Re: ISIS The Start of World War III?

2015-07-12 Thread Alberto G. Corona
The parallels are astonishing: The Byzantines were materially  and probably
morally exhausted after the wars against the Sassanid empire in the 700

We are now morally exhausted after the cold war by the  soviet directed
leftist propaganda. Now the left, without some central guidance is running
amok. I know that the sovietic empire, contrary to common belief and
contrary to the image that they cultivated, promoted the moderate leftist
in the West, most of the time, since they needed to appeal to the majority
in a gradual way towards socialism and communism. Now the left is in
 histherical phase . The URRS was a stabilizing counterbalance needed for
the affirmation of values of the westerners.

I doubt that

2015-07-11 17:35 GMT+02:00 spudboy100 via Everything List 
everything-list@googlegroups.com:

 Icke is an interesting, but paranoid character. If ISIS, or any element
 from the Islamic World causes a 4th world war (The Cold War was actually
 WW3), then it is not any member of the Uma's fault, but instead the
 weakness, the cowardice, the irresolution, of 'so called' Western leaders.
 Perfection with one's fellows humans is fraught with disappointment,
 because people will always disappoint. But, the leadership of the so-called
 West, is so bad that it invites attack from ISIS or anyone else.As Bin
 Laden said, People like the stronger horse. Leaders here are so weak,
 that if ISIS attacked, they might win. Who now knows?



  -Original Message-
 From: Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com
 To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Sat, Jul 11, 2015 1:36 am
 Subject: Fwd: ISIS The Start of World War III?

   Begin forwarded message:

  ISIS The Start of World War III?
 David Icke interview
  Video link:
 http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthread.php?266299-ISIS-The-Start-of-World-War-III


--
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Everything List group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Everything List group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




-- 
Alberto.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: ISIS The Start of World War III?

2015-07-12 Thread Alberto G. Corona
I doubt that there is enough determination to fight for anything here. The
elites are the worst in centuries, only care about their own families and
the New World Order, and I do not doubt that they welcome anything that
destroy us. They prefer to reign over dumb brainless specialized porks
 than over people conscious of their freedom and their history and
identity. Their main target are the ones of us that still resist them.

2015-07-12 10:37 GMT+02:00 Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com:

 The parallels are astonishing: The Byzantines were materially  and
 probably morally exhausted after the wars against the Sassanid empire in
 the 700

 We are now morally exhausted after the cold war by the  soviet directed
 leftist propaganda. Now the left, without some central guidance is running
 amok. I know that the sovietic empire, contrary to common belief and
 contrary to the image that they cultivated, promoted the moderate leftist
 in the West, most of the time, since they needed to appeal to the majority
 in a gradual way towards socialism and communism. Now the left is in
  histherical phase . The URRS was a stabilizing counterbalance needed for
 the affirmation of values of the westerners.

 I doubt that

 2015-07-11 17:35 GMT+02:00 spudboy100 via Everything List 
 everything-list@googlegroups.com:

 Icke is an interesting, but paranoid character. If ISIS, or any element
 from the Islamic World causes a 4th world war (The Cold War was actually
 WW3), then it is not any member of the Uma's fault, but instead the
 weakness, the cowardice, the irresolution, of 'so called' Western leaders.
 Perfection with one's fellows humans is fraught with disappointment,
 because people will always disappoint. But, the leadership of the so-called
 West, is so bad that it invites attack from ISIS or anyone else.As Bin
 Laden said, People like the stronger horse. Leaders here are so weak,
 that if ISIS attacked, they might win. Who now knows?



  -Original Message-
 From: Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com
 To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Sat, Jul 11, 2015 1:36 am
 Subject: Fwd: ISIS The Start of World War III?

   Begin forwarded message:

  ISIS The Start of World War III?
 David Icke interview
  Video link:
 http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthread.php?266299-ISIS-The-Start-of-World-War-III


--
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Everything List group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Everything List group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




 --
 Alberto.




-- 
Alberto.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: A riddle for John Clark

2015-07-12 Thread Terren Suydam
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 1:46 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Terren Suydam terren.suy...@gmail.com
 wrote:


 ​ ​
 It's about continuity of consciousness above all else, and the labels
 change nothing about that.


