Re: Mandela effect?
As the simulation runs at the speed of light, we'd have to drive very fast and randomly, indeed. It is a simulation, or rather, a computation, such as a statistical mechanics analysis. The boot up and power on and self test, was the Big Bang. here's another completely, off the wall, point of view. The challenge is not merely, to discover what is true, but to discover what is true, and then use this against despair. Consider this a super-goal, perhaps one that is best resolved by hypercomputing. This utilizes both the cerebrum and the amygdala, to achieve this goal. We use the cerebrum to discover, we use the amygdala to decide when we are pleased with the result. -Original Message- From: Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.com> To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com> Sent: Sun, Oct 4, 2015 6:28 am Subject: Re: Mandela effect? On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Brent Meeker <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote: Never heard of it before. http://www.skeptic.com/insight/the-mandela-effect/ I have heard about it, and found it silly (I agree with the link and with what Bruno said). It is fun to see how the Internet enables kids to explore weird ideas though: https://www.reddit.com/r/mandelaeffect I remember when me and a friend, after failing to impress some girls at a bar, started philosophizing about the nature of reality. We came up with the sort of ideas that later became popular in the Matrix (and were popular before in smaller circles, of course), and decided to test the simulation. Our hypothesis was that, if we started driving fast and always choosing a random path, we would eventually break the simulation's ability to "keep up". It didn't work, but these days we could have started an Internet movement. Best, Telmo. Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Mandela effect?
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Brent Meeker <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote: > Never heard of it before. > > http://www.skeptic.com/insight/the-mandela-effect/ > I have heard about it, and found it silly (I agree with the link and with what Bruno said). It is fun to see how the Internet enables kids to explore weird ideas though: https://www.reddit.com/r/mandelaeffect I remember when me and a friend, after failing to impress some girls at a bar, started philosophizing about the nature of reality. We came up with the sort of ideas that later became popular in the Matrix (and were popular before in smaller circles, of course), and decided to test the simulation. Our hypothesis was that, if we started driving fast and always choosing a random path, we would eventually break the simulation's ability to "keep up". It didn't work, but these days we could have started an Internet movement. Best, Telmo. > > Brent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Mandela effect?
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 1:26 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List < everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote: > As the simulation runs at the speed of light, we'd have to drive very fast > and randomly, indeed. Ok, but suppose that the simulation has limited resources and only computes some sphere around the current part of the universe you're observing. Then it might do some predictive analysis to pre-compute likely future states. Driving randomly would be an attempt to fuck with that algorithm. Of course this would have to be a scenario where our perception channels are hijacked but our cognition is performed in the real world. If Our cognition is part of the simulation, it can just take more outside-the-simulation time to compute the next simulation moment and the inhabitants of the simulation won't notice. > It is a simulation, or rather, a computation, such as a statistical > mechanics analysis. The boot up and power on and self test, was the Big > Bang. My view is that the big bang is the simplest possible state, so it's the common ancestor of all possible states, so if you look far enough in time your are bound to observe it. My crazy hypothesis is that the instant of the big bang is shared by all universes and belongs to all histories. > here's another completely, off the wall, point of view. The challenge is > not merely, to discover what is true, but to discover what is true, and > then use this against despair. I agree. > Consider this a super-goal, perhaps one that is best resolved by > hypercomputing. This utilizes both the cerebrum and the amygdala, to > achieve this goal. We use the cerebrum to discover, we use the amygdala to > decide when we are pleased with the result. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.com> > To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com> > Sent: Sun, Oct 4, 2015 6:28 am > Subject: Re: Mandela effect? > > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Brent Meeker <meeke...@verizon.net> > wrote: > >> Never heard of it before. >> >> http://www.skeptic.com/insight/the-mandela-effect/ >> > > > I have heard about it, and found it silly (I agree with the link and with > what Bruno said). > > It is fun to see how the Internet enables kids to explore weird ideas > though: > https://www.reddit.com/r/mandelaeffect > > I remember when me and a friend, after failing to impress some girls at a > bar, started philosophizing about the nature of reality. We came up with > the sort of ideas that later became popular in the Matrix (and were popular > before in smaller circles, of course), and decided to test the simulation. > Our hypothesis was that, if we started driving fast and always choosing a > random path, we would eventually break the simulation's ability to "keep > up". It didn't work, but these days we could have started an Internet > movement. > > Best, > Telmo. > > > >> >> Brent >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Mandela effect?
