Re: [Emc-users] emc chess pawn part program run request

2009-08-17 Thread Alex Joni
 Rob I removed the % at the bottom of the program and it still acts like it 
 is still loading something .

How do you determine that?
Once it's loaded there won't be anything different with AXIS, except you'll 
have the file in the preview.
To run it, you just push the Run button on the top menu.


 It is running version 2.2 . Thanks Ron

That should be ok.
Did you make sure you are using a lathe config? Try the sample config 
sim/lathe.ini, and open with that.
The display should only have XZ.

Regards,
Alex


--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] emc chess pawn part program run request

2009-08-17 Thread robert

Rondal Nannie wrote:
 I do not know about that, I only removed the % sign on the end of the proram. 
 Thanks for the response. Ron

 --- On Mon, 8/17/09, Ray Henry rehe...@copper.net wrote:

 Is it possible that this is another case of editing a text file on
 another OS or editor that uses a different end of line code. 
   
Hi ron


what ray means if if u wrtie a file on windows say and save it from 
wordpad it will put very funny odd things on end of line (inviable to 
reader, but open it in a true text editor u will see the carriage 
returns and new line markers as they are called)
but if u made it on EMC machine using Gedit or likes it should be pretty 
well safe to use and give no problems.




--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Realistic spindle encoder count for parallel port?

2009-08-17 Thread Steve Blackmore
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:00:31 -0400, you wrote:

Sounds like it is time to go back to your homemade 90
count encoder. If you just intend threading and not a 
rotary axis with positioning, then it should work well.

Hi Steve - Not an option I'm afraid, with the 3 speed belt drive
installed the timing disc hits the belt tensioner arm and there's no
space to fit it any other way.

Steve Blackmore
--

--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Realistic spindle encoder count for parallel port?

2009-08-17 Thread Leslie Newell
If this is just for threading then you could run in counter mode. That 
would effectively divide the pulse rate by 4. If you still have problems 
then a simple binary counter such as a 74HCT93 can be used to divide one 
channel (counter mode only uses one channel) by 2,4,8 or whatever. 74HC 
series logic chips only cost a few pence.

If you want I can send you a circuit diagram of how to connect up a 
74HCT93. It is dead simple and can even be made by simply soldering a 
few wires directly to the chip.

Les



Steve Blackmore wrote:
 On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:00:31 -0400, you wrote:
 
 Sounds like it is time to go back to your homemade 90
 count encoder. If you just intend threading and not a 
 rotary axis with positioning, then it should work well.
 
 Hi Steve - Not an option I'm afraid, with the 3 speed belt drive
 installed the timing disc hits the belt tensioner arm and there's no
 space to fit it any other way.
 
 Steve Blackmore
 

--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Realistic spindle encoder count for parallel port?

2009-08-17 Thread Steve Blackmore
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:03:54 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:


Can you use both encoders at once?
High resolution for low speed and Low resolution for high speed?


You could also do this with the high resolution encoder and a gizmo
like the USdigital divider, only with 2 selectable divide ratios run from a
single I/O bit, say 1/1 and 1/64. This is easily do-able in a $ 1.20 CPLD

A divider would work well, but I'm no programmer and wouldn't know where
to start.

If I can't find a simple solution it looks like I'll have to get another
encoder.

Would you need the index at high speeds?

My normal working range is 600-1200 rpm. Most of my threading is done at
600-1000 rpm, depending on pitch.

Steve Blackmore
--

--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Realistic spindle encoder count for parallel port?

2009-08-17 Thread Steve Blackmore
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:10:12 +0100, you wrote:

If this is just for threading then you could run in counter mode. That 
would effectively divide the pulse rate by 4. If you still have problems 
then a simple binary counter such as a 74HCT93 can be used to divide one 
channel (counter mode only uses one channel) by 2,4,8 or whatever. 74HC 
series logic chips only cost a few pence.

Yep - only for threading, but in counter mode can EMC still make
corrections for spindle speed variations?

If you want I can send you a circuit diagram of how to connect up a 
74HCT93. It is dead simple and can even be made by simply soldering a 
few wires directly to the chip.

Yes please Les, if nothing else it will get me a temporary solution.

Steve Blackmore
--

--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users