Re: [E-devel] fixes to configure.ac
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:29:18 -0400 Rodrigo Belem said: > Hi all, > > I was getting some build fails, so I notice that the error was coming > from configure.ac. > > The patch is attached, but I did not tested if the others libs need > this fix too. hmm i changed it for consistency in the version strip - it worked for me but not you (odd). i've gone the other way and removed all the []'s instead. it''s at least consistent -- - Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] fixes to configure.ac
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:29:18 -0400 Rodrigo Belem said: > >> Hi all, >> >> I was getting some build fails, so I notice that the error was coming >> from configure.ac. >> >> The patch is attached, but I did not tested if the others libs need >> this fix too. > > hmm i changed it for consistency in the version strip - it worked for me but > not you (odd). i've gone the other way and removed all the []'s instead. it''s > at least consistent maybe you should search why it does not work, instead of committing this Vincent -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] fixes to configure.ac
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:36:18 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri said: > > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:29:18 -0400 Rodrigo Belem said: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I was getting some build fails, so I notice that the error was coming > >> from configure.ac. > >> > >> The patch is attached, but I did not tested if the others libs need > >> this fix too. > > > > hmm i changed it for consistency in the version strip - it worked for me but > > not you (odd). i've gone the other way and removed all the []'s instead. > > it''s at least consistent > > maybe you should search why it does not work, instead of committing this the ones with no []'s work for rodrigo, the ones with all []'s work for him, just the ones with mixed (some fields with [], some not) dont work for him. they happen to all work for me. i just changed them all to be consistent with the same format. -- - Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] fixes to configure.ac
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:36:18 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri > said: > >> >> >> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:29:18 -0400 Rodrigo Belem said: >>> Hi all, I was getting some build fails, so I notice that the error was coming from configure.ac. The patch is attached, but I did not tested if the others libs need this fix too. >>> >>> hmm i changed it for consistency in the version strip - it worked for me but >>> not you (odd). i've gone the other way and removed all the []'s instead. >>> it''s at least consistent >> >> maybe you should search why it does not work, instead of committing this > > the ones with no []'s work for rodrigo, the ones with all []'s work for him, > just the ones with mixed (some fields with [], some not) dont work for him. > they happen to all work for me. i just changed them all to be consistent with > the same format. then use the case with all the [], because the macro is underquoted Vincent -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] fixes to configure.ac
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Vincent Torri wrote: > On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > >> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:36:18 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri >> said: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:29:18 -0400 Rodrigo Belem said: > Hi all, > > I was getting some build fails, so I notice that the error was coming > from configure.ac. > > The patch is attached, but I did not tested if the others libs need > this fix too. hmm i changed it for consistency in the version strip - it worked for me but not you (odd). i've gone the other way and removed all the []'s instead. it''s at least consistent >>> >>> maybe you should search why it does not work, instead of committing this >> >> the ones with no []'s work for rodrigo, the ones with all []'s work for him, >> just the ones with mixed (some fields with [], some not) dont work for him. >> they happen to all work for me. i just changed them all to be consistent with >> the same format. > > then use the case with all the [], because the macro is underquoted shouldn't matter there as all the fields are not supposed to have problematic chars. -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] fixes to configure.ac
On Thursday, 23 April 2009, at 00:09:54 (-0300), Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > > then use the case with all the [], because the macro is underquoted > > shouldn't matter there as all the fields are not supposed to have > problematic chars. It does matter, and "problematic chars" are not the only thing that can cause underquoted macros. Another possible cause is previously-defined macros being redefined (or duplicately defined), as explained here: http://www.gnu.org/software/hello/manual/automake/Extending-aclocal.html Vincent is correct. It's always better to quote than not quote if quoting works. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) --- G: "If we do happen to step on a mine, Sir, what do we do?" EB: "Normal procedure, Lieutenant, is to jump 200 feet in the air and scatter oneself over a wide area." -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] fixes to configure.ac
if there is no problem with libs other than edje and embryo (acording to Rodrigo's patch), the problem is certainly not the quotes, but it is elsewhere. Vincent On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:29:18 -0400 Rodrigo Belem said: Hi all, I was getting some build fails, so I notice that the error was coming from configure.ac. The patch is attached, but I did not tested if the others libs need this fix too. hmm i changed it for consistency in the version strip - it worked for me but not you (odd). i've gone the other way and removed all the []'s instead. it''s at least consistent -- - Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- Ce message a été vérifié par MailScanner pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de suspect n'a été trouvé. Message délivré par le serveur de messagerie de l'Université d'Evry. -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] fixes to configure.ac
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:20:37 -0700 Michael Jennings said: > On Thursday, 23 April 2009, at 00:09:54 (-0300), > Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > > > > then use the case with all the [], because the macro is underquoted > > > > shouldn't matter there as all the fields are not supposed to have > > problematic chars. > > It does matter, and "problematic chars" are not the only thing that > can cause underquoted macros. Another possible cause is > previously-defined macros being redefined (or duplicately defined), as > explained here: > http://www.gnu.org/software/hello/manual/automake/Extending-aclocal.html > > Vincent is correct. It's always better to quote than not quote if > quoting works. but - we dont nest anything or define anything inside the macro parameters - its simple strings. []'s are not NEEDED. it's much of a muchness which way you go. -- - Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] fixes to configure.ac