Ha! Your imagery of messing with the simulation, reminds me of the old film The 13th Floor. If it is indeed a sim, then its really, really, big. Not impossible, but much bigger and much more complex than a game. I read this from one of the physicists on FQXI, some years ago. "It could be all real, with strong similarities to a sim, or it could be a sim, with solid aspects of a genuine reality." My guess if that there is a Multiverse, it has some kind of regulator controlling, spawning, an array, an If Then Else code. We, as a species, find evidence of all this, if such exists, and then, if discovered or even suggested, we need to apply this to our lives and civilization. -Original Message- From: Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.com> To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com> Sent: Sun, Oct 4, 2015 9:27 am Subject: Re: Mandela effect? On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 1:26 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List <everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote: As the simulation runs at the speed of light, we'd have to drive very fast and randomly, indeed. Ok, but suppose that the simulation has limited resources and only computes some sphere around the current part of the universe you're observing. Then it might do some predictive analysis to pre-compute likely future states. Driving randomly would be an attempt to fuck with that algorithm. Of course this would have to be a scenario where our perception channels are hijacked but our cognition is performed in the real world. If Our cognition is part of the simulation, it can just take more outside-the-simulation time to compute the next simulation moment and the inhabitants of the simulation won't notice. It is a simulation, or rather, a computation, such as a statistical mechanics analysis. The boot up and power on and self test, was the Big Bang. My view is that the big bang is the simplest possible state, so it's the common ancestor of all possible states, so if you look far enough in time your are bound to observe it. My crazy hypothesis is that the instant of the big bang is shared by all universes and belongs to all histories. here's another completely, off the wall, point of view. The challenge is not merely, to discover what is true, but to discover what is true, and then use this against despair. I agree. Consider this a super-goal, perhaps one that is best resolved by hypercomputing. This utilizes both the cerebrum and the amygdala, to achieve this goal. We use the cerebrum to discover, we use the amygdala to decide when we are pleased with the result. -Original Message- From: Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.com> To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com> Sent: Sun, Oct 4, 2015 6:28 am Subject: Re: Mandela effect? On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Brent Meeker <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote: Never heard of it before. http://www.skeptic.com/insight/the-mandela-effect/ I have heard about it, and found it silly (I agree with the link and with what Bruno said). It is fun to see how the Internet enables kids to explore weird ideas though: https://www.reddit.com/r/mandelaeffect I remember when me and a friend, after failing to impress some girls at a bar, started philosophizing about the nature of reality. We came up with the sort of ideas that later became popular in the Matrix (and were popular before in smaller circles, of course), and decided to test the simulation. Our hypothesis was that, if we started driving fast and always choosing a random path, we would eventually break the simulation's ability to "keep up". It didn't work, but these days we could have started an Internet movement. Best, Telmo. Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everythin
Re: Mandela effect?