 ​Labels

 ​are what ​gives meanings to words and all the arguments
 you have made on this list are made of words, so now you're saying the
 meanings of those words are not important and can be changed to mean
 anything. Well you can do that with your words if you want, but I'm not
 going to do it with mine.
 ​​

 ​ John k Clark​


I'm not saying the meanings of words are not important. You must be out of
arguments.

Terren

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: May be of interest

2015-07-12 Thread Bruno Marchal


On 11 Jul 2015, at 07:35, LizR wrote:


http://arstechnica.co.uk/science/2015/06/relativitys-time-dilation-may-limit-the-quantum-world/



That paper might put Roger Penrose in the superposition state Happy +  
Not-Happy.


Happy because, simplifying a little bit, the paper would show that  
gravitation do collapse the wave, after all.


Not-Happy, because it shows this in a mechanical way without  
contradicting the linearity (of evolution and tensor product), so if  
the experiment confirms this, it would add evidences on the many- 
universe idea. They would just already differentiate along the time  
dilation. The multiverse would be multi-curvatures.


Good news, also,  to learn that Dark Matter might self-interact. It  
makes it a bit more ... familiar.

http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/04/new-evidence-that-dark-matter-could-be-self-interacting/

I guess it will take time before we can compare what we take as  
physical and geographical around us by extrapolation from observation,  
and what can be physical and geographical around Universal Turing  
Machine.


Bruno




http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: ISIS The Start of World War III?

2015-07-12 Thread spudboy100 via Everything List

 It may be as you have suggested. What the world lacked backed then, was the 
computer revolution, which will eventuate soon, in a revolution like none 
other. I am guessing that whatever ISIS or some other enemy will be over-taken 
by this technology. A new technology that will be able, with some human help, 
to invent and uncover new things. On the other hand, if one's family is part of 
likely, on-coming attacks (which I suspect are on the way), then having a 
perfected artificial heart, may be of no consolation. Rank me as kind of 
pessimistic in that department, because as Bin Laden said, People naturally 
like the stronger horse. Many peoples have always worshipped power, and have, 
or had, contempt for the weak.   



-Original Message-
From: Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sun, Jul 12, 2015 4:38 am
Subject: Re: ISIS The Start of World War III?


 
The parallels are astonishing: The Byzantines were materially  and probably 
morally exhausted after the wars against the Sassanid empire in the 700   
   
  
  
We are now morally exhausted after the cold war by the  soviet directed leftist 
propaganda. Now the left, without some central guidance is running amok. I know 
that the sovietic empire, contrary to common belief and contrary to the image 
that they cultivated, promoted the moderate leftist in the West, most of the 
time, since they needed to appeal to the majority in a gradual way towards 
socialism and communism. Now the left is in  histherical phase . The URRS was a 
stabilizing counterbalance needed for the affirmation of values of the 
westerners.  
  
   
  
  
I doubt that  
 
 
  
  
2015-07-11 17:35 GMT+02:00 spudboy100 via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com:   
   
Icke is an interesting, but paranoid character. If ISIS, or any element 
from the Islamic World causes a 4th world war (The Cold War was actually WW3), 
then it is not any member of the Uma's fault, but instead the weakness, the 
cowardice, the irresolution, of 'so called' Western leaders. Perfection with 
one's fellows humans is fraught with disappointment, because people will always 
disappoint. But, the leadership of the so-called West, is so bad that it 
invites attack from ISIS or anyone else.As Bin Laden said, People like the 
stronger horse. Leaders here are so weak, that if ISIS attacked, they might 
win. Who now knows?  
  

 


 


 


-Original Message-
 From: Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com
 To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Sat, Jul 11, 2015 1:36 am
 Subject: Fwd: ISIS The Start of World War III?
 
 
  
   
 Begin forwarded message:
   

 
  
ISIS The Start of World War III?
  
