Re: [E-devel] [Patch] Focus issue in elm_widget.c

2011-03-11 Thread WooHyun Jung
Oh. Patch has bad white space ~ I modified it. 

(Thx Seoz)

 

 

From: WooHyun Jung [mailto:wh0705.j...@samsung.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 3:53 PM
To: 'enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net'
(enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net)
Subject: [Patch] Focus issue in elm_widget.c 

 

Hello ~ 

I've checked there were some focus problems when an object is hidden. 

So I made patch for that ~ 

Can anybody check about this ? 

Thanks.



elm_widget.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Adding support for a ternary state shift in illume keyboard

2011-03-11 Thread Rui Miguel Silva Seabra

Em 11-03-2011 04:02, Christopher Michael escreveu:


On 03/10/2011 06:49 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:

Hi,

I'm completely unsure of this patch and haven't had the change of
testing it.

The desired behavior is to have a shit key that will alternate between
shift, capslock and then normal state.

This would allow a caps lock in the Default.kbd without adding another
virtual key.

I'm thinking of adding other special kinds of keys which will do things
like change layout to keyboard type fubar (rather than just sliding up
on the keyboard).

Specially to dh, am I going in the right direction with this patch?

Rui



1) Thanks for the patch :)
2) I'm currently away from home with very limited 'net access (if any @
all sometimes) and don't have my comp with me, so I can't apply this and
test it (yet).

I should be back 'online' (hopefully) Saturday night/Sunday (monday @
the latest). I'll have a look @ this patch then.


Thanks,

Please look at this patch instead, as it has a bit operation bug (in my 
changes) fixed.


Rui
Index: e_kbd_int.c
===
--- e_kbd_int.c (revision 57681)
+++ e_kbd_int.c (working copy)
@@ -174,6 +174,8 @@
if ((ki-layout.state  CTRL)  (ky-is_ctrl)) selected = 1;
if ((ki-layout.state  ALT)  (ky-is_alt)) selected = 1;
if ((ki-layout.state  CAPSLOCK)  (ky-is_capslock)) selected = 1;
+   if ((ki-layout.state  SHIFT)  (ky-tern_shift)) selected = 1;
+   if ((ki-layout.state  CAPSLOCK)  (ky-tern_capslock)) selected = 1;
if (selected)
  {
 if (!ky-selected)
@@ -351,6 +353,20 @@
_e_kbd_int_layout_state_update(ki);
return;
  }
+   if (ky-tern_shift)
+ {
+   if (ki-layout.state  SHIFT)
+  {
+ ki-layout.state = (~(SHIFT));
+ ki-layout.state |= CAPSLOCK;
+  }
+   else if (ki-layout.state  CAPSLOCK)
+ki-layout.state = (~(CAPSLOCK));
+ else
+ki-layout.state |= SHIFT;
+   _e_kbd_int_layout_state_update(ki);
+   return;
+ }
if (ky-is_ctrl)
  {
if (ki-layout.state  CTRL) ki-layout.state = (~(CTRL));
@@ -574,6 +590,8 @@
if ((ki-layout.state  CTRL)  (ky-is_ctrl)) selected = 1;
if ((ki-layout.state  ALT)  (ky-is_alt)) selected = 1;
if ((ki-layout.state  CAPSLOCK)  (ky-is_capslock)) selected = 1;
+   if ((ki-layout.state  SHIFT)  (ky-tern_shift)) selected = 1;
+   if ((ki-layout.state  CAPSLOCK)  (ky-tern_capslock)) selected = 1;
if (selected)
  edje_object_signal_emit(o, e,state,selected, e);
if (!selected)
@@ -997,6 +1015,7 @@
 st-out = eina_stringshare_add(str);
  }
if (!strcmp(str, is_shift)) ky-is_shift = 1;
+   if (!strcmp(str, tern_shift)) ky-tern_shift = 1;
if (!strcmp(str, is_ctrl)) ky-is_ctrl = 1;
if (!strcmp(str, is_alt)) ky-is_alt = 1;
if (!strcmp(str, is_capslock)) ky-is_capslock = 1;
Index: e_kbd_int.h
===
--- e_kbd_int.h (revision 57681)
+++ e_kbd_int.h (working copy)
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@
unsigned char selected : 1;

unsigned char is_shift : 1;
+   unsigned char tern_shift : 1;
unsigned char is_ctrl : 1;
unsigned char is_alt : 1;
unsigned char is_capslock : 1;
--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Adding support for a ternary state shift in illume keyboard

2011-03-11 Thread Rui Miguel Silva Seabra

Em 11-03-2011 09:47, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra escreveu:

Em 11-03-2011 04:02, Christopher Michael escreveu:


On 03/10/2011 06:49 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:

Hi,

I'm completely unsure of this patch and haven't had the change of
testing it.

The desired behavior is to have a shit key that will alternate between
shift, capslock and then normal state.

This would allow a caps lock in the Default.kbd without adding another
virtual key.

I'm thinking of adding other special kinds of keys which will do things
like change layout to keyboard type fubar (rather than just sliding up
on the keyboard).

Specially to dh, am I going in the right direction with this patch?

Rui



1) Thanks for the patch :)
2) I'm currently away from home with very limited 'net access (if any @
all sometimes) and don't have my comp with me, so I can't apply this and
test it (yet).

I should be back 'online' (hopefully) Saturday night/Sunday (monday @
the latest). I'll have a look @ this patch then.


Thanks,

Please look at this patch instead, as it has a bit operation bug (in my
changes) fixed.

Rui


My lil'bernie gave a few minutes to test at least compilation, THIS 
attached version at least compiles.


Rui
Index: src/modules/illume-keyboard/e_kbd_int.c
===
--- src/modules/illume-keyboard/e_kbd_int.c (revision 57681)
+++ src/modules/illume-keyboard/e_kbd_int.c (working copy)
@@ -174,6 +174,8 @@
if ((ki-layout.state  CTRL)  (ky-is_ctrl)) selected = 1;
if ((ki-layout.state  ALT)  (ky-is_alt)) selected = 1;
if ((ki-layout.state  CAPSLOCK)  (ky-is_capslock)) selected = 1;
+   if ((ki-layout.state  SHIFT)  (ky-tern_shift)) selected = 1;
+   if ((ki-layout.state  CAPSLOCK)  (ky-tern_shift)) selected = 1;
if (selected)
  {
 if (!ky-selected)
@@ -351,6 +353,20 @@
_e_kbd_int_layout_state_update(ki);
return;
  }
+   if (ky-tern_shift)
+ {
+   if (ki-layout.state  SHIFT)
+  {
+ ki-layout.state = (~(SHIFT));
+ ki-layout.state |= CAPSLOCK;
+  }
+   else if (ki-layout.state  CAPSLOCK)
+ki-layout.state = (~(CAPSLOCK));
+ else
+ki-layout.state |= SHIFT;
+   _e_kbd_int_layout_state_update(ki);
+   return;
+ }
if (ky-is_ctrl)
  {
if (ki-layout.state  CTRL) ki-layout.state = (~(CTRL));
@@ -574,6 +590,8 @@
if ((ki-layout.state  CTRL)  (ky-is_ctrl)) selected = 1;
if ((ki-layout.state  ALT)  (ky-is_alt)) selected = 1;
if ((ki-layout.state  CAPSLOCK)  (ky-is_capslock)) selected = 1;
+   if ((ki-layout.state  SHIFT)  (ky-tern_shift)) selected = 1;
+   if ((ki-layout.state  CAPSLOCK)  (ky-tern_shift)) selected = 1;
if (selected)
  edje_object_signal_emit(o, e,state,selected, e);
if (!selected)
@@ -997,6 +1015,7 @@
 st-out = eina_stringshare_add(str);
  }
if (!strcmp(str, is_shift)) ky-is_shift = 1;
+   if (!strcmp(str, tern_shift)) ky-tern_shift = 1;
if (!strcmp(str, is_ctrl)) ky-is_ctrl = 1;
if (!strcmp(str, is_alt)) ky-is_alt = 1;
if (!strcmp(str, is_capslock)) ky-is_capslock = 1;
--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge

2011-03-11 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net wrote:
 Hello,

 Some time ago I wrote a little tool called edje_player:

 http://andreasvolz.wordpress.com/2009/01/25/edjeplayer-01/

 It was very simple and not yet finished. I like to use it often.

 Now I just noticed that someone removed it from SVN:

 http://svn.enlightenment.org/svn/e/trunk/PROTO/edje_player

 It has been moved to edje/bin/edje_player.c with the

 rev. 47341 barbieri

 and some revision later deleted in PROTO.

 I didn't notice it, because the main command line switches never
 changed. I diffed the changes and it's a more or less a complete
 rewrite. I think all the changes are good!

 So what's the problem?

 I've a big problem if someone simply move files or directories from a
 application which has an AUTHORS file to another directory. Even if
 its placed in PROTO or not touched since some time!

 And it's even not nice to take it without adding me to AUTHORS in edje
 or the edje_player.c file. Ok, this isn't longer valid as it's
 rewritten...

 But I think we should come to the main agreement that it's not nice to
 simply move around code from someone else without talking to him! You
 couldn't know what's my plan with edje_player and if that fits my ideas.

Sorry, as you noticed it was my fault. You have svn commit, so if you
can just add yourself to AUTHORS file.

I tried to do it for good as a default companion application to
edje_cc and similars, AFAIR I wrote it from scratch, just used the
same name and kept the options, however I even changed it to
Ecore_Getopt.

I did not write yet-another mail to communicate those as supposedly
people with stuff in SVN reads the svn-commits list, so it should be
the official communication media. But indeed, although this is as a
personal project inside SVN and I should have asked permission to
change it.


Again, sorry you feel bad, it won't have a next time...

-- 
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge

2011-03-11 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:08 PM, unixti...@gmail.com
unixti...@gmail.com wrote:
 I think you make a very good point Andreas. While the other side may argue 
 that it is in public subversion and is open source code, at the same time the 
 project still has an author with an idea and scope for the project. I think 
 its rude to change the code of ones project and even the scope of it without 
 any knowledge of the author. This has been happening to a lot of authors and 
 projects over the past year or so maybe a little more. To all developers: get 
 to know you're fellow developers!!! Communicate with them! Communication is a 
 good thing. I promise.


Hi okra, here I have to disagree a bit. Or at least explain why these
things happened to you and ephoto:

1. I understood Ephoto was an E project, not a personal project
(as Andreas' PROTO/edje-player). Similarly that I don't go ask Raster
every change I did to Evas, Ecore, Edje or E itself, I did not feel
like asking permission to change it. SORRY, later own I realized
(actually after being told by many) that Ephoto was your lovely
playground and rantalthough the name, most E people don't use it to
see photos because it barely work./rant

2. You never grasped Elementary or other core components of EFL,
as you're not much into them. This reflected into the Nth rewrite of
Ephoto in Elementary being barely working. From basic things as
asynchronous listing of directories with eio to incremental sorting
with insert ordered means. You struggled with these and were not
going anywhere... partly because even Elementary lacked some
primitives in gengrid to do so, and you're not willing to do these,
instead opted to work around.

3. In a worthless movement, I tried to create a common feeling
among EFL applications by introduction of recommended application
layouts bundled in Elementary's theme. This resulted into changes to
Ephoto visual so it and other applications such as Eve, Enjoy and
Envision would look similar, with toolbars in the same place. It was
worthless as general consensus was that people should do whatever they
want as it was their own software. This actually resulted into lack of
motivation to work on our applications as no matter what amount of
work I did (even if I was allowed to do!) would not work as a it would
never provide EFL experience because EFL experience never existed,
it was dream I had but never existed in reality. Together with lack of
time, I went back to KDE applications (if you need a recommendation:
gwenview, amarok, okular and dolphin are excellent applications).

Seems that all we do, and from feedback I got, all we SHOULD do is
create personal applications to fit our own needs, the way we like
them, veto other changes.

After all this rant, sorry to change your pet project with stupid
dreams to have EFL applications. We're not ready to have such with
current mindset. Thank your for reminding me of such.

-- 
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge

2011-03-11 Thread unixti...@gmail.com
I don't know what has got in to you lately, but I was not talking about or 
referring to ephoto. Get off of your high horse and stop taking offense to 
everything that gets said even when it has nothing to do with you.  For your 
information ephoto is widely used and the general consensus in the e world is 
that elm is the problem and lacks terribly in design and implementation. There 
is a whole lot more that I want to say and could say as you took to personally 
insulting me, but I'm not going to drop to that level.

Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire

- Reply message -
From: Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi
Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 8:34 am
Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
To: unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
Cc: Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net, 
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net


On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:08 PM, unixti...@gmail.com
unixti...@gmail.com wrote:
 I think you make a very good point Andreas. While the other side may argue 
 that it is in public subversion and is open source code, at the same time the 
 project still has an author with an idea and scope for the project. I think 
 its rude to change the code of ones project and even the scope of it without 
 any knowledge of the author. This has been happening to a lot of authors and 
 projects over the past year or so maybe a little more. To all developers: get 
 to know you're fellow developers!!! Communicate with them! Communication is a 
 good thing. I promise.