On 04 Oct 2015, at 15:26, Telmo Menezes wrote: On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 1:26 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List <everything-list@googlegroups.com > wrote: As the simulation runs at the speed of light, we'd have to drive very fast and randomly, indeed. Ok, but suppose that the simulation has limited resources and only computes some sphere around the current part of the universe you're observing. Then it might do some predictive analysis to pre-compute likely future states. Driving randomly would be an attempt to fuck with that algorithm. Of course this would have to be a scenario where our perception channels are hijacked but our cognition is performed in the real world. If Our cognition is part of the simulation, it can just take more outside-the-simulation time to compute the next simulation moment and the inhabitants of the simulation won't notice. It is a simulation, or rather, a computation, such as a statistical mechanics analysis. The boot up and power on and self test, was the Big Bang. My view is that the big bang is the simplest possible state, so it's the common ancestor of all possible states, so if you look far enough in time your are bound to observe it. I tend to agree, but I think this should be derived when Qm will be derived. My crazy hypothesis is that the instant of the big bang is shared by all universes and belongs to all histories. With all the Coebe dispersion, making already a lot of quasi-classical histories possible, but with all the same physical laws. But a sooner diffraction of realities exist too. Now, I can' be sure that what we call the big bang is the real big bang or start of the physical histories. It might be a collision of branes, or just a very big explosion, among infinitely many, I mean the "terrestrial reality" can run very deep. here's another completely, off the wall, point of view. The challenge is not merely, to discover what is true, but to discover what is true, and then use this against despair. I agree. Despair is a complex topic. I do think that the pursuit of truth can help or should help. The lies and the false, which can help locally, only make things harder later. Consider this a super-goal, perhaps one that is best resolved by hypercomputing. I comment on spudboy100, here. I don't think so. With hyper-computing, you will get only hyper-problem, and you will need to pay hypertaxes. Of course, that is good investment, especially if the humans want to remained connected when colliding with Andromeda. The harm reduction is more in the acceptance of lack of perfect solution, and in detaching from certainty, which can help solidify the basic perhaps eternal values. This utilizes both the cerebrum and the amygdala, to achieve this goal. We use the cerebrum to discover, we use the amygdala to decide when we are pleased with the result. A basic implementation of a basic loop, OK. Bruno -Original Message- From: Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.com> To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com> Sent: Sun, Oct 4, 2015 6:28 am Subject: Re: Mandela effect? On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Brent Meeker <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote: Never heard of it before. http://www.skeptic.com/insight/the-mandela-effect/ I have heard about it, and found it silly (I agree with the link and with what Bruno said). It is fun to see how the Internet enables kids to explore weird ideas though: https://www.reddit.com/r/mandelaeffect I remember when me and a friend, after failing to impress some girls at a bar, started philosophizing about the nature of reality. We came up with the sort of ideas that later became popular in the Matrix (and were popular before in smaller circles, of course), and decided to test the simulation. Our hypothesis was that, if we started driving fast and always choosing a random path, we would eventually break the simulation's ability to "keep up". It didn't work, but these days we could have started an Internet movement. Best, Telmo. Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ever
Re: Mandela effect?
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote: > > On 04 Oct 2015, at 15:26, Telmo Menezes wrote: > > > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 1:26 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List < > everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> As the simulation runs at the speed of light, we'd have to drive very >> fast and randomly, indeed. > > > Ok, but suppose that the simulation has limited resources and only > computes some sphere around the current part of the universe you're > observing. Then it might do some predictive analysis to pre-compute likely > future states. Driving randomly would be an attempt to fuck with that > algorithm. Of course this would have to be a scenario where our perception > channels are hijacked but our cognition is performed in the real world. If > Our cognition is part of the simulation, it can just take more > outside-the-simulation time to compute the next simulation moment and the > inhabitants of the simulation won't notice. > > >> It is a simulation, or rather, a computation, such as a statistical >> mechanics analysis. The boot up and power on and self test, was the Big >> Bang. > > > My view is that the big bang is the simplest possible state, so it's the > common ancestor of all possible states, so if you look far enough in time > your are bound to observe it. > > > I tend to agree, but I think this should be derived when Qm will be > derived. > Sure, I don't claim the above to be anything more than a hunch. > > > > My crazy hypothesis is that the instant of the big bang is shared by all > universes and belongs to all histories. > > > With all the Coebe dispersion, making already a lot of quasi-classical > histories possible, but with all the same physical laws. But a sooner > diffraction of realities exist too. > > Now, I can' be sure that what we call the big bang is the real big bang or > start of the physical histories. It might be a collision of branes, or just > a very big explosion, among infinitely many, I mean the "terrestrial > reality" can run very deep. > Ok, but even then I'm not sure the both ideas are mutually exclusive. Can the multiverse contain two copies of the same moment? What would that mean? I have a similar position in regards to simulations. Suppose you have a perfect simulation of the