   David Icke interview  
  
   Video link:
http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthread.php?266299-ISIS-The-Start-of-World-War-III
   
  
   
   
 

   
   
 --   
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.   
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to   everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.   
 To post to this group, send email to   
everything-list@googlegroups.com.   
 Visit this group at   http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.  
 
 For more options, visit   https://groups.google.com/d/optout.  
 
  
 

   
 

 
   
 --   
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.  
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to   everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.  
 To post to this group, send email to   everything-list@googlegroups.com.   
   
 Visit this group at   http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.  
 For more options, visit   https://groups.google.com/d/optout.  
  

   
  
  
  
  
   
  
--   
  
Alberto.  
  
  
 --  
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group. 
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to  everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. 
 To post to this group, send email to  everything-list@googlegroups.com. 
 Visit this group at  http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. 
 For more options, visit  https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 

RE: ISIS The Start of World War III?

2015-07-12 Thread 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
No I am objecting to the making of ISIS into the central existential problem 
that must define our times; they are a largely regional phenomenon (with a 
certain internet reach resulting from their use of graphic brutality). The 
planet earth has far more serious existential problems than ISIS.

ISIS is a side freak show – a freak show of extreme brutality for sure, but a 
freak show never the less. If Saudi/Kuwaiti funding was shut off the monster 
would quickly dry up and wither away. ISIS is Iraq’s problem, it is Syria’s 
problem, it is Iran’s or the Kurd’s problem perhaps, but it is not and never 
will amount to an existential military threat against the West.

I do not see any good reason why our country should become even more involved 
in this mess than it already is – having largely been responsible for the 
creation of the conditions which led to the evolution of these psychopath 
monsters in the first place. ISIS (nor anything like it) did not exist under 
the Baathist regime of Saddam Hussein lest we forget; the Baathist regime was 
an implacable enemy of Islamic fundamentalism; it was a Stalinist regime in 
fact (a very different animal). The US (in its infinite wisdom) utterly 
destroyed the Baathist regime in a series of bloody expensive wars and a ten 
year long occupation of Iraq; ISIS is the predictable blowback of Abu Ghraib 
and the US occupation of Iraq during the first decade of this millennium. Now, 
I am not extolling the Baathist regime as a paradigm of humanism (though woman 
and Christians,  to cite some examples, had far more rights and opportunity 
under Saddam Hussein’s Iraq than they do in the Iraqi “freedom” the US so 
kindly brought to their land).

The US should focus more on taking care of our own country and let other people 
sort out their own destinies. Let Iran handle ISIS (and to a degree ISIS is a 
proxy war between the Gulf Arab regimes and the Iranians); why should we bloody 
our hands in this mess?

ISIS is no existential threat to the US and if we stood out of the way (or as 
we are to some extent to continue to provide discreet logistical and air 
support) Iranian and Kurdish backed forces from one side and Syrian/Hezbollah 
forces from the other side will keep ISIS very well contained.

Those who seek to learn about the rise of ISIS need to understand the roles 
played by these various regional actors prominently including: Turkey, Israel, 
Saudi Arabia/Kuwait/Gulf states in fomenting ISIS as a tool to destroy the 
Baathist Syrian regime – and seen in the larger context of an arc of struggle 
between Saudi, Turkish and Iranian influence broken down largely along 
sectarian lines.

-Chris

 

 

From: everything-list@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] 
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 8:53 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: ISIS The Start of World War III?

 

I don't think this is Manicheanism, You are objecting to fact that ISIS does 
bad things, or that people oppose the bad things that ISIS does? The leadership 
of the US especially, view passivity on the US part, as an unalloyed virtue. On 
the other hand, with the president's involvement wit Iran (read the news 
tomorrow) may have decided to adopt a let em kill each other, policy in which 
Sunni's and Shia, massacre each other. Perhaps with the thought that with 
enough war and massacre's maybe a calm will then take place?   

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, Jul 11, 2015 9:48 pm
Subject: RE: ISIS The Start of World War III?

Who elected you dispenser of prizes, ignobal or otherwise…. net nanny? 

As you make clear by your own subsequent words I can see you must be a fellow 
sufferer of the Manichean delusion, speaking in those exaggerated apocalyptic 
tongues you types favor.

