Re: [Emc-users] subroutines and run from line
Am 20.10.2012 um 22:18 schrieb Jon Elson: Jon Elson wrote: Michael Haberler wrote: the - somewhat brittle - run-from-line feature has seen several fixes related to this, both by cradek and me, in 2.5, see I have another machine with a brand-new build from master, so I will test on that one. I should have thought of doing that first! Brittle is right! I tested it on the system I just built from master last week, 2.6.0~pre, and it does exactly the same thing. If I select the line with the G01 move, and do run from line, it performs that move, but never executes the subroutine. It sits there in some in-between state, forever. If anyone wants to work on it, the snippet of code I posted on 10/16 is all you need. The subroutine waits a second, does a small -Z move, turns on mist coolant for 2 seconds, waits 2 seconds, turns off coolant, waits a second and does a +Z move and returns. If you want a longer copy of the program, email or reply to this message, I can send it. Re 'working on it': no doubt someone could, somehow, patch the interpreter into submission to handle this or that case; I dont think this improves the overall situation. the fundamental issue is that the concept of source location is still in it's pre-subroutine, pre-multiple gcode files state, and without a fundamental rework of line numbers into a more realistic source location which refers to file, linenumber, file type, and call context (definition or reference) this is not going to bring about better quality. This is a quite far-reaching change because it goes all the way from NGC source file to motion and back - all this is currently handled through an integer line number which eventually mutates into a 'motion id'. I've sketched some ideas about source location on the wiki a while ago which outline the principle; it needs updating though. It's one of the two major prerequisites I'd like to see adressed before carrying over any interpreter into LinuxCNC3; the other one being generalized handling of variable references (see QueuebustersRevisited on the wikie). - Michael I'm afraid this behavior probably goes pretty deep into interpreter code that I have no understanding of, so I wouldn't have much luck researching it myself. Thanks, Jon -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] subroutines and run from line
On 10/20/2012 04:18 PM, Jon Elson wrote: If I select the line with the G01 move, and do run from line, it performs that move, but never executes the subroutine. It sits there in some in-between state, forever. I'm just throwing something in here with very limited knowledge of what's going on, but if Run from line can't see the subroutine (I make my very first assumption here, that the sub in in the main program), if you were to break the subroutine out to a separate file, would LinuxCNC see it there? Perhaps a work around? -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] subroutines and run from line
Jon Elson wrote: Michael Haberler wrote: the - somewhat brittle - run-from-line feature has seen several fixes related to this, both by cradek and me, in 2.5, see I have another machine with a brand-new build from master, so I will test on that one. I should have thought of doing that first! Brittle is right! I tested it on the system I just built from master last week, 2.6.0~pre, and it does exactly the same thing. If I select the line with the G01 move, and do run from line, it performs that move, but never executes the subroutine. It sits there in some in-between state, forever. If anyone wants to work on it, the snippet of code I posted on 10/16 is all you need. The subroutine waits a second, does a small -Z move, turns on mist coolant for 2 seconds, waits 2 seconds, turns off coolant, waits a second and does a +Z move and returns. If you want a longer copy of the program, email or reply to this message, I can send it. I'm afraid this behavior probably goes pretty deep into interpreter code that I have no understanding of, so I wouldn't have much luck researching it myself. Thanks, Jon -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Emc-users] subroutines and run from line
All linked to this bug report I think, still not resolved, some of it was supposed to be fixed in the master. sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3440704group_id=6744atid=106744 regards -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] subroutines and run from line
Michael Haberler wrote: the - somewhat brittle - run-from-line feature has seen several fixes related to this, both by cradek and me, in 2.5, see http://git.mah.priv.at/gitweb/emc2-dev.git/commit/f9085e20130e744df8c239eb6df67654995062cd http://git.mah.priv.at/gitweb/emc2-dev.git/commit/9a21aa6fa588c7bd553ad133c84432e1e64bd89f http://git.mah.priv.at/gitweb/emc2-dev.git/commit/7034c8c5c755f06f6b190f0e7752ca7ac5fa00fd that said, my trust in this feature is so low that I suggest to try this in a 2.5 simulator version to make sure it does what you want I have another machine with a brand-new build from master, so I will test on that one. I should have thought of doing that first! Thanks, Jon -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
[Emc-users] subroutines and run from line
My production Bridgeport mill runs an older version, 2.0.4~pre, built from the git repository. To upgrade this system, I may have to replace the computer, it is pretty aged and limited in memory and CPU speed. Anyway, I ran the following program last night: N10 G61 N20 O100 SUB N30 G01 F10 Z-0.02 N40 G04 P2 N50 M7 N60 G04 P2 N70 M9 N80 G04 P1 N90 G01 F10 Z.25 N100 O100 ENDSUB N2020 G01 X8.364 Y-1.286 F60.0 N2030 O100 CALL N2040 Y-1.443 F60.0 N2050 O100 CALL N2060 Y-1.599 F60.0 N2070 O100 CALL and so on, for 500 more iterations. This program is for a prototype soldering robot. So, the O100 sub pushes the soldering tip down onto a connection, waits a moment for it to heat, then feeds solder (M7) for a moment, dwells, and then raises up. This works fine when you run (R) the program, but when you try to run from line at one of the (implied) G1 moves, it makes that move and then just sits there. Does the run from line prevent the interpreter from discovering the subroutine, or is there some other reason for the problem? Will a 2.5.x version also do this? Thanks for any suggestions! Jo n -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
[Emc-users] Subroutines
Did how subroutines work change from 2.3 to 2.5? I had a file I ran 6 months ago on 2.3 and with no changes just moved it to the new computer w/2.5 and I get an error : unable to open file The sub is in the same program just at the bottom % some code o31 call (is the line where the error is) some other code m30 (one line space here) o31 sub some code here o31 endsub % Terry -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Subroutines
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Terry Christophersen tcninj...@yahoo.com wrote: Did how subroutines work change from 2.3 to 2.5? I had a file I ran 6 months ago on 2.3 and with no changes just I am not aware of any changes but the subroutines should be defined before use http://www.linuxcnc.org/docview/html/gcode/o-code.html#sec:subroutines o100 sub G53 G0 X0 Y0 Z0 (rapid move to machine home) o100 endsub ... o100 call (call the subroutine here) Dave Caroline -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Subroutines
Thanks Dave taat worked, So it did change sort of because I have 2.3 on a desktop and it worked at the end of the program Thanks again Terry - Original Message - From: Dave Caroline dave.thearchiv...@gmail.com To: Terry Christophersen tcninj...@yahoo.com; Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 2:45 PM Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Subroutines On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Terry Christophersen tcninj...@yahoo.com wrote: Did how subroutines work change from 2.3 to 2.5? I had a file I ran 6 months ago on 2.3 and with no changes just I am not aware of any changes but the subroutines should be defined before use http://www.linuxcnc.org/docview/html/gcode/o-code.html#sec:subroutines o100 sub G53 G0 X0 Y0 Z0 (rapid move to machine home) o100 endsub ... o100 call (call the subroutine here) Dave Caroline -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
