Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not

2012-01-23 Thread John Prentice

Subject: Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not


 well, since people keep tripping over this glade install path issue I 
 looked into it and it seems it can be fixed:

 ===
 Glade 3.3.3
 ===
 ...
- Defined environment variables GLADE_MODULE_PATH  GLADE_CATALOG_PATH, 
 catalogs will be
  searched in GLADE_CATALOG_PATH and widget libraries/support modules 
 in GLADE_MODULE_PATH. - Tristan Van Berkom
 ...


 I'll see how we can massage this into rip-environment so glade does the 
 right thing when running RIP

 -m

Michael, greetings

The odd thing is that rip-environment seems to do the right thing with the 
CATALOG_PATH

if [ -z $GLADE_CATALOG_PATH ]; then
GLADE_CATALOG_PATH=$EMC2_HOME/lib/python/gladevcp
else
GLADE_CATALOG_PATH=$EMC2_HOME/lib/python/gladevcp:$GLADE_CATALOG_PATH
fi

I get a host of errors strating with a load of No icon named . when 
trying to run  glade-manual.ui in glade 3.6.7

Anything you can turn up would be very handy. A jepler says, RIP seems to be 
the default compile but I have no idea how to turn it off!

John Prentice 


--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not

2012-01-23 Thread Michael Haberler
John,

I just noticed that the glade catalog thing has already been resolved

so there is no need to './configure --prefix=/usr', RIP will be the better 
choice because it doesnt pollute /usr with files

glade usually shows a wash of startup messages, which are harmless

-m

Am 23.01.2012 um 09:17 schrieb John Prentice:

 
 Subject: Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not
 
 
 well, since people keep tripping over this glade install path issue I 
 looked into it and it seems it can be fixed:
 
 ===
 Glade 3.3.3
 ===
 ...
   - Defined environment variables GLADE_MODULE_PATH  GLADE_CATALOG_PATH, 
 catalogs will be
 searched in GLADE_CATALOG_PATH and widget libraries/support modules 
 in GLADE_MODULE_PATH. - Tristan Van Berkom
 ...
 
 
 I'll see how we can massage this into rip-environment so glade does the 
 right thing when running RIP
 
 -m
 
 Michael, greetings
 
 The odd thing is that rip-environment seems to do the right thing with the 
 CATALOG_PATH
 
 if [ -z $GLADE_CATALOG_PATH ]; then
GLADE_CATALOG_PATH=$EMC2_HOME/lib/python/gladevcp
 else
GLADE_CATALOG_PATH=$EMC2_HOME/lib/python/gladevcp:$GLADE_CATALOG_PATH
 fi
 
 I get a host of errors strating with a load of No icon named . when 
 trying to run  glade-manual.ui in glade 3.6.7
 
 Anything you can turn up would be very handy. A jepler says, RIP seems to be 
 the default compile but I have no idea how to turn it off!
 
 John Prentice 
 
 
 --
 Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
 The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
 is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
 Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not

2012-01-23 Thread andy pugh
On 23 January 2012 01:46, Tom Easterday tom-...@bgp.nu wrote:
 We currently have to open a terminal, cd to ~/emc2/emc2-dev/ and do a . 
 scripts/environment and then run emc.

If you look at the icon properties you can see the command line that
they run, and edit that to point at the run-in-place startup script. I
managed to do this, so it can't be that hard.
It is probably possible to do the same thing with the application menu
items too, but I haven't bothered.

-- 
atp
The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong.

--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not

2012-01-23 Thread John Thornton
I have both ways with a script running a RIP and I have changed the 
installed version from the live cd to get the buildbot deb. I prefer the 
deb way as I will get the automatic update prompt.

John

On 1/22/2012 7:46 PM, Tom Easterday wrote:
 We have been using the 2.5 branch and have made quite a few changes and have 
 things working nicely.  We want to continue forward with 2.5 and abandon 
 2.4.X.  Should I just leave things alone, leave it in run-in-place mode, or 
 should I rebuild it without that (or is there a way other than reinstalling)? 
   We currently have to open a terminal, cd to ~/emc2/emc2-dev/ and do a . 
 scripts/environment and then run emc.  We could turn that into a shell 
 script, but I was wondering what the advantages/disadvantages are (besides a 
 handy desktop icon to start emc)

 Tom
 --
 Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
 The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
 is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
 Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not

2012-01-23 Thread Jon Elson
Tom Easterday wrote:
 We have been using the 2.5 branch and have made quite a few changes and have 
 things working nicely.  We want to continue forward with 2.5 and abandon 
 2.4.X.  Should I just leave things alone, leave it in run-in-place mode, or 
 should I rebuild it without that (or is there a way other than reinstalling)? 
   We currently have to open a terminal, cd to ~/emc2/emc2-dev/ and do a . 
 scripts/environment and then run emc.  We could turn that into a shell 
 script, but I was wondering what the advantages/disadvantages are (besides a 
 handy desktop icon to start emc)
   
I do all my work in run-in-place mode, and have since that was 
available.  I often
have several versions of EMC on the same system.  I am aware of no downside
to RIP.

Jon

--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not

2012-01-22 Thread Michael Haberler

Am 23.01.2012 um 02:46 schrieb Tom Easterday:

 We have been using the 2.5 branch and have made quite a few changes and have 
 things working nicely.  We want to continue forward with 2.5 and abandon 
 2.4.X.  Should I just leave things alone, leave it in run-in-place mode, or 
 should I rebuild it without that (or is there a way other than reinstalling)? 
   We currently have to open a terminal, cd to ~/emc2/emc2-dev/ and do a . 
 scripts/environment and then run emc.  We could turn that into a shell 
 script, but I was wondering what the advantages/disadvantages are (besides a 
 handy desktop icon to start emc)

I dont see many disadvantages except the fact the RIP doesnt install glade 
catalogs in /usr/whatsit so editing gladevcp panels with glade might not work 
properly
-m
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] 2.5 run-in-place or not

2012-01-22 Thread Michael Haberler
well, since people keep tripping over this glade install path issue I looked 
into it and it seems it can be fixed:

===
Glade 3.3.3
===
...
- Defined environment variables GLADE_MODULE_PATH  GLADE_CATALOG_PATH, 
catalogs will be
  searched in GLADE_CATALOG_PATH and widget libraries/support modules in 
GLADE_MODULE_PATH. - Tristan Van Berkom
...


I'll see how we can massage this into rip-environment so glade does the right 
thing when running RIP

-m

Am 23.01.2012 um 07:57 schrieb Michael Haberler:

 
 Am 23.01.2012 um 02:46 schrieb Tom Easterday:
 
 We have been using the 2.5 branch and have made quite a few changes and have 
 things working nicely.  We want to continue forward with 2.5 and abandon 
 2.4.X.  Should I just leave things alone, leave it in run-in-place mode, or 
 should I rebuild it without that (or is there a way other than 
 reinstalling)?   We currently have to open a terminal, cd to 
 ~/emc2/emc2-dev/ and do a . scripts/environment and then run emc.  We 
 could turn that into a shell script, but I was wondering what the 
 advantages/disadvantages are (besides a handy desktop icon to start emc)
 
 I dont see many disadvantages except the fact the RIP doesnt install glade 
 catalogs in /usr/whatsit so editing gladevcp panels with glade might not work 
 properly
 -m
 --
 Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
 The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
 is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
 Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users