Thanks, but no thanks… I don’t need, desire or see the fruit in your peculiar 
kind of religion; mind set; world view… whatever you wish to call it. It is not 
based on a rational analysis of actual geopolitical strength, but rather 
appeals to irrational Manichean idiocy and lurid anecdotal tales told over and 
over again.

This world of ours is enough of a tinder box already without the added idiocy 
of war mongering nutters – like ISIS as well -- wanting to ignite another 
crusade/jihad.

I hope this makes my opinion even clearer to you. 

Just in case, in typical Manichean fashion you use my complete rejection of 
your hyperbolic world view, as a rhetorical hammer to try to shape me into some 
kind of sympathizer or something vaguely treasonous sounding – as your fellow 
crusader spudboy has in fact insinuated in my case  on numerous previous 
occasions – let me – a priori – make it clear that my current complete 
rejection of your insane fallacy does not imply any kind of support or 
tolerance of the medieval minded brutality of the murderous 

Re: A riddle for John Clark

2015-07-12 Thread John Clark
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote: 


 ​ ​
 You know in Helsinki with certainty (accepting comp

But I do not accept “comp”.

  I don't see any problem. Just play with words.

Logic is playing with symbols according to certain rules, and words are
symbols.

 is that it is never specified who is making this all important 1p and
 3p distinction.



 The guy in Helsinki when trying to evaluate what to expect from the
 experiential view.

And how many experiential views will the guy in Helsinki have after
duplication? Two. But of course ICT3PAT1P.

  We have already agreed that both the W-guy and the M-guy are the
 Helsinki man.

Then what the hell are we arguing about?!

  The problem is that there is no such thing as *THE* 1p, there is only
 *A* 1p.



 There is the 1p of the W-guy, and the 1p of the M-guy

Yes, and you just said BOTH the W-guy AND the M-guy are the H-guy.

  and as first person experience they are incoptaible.

 Incompatible from each other but NOT incompatible from the Helsinki Man,

Who will *experience* two-cities?




 ​ ​
 The Helsinki Man.



 Nobody ever experience two cities”

Then “The Helsinki Man” doesn’t mean what you just said it means. So what
does it mean now?

   It is not a Leibnizian identity

Well duh! If a Leibnizian identity is a requirement for survival they you
will not survive the next 5 seconds.

  as we have also agreed that after the duplication, the Helsinki man has
 two incompatible continuations

Incompatible with each other but not incompatible with the Helsinki Man,
and it’s the Helsinki Man you were asking about. But yeah yeah I know,
ICT3PAT1P.

  We do agree on the notion of personal identity.

Apparently not. So I repeat my question, if Bruno Marchal doesn't mean
someone who remembers being Bruno Marchal yesterday then who the hell are
you?

  I am the guy who has BM's private memory.

And the Moscow Man has the Helsinki Man’s private memories and the
Washington Man has the Helsinki Man’s private memories.
​ So why aren't they The Helsinki MEN? ​Oh yes, because
ICT3PAT1P
​.​

 being duplicated would not change that.

I agree. There is absolutely no law of physics that forbids more than one
guy having that private memory, the only reason that sort of thing is not
common is due to technological limitations

   It would just bifurcate my future and introduce an indeterminacy on
 which future I will live.

The use of ambiguous personal pronouns comes so easily that Bruno doesn't
even seem to realize that Bruno is using them;  it's like breathing,
thought is required for neither activity.

  You are the one introducing again and again the same ambiguity by
 confusing the 3p views and the 1p views.

Yeah  yeah I know, I Confuse The 3P And The 1P, but I keep telling you it
will save time if you use the acronym ICT3PAT1P.
​And we all know you love acronyms ​


 ​ ​
 He means the guy who has been in Helsinki and has the corresponding
 memory,




 ​ ​
 And there are TWO people who have that memory,



​​
 Yes, that is why there is an indeterminacy.

The Helsinki Man means having that memory and we agree that TWO people who
have that memory, so The Helsinki Man is two people, so the Helsinki Man
sees both cities. I see no indeterminacy in that, everything is
specified,  but yeah yeah I know,  ICT3PAT1P.

 those TWO people live in different cities, and if we accept your
 definition of he then it doesn't take a Kurt Godel to form the logical
 conclusion that he will see TWO cities.