middle ages running in a computer. The inhabitants are not aware that they are in a simulation, but their entire universe is exactly the same as the original in terms of information content. Can you really claim that you created a "copy" of the middle ages, or did you just figure out a way to make all the information available from your perspective? I see the simulation hypothesis as more of a way to connect dots in a graph more than a model of nested dolls. I think the latter implies mysticism -- that the computational medium as any bearing on the experience of the computed entities. > > > > >> here's another completely, off the wall, point of view. The challenge is >> not merely, to discover what is true, but to discover what is true, and >> then use this against despair. > > > I agree. > > > Despair is a complex topic. I do think that the pursuit of truth can help > or should help. > I think so too. > The lies and the false, which can help locally, only make things harder > later. > Yes, and lies can be very subtle. > > > > > >> Consider this a super-goal, perhaps one that is best resolved by >> hypercomputing. > > > I comment on spudboy100, here. I don't think so. With hyper-computing, you > will get only hyper-problem, and you will need to pay hypertaxes. Of > course, that is good investment, especially if the humans want to remained > connected when colliding with Andromeda. > > The harm reduction is more in the acceptance of lack of perfect solution, > and in detaching from certainty, which can help solidify the basic perhaps > eternal values. > > > > > > This utilizes both the cerebrum and the amygdala, to achieve this goal. We >> use the cerebrum to discover, we use the amygdala to decide when we are >> pleased with the result. >> > > A basic implementation of a basic loop, OK. > > Bruno > > > > >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.com> >> To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com> >> Sent: Sun, Oct 4, 2015 6:28 am >> Subject: Re: Mandela effect? >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Brent Meeker <meeke...@verizon.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Never heard of it before. >>> >>>
Re: Mandela effect?
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2015-10-04 15:26 GMT+02:00 Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.com>: > >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 1:26 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List < >> everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote: >> >>> As the simulation runs at the speed of light, we'd have to drive very >>> fast and randomly, indeed. >> >> >> Ok, but suppose that the simulation has limited resources and only >> computes some sphere around the current part of the universe you're >> observing. Then it might do some predictive analysis to pre-compute likely >> future states. Driving randomly would be an attempt to fuck with that >> algorithm. >> > > That presupose you're not part yourself of the algorithm... so where is > your consciousness computed ? > Well, I guess this would have to be a Matrix-like scenario. You are just alive in some other reality but have your nervous system hijacked so that inputs/outputs to through the simulation. Give me a break, I was 18 and heart-broken :) > If you're computed along everything else... you can't escape it, as from > the pov of what is computing, you don't do something unpredicted, because > that would mean you're doing something the algorithm has not computed... > but it's a plain contradiction with the premises which is you're computed > by it. > Yes, if you are a native of the simulation what you say follows. But you can imagine convoluted scenarios like the one above, more useful for sci-fi than real science. Telmo. > > Quentin > > >> Of course this would have to be a scenario where our perception channels >> are hijacked but our cognition is performed in the real world. If Our >> cognition is part of the simulation, it can just take more >> outside-the-simulation time to compute the next simulation moment and the >> inhabitants of the simulation won't notice. >> >> >>> It is a simulation, or rather, a computation, such as a statistical >>> mechanics analysis. The boot up and power on and self test, was the Big >>> Bang. >> >> >> My view is that the big bang is the simplest possible state, so it's the >> common ancestor of all possible states, so if you look far enough in time >> your are bound to observe it. My crazy hypothesis is that the instant of >> the big bang is shared by all universes and belongs to all histories. >> >> >>> here's another completely, off the wall, point of view. The challenge is >>> not merely, to discover what is true, but to discover what is true, and >>> then use this against despair. >> >> >> I agree. >> >> >>> Consider this a super-goal, perhaps one that is best resolved by >>> hypercomputing. This utilizes both the cerebrum and the amygdala, to >>> achieve this goal. We use the cerebrum to discover, we use the amygdala to >>> decide when we are pleased with the result. >>> >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.com> >>> To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com> >>> Sent: Sun, Oct 4, 2015 6:28 am >>> Subject: Re: Mandela effect? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Brent Meeker <meeke...@verizon.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Never heard of it before. >>>> >>>> http://www.skeptic.com/insight/the-mandela-effect/ >>>> >>> >>> >>> I have heard about it, and found it silly (I agree with the link and >>> with what Bruno said). >>> >>> It is fun to see how the Internet enables kids to explore weird ideas >>> though: >>> https://www.reddit.com/r/mandelaeffect >>> >>> I remember when me and a friend, after failing to impress some girls at >>> a bar, started philosophizing about the nature of reality. We came up with >>> the sort of ideas that later became popular in the Matrix (and were popular >>> before in smaller circles, of course), and decided to test the simulation. >>> Our hypothesis was that, if we started driving fast and always choosing a >>> random path, we would eventually break the simulation's ability to "keep >>> up". It didn't work, but these days we could have started an Internet >>> movement. >>> >>> Best, >>> Telmo. >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Brent >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received th
Re: Mandela effect?
