


Regards,

Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com


 From: Bill Bisenius

 A reinforced insulation system by definition may
 be multiple layers if it is
 all the same insulating material.


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: Layered Reinforced Insulation

2002-10-25 Thread Peter L. Tarver

Richard -

Which edition are you referring to?  2.2.1 in EN60950-1  and
EN60950, 3rd ed., addresses general requirements for SELV
circuits.  In these standards, there is also no
2.9.4.anything.

I'll assume for now that it's 2nd ed., through the 4th
amendment.

2.9.4.2 refers to thin sheet material and accepting thin
sheet material as a valid construction method for Reinforced
Insulation, it must be physically protected; hence internal
to a mechanical enclosure.  This was written into the
standard to allow common transformer constructions to meet
Reinforced insulation requirements and other

2.9.4.1 states Reinforced Insulation can be 0.4 mm, and is
not precluded from being outside the enclosure, *if* it's
not subject to mechanical stresses that can deform the
insulation at normal operating temperatures (it implies it
*can* deform under abnormal operating conditions that lead
to abnormal temperatures).  [Be sure to pay attention to the
Note.]

What you've described seems more like a combination of Basic
Insulation (the inner, single conductor insulation) and
Supplementary Insulation (the jacket).  If the cable is
outside the enclosure, it should be jacketed for mechanical
protection.  Jacketed cables offer many thicknesses of
jacket such that you could readily find one that has a 0.4
mm thickness (16 mils).


Regards,

Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com


 From: richwo...@tycoint.com

 Consider the insulation construction for an
 external interconecting cable
 connected to secondary hazardous circuits of ITE
 (EN60950). Is it
 permissible for the reinforced insulation to be
 constructed of two layers
 (e.g., conductor insulation plus external jacket)
 if the total thickness is
 at least 0.4 mm? Clause 2.2.1 appears to allow
 it; however, clause 2.9.4.2
 appears to indicate that layered insulation can
 only be used internally.

 Richard Woods
 Sensormatic Electronics
 Tyco International


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: Layered Reinforced Insulation

2002-10-25 Thread Peter L. Tarver

Bill  -

This is not quite correct.  Reinforced Insulation may also
be a single piece of insulation (I do note you used may).
There's no definition, per se, of multiple layers, except
for the case of thin sheet material.


Regards,

Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com


 From: Bill Bisenius

 A reinforced insulation system by definition may
 be multiple layers if it is
 all the same insulating material.


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: Layered Reinforced Insulation

2002-10-25 Thread FastWave

A reinforced insulation system by definition may be multiple layers if it is
all the same insulating material. Two different insulating materials must be
evaluated as double insulation = one of the materials must meet the
requirements for basic insulation, the other material must meet the
requirements for supplementary insulation. 

Regardless, both supplementary and reinforced insulation are required to be
min. 0.4 mm thick (clause 2.10.5.1) There is an exception to the 0.4 mm
thickness requirement if multiple layers - of the same insulating material
(clause 2.10.5.2). The exception has additional dielectric testing
requirements that depend on the number of layers used.

You don't provide any details on the hazardous circuit in the
interconnecting cable. If it can be defined as ELV, you will only need to
evaluate one of the insulating materials as supplementary insulation. Still
doesn't get you past the 0.4 mm requirement. Note - I have found many wire
insulations that will meet the 0.4 mm requirement and comply with the
reinforced insulation requirements.

Best regards,

Bill Bisenius
bi...@productsafet.com
EDD
www.productsafeT.com

 -Original Message-
From:   owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]  On Behalf Of
richwo...@tycoint.com
Sent:   Friday, October 25, 2002 10:24 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject:Layered Reinforced Insulation


Consider the insulation construction for an external interconecting cable
connected to secondary hazardous circuits of ITE (EN60950). Is it
permissible for the reinforced insulation to be constructed of two layers
(e.g., conductor insulation plus external jacket) if the total thickness is
at least 0.4 mm? Clause 2.2.1 appears to allow it; however, clause 2.9.4.2
appears to indicate that layered insulation can only be used internally. 

Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list