Hi okra, here I have to disagree a bit. Or at least explain why these
things happened to you and ephoto:

1. I understood Ephoto was an E project, not a personal project
(as Andreas' PROTO/edje-player). Similarly that I don't go ask Raster
every change I did to Evas, Ecore, Edje or E itself, I did not feel
like asking permission to change it. SORRY, later own I realized
(actually after being told by many) that Ephoto was your lovely
playground and rantalthough the name, most E people don't use it to
see photos because it barely work./rant

2. You never grasped Elementary or other core components of EFL,
as you're not much into them. This reflected into the Nth rewrite of
Ephoto in Elementary being barely working. From basic things as
asynchronous listing of directories with eio to incremental sorting
with insert ordered means. You struggled with these and were not
going anywhere... partly because even Elementary lacked some
primitives in gengrid to do so, and you're not willing to do these,
instead opted to work around.

3. In a worthless movement, I tried to create a common feeling
among EFL applications by introduction of recommended application
layouts bundled in Elementary's theme. This resulted into changes to
Ephoto visual so it and other applications such as Eve, Enjoy and
Envision would look similar, with toolbars in the same place. It was
worthless as general consensus was that people should do whatever they
want as it was their own software. This actually resulted into lack of
motivation to work on our applications as no matter what amount of
work I did (even if I was allowed to do!) would not work as a it would
never provide EFL experience because EFL experience never existed,
it was dream I had but never existed in reality. Together with lack of
time, I went back to KDE applications (if you need a recommendation:
gwenview, amarok, okular and dolphin are excellent applications).

Seems that all we do, and from feedback I got, all we SHOULD do is
create personal applications to fit our own needs, the way we like
them, veto other changes.

After all this rant, sorry to change your pet project with stupid
dreams to have EFL applications. We're not ready to have such with
current mindset. Thank your for reminding me of such.

-- 
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202
--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster IN trunk/evas: . m4 src/lib/engines/common src/lib/file src/modules/loaders src/modules/loaders/ico

2011-03-11 Thread Vincent Torri


On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:

 Log:
 Evas: add ico loader!

does it support the Windows ico forat (that is, the one which can have 
more han 1 image in it) ?

Vincent




 Author:   raster
 Date: 2011-03-11 07:07:25 -0800 (Fri, 11 Mar 2011)
 New Revision: 57693
 Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/57693

 Added:
  trunk/evas/src/modules/loaders/ico/ 
 trunk/evas/src/modules/loaders/ico/Makefile.am 
 trunk/evas/src/modules/loaders/ico/evas_image_load_ico.c
 Modified:
  trunk/evas/ChangeLog trunk/evas/configure.ac 
 trunk/evas/m4/evas_check_loader.m4 
 trunk/evas/src/lib/engines/common/evas_image_load.c 
 trunk/evas/src/lib/file/evas_module.c

 Modified: trunk/evas/ChangeLog
 ===
 --- trunk/evas/ChangeLog  2011-03-11 14:16:01 UTC (rev 57692)
 +++ trunk/evas/ChangeLog  2011-03-11 15:07:25 UTC (rev 57693)
 @@ -162,3 +162,7 @@
 are 0 or not and then force alpha off if all are 0. This
 means you can never have a 100% empty/transparent BMP though
 in 32bpp mode.
 +
 +2011-03-11  Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
 +
 + * Add ICO loader to evas (also can load CUR cursor files in theory)

 Modified: trunk/evas/configure.ac
 ===
 --- trunk/evas/configure.ac   2011-03-11 14:16:01 UTC (rev 57692)
 +++ trunk/evas/configure.ac   2011-03-11 15:07:25 UTC (rev 57693)
 @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@
 want_evas_image_loader_bmp=yes
 want_evas_image_loader_tga=yes
 want_evas_image_loader_wbmp=yes
 +want_evas_image_loader_ico=yes

 want_evas_font_loader_eet=yes

 @@ -820,6 +821,7 @@

 EVAS_CHECK_IMAGE_LOADER([WBMP], [${want_evas_image_loader_wbmp}])

 +EVAS_CHECK_IMAGE_LOADER([ICO], [${want_evas_image_loader_ico}])

 #
 ## Cpu based optimizations
 @@ -1595,6 +1597,7 @@
 src/modules/loaders/tiff/Makefile
 src/modules/loaders/xpm/Makefile
 src/modules/loaders/bmp/Makefile
 +src/modules/loaders/ico/Makefile
 src/modules/loaders/tga/Makefile
 src/modules/loaders/svg/Makefile
 src/modules/loaders/pmaps/Makefile
 @@ -1702,6 +1705,7 @@
 echo   BMP.: $have_evas_image_loader_bmp
 echo   TGA.: $have_evas_image_loader_tga
 echo   WBMP: $have_evas_image_loader_wbmp
 +echo   ICO.: $have_evas_image_loader_ico
 echo
 echo Font Sourcing Systems:
 echo   EET.: $have_evas_font_loader_eet

 Modified: trunk/evas/m4/evas_check_loader.m4
 ===
 --- trunk/evas/m4/evas_check_loader.m42011-03-11 14:16:01 UTC (rev 
 57692)
 +++ trunk/evas/m4/evas_check_loader.m42011-03-11 15:07:25 UTC (rev 
 57693)
 @@ -328,6 +328,26 @@

 ])

 +dnl use: EVAS_CHECK_LOADER_DEP_ICO(loader, want_static[, ACTION-IF-FOUND[, 
 ACTION-IF-NOT-FOUND]])
 +
 +AC_DEFUN([EVAS_CHECK_LOADER_DEP_ICO],
 +[
 +
 +have_dep=yes
 +evas_image_loader_[]$1[]_cflags=
 +evas_image_loader_[]$1[]_libs=
 +
 +AC_SUBST([evas_image_loader_$1_cflags])
 +AC_SUBST([evas_image_loader_$1_libs])
 +
 +if test x${have_dep} = xyes ; then
 +  m4_default([$3], [:])
 +else
 +  m4_default([$4], [:])
 +fi
 +
 +])
 +
 dnl use: EVAS_CHECK_LOADER_DEP_TGA(loader, want_static[, ACTION-IF-FOUND[, 
 ACTION-IF-NOT-FOUND]])

 AC_DEFUN([EVAS_CHECK_LOADER_DEP_TGA],

 Modified: trunk/evas/src/lib/engines/common/evas_image_load.c
 ===
 --- trunk/evas/src/lib/engines/common/evas_image_load.c   2011-03-11 
 14:16:01 UTC (rev 57692)
 +++ trunk/evas/src/lib/engines/common/evas_image_load.c   2011-03-11 
 15:07:25 UTC (rev 57693)
 @@ -30,12 +30,14 @@
{ pnm, pmaps },
{ bmp, bmp },
{ tga, tga },
 -   { wbmp, wbmp }
 +   { wbmp, wbmp },
 +   { ico, ico },
 +   { cur, ico }
 };

 static const char *loaders_name[] =
 {
 -  png, jpeg, eet, xpm, tiff, gif, svg, pmaps, edb, bmp, 
 tga, wbmp
 +  png, jpeg, eet, xpm, tiff, gif, svg, pmaps, edb, bmp, 
 tga, wbmp, ico
 };

 struct evas_image_foreach_loader_data

 Modified: trunk/evas/src/lib/file/evas_module.c
 ===
 --- trunk/evas/src/lib/file/evas_module.c 2011-03-11 14:16:01 UTC (rev 
 57692)
 +++ trunk/evas/src/lib/file/evas_module.c 2011-03-11 15:07:25 UTC (rev 
 57693)
 @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@
 EVAS_EINA_STATIC_MODULE_DEFINE(image_loader, edb);
 EVAS_EINA_STATIC_MODULE_DEFINE(image_loader, tga);
 EVAS_EINA_STATIC_MODULE_DEFINE(image_loader, wbmp);
 +EVAS_EINA_STATIC_MODULE_DEFINE(image_loader, ico);
 EVAS_EINA_STATIC_MODULE_DEFINE(image_saver, edb);
 EVAS_EINA_STATIC_MODULE_DEFINE(image_saver, eet);
 EVAS_EINA_STATIC_MODULE_DEFINE(image_saver, jpeg);
 @@ -240,6 +241,9 @@
 #ifdef EVAS_STATIC_BUILD_WBMP
   EVAS_EINA_STATIC_MODULE_USE(image_loader, wbmp),
 #endif
 +#ifdef EVAS_STATIC_BUILD_ICO
 +  

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster IN trunk/evas: . m4 src/lib/engines/common src/lib/file src/modules/loaders src/modules/loaders/ico

2011-03-11 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:


 On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:

 Log:
 Evas: add ico loader!

 does it support the Windows ico forat (that is, the one which can have
 more han 1 image in it) ?

likely not, otherwise we'd need a load_hint to specify which one to
load, and maybe something to return the number of images in it. Would
be useful for gif and mjpeg as well.


-- 
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] CeBIT 2011 reports

2011-03-11 Thread Tom Hacohen
Snowboarding is a blast (obviously). :P

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo seojuyu...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hey Tom,
 How is your tour?
 Anything fun in France?

 Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)

 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com wrote:
  On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Thomas Gstädtner tho...@gstaedtner.net
 
  wrote:
 
  You might not be familiar with this, but they actually do sell razors
  in Germany. :P
 
  But I don't speak German... Anyhow, I'm currently in france, and I still
  haven't shaved (can't speak french)... :P
 
  Well actually, I want to use a trimmer before actually using a blade,
 will
  make it far easier, and I only have a hair trimmer at home, so it'll
 wait.
 
  --
  Tom.
 




-- 
Tom.
--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] CeBIT 2011 reports

2011-03-11 Thread Tom Hacohen
Was supposed to get to Paris, but in the end I took another train. I'm
currently in the Alps, Val D'isere to be exact. :)

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:



 On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote:

  On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Thomas Gstädtner tho...@gstaedtner.net
 wrote:

   You might not be familiar with this, but they actually do sell razors
 in Germany. :P


 But I don't speak German... Anyhow, I'm currently in france, and I still
 haven't shaved (can't speak french)... :P


 are you near Paris ?

 Vincent


 Well actually, I want to use a trimmer before actually using a blade, will
 make it far easier, and I only have a hair trimmer at home, so it'll wait.

 --
 Tom.

 --
 Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
 A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
 for your organization - today and in the future.
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d

 ___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel




-- 
Tom.
--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge

2011-03-11 Thread Leif Middelschulte
I don't want to jump in into anything personal.

I just wanted to support Gustavo on the way he thought. I would have
thought the same way. By saying so, I don't want to say: You guys
were wrong!, but As we can see we need to solve this issue and come
up with a rule..

Therefore, I'll start a thread about policy. I'll use the outcome to
put an article into trac/wiki about how stuff in e.svn.org is to be
treated so we (hopefully) never have to argue about such things and
can focus on development as a community.


BR,

Leif

2011/3/11 unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com:
 I don't know what has got in to you lately, but I was not talking about or 
 referring to ephoto. Get off of your high horse and stop taking offense to 
 everything that gets said even when it has nothing to do with you.  For your 
 information ephoto is widely used and the general consensus in the e world is 
 that elm is the problem and lacks terribly in design and implementation. 
 There is a whole lot more that I want to say and could say as you took to 
 personally insulting me, but I'm not going to drop to that level.

 Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire

 - Reply message -
 From: Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi
 Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 8:34 am
 Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
 To: unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
 Cc: Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net, 
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net


 On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:08 PM, unixti...@gmail.com
 unixti...@gmail.com wrote:
 I think you make a very good point Andreas. While the other side may argue 
 that it is in public subversion and is open source code, at the same time 
 the project still has an author with an idea and scope for the project. I 
 think its rude to change the code of ones project and even the scope of it 
 without any knowledge of the author. This has been happening to a lot of 
 authors and projects over the past year or so maybe a little more. To all 
 developers: get to know you're fellow developers!!! Communicate with them! 
 Communication is a good thing. I promise.


 Hi okra, here I have to disagree a bit. Or at least explain why these
 things happened to you and ephoto:

    1. I understood Ephoto was an E project, not a personal project
 (as Andreas' PROTO/edje-player). Similarly that I don't go ask Raster
 every change I did to Evas, Ecore, Edje or E itself, I did not feel
 like asking permission to change it. SORRY, later own I realized
 (actually after being told by many) that Ephoto was your lovely
 playground and rantalthough the name, most E people don't use it to
 see photos because it barely work./rant

    2. You never grasped Elementary or other core components of EFL,
 as you're not much into them. This reflected into the Nth rewrite of
 Ephoto in Elementary being barely working. From basic things as
 asynchronous listing of directories with eio to incremental sorting
 with insert ordered means. You struggled with these and were not
 going anywhere... partly because even Elementary lacked some
 primitives in gengrid to do so, and you're not willing to do these,
 instead opted to work around.

