What's Next

2003-02-11 Thread G B Leatherwood



This is really addressed to Bruce Moomaw, but this 
is the only email address I have for him. No, it's not about Europa, so don't 
get on my case. I know that, but this is the only way I know to get my thoughts 
out.
Bruce, you have repeatedly bashed the space shuttle 
and the ISS as colossal boondoggles, and I have often taken issue with that 
position for a variety of reasons which I thought at the time were valid. 
However, and this is a big HOWEVER, I'm beginning to agree with you and the 
others who question the sense of continuing something that is not only not 
producing anything worthwhile, but is diverting badly needed resources from 
finding better ways to explore space--or "explore" it at all. Please see my 
question at the end and see if you can come up with anything.
A number of the things I've been reading on the internet following the 
Columbia disaster have to do with arguments for and against keeping the 
shuttle/station program alive.One comment seems to be a lament that the 
public just doesn't seem to care all that much about the program, whatever 
it is. Joe Latrell went to his kids' schoolroom to talk with the kids about 
the disaster and was met with indefference--"Thanks for dropping by," I 
think the response was.Why? Because as far as the shuttle/station is 
concerned, there is NO exploration taking place! We've been circling the 
earth at 240 miles up for years, and aside from the Hubble repair mission 
and the Columbia research mission, we haven't gone anywhere or done anything 
new. So what's to get excited about? Damn little.That raises the 
question of whether we have learned all we can from the station, and very 
little, if anything, new will come from spending billions more. Same is true 
of the shuttle. True, it's the only thing we have, but maybe the time HAS 
come to bring the folks home, lock the door, and go up only as often as 
necessary to boost the station back up to the proper orbit. I would favor 
keeping it there as a relay point for trips further out, but maintaining a 
crew seems to be a waste of time and human power. One thing it could be used 
for is a "space classroom" for future mission personnel so they could get 
the feel of microgravity, space suits, and tool use. Pretty expensive, but 
maybe worth it.In an article on Slashdot.org, (www.slashdot.org) Gregory Benford said that 
we have not conquered two things we must have before we even think seriously 
about going to Mars: (1) a true self-supporting biosphere, and (2) an 
artificial gravity that could be produced by centrifugal force with the 
habitat module on one end of a tether and a spent container of appropriate 
weight on the other. He commented that Russians who have set the endurance 
records in microgravity never have regained full mobility, and even those 
who have been up for six months or more are still having problems. Check out 
the whole article.So what's to do? Maybe the answer IS to stop spending more 
billions on a program which has essentially run its course and put the money 
into development of better propulsion systems, such as nuclear or ion 
drives, better comm and computer controls, and so on. Prepare to go to the 
Moon and set up permanent housekeeping so we can develop the true biosphere 
we need and get used to living, working, and playing in reduced 
gravity.Any ideas on how we get this brilliant and insightful thinking to 
the decision makers?Ad Astra!Gail Leatherwood



On/Off Topic

2003-02-11 Thread G B Leatherwood



Since we seem to have so much trouble reining in 
those who have something to say about space exploration, how about 
this?
Suppose we either just change the name of the 
group, or keep the name for its intended purpose and just stop worrying about 
what is discussed?
A. This is a wonderfully diverse group with a 
sincere desire to foster efforts in getting off the planet, and 
B. There is actually very little to discuss 
productively about Europa, at least for the foreseeable future. 
I'd like to see the group continue because it's 
such a rich resource, and current events discussion could help keep the interest 
of the members up in the doldrum periods of Europa interest.
Please be assured this is in no way a criticism of 
our site administrator--his is a thankless job at best, and we should all give 
him a big "Well Done!" for putting up with us for as long as he 
has.
What thinkest thou?
Gail Leatherwood


Re: On/Off Topic

2003-02-11 Thread G B Leatherwood



I didn't mean to imply that the shuttle/station 
wasn't the best that could be done at the time, although some evidence to the 
contrary has been produced during this past week. We know that many decisions 
about the whole program, from the earliest responses to Sputnik to actual 
construction of the ISS and its mission definitions, were political, not 
technical or scientific. We HAVE learned a lot, but my thesis is becoming that 
we've "been there, done that, let's move on to the next stage." Let's not put 
any more resources into something that is aged and unproductive; something that 
is preventing other avenues of exploration.
Gail

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  John Sheff 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 8:43 
  PM
  Subject: RE: On/Off Topic
  
  
  There 
  IS stuff going on regarding Europa (i.e., this new Prometheus Project), but 
  people are so into flaming about Columbia that, unfortunately, no one seems 
  interested in talking about Europa. (I’ve 
  tried.)
  
  One of 
  the difficult things I’ve had to learn about life is that people have 
  different points of view. This doesn’t necessarily mean they are ignorant, or 
  evil, or even - wrong. Intelligent, well-informed, well-intentioned people can 
  be presented with the same facts as me, and come to totally different 
  conclusions. What’s worse, rarely will my arguments – however well-reasoned – 
  convince them that I am right and they are wrong, nor are they likely to 
  convince me. So I’ve given up trying; I still enjoy the satisfaction of 
  knowing, deep down inside, that I AM 
right!
  
  Having 
  said that, I still believe that the shuttle was the best we could come up with 
  at the time given the constraints of technology and budget, that the ISS (or 
  something like it) is a necessary stepping stone to a permanent human presence 
  in space, and the more wonderful unmanned exploration of the solar system 
  gets, the more it whets my appetite for going there in person. I can’t imagine 
  anything as exciting as the thought of living in a spacefaring civilization. 
  Maybe someday… 
  
  
  John 
  Sheff
  Harvard-Smithsonian 
  Center for Astrophysics
  Cambridge, 
  MA 02138
  Voice: 
  617-495-4671
  Fax: 
  617-496-0193
  E-Mail: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Website: 
  http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/
  
  
  
  
  


Re: ADMIN: reminder about the list

2003-02-04 Thread G B Leatherwood

My apologies also, Jeff, especially if I was one of those causing problems.
I agree with Bruce: this group has always had a lot to say about a lot of
things not necessarily related to Europa.
BTW, you mentioned other lists we could use for broader discussions. Would
you name a few? I know a couple, but would like to know more. Thanks.
Watch the skies!
Gail
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Foust [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:34 PM
Subject: ADMIN: reminder about the list



 Hello,

 I hate to have to play the bad cop here, but I do want to remind people
 that the purpose of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list is for discussions
 of topics directly related to Europa, including exploration of it.
 While it's understandable to want to talk about the shuttle tragedy,
 there are far more appropriate fora for doing do than this list.  Please
 respect the wishes of those who signed up for the list only for Europa
 discussions by limiting your messages to that topic (and by posting in
 plain text, not HTML, by the way).

 I will say that I had to spend some time over the last couple of weeks
 getting this server off one blacklist compiled by a, shall we say,
 over-zealous anti-spam group.  (It appears to be completely unrelated to
 this list, as a whole range of IP addresses were blocked for the
 perceived transgressions of a single person.)  This is why some of you
 may not have received any messages from this list for the last couple of
 weeks.  It takes a non-zero amount of effort to maintain this list, so
 all I ask is that you follow a couple simple guidelines to make that job
 easier.

 Sincerely,
 Jeff Foust
 list administrator
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ==
 You are subscribed to the Europa Icepick mailing list:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Project information and list (un)subscribe info: http://klx.com/europa/


==
You are subscribed to the Europa Icepick mailing list:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project information and list (un)subscribe info: http://klx.com/europa/