2015-10-04 15:26 GMT+02:00 Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.com>: > > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 1:26 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List < > everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> As the simulation runs at the speed of light, we'd have to drive very >> fast and randomly, indeed. > > > Ok, but suppose that the simulation has limited resources and only > computes some sphere around the current part of the universe you're > observing. Then it might do some predictive analysis to pre-compute likely > future states. Driving randomly would be an attempt to fuck with that > algorithm. > That presupose you're not part yourself of the algorithm... so where is your consciousness computed ? If you're computed along everything else... you can't escape it, as from the pov of what is computing, you don't do something unpredicted, because that would mean you're doing something the algorithm has not computed... but it's a plain contradiction with the premises which is you're computed by it. Quentin > Of course this would have to be a scenario where our perception channels > are hijacked but our cognition is performed in the real world. If Our > cognition is part of the simulation, it can just take more > outside-the-simulation time to compute the next simulation moment and the > inhabitants of the simulation won't notice. > > >> It is a simulation, or rather, a computation, such as a statistical >> mechanics analysis. The boot up and power on and self test, was the Big >> Bang. > > > My view is that the big bang is the simplest possible state, so it's the > common ancestor of all possible states, so if you look far enough in time > your are bound to observe it. My crazy hypothesis is that the instant of > the big bang is shared by all universes and belongs to all histories. > > >> here's another completely, off the wall, point of view. The challenge is >> not merely, to discover what is true, but to discover what is true, and >> then use this against despair. > > > I agree. > > >> Consider this a super-goal, perhaps one that is best resolved by >> hypercomputing. This utilizes both the cerebrum and the amygdala, to >> achieve this goal. We use the cerebrum to discover, we use the amygdala to >> decide when we are pleased with the result. >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.com> >> To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com> >> Sent: Sun, Oct 4, 2015 6:28 am >> Subject: Re: Mandela effect? >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Brent Meeker <meeke...@verizon.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Never heard of it before. >>> >>> http://www.skeptic.com/insight/the-mandela-effect/ >>> >> >> >> I have heard about it, and found it silly (I agree with the link and with >> what Bruno said). >> >> It is fun to see how the Internet enables kids to explore weird ideas >> though: >> https://www.reddit.com/r/mandelaeffect >> >> I remember when me and a friend, after failing to impress some girls at a >> bar, started philosophizing about the nature of reality. We came up with >> the sort of ideas that later became popular in the Matrix (and were popular >> before in smaller circles, of course), and decided to test the simulation. >> Our hypothesis was that, if we started driving fast and always choosing a >> random path, we would eventually break the simulation's ability to "keep >> up". It didn't work, but these days we could have started an Internet >> movement. >> >> Best, >> Telmo. >> >> >> >>> >>> Brent >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Everything List" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/eve
Re: Mandela effect?
On 23 Sep 2015, at 21:05, Brent Meeker wrote: Never heard of it before. http://www.skeptic.com/insight/the-mandela-effect/ I agree with the conclusion of the paper. Also, if that "mandela-many- world" theory was correct, it would mean that parallel universes can interact, and that QM is non linear (and the SWE only an approximation), and that would mean that basically all basic physical principles are false (GR and thermodynamic are refutable in such a theory, as shown by Plaga and Weinberg). Bruno Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Mandela effect?
Never heard of it before. http://www.skeptic.com/insight/the-mandela-effect/ Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