    3. In a worthless movement, I tried to create a common feeling
 among EFL applications by introduction of recommended application
 layouts bundled in Elementary's theme. This resulted into changes to
 Ephoto visual so it and other applications such as Eve, Enjoy and
 Envision would look similar, with toolbars in the same place. It was
 worthless as general consensus was that people should do whatever they
 want as it was their own software. This actually resulted into lack of
 motivation to work on our applications as no matter what amount of
 work I did (even if I was allowed to do!) would not work as a it would
 never provide EFL experience because EFL experience never existed,
 it was dream I had but never existed in reality. Together with lack of
 time, I went back to KDE applications (if you need a recommendation:
 gwenview, amarok, okular and dolphin are excellent applications).

 Seems that all we do, and from feedback I got, all we SHOULD do is
 create personal applications to fit our own needs, the way we like
 them, veto other changes.

 After all this rant, sorry to change your pet project with stupid
 dreams to have EFL applications. We're not ready to have such with
 current mindset. Thank your for reminding me of such.

 --
 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
 http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
 --
 MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
 Skype: gsbarbieri
 Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202
 --
 Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
 A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
 for your organization - today and in the future.
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
 ___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 

Re: [E-devel] CeBIT 2011 reports

2011-03-11 Thread Vincent Torri



On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote:


Was supposed to get to Paris, but in the end I took another train. I'm
currently in the Alps, Val D'isere to be exact. :)


haaa ! I like this ski resort a lot (got there several times). You can 
ski also in Tignes, which is just beside (you can go from Val d'Isere to 
Tignes, and converesly by taking the 'Face', a black slope, but the ticket 
is more expensive).


happy skiing !

Vincent



On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:




On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote:

 On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Thomas Gstädtner tho...@gstaedtner.net

wrote:


  You might not be familiar with this, but they actually do sell razors

in Germany. :P



But I don't speak German... Anyhow, I'm currently in france, and I still
haven't shaved (can't speak french)... :P



are you near Paris ?

Vincent



Well actually, I want to use a trimmer before actually using a blade, will
make it far easier, and I only have a hair trimmer at home, so it'll wait.

--
Tom.

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d

___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel





--
Tom.
--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge

2011-03-11 Thread Tom Hacohen
I completely agree. I also don't want to step in an argument I know nothing
about, but I do agree with Gustavo. In my pov e's svn is for e applications.
It's not sourceforge that stores open source projects, everything in the svn
is made for e and thus should follow whatever guidelines/spirit e may have.
I don't think svn is a good place for *personal* pet projects (maybe in your
own dev dir?) because everything in svn is seen by other people as something
developed and supported by the e team, and thus, all the e team should be
able to adjust, modify and even rewrite so it'll follow e's spirit the
direction.

Unrelated note: I really love edje_player, been using it for ages now.

--
Tom.

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Leif Middelschulte 
leif.middelschu...@gmail.com wrote:

 I don't want to jump in into anything personal.

 I just wanted to support Gustavo on the way he thought. I would have
 thought the same way. By saying so, I don't want to say: You guys
 were wrong!, but As we can see we need to solve this issue and come
 up with a rule..

 Therefore, I'll start a thread about policy. I'll use the outcome to
 put an article into trac/wiki about how stuff in e.svn.org is to be
 treated so we (hopefully) never have to argue about such things and
 can focus on development as a community.


 BR,

 Leif

 2011/3/11 unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com:
  I don't know what has got in to you lately, but I was not talking about
 or referring to ephoto. Get off of your high horse and stop taking offense
 to everything that gets said even when it has nothing to do with you.  For
 your information ephoto is widely used and the general consensus in the e
 world is that elm is the problem and lacks terribly in design and
 implementation. There is a whole lot more that I want to say and could say
 as you took to personally insulting me, but I'm not going to drop to that
 level.
 
  Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire
 
  - Reply message -
  From: Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi
  Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 8:34 am
  Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
  To: unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
  Cc: Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net, 
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 
 
  On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:08 PM, unixti...@gmail.com
  unixti...@gmail.com wrote:
  I think you make a very good point Andreas. While the other side may
 argue that it is in public subversion and is open source code, at the same
 time the project still has an author with an idea and scope for the project.
 I think its rude to change the code of ones project and even the scope of it
 without any knowledge of the author. This has been happening to a lot of
 authors and projects over the past year or so maybe a little more. To all
 developers: get to know you're fellow developers!!! Communicate with them!
 Communication is a good thing. I promise.
 
 
  Hi okra, here I have to disagree a bit. Or at least explain why these
  things happened to you and ephoto:
 
 1. I understood Ephoto was an E project, not a personal project
  (as Andreas' PROTO/edje-player). Similarly that I don't go ask Raster
  every change I did to Evas, Ecore, Edje or E itself, I did not feel
  like asking permission to change it. SORRY, later own I realized
  (actually after being told by many) that Ephoto was your lovely
  playground and rantalthough the name, most E people don't use it to
  see photos because it barely work./rant
 
 2. You never grasped Elementary or other core components of EFL,
  as you're not much into them. This reflected into the Nth rewrite of
  Ephoto in Elementary being barely working. From basic things as
  asynchronous listing of directories with eio to incremental sorting
  with insert ordered means. You struggled with these and were not
  going anywhere... partly because even Elementary lacked some
  primitives in gengrid to do so, and you're not willing to do these,
  instead opted to work around.
 
 3. In a worthless movement, I tried to create a common feeling
  among EFL applications by introduction of recommended application
  layouts bundled in Elementary's theme. This resulted into changes to
  Ephoto visual so it and other applications such as Eve, Enjoy and
  Envision would look similar, with toolbars in the same place. It was
  worthless as general consensus was that people should do whatever they
  want as it was their own software. This actually resulted into lack of
  motivation to work on our applications as no matter what amount of
  work I did (even if I was allowed to do!) would not work as a it would
  never provide EFL experience because EFL experience never existed,
  it was dream I had but never existed in reality. Together with lack of
  time, I went back to KDE applications (if you need a recommendation:
  gwenview, amarok, okular and dolphin are excellent applications).
 
  Seems that all we do, and from feedback I got, all we SHOULD do 

Re: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge

2011-03-11 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Leif Middelschulte
leif.middelschu...@gmail.com wrote:
 I don't want to jump in into anything personal.

 I just wanted to support Gustavo on the way he thought. I would have
 thought the same way. By saying so, I don't want to say: You guys
 were wrong!, but As we can see we need to solve this issue and come
 up with a rule..

 Therefore, I'll start a thread about policy. I'll use the outcome to
 put an article into trac/wiki about how stuff in e.svn.org is to be
 treated so we (hopefully) never have to argue about such things and
 can focus on development as a community.

I do support your initiative Leif. From my point of view top level
application have always been here as a way to design an EFL
experience, but that doesn't look like it is the opinion of every
one. So to avoid any misunderstanding, we need to define some rules on
what kind of content end where in our svn.

In my opinion it would be the first step toward an EFL experience that
should become a community vision. If we don't drive together, but go
in all direction, we will end nowhere.

As a side note, Andreas could you send me a patch for edje AUTHORS
file. I will apply it happily as we really need to remember all the
people that helped us make this great tools !
-- 
Cedric BAIL

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] CeBIT 2011 reports

2011-03-11 Thread Tom Hacohen
Yeah, been to Tignes and Val D'isere a couple of times as well, a very nice
resort, especially so late in the season when there's no snow in other
places :P

I bought the skipass for both resorts, even managed to crash in the snowpark
in Tignes and had to go all the way back to val disere limping :P

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:



 On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote:

  Was supposed to get to Paris, but in the end I took another train. I'm
 currently in the Alps, Val D'isere to be exact. :)


 haaa ! I like this ski resort a lot (got there several times). You can ski
 also in Tignes, which is just beside (you can go from Val d'Isere to Tignes,
 and converesly by taking the 'Face', a black slope, but the ticket is more
 expensive).

 happy skiing !

 Vincent



 On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr
 wrote:



 On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote:

  On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Thomas Gstädtner 
 tho...@gstaedtner.net

 wrote:


  You might not be familiar with this, but they actually do sell razors

 in Germany. :P


  But I don't speak German... Anyhow, I'm currently in france, and I
 still
 haven't shaved (can't speak french)... :P


 are you near Paris ?

 Vincent


  Well actually, I want to use a trimmer before actually using a blade,
 will
 make it far easier, and I only have a hair trimmer at home, so it'll
 wait.

 --
 Tom.


 --
 Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
 A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
 for your organization - today and in the future.
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d

 ___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel




 --
 Tom.




-- 
Tom.
--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge

2011-03-11 Thread Nicolas Aguirre
2011/3/11 Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com:
 I completely agree. I also don't want to step in an argument I know nothing
 about, but I do agree with Gustavo. In my pov e's svn is for e applications.
 It's not sourceforge that stores open source projects, everything in the svn
 is made for e and thus should follow whatever guidelines/spirit e may have.
 I don't think svn is a good place for *personal* pet projects (maybe in your
 own dev dir?) because everything in svn is seen by other people as something
 developed and supported by the e team, and thus, all the e team should be
 able to adjust, modify and even rewrite so it'll follow e's spirit the
 direction.

 Unrelated note: I really love edje_player, been using it for ages now.

 --
 Tom.

 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Leif Middelschulte 
 leif.middelschu...@gmail.com wrote:

 I don't want to jump in into anything personal.

 I just wanted to support Gustavo on the way he thought. I would have
 thought the same way. By saying so, I don't want to say: You guys
 were wrong!, but As we can see we need to solve this issue and come
 up with a rule..

 Therefore, I'll start a thread about policy. I'll use the outcome to
 put an article into trac/wiki about how stuff in e.svn.org is to be
 treated so we (hopefully) never have to argue about such things and
 can focus on development as a community.


 BR,

 Leif

 2011/3/11 unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com:
  I don't know what has got in to you lately, but I was not talking about
 or referring to ephoto. Get off of your high horse and stop taking offense
 to everything that gets said even when it has nothing to do with you.  For
 your information ephoto is widely used and the general consensus in the e
 world is that elm is the problem and lacks terribly in design and
 implementation. There is a whole lot more that I want to say and could say
 as you took to personally insulting me, but I'm not going to drop to that
 level.
 
  Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire
 
  - Reply message -
  From: Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi
  Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 8:34 am
  Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
  To: unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
  Cc: Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net, 
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 
 
  On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:08 PM, unixti...@gmail.com
  unixti...@gmail.com wrote:
  I think you make a very good point Andreas. While the other side may
 argue that it is in public subversion and is open source code, at the same
 time the project still has an author with an idea and scope for the project.
 I think its rude to change the code of ones project and even the scope of it
 without any knowledge of the author. This has been happening to a lot of
 authors and projects over the past year or so maybe a little more. To all
 developers: get to know you're fellow developers!!! Communicate with them!
 Communication is a good thing. I promise.
 
 
  Hi okra, here I have to disagree a bit. Or at least explain why these
  things happened to you and ephoto:
 
     1. I understood Ephoto was an E project, not a personal project
  (as Andreas' PROTO/edje-player). Similarly that I don't go ask Raster
  every change I did to Evas, Ecore, Edje or E itself, I did not feel
  like asking permission to change it. SORRY, later own I realized
  (actually after being told by many) that Ephoto was your lovely
  playground and rantalthough the name, most E people don't use it to
  see photos because it barely work./rant
 
     2. You never grasped Elementary or other core components of EFL,
  as you're not much into them. This reflected into the Nth rewrite of
  Ephoto in Elementary being barely working. From basic things as
  asynchronous listing of directories with eio to incremental sorting
  with insert ordered means. You struggled with these and were not
  going anywhere... partly because even Elementary lacked some
  primitives in gengrid to do so, and you're not willing to do these,
  instead opted to work around.
 
     3. In a worthless movement, I tried to create a common feeling
  among EFL applications by introduction of recommended application
  layouts bundled in Elementary's theme. This resulted into changes to
  Ephoto visual so it and other applications such as Eve, Enjoy and
  Envision would look similar, with toolbars in the same place. It was
  worthless as general consensus was that people should do whatever they
  want as it was their own software. This actually resulted into lack of
  motivation to work on our applications as no matter what amount of
  work I did (even if I was allowed to do!) would not work as a it would
  never provide EFL experience because EFL experience never existed,
  it was dream I had but never existed in reality. Together with lack of
  time, I went back to KDE applications (if you need a recommendation:
  gwenview, amarok, okular and dolphin are excellent applications).
 
  Seems that 

Re: [E-devel] CeBIT 2011 reports

2011-03-11 Thread Nicolas Aguirre
2011/3/11 Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com:
 Yeah, been to Tignes and Val D'isere a couple of times as well, a very nice
 resort, especially so late in the season when there's no snow in other
 places :P

 I bought the skipass for both resorts, even managed to crash in the snowpark
 in Tignes and had to go all the way back to val disere limping :P


Every one should know that Pyrenees are the best place for skiing !


