Re: [E-devel] Dumping Exebuf in favor of Everything?
I'd keep both of them and load both by default, so every user can try them and choose what he/she prefer in that particular moment, i.e. one would choose exebuf to just run a simple command and choose everything if wants to perform a more complex task. also, they should have different icons to remark they are different things. while we're at it, is there any particular reason why the everything module is excluded from localization? is there any objection if I enable it in POTFILES.in? -- Massimo Maiurana massimoatragusa.linux.it http://massimo.solira.orgGPG keyID #7044D601 Creare l'uomo fu un'idea bizzarra e originale, ma aggiungere la pecora fu una tautologia. [Mark Twain] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
[E-devel] Pixbuf
HI I want to load a image from the memory(a point got from xmmsv_get_bin), So, is there a API just like gdk_pixbuf_loader_writeGdkPixbufLoader.html#gdk-pixbuf-loader-write ?? Thanks -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Pixbuf
hey,
I want to load a image from the memory(a point got from xmmsv_get_bin), So,
is there a API just like
gdk_pixbuf_loader_writeGdkPixbufLoader.html#gdk-pixbuf-loader-write
Without more info of what you want to do, here is what i would do:
Once you have an evas:
void *data; /* your image data */
int width; /* width of your image */
int height /* height of your image */
Evas_Object *o;
void *o_data; /* data of the evas object */
o = evas_object_image_add(evas);
evas_object_image_size_set(o, width, height);
evas_object_image_fill_set(o, 0, 0, width, height);
o_data = evas_object_image_data_get(o, 1);
if (!o_data)
{
/* manage the error */
}
memcpy (o_data, data, height * width * 4);
evas_object_image_data_set(o, o_data);
evas_object_image_data_update_add(o, 0, 0, width, height);
evas_object_resize(o, width, height);
You then have to show the evas object to make it visible on the canvas.
Vincent Torri
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Pixbuf
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, rui kou wrote: HI I want to load a image from the memory(a point got from xmmsv_get_bin), So, is there a API just like gdk_pixbuf_loader_writeGdkPixbufLoader.html#gdk-pixbuf-loader-write ?? i'm curious : you want to do an EFL frontend to xmms2 ? Vincent -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Dumping Exebuf in favor of Everything?
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:43 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote : Hi all, I'd like to call a voting to dump Exebuf and use Everything by default. It is fancier, it is more powerful and i see no reason to not do it. exebuf can be then disabled or just removed from SVN, as well as its conf_exebuf. Speaking of which… I just recompiled from SVN, and everything (which I have been using as a replacement for exebuf for a long time) now uses modules. That's all nice and awesome, but please do enable those modules by default. Updating e17 and not being able to do anything with everything (heh) anymore is just plain annoying. Cheers, -- Albin Tonnerre -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
[E-devel] error of genlist
Hi
I am using genlist, I have a double_label genlist in my Application:
e_music_playlist_append(Evas_Object *playlist_show, TrackProperties
*properties, int list_id)
{
Listitem *listitem;
itclass.item_style = double_label;
itclass.func.label_get = _gl_label_get;
itclass.func.icon_get = _gl_icon_get;
itclass.func.state_get = _gl_state_get;
itclass.func.del = _gl_del;
listitem = E_MUSIC_NEW(Listitem, 1);
listitem-pro = properties;
listitem-item = elm_genlist_item_append(playlist_show, itclass,
listitem, NULL/* parent */, ELM_GENLIST_ITEM_NONE,
_list_sel, (int *)list_id/* func data */ );
/* it will do _gl_label_get two times, but wen we do _gl_label_get in the
second time ,listitem may has been free! */
// free( listitem );
}
so, I expected to got two times of call of _gl_label_get:
char *
_gl_label_get(const void *data, Evas_Object *obj, const char *part)
{
const Listitem *tit = data;
char buf[PATH_MAX];
printf(BUF:%s\n, tit-pro-title);
if (!strcmp(part, elm.text))
{
snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), %s, tit-pro-title);
}
else if (!strcmp(part, elm.text.sub))
{
snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), %s, tit-pro-artist);
}
return strdup(buf);
}
BUT, i have got four!
Breakpoint 1, _gl_label_get (data=0x824e9d0, obj=0x80bf588, part=0x82523c8
elm.text) at e_music_playlist.c:23
23 if (!strcmp(part, elm.text))
(gdb) bt
#0 _gl_label_get (data=0x824e9d0, obj=0x80bf588, part=0x82523c8 elm.text)
at e_music_playlist.c:23
#1 0x001893fb in _item_realize (it=0x824e9e0, in=value optimized out,
calc=1) at elm_genlist.c:881
#2 0x00189bb1 in _item_block_recalc (itb=value optimized out, in=value
optimized out, qadd=1, norender=0) at elm_genlist.c:1001
#3 0x0018a2a6 in _queue_proecess (wd=value optimized out, norender=value
optimized out) at elm_genlist.c:1708
#4 0x0018a494 in _item_queue (wd=0x80b4188, it=value optimized out) at
elm_genlist.c:1751
#5 0x0018a7d6 in elm_genlist_item_append (obj=0x80bf588, itc=0x805022c,
data=0x824e9d0, parent=0x0, flags=ELM_GENLIST_ITEM_NONE,
func=0x804d640 _list_sel, func_data=0x0) at elm_genlist.c:1804
#6 0x0804d62b in e_music_playlist_append (playlist_show=0x80bf588,
properties=0xb6e0, list_id=0) at e_music_playlist.c:90
#7 0x0804d23c in _update_track (value=0x80ffb50, user_data=0x0) at
xmms2_callback.c:137
#8 0x0013cdc7 in xmmsc_result_run (res=0x813c9c0, msg=0x811c698) at
../src/clients/lib/xmmsclient/result.c:437
#9 0x00138788 in xmmsc_ipc_exec_msg (ipc=0x8052a20, msg=0x811c698) at
../src/clients/lib/xmmsclient/ipc.c:399
#10 0x00137b77 in xmmsc_ipc_io_in_callback (ipc=0x8052a20) at
../src/clients/lib/xmmsclient/ipc.c:80
#11 0x0013df47 in xmmsc_io_in_handle (c=0x8051080) at
../src/clients/lib/xmmsclient/xmmsclient.c:511
#12 0x0014f834 in on_fd_data (udata=0x8051080, handler=0x8052ab8) at
../src/clients/lib/xmmsclient-ecore/xmmsclient-ecore.c:35
#13 0x005834ad in _ecore_main_fd_handlers_call (once_only=0) at
ecore_main.c:699
#14 _ecore_main_loop_iterate_internal (once_only=0) at ecore_main.c:884
#15 0x00583667 in ecore_main_loop_begin () at ecore_main.c:166
#16 0x00167917 in elm_run () at elm_main.c:1260
#17 0x0804a9a7 in elm_main (argc=1, argv=0xb984) at e_music.c:42
#18 0x0804aa8e in main (argc=1, argv=0xb984) at e_music.c:67
(gdb) continue
Continuing.