 In the 3-1 view, but he will never see two cities”

Then “he” doesn’t mean what you just said it does, “he” can’t mean somebody
who remembers being the Helsinki Man.  The question asked back in Helsinki
was what cities will he see tomorrow, so if asked yesterday back in
Helsinki what he meant what would be the correct answer? On second
thought never mind, don't bother answering I already know what you will
say, you will start babbling about *THE* 1p even though after duplication
there is no such thing as *THE* 1p there is only *A* 1p; but of course
 ICT3PAT1P.

 There is no atoms of ambiguity, as I specify the type of view on which
 the expectations are evaluated.

Big talk, so I repeat my challenge that you refused to accept last time,
run through the entire duplicating procedure from start to finish WITHOUT
using ambiguous personal pronouns and WITH the correct usage of the words
“the” and “a”. I’m betting you can't do it without tripping over your own
logic.

 how many cities did the Helsinki man see?


  Two in the third description of the 1-views of the survivors. One, in
 each first person view of each experiencers.

And now the Helsinki Man now has TWO experiencers because the Helsinki Man
has been duplicated. Pop Quiz: How much is 1+1?

   of course they are now different person

Yes.

  and both the W and the M man see only once city.

Yes.

  So you agree that P(W or M) = 1

My agreement depends on if that is a exclusive OR.

   and 

Re: ISIS The Start of World War III?

2015-07-12 Thread spudboy100 via Everything List
I don't think this is Manicheanism, You are objecting to fact that ISIS does 
bad things, or that people oppose the bad things that ISIS does? The leadership 
of the US especially, view passivity on the US part, as an unalloyed virtue. On 
the other hand, with the president's involvement wit Iran (read the news 
tomorrow) may have decided to adopt a let em kill each other, policy in which 
Sunni's and Shia, massacre each other. Perhaps with the thought that with 
enough war and massacre's maybe a calm will then take place?  
 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, Jul 11, 2015 9:48 pm
Subject: RE: ISIS The Start of World War III?


 
  
Who elected you dispenser of prizes, ignobal or otherwise…. net nanny? 
  
As you make clear by your own subsequent words I can see you must be a fellow 
sufferer of the Manichean delusion, speaking in those exaggerated apocalyptic 
tongues you types favor.
  
Thanks, but no thanks… I don’t need, desire or see the fruit in your peculiar 
kind of religion; mind set; world view… whatever you wish to call it. It is not 
based on a rational analysis of actual geopolitical strength, but rather 
appeals to irrational Manichean idiocy and lurid anecdotal tales told over and 
over again.
  
This world of ours is enough of a tinder box already without the added idiocy 
of war mongering nutters – like ISIS as well -- wanting to ignite another 
crusade/jihad.
  
I hope this makes my opinion even clearer to you. 
  
Just in case, in typical Manichean fashion you use my complete rejection of 
your hyperbolic world view, as a rhetorical hammer to try to shape me into some 
kind of sympathizer or something vaguely treasonous sounding – as your fellow 
crusader spudboy has in fact insinuated in my case  on numerous previous 
occasions – let me – a priori – make it clear that my current complete 
rejection of your insane fallacy does not imply any kind of support or 
tolerance of the medieval minded brutality of the murderous lunatics of ISIS. 
Just so we are clear on this, and because this is a usual rhetorical tactic 
that war junkies commonly use against those who publicly oppose their agenda. 
  
 
  
Now speaking directly to your facile and childish disparaging of the term 
“psychological mind ghosts”. If you actually knew the mind – instead of merely 
pontificating about it, which you seem to do a lot of -- you would know that 
there is quite a bit of evidence that our minds are inhabited by numerous 
zombie neural processes, of which we remain consciously unaware; these are our 
mind ghosts; they are ghosts in our minds. We – the conscious self-aware part 
of ourselves at least -- are to a large degree informed and formed by these 
dynamically evolving entities comprised of synchronized neural firing networks. 
They can take dynamic movies of these neural firing networks evolving as 
thoughts form and perception is perceived! If we did not have any ghosts in our 
minds; would we have any minds at all?
  