-- 
Nicolas Aguirre
Mail: aguirre.nico...@gmail.com
Web: http://enna.geexbox.org
Blog: http://dev.enlightenment.fr/~captainigloo/

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge

2011-03-11 Thread Tom Hacohen
Yep, enna does not belong to the e svn (although it's obviously AWESOME).

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Nicolas Aguirre
aguirre.nico...@gmail.comwrote:

 2011/3/11 Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com:
  I completely agree. I also don't want to step in an argument I know
 nothing
  about, but I do agree with Gustavo. In my pov e's svn is for e
 applications.
  It's not sourceforge that stores open source projects, everything in the
 svn
  is made for e and thus should follow whatever guidelines/spirit e may
 have.
  I don't think svn is a good place for *personal* pet projects (maybe in
 your
  own dev dir?) because everything in svn is seen by other people as
 something
  developed and supported by the e team, and thus, all the e team should be
  able to adjust, modify and even rewrite so it'll follow e's spirit the
  direction.
 
  Unrelated note: I really love edje_player, been using it for ages now.
 
  --
  Tom.
 
  On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Leif Middelschulte 
  leif.middelschu...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  I don't want to jump in into anything personal.
 
  I just wanted to support Gustavo on the way he thought. I would have
  thought the same way. By saying so, I don't want to say: You guys
  were wrong!, but As we can see we need to solve this issue and come
  up with a rule..
 
  Therefore, I'll start a thread about policy. I'll use the outcome to
  put an article into trac/wiki about how stuff in e.svn.org is to be
  treated so we (hopefully) never have to argue about such things and
  can focus on development as a community.
 
 
  BR,
 
  Leif
 
  2011/3/11 unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com:
   I don't know what has got in to you lately, but I was not talking
 about
  or referring to ephoto. Get off of your high horse and stop taking
 offense
  to everything that gets said even when it has nothing to do with you.
  For
  your information ephoto is widely used and the general consensus in the
 e
  world is that elm is the problem and lacks terribly in design and
  implementation. There is a whole lot more that I want to say and could
 say
  as you took to personally insulting me, but I'm not going to drop to
 that
  level.
  
   Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire
  
   - Reply message -
   From: Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi
   Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 8:34 am
   Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
   To: unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
   Cc: Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net, 
  enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
  
  
   On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:08 PM, unixti...@gmail.com
   unixti...@gmail.com wrote:
   I think you make a very good point Andreas. While the other side may
  argue that it is in public subversion and is open source code, at the
 same
  time the project still has an author with an idea and scope for the
 project.
  I think its rude to change the code of ones project and even the scope
 of it
  without any knowledge of the author. This has been happening to a lot of
  authors and projects over the past year or so maybe a little more. To
 all
  developers: get to know you're fellow developers!!! Communicate with
 them!
  Communication is a good thing. I promise.
  
  
   Hi okra, here I have to disagree a bit. Or at least explain why these
   things happened to you and ephoto:
  
  1. I understood Ephoto was an E project, not a personal project
   (as Andreas' PROTO/edje-player). Similarly that I don't go ask Raster
   every change I did to Evas, Ecore, Edje or E itself, I did not feel
   like asking permission to change it. SORRY, later own I realized
   (actually after being told by many) that Ephoto was your lovely
   playground and rantalthough the name, most E people don't use it to
   see photos because it barely work./rant
  
  2. You never grasped Elementary or other core components of EFL,
   as you're not much into them. This reflected into the Nth rewrite of
   Ephoto in Elementary being barely working. From basic things as
   asynchronous listing of directories with eio to incremental sorting
   with insert ordered means. You struggled with these and were not
   going anywhere... partly because even Elementary lacked some
   primitives in gengrid to do so, and you're not willing to do these,
   instead opted to work around.
  
  3. In a worthless movement, I tried to create a common feeling
   among EFL applications by introduction of recommended application
   layouts bundled in Elementary's theme. This resulted into changes to
   Ephoto visual so it and other applications such as Eve, Enjoy and
   Envision would look similar, with toolbars in the same place. It was
   worthless as general consensus was that people should do whatever they
   want as it was their own software. This actually resulted into lack of
   motivation to work on our applications as no matter what amount of
   work I did (even if I was allowed to do!) would not work as a it would
   never provide EFL 

Re: [E-devel] CeBIT 2011 reports

2011-03-11 Thread Tom Hacohen
Nah, I'm sticking with the Alps. :P

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Nicolas Aguirre
aguirre.nico...@gmail.comwrote:

 2011/3/11 Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com:
  Yeah, been to Tignes and Val D'isere a couple of times as well, a very
 nice
  resort, especially so late in the season when there's no snow in other
  places :P
 
  I bought the skipass for both resorts, even managed to crash in the
 snowpark
  in Tignes and had to go all the way back to val disere limping :P
 

 Every one should know that Pyrenees are the best place for skiing !


 --
 Nicolas Aguirre
 Mail: aguirre.nico...@gmail.com
 Web: http://enna.geexbox.org
 Blog: http://dev.enlightenment.fr/~captainigloo/




-- 
Tom.
--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] CeBIT 2011 reports

2011-03-11 Thread Guillaume Friloux

On 11/03/2011 16:59, Nicolas Aguirre wrote:

2011/3/11 Tom Hacohent...@stosb.com:

Yeah, been to Tignes and Val D'isere a couple of times as well, a very nice
resort, especially so late in the season when there's no snow in other
places :P

I bought the skipass for both resorts, even managed to crash in the snowpark
in Tignes and had to go all the way back to val disere limping :P


Every one should know that Pyrenees are the best place for skiing !



Yeah, thats where i live =)
attachment: guillaume_friloux.vcf--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge

2011-03-11 Thread unixti...@gmail.com
Just to clear things up, Ephoto is not a pet or personal project and this 
thread should not be questioning ephoto. It is meant for the community and to 
be developed by the community. It wouldn't be where it is today without 
contributions from others including Gustavo, even though he will publicly call 
it a pos and barely functional on a public list when he hasn't even used it. 
Okay I'm done with that now.

I agree there needs to be guidelines and I think its important to note that the 
original developer is the president in the development. Licensing, releasing, 
and things of that nature should be handled by this president. Also when 
modifications happen that have opposing sides, the presidents word goes. 
Finally if there is a rewrite, change in scope, or anything extremely 
significant of the such, the presidents permission needs to be obtained.

Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire

- Reply message -
From: Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com
Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 10:00 am
Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
To: Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com
Cc: Leif Middelschulte leif.middelschu...@gmail.com, unixti...@gmail.com 
unixti...@gmail.com, enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Andreas 
Volz li...@brachttal.net


Yep, enna does not belong to the e svn (although it's obviously AWESOME).

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Nicolas Aguirre
aguirre.nico...@gmail.comwrote:

 2011/3/11 Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com:
  I completely agree. I also don't want to step in an argument I know
 nothing
  about, but I do agree with Gustavo. In my pov e's svn is for e
 applications.
  It's not sourceforge that stores open source projects, everything in the
 svn
  is made for e and thus should follow whatever guidelines/spirit e may
 have.
  I don't think svn is a good place for *personal* pet projects (maybe in
 your
  own dev dir?) because everything in svn is seen by other people as
 something
  developed and supported by the e team, and thus, all the e team should be
  able to adjust, modify and even rewrite so it'll follow e's spirit the
  direction.
 
  Unrelated note: I really love edje_player, been using it for ages now.
 
  --
  Tom.
 
  On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Leif Middelschulte 
  leif.middelschu...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  I don't want to jump in into anything personal.
 
  I just wanted to support Gustavo on the way he thought. I would have
  thought the same way. By saying so, I don't want to say: You guys
  were wrong!, but As we can see we need to solve this issue and come
  up with a rule..
 
  Therefore, I'll start a thread about policy. I'll use the outcome to
  put an article into trac/wiki about how stuff in e.svn.org is to be
  treated so we (hopefully) never have to argue about such things and
  can focus on development as a community.
 
 
  BR,
 
  Leif
 
  2011/3/11 unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com:
   I don't know what has got in to you lately, but I was not talking
 about
  or referring to ephoto. Get off of your high horse and stop taking
 offense
  to everything that gets said even when it has nothing to do with you.
  For
  your information ephoto is widely used and the general consensus in the
 e
  world is that elm is the problem and lacks terribly in design and
  implementation. There is a whole lot more that I want to say and could
 say
  as you took to personally insulting me, but I'm not going to drop to
 that
  level.
  
   Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire
  
   - Reply message -
   From: Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi
   Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 8:34 am
   Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
   To: unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
   Cc: Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net, 
  enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
  
  
   On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:08 PM, unixti...@gmail.com
   unixti...@gmail.com wrote:
   I think you make a very good point Andreas. While the other side may
  argue that it is in public subversion and is open source code, at the
 same
  time the project still has an author with an idea and scope for the
 project.
  I think its rude to change the code of ones project and even the scope
 of it
  without any knowledge of the author. This has been happening to a lot of
  authors and projects over the past year or so maybe a little more. To
 all
  developers: get to know you're fellow developers!!! Communicate with
 them!
  Communication is a good thing. I promise.
  
  
   Hi okra, here I have to disagree a bit. Or at least explain why these
   things happened to you and ephoto:
  
  1. I understood Ephoto was an E project, not a personal project
   (as Andreas' PROTO/edje-player). Similarly that I don't go ask Raster
   every change I did to Evas, Ecore, Edje or E itself, I did not feel
   like asking permission to change it. SORRY, later own I realized
   (actually after being told by many) that Ephoto was your lovely
   playground 

Re: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge

2011-03-11 Thread unixti...@gmail.com
If this is the case then I will remove Ephoto from svn and it will get no help 
from the e devs and little use from the community and will probably fizzle out 
and fail. If I have little say that can be outweighed in an app I created and 
slaved over, that includes my intellectual property in the original idea, 
scope, direction, and design, then I have no desire to leave it there.

Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire

- Reply message -
From: Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com
Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 10:26 am
Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
To: unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
Cc: Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com, Leif Middelschulte 
leif.middelschu...@gmail.com, enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, 
Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net


I disagree. By putting stuff into e's svn you are giving up on your right to
veto. This svn is for e's devs and community, not for el presidente. As I
said, all the apps in e should follow the guidelines and spirits. If those
are debatable the ML should be consulted first, not the creator.

As I said in IRC:

Whoever wants to do big changes should send to the ML before, not to the
initial creator. By committing code to e's svn you are giving up this veto.
If someone wants this kind of power he should use sourceforge, not e's svn.
:P

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:14 PM, unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.comwrote:

 Just to clear things up, Ephoto is not a pet or personal project and this
 thread should not be questioning ephoto. It is meant for the community and
 to be developed by the community. It wouldn't be where it is today without
 contributions from others including Gustavo, even though he will publicly
 call it a pos and barely functional on a public list when he hasn't even
 used it. Okay I'm done with that now.

 I agree there needs to be guidelines and I think its important to note that
 the original developer is the president in the development. Licensing,
 releasing, and things of that nature should be handled by this president.
 Also when modifications happen that have opposing sides, the presidents
 word goes. Finally if there is a rewrite, change in scope, or anything
 extremely significant of the such, the presidents permission needs to be
 obtained.


 Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire

 - Reply message -
 From: Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com
 Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 10:00 am

 Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
 To: Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com
 Cc: Leif Middelschulte leif.middelschu...@gmail.com, 
 unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com, 
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Andreas Volz 
 li...@brachttal.net



 Yep, enna does not belong to the e svn (although it's obviously AWESOME).

 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Nicolas Aguirre
 aguirre.nico...@gmail.comwrote:

  2011/3/11 Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com:
   I completely agree. I also don't want to step in an argument I know
  nothing
   about, but I do agree with Gustavo. In my pov e's svn is for e
  applications.
   It's not sourceforge that stores open source projects, everything in
 the
  svn
   is made for e and thus should follow whatever guidelines/spirit e may
  have.
   I don't think svn is a good place for *personal* pet projects (maybe in
  your
   own dev dir?) because everything in svn is seen by other people as
  something
   developed and supported by the e team, and thus, all the e team should
 be
   able to adjust, modify and even rewrite so it'll follow e's spirit the
   direction.
  
   Unrelated note: I really love edje_player, been using it for ages now.
  
   --
   Tom.
  
   On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Leif Middelschulte 
   leif.middelschu...@gmail.com wrote:
  
   I don't want to jump in into anything personal.
  
   I just wanted to support Gustavo on the way he thought. I would have
   thought the same way. By saying so, I don't want to say: You guys
   were wrong!, but As we can see we need to solve this issue and come
   up with a rule..
  
   Therefore, I'll start a thread about policy. I'll use the outcome to
   put an article into trac/wiki about how stuff in e.svn.org is to be
   treated so we (hopefully) never have to argue about such things and
   can focus on development as a community.
  
  
   BR,
  
   Leif
  
   2011/3/11 unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com:
I don't know what has got in to you lately, but I was not talking
  about
   or referring to ephoto. Get off of your high horse and stop taking
  offense
   to everything that gets said even when it has nothing to do with you.
   For
   your information ephoto is widely used and the general consensus in
 the
  e
   world is that elm is the problem and lacks terribly in design and
   implementation. There is a whole lot more that I want to say and could
  say
   as you took to personally insulting me, but I'm not going to drop to
  that
   level.
   
