Re: [e-users] rpm for enlightenment-0.17.0_pre10-NOT_RELEASE_1 in cvs is now available
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 03:46:14 -0500, Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday, 04 December 2004, at 14:47:41 (+0800), Didier Casse wrote: Well yeah... as raster said/meant, I used the notation found in the spec file found in cvs. I don't know if it's good or bad. I don't really care at this point of time since it's not an official release anyway. It's a courtesy release of the thing in cvs. If you guys really want me to change the name, well it's really not a problem for me to do it. I didn't realize raster had done it on purpose. Apparently he enjoys causing trouble. :P ;-p Ok I just rebuilded the files and switched to the non-controversial naming system. But it seems that the server sps.nus.edu.sg is down at the moment. I will transfer the files as soon as it's up. -- With kind regards, Didier. --- Didier F.B Casse | PhD student | Singapore Synchrotron light Source (SSLS) Email: didier.casse AT_Remove_THE_N00SPAM gmail DOT com | Web: http://ssls.nus.edu.sg --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ ___ enlightenment-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
Re: [e-users] Ebuild 0.17.0
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 10:56:07 +0100 Emanuele Cecchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bbabbled: (B (B any possibility to find a package gentoo based , I mean a .ebuild of (B the last CVS 0.17.0...??? (B I like to try it e contribute to find bug and error (B (Bthere is very little point in that at this stage as there are a tonne of errors (Bwe know about already - and bugs. it's not complete. we don't need bug reports (Bof stuff we already know and is due to it simply not being ready for release. (Buse it and play with it - let us know u like it. but filing bug reports is a (Bpointless task. (B (B"the car doesn't drive that well! it's a bit rough!" (B (B"yes. as you may notice we have not put in a rear axle or wheels yet, and (Bhaven't put in an exhaust system at all yet. this may be why you find it a bit (B'rough'" :) (B (B P.S. I got Impressed on watching the clip of the demo !!! (B (B (B (B --- (B SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide (B Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. (B Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. (B http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ (B ___ (B enlightenment-users mailing list (B [EMAIL PROTECTED] (B https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users (B (B (B (B-- (B- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -- (BThe Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED] $BMg9%B?(B [EMAIL PROTECTED] (BTokyo, Japan ($BEl5~(B $BF|K\(B) (B (B (B--- (BSF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide (BRead honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. (BDiscover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. (Bhttp://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ (B___ (Benlightenment-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bhttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
[e-users] E17 build script
Good time of day/night to List! Here is my small contribution to e17 - e17 cvs build script. Adapt variables as needed, run, and in 10 - 15 minutes you will have fresh e17. Please note, you will need tcl-devel, fbdevel, tk-devel (and posible more of these) to successefully compile e17. Also please note, THIS SCRIPT PROVIDED AS-IS, and it possible buggy. No complaints accepted. It works for me. Feel free to modify it as you need. To all E team: Comrades, you doing GREAT and VERRY VALUABLE job! Party will never forget you! ;) Thanks, Danny rebuild.sh Description: application/shellscript
Re: [e-users] can this be done?
I have added (in CVS) the possibilty to do actions on window events (at least enter/leave). This makes it possible to do the auto shade/unshade thing without having to modify all border parts and still not having it work properly. Example based on winter/borders/PAGER/border.cfg: __ACLASS __BGN __NAME ACTION_AUTOSHADE __TYPE __TYPE_NORMAL __EVENT __MOUSE_ENTER __ACTION __A_SHADE off __NEXT_ACTION __EVENT __MOUSE_LEAVE __ACTION __A_SHADE on __END __BORDER __BGN __NAME PAGER __BORDER_GROUP_NAME PAGER_GROUP __BORDER_SIZE_LEFT 5 __BORDER_SIZE_RIGHT 19 __BORDER_SIZE_TOP 5 __BORDER_SIZE_BOTTOM 5 __SHADE_DIRECTION __LEFT __CHANGES_SHAPE __OFF __ACLASS ACTION_AUTOSHADE /* 0 */ __BORDER_PART __BGN __ICLASS PB1 ... There can still be some glitches but it's quite useable. /Kim PLASSON Raphael wrote: Hello, This quite looks like what I had once tried (and didn't really succed) to do. What would be interesting, is to have a window that can be either in an unshaded state (i.e. behave like a common window) or a semi-shaded state, that is: - It is shaded if it doesn't have the focus - It is automatically unshaded when it get the focus (e.g. when the mouse is on it) - It is automatically shaded when it loses the focus (e.g. when the mouse leave it) It should be very useful for windows that are often used, but for a short length each time. Typically: the pager, configuration sub-windows (for software like Gimp, Grace, etc.), launchers... Actually, this is just the ability to apply an auto-hide-like behavior, like gnome or KDE taskbar, to any window. What I had tried to do was to modify the theme border of a window, so that each time the mouse enter on one of the border of the considered window (__EVENT __MOUSE_ENTER for every border element), the shade state is toggled (__ACTION __A_SHADE). It may have worked quite well, as each time the mouse goes into the window, it has to enter one border (then unshade), and when it leave the window, it has to enter again in one border (then shade). However, there was many drawbacks I couldn't manage to avoid: If the mouse moves to quickly, the toggle state may not be taken into account, if the mouse just touch the border but not enter the window, the shade behavior was reversed, if the window is partly hidden by another one, the mouse can leave the window without entering any border, etc... Would there be any elegant solution to solve this problem ? Is there a __GET/LOSE__FOCUS event available for window configuration in E (I think I didn't manage to find it the last time I conigured my own theme, but things seems to evolve fast since the E16.7.x series) ? --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ ___ enlightenment-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