BUF:Lament for Lost Dreams (snippet)
Breakpoint 1, _gl_label_get (data=0x824e9d0, obj=0x80bf588, part=0x8252400
elm.text.sub) at e_music_playlist.c:23
23 if (!strcmp(part, elm.text))
(gdb) bt
#0 _gl_label_get (data=0x824e9d0, obj=0x80bf588, part=0x8252400
elm.text.sub) at e_music_playlist.c:23
#1 0x001893fb in _item_realize (it=0x824e9e0, in=value optimized out,
calc=1) at elm_genlist.c:881
#2 0x00189bb1 in _item_block_recalc (itb=value optimized out, in=value
optimized out, qadd=1, norender=0) at elm_genlist.c:1001
#3 0x0018a2a6 in _queue_proecess (wd=value optimized out, norender=value
optimized out) at elm_genlist.c:1708
#4 0x0018a494 in _item_queue (wd=0x80b4188, it=value optimized out) at
elm_genlist.c:1751
#5 0x0018a7d6 in elm_genlist_item_append (obj=0x80bf588, itc=0x805022c,
data=0x824e9d0, parent=0x0, flags=ELM_GENLIST_ITEM_NONE,
func=0x804d640 _list_sel, func_data=0x0) at elm_genlist.c:1804
#6 0x0804d62b in e_music_playlist_append (playlist_show=0x80bf588,
properties=0xb6e0, list_id=0) at e_music_playlist.c:90
#7 0x0804d23c in _update_track (value=0x80ffb50, user_data=0x0) at
xmms2_callback.c:137
#8 0x0013cdc7 in xmmsc_result_run (res=0x813c9c0, msg=0x811c698) at
../src/clients/lib/xmmsclient/result.c:437
#9 0x00138788 in xmmsc_ipc_exec_msg (ipc=0x8052a20, msg=0x811c698) at
../src/clients/lib/xmmsclient/ipc.c:399
#10 0x00137b77 in xmmsc_ipc_io_in_callback
Re: [E-devel] Dumping Exebuf in favor of Everything?
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Albin Tonnerre albin.tonne...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:43 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote : Hi all, I'd like to call a voting to dump Exebuf and use Everything by default. It is fancier, it is more powerful and i see no reason to not do it. exebuf can be then disabled or just removed from SVN, as well as its conf_exebuf. Speaking of which… I just recompiled from SVN, and everything (which I have been using as a replacement for exebuf for a long time) now uses modules. That's all nice and awesome, but please do enable those modules by default. Updating e17 and not being able to do anything with everything (heh) anymore is just plain annoying. The modules are enabled by default in standard profile. Dont know if and how one should update old configs automatically. Regards, Hannes Cheers, -- Albin Tonnerre -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Dumping Exebuf in favor of Everything?
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:19 +0200, hannes.janet...@gmail.com wrote : On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Albin Tonnerre albin.tonne...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:43 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote : Hi all, I'd like to call a voting to dump Exebuf and use Everything by default. It is fancier, it is more powerful and i see no reason to not do it. exebuf can be then disabled or just removed from SVN, as well as its conf_exebuf. Speaking of which… I just recompiled from SVN, and everything (which I have been using as a replacement for exebuf for a long time) now uses modules. That's all nice and awesome, but please do enable those modules by default. Updating e17 and not being able to do anything with everything (heh) anymore is just plain annoying. The modules are enabled by default in standard profile. Dont know if and how one should update old configs automatically. I know it's possible to add new default values on upgrades, but I don't whether that's also true for modules. Raster: is there any way to make a module automatically loaded when upgrading to a new version ? Regards, -- Albin Tonnerre -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Dumping Exebuf in favor of Everything?
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Massimo Maiurana maiur...@gmail.com wrote: I'd keep both of them and load both by default, so every user can try them and choose what he/she prefer in that particular moment, i.e. one would choose exebuf to just run a simple command and choose everything if wants to perform a more complex task. also, they should have different icons to remark they are different things. This is highly pointless. They do the same thing, there is no point in enabling one. Nobody in earth should think about will I launch something with A, B or C, this is just bad usability. while we're at it, is there any particular reason why the everything module is excluded from localization? is there any objection if I enable it in POTFILES.in? of course not, go for it. -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