Sent from my 

[E-devel] Private projects in svn.e.org

2011-03-11 Thread Leif Middelschulte
Hello everyone,

As of recent events, I want to poll the developers' perception on
Private projects in e.svn.org.
Some developers were suprised that their projects (which were in
trunk) were (re)moved/rewritten/majorly changed by other developers of
our community.
Both sides came up with reasonable arguments, I don't want to discuss here.

I'll just propose two basic and simple ideas of how code (in e's
central svn, except for the dev's directories) is to be treated by
other developers. The already available guidlines for commits apply
for both proposals:

1.) Code in e.svn.org is free for (entire, including remove) change by
anyone with commit access. People who put their code there aggree with
this. The mailinglist shall be consulted in cases of 'major' changes.
- Leif (T_UNIX)

2.) If a developer changes (adds/(re)moves/changes to almost rewrite)
code in e.svn.org he or she has to consult the respective project's
maintainer.

Put your name under which idea you see suits your oppinion best.
Please don't make this a flamewar and stay _on_ topic. Make sure you
don't put annything in your answer besides your name/signature. This
mail is not a discussion thread. If you think a different policy
should be discussed feel free to open another thread so people might
comment if necessary.

BR,

Leif

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge

2011-03-11 Thread unixti...@gmail.com
The same way raster has final say with e and efl's scope and direction and 
timelines.

Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire

- Reply message -
From: Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com
Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 10:26 am
Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
To: unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
Cc: Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com, Leif Middelschulte 
leif.middelschu...@gmail.com, enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, 
Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net


I disagree. By putting stuff into e's svn you are giving up on your right to
veto. This svn is for e's devs and community, not for el presidente. As I
said, all the apps in e should follow the guidelines and spirits. If those
are debatable the ML should be consulted first, not the creator.

As I said in IRC:

Whoever wants to do big changes should send to the ML before, not to the
initial creator. By committing code to e's svn you are giving up this veto.
If someone wants this kind of power he should use sourceforge, not e's svn.
:P

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:14 PM, unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.comwrote:

 Just to clear things up, Ephoto is not a pet or personal project and this
 thread should not be questioning ephoto. It is meant for the community and
 to be developed by the community. It wouldn't be where it is today without
 contributions from others including Gustavo, even though he will publicly
 call it a pos and barely functional on a public list when he hasn't even
 used it. Okay I'm done with that now.

 I agree there needs to be guidelines and I think its important to note that
 the original developer is the president in the development. Licensing,
 releasing, and things of that nature should be handled by this president.
 Also when modifications happen that have opposing sides, the presidents
 word goes. Finally if there is a rewrite, change in scope, or anything
 extremely significant of the such, the presidents permission needs to be
 obtained.


 Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire

 - Reply message -
 From: Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com
 Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 10:00 am

 Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
 To: Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com
 Cc: Leif Middelschulte leif.middelschu...@gmail.com, 
 unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com, 
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Andreas Volz 
 li...@brachttal.net



 Yep, enna does not belong to the e svn (although it's obviously AWESOME).

 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Nicolas Aguirre
 aguirre.nico...@gmail.comwrote:

  2011/3/11 Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com:
   I completely agree. I also don't want to step in an argument I know
  nothing
   about, but I do agree with Gustavo. In my pov e's svn is for e
  applications.
   It's not sourceforge that stores open source projects, everything in
 the
  svn
   is made for e and thus should follow whatever guidelines/spirit e may
  have.
   I don't think svn is a good place for *personal* pet projects (maybe in
  your
   own dev dir?) because everything in svn is seen by other people as
  something
   developed and supported by the e team, and thus, all the e team should
 be
   able to adjust, modify and even rewrite so it'll follow e's spirit the
   direction.
  
   Unrelated note: I really love edje_player, been using it for ages now.
  
   --
   Tom.
  
   On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Leif Middelschulte 
   leif.middelschu...@gmail.com wrote:
  
   I don't want to jump in into anything personal.
  
   I just wanted to support Gustavo on the way he thought. I would have
   thought the same way. By saying so, I don't want to say: You guys
   were wrong!, but As we can see we need to solve this issue and come
   up with a rule..
  
   Therefore, I'll start a thread about policy. I'll use the outcome to
   put an article into trac/wiki about how stuff in e.svn.org is to be
   treated so we (hopefully) never have to argue about such things and
   can focus on development as a community.
  
  
   BR,
  
   Leif
  
   2011/3/11 unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com:
I don't know what has got in to you lately, but I was not talking
  about
   or referring to ephoto. Get off of your high horse and stop taking
  offense
   to everything that gets said even when it has nothing to do with you.
   For
   your information ephoto is widely used and the general consensus in
 the
  e
   world is that elm is the problem and lacks terribly in design and
   implementation. There is a whole lot more that I want to say and could
  say
   as you took to personally insulting me, but I'm not going to drop to
  that
   level.
   
Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire
   
- Reply message -
From: Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi
Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 8:34 am
Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author
 knowledge
To: unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
Cc: Andreas Volz 

Re: [E-devel] edje_decc - build.sh

2011-03-11 Thread Davide Andreoli
2011/3/10 Daniel Juyung Seo seojuyu...@gmail.com:
 It looks like a bug.
 When using editje for edj creation, edje_file-compiler becomes edje_edit.
 When using edje_cc for edj creation, edje_file-compiler becomes edje_cc.

We spotted this bug log time ago...don't remember the old discussion.
Can't we just hardcode edje_cc in the printf call?

DaveMDS



 Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)

 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net wrote:
 Hello,

 I'm just wondering why edje_decc writes a build.sh with this content:

 edje_edit $@ -id . -fd . generated_source.edc -o screens.edj

 This for sure doesn't work. I searched the sources and found this in
 edje_decc.c:


        if (build_sh)
          {
             snprintf(out, sizeof(out), %s/build.sh, outdir);
             printf(Output Build Script: %s\n, out);
             if (strstr(out, ../))
               {
                  ERR(potential security violation. attempt to write in 
 parent dir.\n);
                  exit (-1);
               }
             f = fopen(out, wb);
             fprintf(f, #!/bin/sh\n);
             fprintf(f, %s $@ -id . -fd . %s -o %s.edj\n, 
 edje_file-compiler, sf-name, outdir);
             fclose(f);

             WRN(\n*** CAUTION ***\n
                 Please check the build script for anything malicious 

 I edited this files ages ago with edje_edit. I think because of this 
 edje_file-compiler is
 edje_edit. But running build.sh doesn't work here. Couldn't we just always 
 use edje_cc?

 regards
        Andreas

 --
 Technical Blog http://andreasvolz.wordpress.com/

 --
 Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
 A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
 for your organization - today and in the future.
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
 ___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


 --
 Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
 A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
 for your organization - today and in the future.
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
 ___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge

2011-03-11 Thread Tom Hacohen
No need to get all fired up. But you do have to understand that the
applications in e's svn represent e, and therefore they have to follow the e
spirit. Of course you have a say, cause you are the maintainer, but
obviously, ephoto can't be the official e photo viewer if it only represents
your thoughts and ideas, and not those of the community.

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:36 PM, unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.comwrote:

 If this is the case then I will remove Ephoto from svn and it will get no
 help from the e devs and little use from the community and will probably
 fizzle out and fail. If I have little say that can be outweighed in an app I
 created and slaved over, that includes my intellectual property in the
 original idea, scope, direction, and design, then I have no desire to leave
 it there.


 Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire

 - Reply message -
 From: Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com
 Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 10:26 am

 Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
 To: unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
 Cc: Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com, Leif Middelschulte 
 leif.middelschu...@gmail.com, enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
 Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net



 I disagree. By putting stuff into e's svn you are giving up on your right
 to
 veto. This svn is for e's devs and community, not for el presidente. As I
 said, all the apps in e should follow the guidelines and spirits. If those
 are debatable the ML should be consulted first, not the creator.

 As I said in IRC:

 Whoever wants to do big changes should send to the ML before, not to the
 initial creator. By committing code to e's svn you are giving up this veto.
 If someone wants this kind of power he should use sourceforge, not e's svn.
 :P

 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:14 PM, unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Just to clear things up, Ephoto is not a pet or personal project and
 this
  thread should not be questioning ephoto. It is meant for the community
 and
  to be developed by the community. It wouldn't be where it is today
 without
  contributions from others including Gustavo, even though he will publicly
  call it a pos and barely functional on a public list when he hasn't even
  used it. Okay I'm done with that now.
 
  I agree there needs to be guidelines and I think its important to note
 that
  the original developer is the president in the development. Licensing,
  releasing, and things of that nature should be handled by this
 president.
  Also when modifications happen that have opposing sides, the presidents
  word goes. Finally if there is a rewrite, change in scope, or anything
  extremely significant of the such, the presidents permission needs to
 be
  obtained.
 
 
  Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire
 
  - Reply message -
  From: Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com
  Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 10:00 am
 
  Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
  To: Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com
  Cc: Leif Middelschulte leif.middelschu...@gmail.com, 
  unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com, 
  enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Andreas Volz 
  li...@brachttal.net
 
 
 
  Yep, enna does not belong to the e svn (although it's obviously AWESOME).
 
  On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Nicolas Aguirre
  aguirre.nico...@gmail.comwrote:
 
   2011/3/11 Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com:
I completely agree. I also don't want to step in an argument I know
   nothing
about, but I do agree with Gustavo. In my pov e's svn is for e
   applications.
It's not sourceforge that stores open source projects, everything in
  the
   svn
is made for e and thus should follow whatever guidelines/spirit e may
   have.
I don't think svn is a good place for *personal* pet projects (maybe
 in
   your
own dev dir?) because everything in svn is seen by other people as
   something
developed and supported by the e team, and thus, all the e team
 should
  be
able to adjust, modify and even rewrite so it'll follow e's spirit
 the
direction.
   
Unrelated note: I really love edje_player, been using it for ages
 now.
   
--
Tom.
   
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Leif Middelschulte 
leif.middelschu...@gmail.com wrote:
   
I don't want to jump in into anything personal.
   
I just wanted to support Gustavo on the way he thought. I would have
thought the same way. By saying so, I don't want to say: You guys
were wrong!, but As we can see we need to solve this issue and
 come
up with a rule..
   
Therefore, I'll start a thread about policy. I'll use the outcome to
put an article into trac/wiki about how stuff in e.svn.org is to be
treated so we (hopefully) never have to argue about such things and
can focus on development as a community.
   
   
BR,
   
Leif
   
2011/3/11 unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com:
 I don't know what has got in to 

Re: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge

2011-03-11 Thread Tom Hacohen
Not even slightly similar. He doesn't have this kind of power because he is
the founder of e, he has this kind of power because he is the project
leader.

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:40 PM, unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.comwrote:

 The same way raster has final say with e and efl's scope and direction and
 timelines.


 Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire

 - Reply message -
 From: Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com
 Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 10:26 am
 Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
 To: unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
 Cc: Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com, Leif Middelschulte 
 leif.middelschu...@gmail.com, enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
 Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net


 I disagree. By putting stuff into e's svn you are giving up on your right
 to
 veto. This svn is for e's devs and community, not for el presidente. As I
 said, all the apps in e should follow the guidelines and spirits. If those
 are debatable the ML should be consulted first, not the creator.

 As I said in IRC:

 Whoever wants to do big changes should send to the ML before, not to the
 initial creator. By committing code to e's svn you are giving up this veto.
 If someone wants this kind of power he should use sourceforge, not e's svn.
 :P

 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:14 PM, unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Just to clear things up, Ephoto is not a pet or personal project and
 this
  thread should not be questioning ephoto. It is meant for the community
 and
  to be developed by the community. It wouldn't be where it is today
 without
  contributions from others including Gustavo, even though he will publicly
  call it a pos and barely functional on a public list when he hasn't even
  used it. Okay I'm done with that now.
 
  I agree there needs to be guidelines and I think its important to note
 that
  the original developer is the president in the development. Licensing,
  releasing, and things of that nature should be handled by this
 president.
  Also when modifications happen that have opposing sides, the presidents
  word goes. Finally if there is a rewrite, change in scope, or anything
  extremely significant of the such, the presidents permission needs to
 be
  obtained.
 
 
  Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire
 
  - Reply message -
  From: Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com
  Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 10:00 am
 
  Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
  To: Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com
  Cc: Leif Middelschulte leif.middelschu...@gmail.com, 
  unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com, 
  enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Andreas Volz 
  li...@brachttal.net
 
 
 
  Yep, enna does not belong to the e svn (although it's obviously AWESOME).
 
  On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Nicolas Aguirre
  aguirre.nico...@gmail.comwrote:
 
   2011/3/11 Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com:
I completely agree. I also don't want to step in an argument I know
   nothing
about, but I do agree with Gustavo. In my pov e's svn is for e
   applications.
It's not sourceforge that stores open source projects, everything in
  the
   svn
is made for e and thus should follow whatever guidelines/spirit e may
   have.
I don't think svn is a good place for *personal* pet projects (maybe
 in
   your
own dev dir?) because everything in svn is seen by other people as
   something
developed and supported by the e team, and thus, all the e team
 should
  be
able to adjust, modify and even rewrite so it'll follow e's spirit
 the
direction.
   