Those who think their self-aware minds are comprised by the narrative voice in 
their heads alone, are suggestive of those who, for so long believed the 
celestial bodies revolved around the earth. If, in fact, you accept that by far 
most of who you are actually occurs outside of the boundaries of your own 
self-aware narrative (and narrator); then why on earth would you feel that 
“psychological mind ghosts” was just an insult, worthy of your net nanny 
interventionist response, awarding me the most Ignobal prize – so kind of you 
to do that really.
  
More people die of bee stings… bathtub falls… and certainly far more people die 
and become horribly wounded in traffic accidents than people dying by this kind 
of terrorism; yet you seem to want to raise it up on the altar of some bloody 
crusade around which we must all align ourselves marching lemming like over the 
cliffs of oblivion. Excuse me, but I am going to pass on that world view, and I 
will continue to ridicule it as well; it is a world view most richly deserving 
of ridicule.
  
Let us laugh together… for it is patently ridiculous that ISIS poses an 
existential threat to the USA, or even to your own country Australia. Unless 
you are living in Syria or Iraq, or somewhere that is too close to the small 
region where ISIS has the logistical ability to pose a threat then it is not a 
threat and to insist that it must be our most existential cause around which we 
must all rally… well that just reeks of fascism to me.
  
Yours truly,
  
-Chris
  
 
  
 
  
   

 

 

 

From: everything-list@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kim Jones
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2015 5:40 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: ISIS The Start of World War III?
   
  
  
 
  
   
 
  
  
   
On 12 Jul 2015, at 3:09 am, 'Chris de Morsella' 

Re: ISIS The Start of World War III?

2015-07-12 Thread spudboy100 via Everything List
I am here to free your mind -Morpheus
 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, Jul 11, 2015 9:53 pm
Subject: RE: ISIS The Start of World War III?


 
  
Only you can free yourself from the unhealthy war paranoia that seethes -- 
largely unexamined -- within your mind. 
  
 
  
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] 
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2015 4:11 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: ISIS The Start of World War III?
  
 
  
Thanks dr.

Sent from AOL Mobile Mail


-Original Message-
From: 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, Jul 11, 2015 01:09 PM
Subject: RE: ISIS The Start of World War III?


  
   

 
You suffer from raving psychological mind ghosts; carefully nurtured paranoid 
Manichean delusions brought upon by the ingestion of too much war propaganda. 
 
 
 
 
 
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] 
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2015 8:36 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: ISIS The Start of World War III?
 
 
 
Icke is an interesting, but paranoid character. If ISIS, or any element from 
the Islamic World causes a 4th world war (The Cold War was actually WW3), then 
it is not any member of the Uma's fault, but instead the weakness, the 
cowardice, the irresolution, of 'so called' Western leaders. Perfection with 
one's fellows humans is fraught with disappointment, because people will always 
disappoint. But, the leadership of the so-called West, is so bad that it 
invites attack from ISIS or anyone else.As Bin Laden said, People like the 
stronger horse. Leaders here are so weak, that if ISIS attacked, they might 
win. Who now knows?  
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
-Original Message-
From: Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, Jul 11, 2015 1:36 am
Subject: Fwd: ISIS The Start of World War III?
  
   

 
Begin forwarded message:  


 
  
   
ISIS The Start of World War III?
   

David Icke interview 
   
   

Video link:  
http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthread.php?266299-ISIS-The-Start-of-World-War-III
  
   
   

 
   
  
 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group. 
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. 
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. 
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. 
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
   
  
 
 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group. 
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. 
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. 
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. 
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
   
  
  
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
  
 --  
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group. 
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to  everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. 
 To post to this group, send email to  everything-list@googlegroups.com. 
 Visit this group at  http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. 
 For more options, visit  https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To 

Re: ISIS The Start of World War III?