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:59:19 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri said: > > if there is no problem with libs other than edje and embryo (acording to > Rodrigo's patch), the problem is certainly not the quotes, but it is > elsewhere. to fix it - he added []'s i had removed them to have all version fields consistent so scripts can easily update them all. he reported the problem after the change to unquoted and added it back. it worked fine for me here thus it didnt seem a problem. it must be a change in the local aclocal rodrigo has. it doesnt like 1 field being unquoted yet others quoter (but libs/apps with all 3 fields unquoted caused no problem). it's a question of preference a or b in this case. i just went for option b :) > Vincent > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:29:18 -0400 Rodrigo Belem said: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I was getting some build fails, so I notice that the error was coming > >> from configure.ac. > >> > >> The patch is attached, but I did not tested if the others libs need > >> this fix too. > > > > hmm i changed it for consistency in the version strip - it worked for me but > > not you (odd). i've gone the other way and removed all the []'s instead. > > it''s at least consistent > > > > -- > > - Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -- > > The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com > > > > > > -- > > Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and > > around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save > > $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. > > 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. > > Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p > > ___ > > enlightenment-devel mailing list > > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > > > -- > > Ce message a été vérifié par MailScanner > > pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de > > suspect n'a été trouvé. > > Message délivré par le serveur de messagerie de l'Université d'Evry. > > > > -- - Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] fixes to configure.ac
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 04:36:18AM +0200, Vincent Torri wrote : > On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:29:18 -0400 Rodrigo Belem said: > >> Hi all, > >> I was getting some build fails, so I notice that the error was coming > >> from configure.ac. > >> The patch is attached, but I did not tested if the others libs need > >> this fix too. > > hmm i changed it for consistency in the version strip - it worked for me but > > not you (odd). i've gone the other way and removed all the []'s instead. > > it''s > > at least consistent > maybe you should search why it does not work, instead of committing this I agree with vincent here, it's been this way for long and nobody ever had issues with it. Would you mind providing an error log so that we can try to understand why you were getting this error ? Cheers, -- Albin Tonnerre signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] fixes to configure.ac
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:37:25 +0200 Albin Tonnerre said: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 04:36:18AM +0200, Vincent Torri wrote : > > > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > > On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:29:18 -0400 Rodrigo Belem > > > said: > > > >> Hi all, > > > >> I was getting some build fails, so I notice that the error was coming > > >> from configure.ac. > > > >> The patch is attached, but I did not tested if the others libs need > > >> this fix too. > > > > hmm i changed it for consistency in the version strip - it worked for me > > > but not you (odd). i've gone the other way and removed all the []'s > > > instead. it''s at least consistent > > > maybe you should search why it does not work, instead of committing this > > I agree with vincent here, it's been this way for long and nobody ever had > issues with it. Would you mind providing an error log so that we can try to > understand why you were getting this error ? we've had it both ways forever. never had a mixed line - thus i just changed it to be one of the ways that worked "forever". :) -- - Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] fixes to configure.ac
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 04:36:18AM +0200, Vincent Torri wrote : > > >> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > >> > On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:29:18 -0400 Rodrigo Belem said: > >> >> Hi all, > >> >> I was getting some build fails, so I notice that the error was coming >> >> from configure.ac. > >> >> The patch is attached, but I did not tested if the others libs need >> >> this fix too. > >> > hmm i changed it for consistency in the version strip - it worked for me >> > but >> > not you (odd). i've gone the other way and removed all the []'s instead. >> > it''s >> > at least consistent > >> maybe you should search why it does not work, instead of committing this > > I agree with vincent here, it's been this way for long and nobody ever had > issues with it. Would you mind providing an error log so that we can try to > understand why you were getting this error ? > The error is in the following link http://paste.ubuntu.com/156095/ -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] fixes to configure.ac
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Rodrigo Belem wrote: On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Albin Tonnerre wrote: On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 04:36:18AM +0200, Vincent Torri wrote : On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:29:18 -0400 Rodrigo Belem said: Hi all, I was getting some build fails, so I notice that the error was coming from configure.ac. The patch is attached, but I did not tested if the others libs need this fix too. hmm i changed it for consistency in the version strip - it worked for me but not you (odd). i've gone the other way and removed all the []'s instead. it''s at least consistent maybe you should search why it does not work, instead of committing this I agree with vincent here, it's been this way for long and nobody ever had issues with it. Would you mind providing an error log so that we can try to understand why you were getting this error ? The error is in the following link http://paste.ubuntu.com/156095/ line 375 of your paste: cp -R ./embryo-AC_INIT([embryo], 0.9.9.060, [enlightenment-de...@lists.sourceforge.net])-doc/doc/html debian/libembryo-doc/usr/share/doc/libembryo-doc/ i think that you have an error in your script somewhere for embryo, but it has nothing to do with the quotes in configure.ac. The command is certainly: cp -R ./embryo-doc/doc/html debian/libembryo-doc/usr/share/doc/libembryo-doc/ and for a reason or another, AC_INIT([embryo], 0.9.9.060, [enlightenment-de...@lists.sourceforge.net]) has been pasted into that command Vincent-- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