Unrelated note: I really love edje_player, been using it for ages
 now.
   
--
Tom.
   
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Leif Middelschulte 
leif.middelschu...@gmail.com wrote:
   
I don't want to jump in into anything personal.
   
I just wanted to support Gustavo on the way he thought. I would have
thought the same way. By saying so, I don't want to say: You guys
were wrong!, but As we can see we need to solve this issue and
 come
up with a rule..
   
Therefore, I'll start a thread about policy. I'll use the outcome to
put an article into trac/wiki about how stuff in e.svn.org is to be
treated so we (hopefully) never have to argue about such things and
can focus on development as a community.
   
   
BR,
   
Leif
   
2011/3/11 unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com:
 I don't know what has got in to you lately, but I was not talking
   about
or referring to ephoto. Get off of your high horse and stop taking
   offense
to everything that gets said even when it has nothing to do with
 you.
For
your information ephoto is widely used and the general consensus in
  the
   e
world is that elm is the problem and lacks terribly in design and
implementation. There is a whole lot more that I want to say and
 could
   say
as you took to personally insulting me, but 

Re: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge

2011-03-11 Thread unixti...@gmail.com
As I am the project leader of ephoto.

Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire

- Reply message -
From: Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com
Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 10:42 am
Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
To: unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
Cc: Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com, Leif Middelschulte 
leif.middelschu...@gmail.com, enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, 
Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net


Not even slightly similar. He doesn't have this kind of power because he is
the founder of e, he has this kind of power because he is the project
leader.

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:40 PM, unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.comwrote:

 The same way raster has final say with e and efl's scope and direction and
 timelines.


 Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire

 - Reply message -
 From: Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com
 Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 10:26 am
 Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
 To: unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
 Cc: Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com, Leif Middelschulte 
 leif.middelschu...@gmail.com, enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
 Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net


 I disagree. By putting stuff into e's svn you are giving up on your right
 to
 veto. This svn is for e's devs and community, not for el presidente. As I
 said, all the apps in e should follow the guidelines and spirits. If those
 are debatable the ML should be consulted first, not the creator.

 As I said in IRC:

 Whoever wants to do big changes should send to the ML before, not to the
 initial creator. By committing code to e's svn you are giving up this veto.
 If someone wants this kind of power he should use sourceforge, not e's svn.
 :P

 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:14 PM, unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Just to clear things up, Ephoto is not a pet or personal project and
 this
  thread should not be questioning ephoto. It is meant for the community
 and
  to be developed by the community. It wouldn't be where it is today
 without
  contributions from others including Gustavo, even though he will publicly
  call it a pos and barely functional on a public list when he hasn't even
  used it. Okay I'm done with that now.
 
  I agree there needs to be guidelines and I think its important to note
 that
  the original developer is the president in the development. Licensing,
  releasing, and things of that nature should be handled by this
 president.
  Also when modifications happen that have opposing sides, the presidents
  word goes. Finally if there is a rewrite, change in scope, or anything
  extremely significant of the such, the presidents permission needs to
 be
  obtained.
 
 
  Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire
 
  - Reply message -
  From: Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com
  Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 10:00 am
 
  Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
  To: Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com
  Cc: Leif Middelschulte leif.middelschu...@gmail.com, 
  unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com, 
  enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Andreas Volz 
  li...@brachttal.net
 
 
 
  Yep, enna does not belong to the e svn (although it's obviously AWESOME).
 
  On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Nicolas Aguirre
  aguirre.nico...@gmail.comwrote:
 
   2011/3/11 Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com:
I completely agree. I also don't want to step in an argument I know
   nothing
about, but I do agree with Gustavo. In my pov e's svn is for e
   applications.
It's not sourceforge that stores open source projects, everything in
  the
   svn
is made for e and thus should follow whatever guidelines/spirit e may
   have.
I don't think svn is a good place for *personal* pet projects (maybe
 in
   your
own dev dir?) because everything in svn is seen by other people as
   something
developed and supported by the e team, and thus, all the e team
 should
  be
able to adjust, modify and even rewrite so it'll follow e's spirit
 the
direction.
   
Unrelated note: I really love edje_player, been using it for ages
 now.
   
--
Tom.
   
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Leif Middelschulte 
leif.middelschu...@gmail.com wrote:
   
I don't want to jump in into anything personal.
   
I just wanted to support Gustavo on the way he thought. I would have
thought the same way. By saying so, I don't want to say: You guys
were wrong!, but As we can see we need to solve this issue and
 come
up with a rule..
   
Therefore, I'll start a thread about policy. I'll use the outcome to
put an article into trac/wiki about how stuff in e.svn.org is to be
treated so we (hopefully) never have to argue about such things and
can focus on development as a community.
   
   
BR,
   
Leif
   
2011/3/11 unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com:
 I don't know what has got in to you lately, but I was not talking

Re: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge

2011-03-11 Thread Sachiel
2011/3/11 Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com:
 Not even slightly similar. He doesn't have this kind of power because he is
 the founder of e, he has this kind of power because he is the project
 leader.


So he has that kind of power over EVERYTHING in svn? Even stuff he
never touched before or he publicly says he doesn't use or care about and
they are their own authors responsabilities?

 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:40 PM, unixti...@gmail.com 
 unixti...@gmail.comwrote:

 The same way raster has final say with e and efl's scope and direction and
 timelines.


 Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire

 - Reply message -
 From: Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com
 Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 10:26 am
 Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
 To: unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
 Cc: Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com, Leif Middelschulte 
 leif.middelschu...@gmail.com, enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
 Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net


 I disagree. By putting stuff into e's svn you are giving up on your right
 to
 veto. This svn is for e's devs and community, not for el presidente. As I
 said, all the apps in e should follow the guidelines and spirits. If those
 are debatable the ML should be consulted first, not the creator.

 As I said in IRC:

 Whoever wants to do big changes should send to the ML before, not to the
 initial creator. By committing code to e's svn you are giving up this veto.
 If someone wants this kind of power he should use sourceforge, not e's svn.
 :P

 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:14 PM, unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Just to clear things up, Ephoto is not a pet or personal project and
 this
  thread should not be questioning ephoto. It is meant for the community
 and
  to be developed by the community. It wouldn't be where it is today
 without
  contributions from others including Gustavo, even though he will publicly
  call it a pos and barely functional on a public list when he hasn't even
  used it. Okay I'm done with that now.
 
  I agree there needs to be guidelines and I think its important to note
 that
  the original developer is the president in the development. Licensing,
  releasing, and things of that nature should be handled by this
 president.
  Also when modifications happen that have opposing sides, the presidents
  word goes. Finally if there is a rewrite, change in scope, or anything
  extremely significant of the such, the presidents permission needs to
 be
  obtained.
 
 
  Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire
 
  - Reply message -
  From: Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com
  Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 10:00 am
 
  Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
  To: Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com
  Cc: Leif Middelschulte leif.middelschu...@gmail.com, 
  unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com, 
  enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Andreas Volz 
  li...@brachttal.net
 
 
 
  Yep, enna does not belong to the e svn (although it's obviously AWESOME).
 
  On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Nicolas Aguirre
  aguirre.nico...@gmail.comwrote:
 
   2011/3/11 Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com:
I completely agree. I also don't want to step in an argument I know
   nothing
about, but I do agree with Gustavo. In my pov e's svn is for e
   applications.
It's not sourceforge that stores open source projects, everything in
  the
   svn
is made for e and thus should follow whatever guidelines/spirit e may
   have.
I don't think svn is a good place for *personal* pet projects (maybe
 in
   your
own dev dir?) because everything in svn is seen by other people as
   something
developed and supported by the e team, and thus, all the e team
 should
  be
able to adjust, modify and even rewrite so it'll follow e's spirit
 the
direction.
   
Unrelated note: I really love edje_player, been using it for ages
 now.
   
--
Tom.
   
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Leif Middelschulte 
leif.middelschu...@gmail.com wrote:
   
I don't want to jump in into anything personal.
   
I just wanted to support Gustavo on the way he thought. I would have
thought the same way. By saying so, I don't want to say: You guys
were wrong!, but As we can see we need to solve this issue and
 come
up with a rule..
   
Therefore, I'll start a thread about policy. I'll use the outcome to
put an article into trac/wiki about how stuff in e.svn.org is to be
treated so we (hopefully) never have to argue about such things and
can focus on development as a community.
   
   
BR,
   
Leif
   
2011/3/11 unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com:
 I don't know what has got in to you lately, but I was not talking
   about
or referring to ephoto. Get off of your high horse and stop taking
   offense
to everything that gets said even when it has nothing to do with
 you.
    For
your information ephoto is widely used and the 

Re: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge

2011-03-11 Thread Tom Hacohen
Not the same thing. As I said, e's svn doesn't host projects, it hosts the
enlightenment project and you wrote part of it.

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:46 PM, unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.comwrote:

 As I am the project leader of ephoto.


 Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire

 - Reply message -
 From: Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com
 Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 10:42 am

 Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
 To: unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
 Cc: Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com, Leif Middelschulte 
 leif.middelschu...@gmail.com, enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
 Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net


 Not even slightly similar. He doesn't have this kind of power because he is
 the founder of e, he has this kind of power because he is the project
 leader.

 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:40 PM, unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  The same way raster has final say with e and efl's scope and direction
 and
  timelines.
 
 
  Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire
 
  - Reply message -
  From: Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com
  Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 10:26 am
  Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
  To: unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
  Cc: Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com, Leif Middelschulte
 
  leif.middelschu...@gmail.com, 
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
  Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net
 
 
  I disagree. By putting stuff into e's svn you are giving up on your right
  to
  veto. This svn is for e's devs and community, not for el presidente. As I
  said, all the apps in e should follow the guidelines and spirits. If
 those
  are debatable the ML should be consulted first, not the creator.
 
  As I said in IRC:
 
  Whoever wants to do big changes should send to the ML before, not to the
  initial creator. By committing code to e's svn you are giving up this
 veto.
  If someone wants this kind of power he should use sourceforge, not e's
 svn.
  :P
 
  On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:14 PM, unixti...@gmail.com 
 unixti...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
   Just to clear things up, Ephoto is not a pet or personal project and
  this
   thread should not be questioning ephoto. It is meant for the community
  and
   to be developed by the community. It wouldn't be where it is today
  without
   contributions from others including Gustavo, even though he will
 publicly
   call it a pos and barely functional on a public list when he hasn't
 even
   used it. Okay I'm done with that now.
  
   I agree there needs to be guidelines and I think its important to note
  that
   the original developer is the president in the development. Licensing,
   releasing, and things of that nature should be handled by this
  president.
   Also when modifications happen that have opposing sides, the
 presidents
   word goes. Finally if there is a rewrite, change in scope, or anything
   extremely significant of the such, the presidents permission needs to
  be
   obtained.
  
  
   Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire
  
   - Reply message -
   From: Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com
   Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 10:00 am
  
   Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
   To: Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com
   Cc: Leif Middelschulte leif.middelschu...@gmail.com, 
   unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com, 
   enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Andreas Volz 
   li...@brachttal.net
  
  
  
   Yep, enna does not belong to the e svn (although it's obviously
 AWESOME).
  
   On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Nicolas Aguirre
   aguirre.nico...@gmail.comwrote:
  
2011/3/11 Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com:
 I completely agree. I also don't want to step in an argument I know
nothing
 about, but I do agree with Gustavo. In my pov e's svn is for e
applications.
 It's not sourceforge that stores open source projects, everything
 in
   the
svn
 is made for e and thus should follow whatever guidelines/spirit e
 may
have.
 I don't think svn is a good place for *personal* pet projects
 (maybe
  in
your
 own dev dir?) because everything in svn is seen by other people as
something
 developed and supported by the e team, and thus, all the e team
  should
   be
 able to adjust, modify and even rewrite so it'll follow e's spirit
  the
 direction.

 Unrelated note: I really love edje_player, been using it for ages
  now.

 --
 Tom.

 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Leif Middelschulte 
 leif.middelschu...@gmail.com wrote:

 I don't want to jump in into anything personal.

 I just wanted to support Gustavo on the way he thought. I would
 have
 thought the same way. By saying so, I don't want to say: You guys
 were wrong!, but As we can see we need to solve this issue and
  come
 up with a rule..

 Therefore, I'll start a thread about policy. I'll use the 

Re: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge

2011-03-11 Thread Tom Hacohen
Well, yes. First of all he has admin access to the server, so he literally
has this kind of power :P Second of all, if we agree that things in svn
represent e (which I think is a common conception) he should have, and
actually has this kind of power. Although he currently may not care, it can
change in the future and then he will have this kind of power.

Yes, maintainers of parts may have power over other devs, but not over the e
spirit.

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Iván Briano (Sachiel)
sachi...@gmail.comwrote:

 2011/3/11 Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com:
  Not even slightly similar. He doesn't have this kind of power because he
 is
  the founder of e, he has this kind of power because he is the project
  leader.
 