2015-07-12 Thread spudboy100 via Everything List
All well and good, but I am surmising that you underestimate the vindictiveness 
from others, who see life differently than yourself. For instance, the European 
epoch of imperialism, which we all know about, is shameful look backwards for 
the Europeans. For the Islamic expansions of the 7th century, the move into the 
Indian subcontinent, the push into southeast asia, are considered a glorious 
time for the Uma. It is considered a thing of great pride. The re-establishment 
of the Caliphate, would get the community back into the grace of Allah, and its 
return would be a sign from God that He is smiling down, and is pleased by His 
people. 

You and I don't agree with this point of view, but I respect that this view is 
their truth. I accept it as I must accept a natural calamity like an 
earthquake of a plague. If you are asking whether it will be ISIS puling the 
trigger on the Qufar? It might happen that way, and they do sell oil, so they 
have finance. They also have audacity, which sometimes wins the day. But I am 
not planning US foreign policy or am a defense department analyst. I do know 
that if one despises somebody intensely, enough, they will go for the jugular. 

There are different ways to defend the country. One would be applied green 
energy systems, at first for emergencies like power outages, another, would be 
to yes, do the shale thing, but also consider methane powered vehicles, and yes 
biogas powered vehicles and homes. This could be a national program and worth 
paying for, and thus, better insulate the US, or Australia, Japan, etc, from 
let us say, the closure of the straight of Hormuz.  

Remember, the question was originally posed about the strength of ISIS, and I 
focused on the weakness of the current world leaders, and so far, their 
weakness has empowered ISIS, and other actors in the world. 

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sun, Jul 12, 2015 1:57 pm
Subject: RE: ISIS The Start of World War III?


 
  
No I am objecting to the making of ISIS into the central existential problem 
that must define our times; they are a largely regional phenomenon (with a 
certain internet reach resulting from their use of graphic brutality). The 
planet earth has far more serious existential problems than ISIS.
  
ISIS is a side freak show – a freak show of extreme brutality for sure, but a 
freak show never the less. If Saudi/Kuwaiti funding was shut off the monster 
would quickly dry up and wither away. ISIS is Iraq’s problem, it is Syria’s 
problem, it is Iran’s or the Kurd’s problem perhaps, but it is not and never 
will amount to an existential military threat against the West.
  
I do not see any good reason why our country should become even more involved 
in this mess than it already is – having largely been responsible for the 
creation of the conditions which led to the evolution of these psychopath 
monsters in the first place. ISIS (nor anything like it) did not exist under 
the Baathist regime of Saddam Hussein lest we forget; the Baathist regime was 
an implacable enemy of Islamic fundamentalism; it was a Stalinist regime in 
fact (a very different animal). The US (in its infinite wisdom) utterly 
destroyed the Baathist regime in a series of bloody expensive wars and a ten 
year long occupation of Iraq; ISIS is the predictable blowback of Abu Ghraib 
and the US occupation of Iraq during the first decade of this millennium. Now, 
I am not extolling the Baathist regime as a paradigm of humanism (though woman 
and Christians,  to cite some examples, had far more rights and opportunity 
under Saddam Hussein’s Iraq than they do in the Iraqi “freedom” the US so 
kindly brought to their land).
  
The US should focus more on taking care of our own country and let other people 
sort out their own destinies. Let Iran handle ISIS (and to a degree ISIS is a 
proxy war between the Gulf Arab regimes and the Iranians); why should we bloody 
our hands in this mess?
  
ISIS is no existential threat to the US and if we stood out of the way (or as 
we are to some extent to continue to provide discreet logistical and air 
support) Iranian and Kurdish backed forces from one side and Syrian/Hezbollah 
forces from the other side will keep ISIS very well contained.
  
Those who seek to learn about the rise of ISIS need to understand the roles 
played by these various regional actors prominently including: Turkey, Israel, 
Saudi Arabia/Kuwait/Gulf states in fomenting ISIS as a tool to destroy the 
Baathist Syrian regime – and seen in the larger context of an arc of struggle 
between Saudi, Turkish and Iranian influence broken down largely along 
sectarian lines.
  
-Chris
  
 
  
 
  
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] 
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 8:53 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: ISIS The