 So he has that kind of power over EVERYTHING in svn? Even stuff he
 never touched before or he publicly says he doesn't use or care about and
 they are their own authors responsabilities?

  On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:40 PM, unixti...@gmail.com 
 unixti...@gmail.comwrote:
 
  The same way raster has final say with e and efl's scope and direction
 and
  timelines.
 
 
  Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire
 
  - Reply message -
  From: Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com
  Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 10:26 am
  Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
  To: unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com
  Cc: Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com, Leif Middelschulte
 
  leif.middelschu...@gmail.com, 
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
  Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net
 
 
  I disagree. By putting stuff into e's svn you are giving up on your
 right
  to
  veto. This svn is for e's devs and community, not for el presidente. As
 I
  said, all the apps in e should follow the guidelines and spirits. If
 those
  are debatable the ML should be consulted first, not the creator.
 
  As I said in IRC:
 
  Whoever wants to do big changes should send to the ML before, not to the
  initial creator. By committing code to e's svn you are giving up this
 veto.
  If someone wants this kind of power he should use sourceforge, not e's
 svn.
  :P
 
  On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:14 PM, unixti...@gmail.com 
 unixti...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
   Just to clear things up, Ephoto is not a pet or personal project and
  this
   thread should not be questioning ephoto. It is meant for the community
  and
   to be developed by the community. It wouldn't be where it is today
  without
   contributions from others including Gustavo, even though he will
 publicly
   call it a pos and barely functional on a public list when he hasn't
 even
   used it. Okay I'm done with that now.
  
   I agree there needs to be guidelines and I think its important to note
  that
   the original developer is the president in the development. Licensing,
   releasing, and things of that nature should be handled by this
  president.
   Also when modifications happen that have opposing sides, the
 presidents
   word goes. Finally if there is a rewrite, change in scope, or anything
   extremely significant of the such, the presidents permission needs
 to
  be
   obtained.
  
  
   Sent from my Cellular South HTC Desire
  
   - Reply message -
   From: Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com
   Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 10:00 am
  
   Subject: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge
   To: Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com
   Cc: Leif Middelschulte leif.middelschu...@gmail.com, 
   unixti...@gmail.com unixti...@gmail.com, 
   enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Andreas Volz 
   li...@brachttal.net
  
  
  
   Yep, enna does not belong to the e svn (although it's obviously
 AWESOME).
  
   On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Nicolas Aguirre
   aguirre.nico...@gmail.comwrote:
  
2011/3/11 Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com:
 I completely agree. I also don't want to step in an argument I
 know
nothing
 about, but I do agree with Gustavo. In my pov e's svn is for e
applications.
 It's not sourceforge that stores open source projects, everything
 in
   the
svn
 is made for e and thus should follow whatever guidelines/spirit e
 may
have.
 I don't think svn is a good place for *personal* pet projects
 (maybe
  in
your
 own dev dir?) because everything in svn is seen by other people as
something
 developed and supported by the e team, and thus, all the e team
  should
   be
 able to adjust, modify and even rewrite so it'll follow e's spirit
  the
 direction.

 Unrelated note: I really love edje_player, been using it for ages
  now.

 --
 Tom.

 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Leif Middelschulte 
 leif.middelschu...@gmail.com wrote:

 I don't want to jump in into anything personal.

 I just wanted to support Gustavo on the way he thought. I would
 have
 thought the same way. By saying so, I don't want to say: You
 guys
 were wrong!, but As we can see we need to solve this issue and
  come
 

Re: [E-devel] imlib2 caching can fail

2011-03-11 Thread Jesper Saxtorph


 -Original Message-
 From: Kim Woelders [mailto:k...@woelders.dk]
 Sent: 10. marts 2011 20:52
 To: Carsten Haitzler
 Cc: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Jesper Saxtorph
 Subject: Re: [E-devel] imlib2 caching can fail
 
 On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:31:32 +0100, Carsten Haitzler
 ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
 
  On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 07:49:59 +0100 Kim Woelders k...@woelders.dk
 said:
 
  On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 15:46:15 +0100, Jesper Saxtorph
  jesper.saxto...@prevas.dk wrote:
 
   I have just submitted a bugraport + a patch on trac (bug #716).
  
   I just wanted to notifify it here also as I do not know the
   enlightenment community and how it works.
  
  Either is fine.
 
   To repeat my bug report:
   I use imlib2 as a image library in a project. However the use we
 have
   sometimes tricker a situation where imlib2 uses an invalid cache.
  
   imlib2 uses timestamps to test if a image cache i valid. If a
files
   modification time is in the future it is not possible to use
  validation
   scheme. Further if the timestamp is equal to now, we do not know
if
  the
   modification time is in the future or not. The result is that the
  cache
   should be invalidated for file timestamps = now.
   An example of a problematic situation: timestamps are in whole
 seconds
   times given as here as seconds:
   time=32.1 : image.png is written by someone
   time=32.4 : image.png is loaded by imlib2
   time=32.5 : image.png is written with new data
   The situation is now that the cache has the same timestamp as the
  file,
   but the content is not the same.
  
   A possible fix is a 3 line patch, which I have attached. It
 invalidate
   the cache if the files timestamp is = now.
   The patch is made agains head, however, the image.c file (where
the
   patch is applied) has changed very little in it lifetime, so it
works
   fine with earlier versions of imlib2 (I use it against 1.4.2).
  
   I attached an incorrect patch at first to the ticket, but have
  submittet
   the correct afterwards. Sorry for that.
  
   My suggestion to a patch (I have made the long comment as I think
it
  is
   not obvious why it is needed):
   --- imlib2/src/lib/image.c.orig 2011-03-03 14:23:49.0
+0100
   +++ imlib2/src/lib/image.c  2011-03-03 14:45:19.0
+0100
   @@ -1017,6 +1017,18 @@
im-key = __imlib_FileKey(file);
 }
   im-moddate = __imlib_FileModDate(file);
   +   /* If the file modify time is now or in the future, we can
not
  make
   a */
   +   /* cache. */
   +   /* One of several possible scenarios: */
   +   /* time=now: file is written by someone */
   +   /* time=now: file is loaded here */
   +   /* time=now: file is written again by someone */
   +   /* Now we have a file a timestamp equal to our cache, but
with a
  */
   +   /* different content. */
   +   if (im-moddate = time(NULL))
   + {
   +dont_cache = 1;
   + }
   /* ok - just check all our loaders are up to date */
   __imlib_RescanLoaders();
   /* take a guess by extension on the best loader to use */
  
   Hope it make sense, otherwise feel free to ask and/or discuss it
  
  I see there is a problem, but I don't think it is the proper
solution.
  If you have a file with a now/future time stamp it would never be
  cached, which is wrong.
 
  How about in stead changing line 986 (svn) to check whether the
time
  stamp
  has changed in stead of checking if it is newer?
 
  while in general you are also right.. he's also trying to fix the
  problem of
  write file at 34.1 secs, then write AGAIN at 34.5 secs - they both
  have the
  SAME timestamp but the 2nd is newer. imlib2 will not load the newer
file
  as the
  timestamps match due to timestamp resolution (34 vs 34 secs). but
while
  solving
  this problem it  breaks caching for timestamp == now. you'd need
much
  higher
  resolution timestamps (and even then you still just have a smaller
race
  condition) or .. you'd have to have another way to differentiate the
  files.
  file size + timestamp + inode +  even then you just lower the
  probability
  not eliminate it.
 
 Yeah, I know.
 
 The important thing here, IMO, is that images which never change,
should
 always be cached (unless explicitly not caching), whichever
 past/now/future time stamp they may have.
 
 How about this:
 
 diff --git src/lib/image.c src/lib/image.c
 index d404961..e8610b2 100644
 --- src/lib/image.c
 +++ src/lib/image.c
 @@ -982,8 +982,10 @@ __imlib_LoadImage(const char *file,
 ImlibProgressFunction progres
time_t  current_modified_time;
 
current_modified_time = __imlib_FileModDate(file);
 - /* if the file on disk is newer than the cached one */
 - if (current_modified_time  im-moddate)
 + /* if the disk file time stamp is different from the */
 + /* cached one or appears to have just been set */
 + if ((current_modified_time != im-moddate) ||
 +  

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster IN trunk/evas: . m4 src/lib/engines/common src/lib/file src/modules/loaders src/modules/loaders/ico

2011-03-11 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:28:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:

 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
 
 
  On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
 
  Log:
  Evas: add ico loader!
 
  does it support the Windows ico forat (that is, the one which can have
  more han 1 image in it) ?
 
 likely not, otherwise we'd need a load_hint to specify which one to
 load, and maybe something to return the number of images in it. Would
 be useful for gif and mjpeg as well.

actually... it does support that windows ico format... and it supports load
options to choose an icon of a specific size (or the nearest size it can) and
it even uses the key to tell it HOW to choose the icon (biggest, smallest,
bigger, smaller). :) the default is to choose the largest (and highest bit
depth) one in the file. if you use bigger and smaller as key, it will find the
icon immediately bigger or immediately smaller than the load options size
given :)

so... yes. it does do it :)

-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com


--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster IN trunk/evas: . m4 src/lib/engines/common src/lib/file src/modules/loaders src/modules/loaders/ico

2011-03-11 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
 On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:28:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
 barbi...@profusion.mobi said:

 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
 
 
  On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
 
  Log:
  Evas: add ico loader!
 
  does it support the Windows ico forat (that is, the one which can have
  more han 1 image in it) ?

 likely not, otherwise we'd need a load_hint to specify which one to
 load, and maybe something to return the number of images in it. Would
 be useful for gif and mjpeg as well.

 actually... it does support that windows ico format... and it supports load
 options to choose an icon of a specific size (or the nearest size it can) and
 it even uses the key to tell it HOW to choose the icon (biggest, 
 smallest,
 bigger, smaller). :) the default is to choose the largest (and highest bit
 depth) one in the file. if you use bigger and smaller as key, it will find the
 icon immediately bigger or immediately smaller than the load options size
 given :)

 so... yes. it does do it :)

enlighten me... but didn't it also allow bundles? Like providing a
series of icons for different applications? Or am I confusing with
something? I recall from windows days that you could choose one entry
and it would show a bundle with lots of applications icons in it.


-- 
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster IN trunk/evas: . m4 src/lib/engines/common src/lib/file src/modules/loaders src/modules/loaders/ico

2011-03-11 Thread Michael Jennings
On Friday, 11 March 2011, at 14:25:04 (-0300),
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:

 enlighten me... but didn't it also allow bundles? Like providing a
 series of icons for different applications? Or am I confusing with
 something? I recall from windows days that you could choose one entry
 and it would show a bundle with lots of applications icons in it.

Are you sure those were ICO files and not DLL or EXE files?  Windows
3.x had a MORICONS.DLL file with a ton of icons in it; maybe that's
what you're thinking of?

Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  m...@kainx.org
Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov   Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
---
 Backstreet Boys?  Why would you wanna do that?  Didn't you see New
  Kids on the Block?  Don't you know how this movie's gonna end?  I
  wanna know who's gonna be the 'bad' Backstreet Boy.  Who's gonna
  get Britney Spears pregnant?-- Chris Rock, 1999 MTV VMA

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster IN trunk/evas: . m4 src/lib/engines/common src/lib/file src/modules/loaders src/modules/loaders/ico

2011-03-11 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:25:04 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:

 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com
 wrote:
  On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:28:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
  barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
 
  On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr
  wrote:
  
  
   On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
  
   Log:
   Evas: add ico loader!
  
   does it support the Windows ico forat (that is, the one which can have
   more han 1 image in it) ?
 
  likely not, otherwise we'd need a load_hint to specify which one to
  load, and maybe something to return the number of images in it. Would
  be useful for gif and mjpeg as well.
 
  actually... it does support that windows ico format... and it supports load
  options to choose an icon of a specific size (or the nearest size it can)
  and it even uses the key to tell it HOW to choose the icon (biggest,
  smallest, bigger, smaller). :) the default is to choose the largest
  (and highest bit depth) one in the file. if you use bigger and smaller as
  key, it will find the icon immediately bigger or immediately smaller than
  the load options size given :)
 
  so... yes. it does do it :)
 
 enlighten me... but didn't it also allow bundles? Like providing a
 series of icons for different applications? Or am I confusing with
 something? I recall from windows days that you could choose one entry
 and it would show a bundle with lots of applications icons in it.

ICL files (icon library files). :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICO_%28file_format%29
(at the bottom - icon library).

-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com


--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster IN trunk/evas: . m4 src/lib/engines/common src/lib/file src/modules/loaders src/modules/loaders/ico

2011-03-11 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:38:13 -0800 Michael Jennings m...@kainx.org said:

 On Friday, 11 March 2011, at 14:25:04 (-0300),
 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
 
  enlighten me... but didn't it also allow bundles? Like providing a
  series of icons for different applications? Or am I confusing with
  something? I recall from windows days that you could choose one entry
  and it would show a bundle with lots of applications icons in it.
 
 Are you sure those were ICO files and not DLL or EXE files?  Windows
 3.x had a MORICONS.DLL file with a ton of icons in it; maybe that's
 what you're thinking of?

that is actually what ICL files are - they are DLL's with ONLY a resource
section with icons in it :)

-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com


--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Private projects in svn.e.org

2011-03-11 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Stephen Houston unixti...@gmail.com wrote:
 Obviously the maintainer has the last word since he/she has the ability to
 pull it out of svn whenever.
 Yes the spirit is fix and improve. Not rewrite or remove!

Hum, it's well in the spirit of this community to rewrite stuff to
provide a better solution to a problem.
-- 
Cedric BAIL

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Private projects in svn.e.org

2011-03-11 Thread Michael Jennings
On Friday, 11 March 2011, at 18:36:37 (+0100),
Leif Middelschulte wrote:

 Fair enough. Many of the said things are already part of the commit guidlines.
 
 Cases to sort out:
 - In cases where the maintainer and the community e.g. ML disagree:
 who has the last word?

For the specific product, the original author/maintainer has the last
word.  For the E project as a whole, raster does.  If those conflict,
raster wins (and the project may need to move out).

The understanding that I always had based on how we set things up:
 - Any E-related project may go in E SVN.  Nothing outside of E's SVN
   repo is officially part of the project.
 - All E-related projects must follow the general technology (Imlib,
   Imlib2, and now EFL) and philosophy of E (choice, power, apperance,
   performance).
 - The author/maintainer has control over their own project.
 - raster has final say (veto power) over the project and the repo.
   If you disagree, you can either try to convince him or take your code
   elsewhere.  Both have been done successfully.  ;-)
 - Anyone with commit access can change your code.  If you don't like
   their changes, revert them and say why.  If there's still
   disagreement, discuss.  Major changes should be discussed first.

If any of this has changed, raster needs to be the one to change it.

 - What's the often cited 'spirit' of the enlightenment project?
  People were arguing the spirit of e is (besides following the guidlines):
  - Fix! Don't workaround!
  - Improve where you can

People saying those things have specific reasons they want to believe
those are the E spirit, but they're not.  They're very good
principles to live by, but that's not the guiding philosophy that the
project has had throughout its lifetime.  The main philosophy has
been:

1.  Choice -- As much power and flexibility in the hands of the user
as possible.  Everything is configurable (options, themes, etc.).
2.  Power -- Feature-rich, not lean and incapable.
3.  Appearance -- It needs to look good.  Better than good.
Mind-bogglingly good.
4.  Performance -- It needs to be fast and optimized, but not at the
expense of features or looks.

Sure, things change over time, but I think those guiding principles
are still present and still evident in the products being produced to
this day.

Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  m...@kainx.org
Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov   Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
---
 A little learning is a dangerous thing;  Drink deep, or taste not
  the Pierian spring:  There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
  And drinking largely sobers us again.
-- Alexander Pope, An Essay on Criticism

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Private projects in svn.e.org

2011-03-11 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:54:46 -0800
Michael Jennings m...@kainx.org wrote:

 On Friday, 11 March 2011, at 18:36:37 (+0100),
 Leif Middelschulte wrote:
 
  Fair enough. Many of the said things are already part of the commit
  guidlines.
  
  Cases to sort out:
  - In cases where the maintainer and the community e.g. ML disagree:
  who has the last word?
 
 For the specific product, the original author/maintainer has the last
 word.  For the E project as a whole, raster does.  If those conflict,
 raster wins (and the project may need to move out).
 
 The understanding that I always had based on how we set things up:
  - Any E-related project may go in E SVN.  Nothing outside of E's SVN
repo is officially part of the project.
  - All E-related projects must follow the general technology (Imlib,
Imlib2, and now EFL) and philosophy of E (choice, power, apperance,
performance).
  - The author/maintainer has control over their own project.
  - raster has final say (veto power) over the project and the repo.
If you disagree, you can either try to convince him or take your code
elsewhere.  Both have been done successfully.  ;-)
  - Anyone with commit access can change your code.  If you don't like
their changes, revert them and say why.  If there's still
disagreement, discuss.  Major changes should be discussed first.
 
 If any of this has changed, raster needs to be the one to change it.
 
  - What's the often cited 'spirit' of the enlightenment project?
   People were arguing the spirit of e is (besides following the
  guidlines):
   - Fix! Don't workaround!
   - Improve where you can
 
 People saying those things have specific reasons they want to believe
 those are the E spirit, but they're not.  They're very good
 principles to live by, but that's not the guiding philosophy that the
 project has had throughout its lifetime.  The main philosophy has
 been:
 
 1.  Choice -- As much power and flexibility in the hands of the user
 as possible.  Everything is configurable (options, themes, etc.).
 2.  Power -- Feature-rich, not lean and incapable.
 3.  Appearance -- It needs to look good.  Better than good.
 Mind-bogglingly good.
 4.  Performance -- It needs to be fast and optimized, but not at the
 expense of features or looks.
 
 Sure, things change over time, but I think those guiding principles
 are still present and still evident in the products being produced to
 this day.
 
 Michael
 
I cast 2 votes.

-- 
Mike Blumenkrantz
Zentific: NULL pointer dereferences now 50% off!

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Private projects in svn.e.org

2011-03-11 Thread Michael Jennings
On Friday, 11 March 2011, at 13:04:37 (-0500),
Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:

  If any of this has changed, raster needs to be the one to change it.

I apologize.  I realized after I sent this that it could be
misinterpreted to mean, Don't discuss it.  That's not what I meant.
What I meant was, if you think things should change, you have to
convince raster, not just some number of developers. :)

I'm always in favor of communication.  I think we need more of it
(preferably constructive), not less.

 I cast 2 votes.

One for you, one for zmike?  :-)

Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  m...@kainx.org
Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov   Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
---
 We both lie silently still in the dead of the night.  Although we
  both lie close together, we feel miles apart inside.  Was it
  something I said or something I did?  Did my words not come out
  right?-- Poison, Every Rose Has Its Thorn

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E SVN: cedric IN trunk/edje: . src/bin src/lib

2011-03-11 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
 Log:
 edje: add PROXY part.

...
 Modified:
  trunk/edje/ChangeLog trunk/edje/src/bin/edje_cc_handlers.c 
 trunk/edje/src/lib/Edje.h trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_cache.c 
 trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_calc.c trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_data.c 
 trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_load.c trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_private.h

Oops, could you also update those in edje_edit source generator and
also in edje_inspector?

-- 
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster IN trunk/evas: . m4 src/lib/engines/common src/lib/file src/modules/loaders src/modules/loaders/ico

2011-03-11 Thread Vincent Torri


On Sat, 12 Mar 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:

 On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:28:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
 barbi...@profusion.mobi said:

 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:


 On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:

 Log:
 Evas: add ico loader!

 does it support the Windows ico forat (that is, the one which can have
 more han 1 image in it) ?

 likely not, otherwise we'd need a load_hint to specify which one to
 load, and maybe something to return the number of images in it. Would
 be useful for gif and mjpeg as well.

 actually... it does support that windows ico format... and it supports load
 options to choose an icon of a specific size (or the nearest size it can) and
 it even uses the key to tell it HOW to choose the icon (biggest, 
 smallest,
 bigger, smaller). :) the default is to choose the largest (and highest bit
 depth) one in the file. if you use bigger and smaller as key, it will find the
 icon immediately bigger or immediately smaller than the load options size
 given :)

 so... yes. it does do it :)

omg, raster is supporting a Windows spec !

Vincent

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] (Re)moving stuff from SVN without author knowledge

2011-03-11 Thread Andreas Volz
Am Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:18:08 -0300 schrieb Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri:

 On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net
 wrote:
  Hello,
 
  Some time ago I wrote a little tool called edje_player:
 
  http://andreasvolz.wordpress.com/2009/01/25/edjeplayer-01/
 
  It was very simple and not yet finished. I like to use it often.
 
  Now I just noticed that someone removed it from SVN:
 
  http://svn.enlightenment.org/svn/e/trunk/PROTO/edje_player
 
  It has been moved to edje/bin/edje_player.c with the
 
  rev. 47341 barbieri
 
  and some revision later deleted in PROTO.
 
  I didn't notice it, because the main command line switches never
  changed. I diffed the changes and it's a more or less a complete
  rewrite. I think all the changes are good!
 
  So what's the problem?
 
  I've a big problem if someone simply move files or directories from
  a application which has an AUTHORS file to another directory. Even
  if its placed in PROTO or not touched since some time!
 
  And it's even not nice to take it without adding me to AUTHORS in
  edje or the edje_player.c file. Ok, this isn't longer valid as it's
  rewritten...
 
  But I think we should come to the main agreement that it's not nice
  to simply move around code from someone else without talking to
  him! You couldn't know what's my plan with edje_player and if that
  fits my ideas.
 
 Sorry, as you noticed it was my fault. You have svn commit, so if you
 can just add yourself to AUTHORS file.
 
 I tried to do it for good as a default companion application to
 edje_cc and similars, AFAIR I wrote it from scratch, just used the
 same name and kept the options, however I even changed it to
 Ecore_Getopt.
 
 I did not write yet-another mail to communicate those as supposedly
 people with stuff in SVN reads the svn-commits list, so it should be
 the official communication media. But indeed, although this is as a
 personal project inside SVN and I should have asked permission to
 change it.
 
 
 Again, sorry you feel bad, it won't have a next time...

I don't feel that bad as your changes to edje_player are really
good. :-)

More I've to thank you that you didn't change the complete command line
syntax.

The only thing that I liked to mention is that, for general, one should
tell the developer in the AUTHORS file before doing such a fundamental
change.

For sure you don't need my permission! I clearly understand that in
the moment I use the E SVN I profit from community changes, but it's
not longer a pet project. This is the reason I put some other E related
stuff on code.google.com or in my private SVN.

If I had known that this topic creates such a big thread I had written
you by personal mail. :-)

regards
Andreas

-- 
Technical Blog http://andreasvolz.wordpress.com/

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster IN trunk/evas: . m4 src/lib/engines/common src/lib/file src/modules/loaders src/modules/loaders/ico

2011-03-11 Thread Leandro Pereira
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:


 omg, raster is supporting a Windows spec !


http://i.imgur.com/WJbr9.jpg

-- 
Cheers,
  Leandro

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E SVN: cedric IN trunk/edje: . src/bin src/lib

2011-03-11 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Enlightenment SVN
 no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
 Log:
 edje: add PROXY part.

 ...
 Modified:
  trunk/edje/ChangeLog trunk/edje/src/bin/edje_cc_handlers.c 
 trunk/edje/src/lib/Edje.h trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_cache.c 
 trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_calc.c trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_data.c 
 trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_load.c trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_private.h

 Oops, could you also update those in edje_edit source generator and
 also in edje_inspector?

Damn, I forgot that ! Will do sunday or monday.
-- 
Cedric BAIL

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster IN trunk/evas: . m4 src/lib/engines/common src/lib/file src/modules/loaders src/modules/loaders/ico

2011-03-11 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:23:55 -0300 Leandro Pereira lean...@profusion.mobi
said:

 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
 
 
  omg, raster is supporting a Windows spec !
 
 
 http://i.imgur.com/WJbr9.jpg

bwahahahahahahahahah

-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com


--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster IN trunk/evas: . m4 src/lib/engines/common src/lib/file src/modules/loaders src/modules/loaders/ico

2011-03-11 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:53:13 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr
said:

 
 
 On Sat, 12 Mar 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
 
  On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:28:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
  barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
 
  On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr
  wrote:
 
 
  On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
 
  Log:
  Evas: add ico loader!
 
  does it support the Windows ico forat (that is, the one which can have
  more han 1 image in it) ?
 
  likely not, otherwise we'd need a load_hint to specify which one to
  load, and maybe something to return the number of images in it. Would
  be useful for gif and mjpeg as well.
 
  actually... it does support that windows ico format... and it supports load
  options to choose an icon of a specific size (or the nearest size it can)
  and it even uses the key to tell it HOW to choose the icon (biggest,
  smallest, bigger, smaller). :) the default is to choose the largest
  (and highest bit depth) one in the file. if you use bigger and smaller as
  key, it will find the icon immediately bigger or immediately smaller than
  the load options size given :)
 
  so... yes. it does do it :)
 
 omg, raster is supporting a Windows spec !

well there is also a bmp loader... :)

-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com


--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster IN trunk/evas: . m4 src/lib/engines/common src/lib/file src/modules/loaders src/modules/loaders/ico

2011-03-11 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:29:53 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote:

 On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:23:55 -0300 Leandro Pereira lean...@profusion.mobi
 said:
 
  On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
  
  
   omg, raster is supporting a Windows spec !
  
  
  http://i.imgur.com/WJbr9.jpg
 
 bwahahahahahahahahah
 
hang that on the door to your office imo

-- 
Mike Blumenkrantz
Zentific: NULL pointer dereferences now 50% off!

--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel