Re: [Evolution] ugly fonts from Outlook users

2001-12-14 Thread Steve Fox

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 10:55, Dan Winship wrote:
> OK, the problem here is that it's using the Unicode apostrophe character
> (U+2019) instead of the standard ASCII/latin1 apostrophe. "Blah". (I'd
> expect libiconv to translate that, but I guess it doesn't.)

FYI...I started getting that same exact thing once I imported the Tahoma
font from WinXP. Wasn't quite sure why it was doing that. Thanks for the
explanation.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Evolution dependencies

2001-12-14 Thread Mike Barnes

On Sat, 2001-12-15 at 00:39, Dan Winship wrote:
> The issue is that libdb file formats change sometimes between versions.
> We wanted to guarantee that you can just move your ~/evolution folder
> between machines (or share it via NFS or whatever) and always have
> things work. So we made it depend on a specific db version (which is
> statically linked in, so it doesn't matter what any other programs on
> your system are using).

This is fair enough, and a reasonable goal - but wouldn't it be easier
in the long run if the relevant chunks of db were pulled into Evo's
source tree? It's going to get more and more unmaintainable as time goes
by, otherwise. I must admit I haven't looked at the license, so this may
not be possible.

In practical terms, you say that file formats "change sometimes". Do we
know for certain if this occurred between 3.1.17 and 4.0.14?

Mike.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Strange calendar bug(s)

2001-12-14 Thread Randy Orrison

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 23:48, Damon Chaplin wrote:
> On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 15:49, Randy Orrison wrote:
> > It's strange, because it's so obvious, but I can't find it in bugzilla. 
> > Here's my repro script:
> > Go to the calendar folder
> > Click Week view
> > Click New Appointment
> > Enter Test for Summary
> > Enter today and 6pm for Start Time
> > Enter today and 7pm for End Time
> > Click Save and Close
> > Observe that the Start Time as displayed in today's box on the calendar
> > is 559pm
> > 
> > This is 100% reproducable for me.  It happened with 0.99.2, and is still
> > happening now with 1.0.  I'm using the package from debian unstable.
> > 
> > I would report this in bugzilla, but since it's so obvious I have to
> > suspect that it's something wrong with my installation, rather than a
> > real bug.  Any suggestions?
> > 
> > (There are a host of other similar little calendar bugs, as well.  Such
> > as: Click Day View on the Toolbar, click Go To on the Toolbar, click Go
> > To Today, get Wednesday (it's Friday); or click on Saturday in the month
> > calendar on the main view and get Thursday, or the test appointment that
> > I just created in Week View on Friday shows up in day view on
> > Thursday...  What's going on???)
> 
> I suspect a packaging problem or a timezone problem.
> 
> What timezone do you have set on the machine? What do 'date' and 'date
> -u' output?

$ date
Sat Dec 15 00:11:07 GMT 2001
$ date -u
Sat Dec 15 00:11:30 UTC 2001

(I live in England, we're not currently on British Summer Time, so
current local time == GMT == UTC.)

The TZ environment variable doesn't appear to be set.  Is there likely to be another
timezone setting somewhere?

> What timezone are you using in Evolution?

It's currently set to UTC, but I've just changed it to Europe/London.  (And, having 
restarted evolution it's still behaving the same.)

> You could try running 'wombat' and 'evolution-calendar' in separate
> terminals before starting Evolution and see if they output any warnings.

Both gave
Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library

wombat didn't exit when I closed evolution, and when I restarted it it
gave

wombat-pcs-Message: cal_notify_categories_changed(): Could not
notify the listener about the current set of categories
wombat-pcs-Message: cal_notify_categories_changed(): Could not
notify the listener about the current set of categories

> Damon

Thanks!


(Interesting note: I started composing this, and while typing my lines wrapped 
automatically; I did File/Send Later, and now that I've reopened it they're not 
wrapping while I type.)

Randy


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Strange calendar bug(s)

2001-12-14 Thread Randy Orrison

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 23:48, Damon Chaplin wrote:
> On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 15:49, Randy Orrison wrote:
> > It's strange, because it's so obvious, but I can't find it in bugzilla. 
> > Here's my repro script:
> > Go to the calendar folder
> > Click Week view
> > Click New Appointment
> > Enter Test for Summary
> > Enter today and 6pm for Start Time
> > Enter today and 7pm for End Time
> > Click Save and Close
> > Observe that the Start Time as displayed in today's box on the calendar
> > is 559pm
> > 
> > This is 100% reproducable for me.  It happened with 0.99.2, and is still
> > happening now with 1.0.  I'm using the package from debian unstable.
> > 
> > I would report this in bugzilla, but since it's so obvious I have to
> > suspect that it's something wrong with my installation, rather than a
> > real bug.  Any suggestions?
> > 
> > (There are a host of other similar little calendar bugs, as well.  Such
> > as: Click Day View on the Toolbar, click Go To on the Toolbar, click Go
> > To Today, get Wednesday (it's Friday); or click on Saturday in the month
> > calendar on the main view and get Thursday, or the test appointment that
> > I just created in Week View on Friday shows up in day view on
> > Thursday...  What's going on???)
> 
> I suspect a packaging problem or a timezone problem.
> 
> What timezone do you have set on the machine? What do 'date' and 'date
> -u' output?

$ date
Sat Dec 15 00:11:07 GMT 2001
$ date -u
Sat Dec 15 00:11:30 UTC 2001

(I live in England, we're not currently on British Summer Time, so
current local time == GMT == UTC.)

The TZ environment variable doesn't appear to be set.  Is there another
timezone setting somewhere?

> What timezone are you using in Evolution?

It's currently set to UTC, but I've just changed it to Europe/London.

> You could try running 'wombat' and 'evolution-calendar' in separate
> terminals before starting Evolution and see if they output any warnings.

Both gave
> Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library

wombat didn't exit when I closed evolution, and when I restarted it it
gave

> wombat-pcs-Message: cal_notify_categories_changed(): Could not
> notify the listener about the current set of categories
> wombat-pcs-Message: cal_notify_categories_changed(): Could not
> notify the listener about the current set of categories

> Damon

Thanks!


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] IMAP comments

2001-12-14 Thread Dan Berger

On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 05:51:58PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> the \Recent flag thing... we *could* do it but we'd need to have some
> way of showing the difference in the UI and no other gui client makes
> the distinction between a \Recent message and a non \Recent message - if
> mutt does it, then it's the *only* client that does).

Hate to contradict you - but Netscape Messenger also differentiates.
Newly delivered messages have a green arrow (or something - it's
really small) on their closed envelope icon.  Old unread messages just
have a closed envelope.


-- 
   Dan Berger [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   http://home.ix.netcom.com/~dberger
   Inter arma silent leges

   "Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect
   liberty when the government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to
   freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by
   evil minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in
   insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without
   understanding."  
Justice Louis Brandeis, dissenting, Olmstead v US (1928)

A982 E6B1 CB2F 7A49  843A 9297 DA73 4371  1F54 8D0C



msg04311/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Evolution] ical compilation problems

2001-12-14 Thread Paul Oliver

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 14:01, Dan Winship wrote:

> Likewise. Maybe 1.30 turned that warning into an error?
> 
> Does it work for you if you remove the line
> 
>   trigger:
> 
> from icalyacc.y?

Booya!  That was it.  thanks for all the help guys--you rule!

Paul

-- 
---
Paul Oliver   http://www.paultastic.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
If you're a boxing referee, it's probably illegal to wear a bow tie 
that spins or changes colors.   


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Undo'ing searches...

2001-12-14 Thread Zot O'Connor

Another thing that would be nice is the ability to open a search to a
new window.

I like when a "search" function opens a new window from what I am
looking at.  That way I do not reload my 4000 message inbox every time I
research an email name while composing.


On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 14:34, Andre Truter wrote:
> On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 01:07, Zot O'Connor wrote:
> > On that thread, anyone else get annoyed that the field clears itself
> > when you change criteria?
> > 
> > I regular search for "sender" then realize I mean "CC:, TO:" and have to
> > switch searches.  Evolution deletes the field... WHY?
> > 
> > 
> Yip, very anoying.  Would be a good feature to keep the contents of the
> search field for all options until you change it, or select 'Clear'
> -- 
> 
> Andre Truter
> Software Engineer
> 
> <->
> < The box said: Requires Windows 95 or better...  >
> < So I installed Linux>
> <->
> 
> 
-- 
Zot O'Connor

http://www.ZotConsulting.com
http://www.WhiteKnightHackers.com


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Strange calendar bug(s)

2001-12-14 Thread Damon Chaplin

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 15:49, Randy Orrison wrote:
> It's strange, because it's so obvious, but I can't find it in bugzilla. 
> Here's my repro script:
> Go to the calendar folder
> Click Week view
> Click New Appointment
> Enter Test for Summary
> Enter today and 6pm for Start Time
> Enter today and 7pm for End Time
> Click Save and Close
> Observe that the Start Time as displayed in today's box on the calendar
> is 559pm
> 
> This is 100% reproducable for me.  It happened with 0.99.2, and is still
> happening now with 1.0.  I'm using the package from debian unstable.
> 
> I would report this in bugzilla, but since it's so obvious I have to
> suspect that it's something wrong with my installation, rather than a
> real bug.  Any suggestions?
> 
> (There are a host of other similar little calendar bugs, as well.  Such
> as: Click Day View on the Toolbar, click Go To on the Toolbar, click Go
> To Today, get Wednesday (it's Friday); or click on Saturday in the month
> calendar on the main view and get Thursday, or the test appointment that
> I just created in Week View on Friday shows up in day view on
> Thursday...  What's going on???)

I suspect a packaging problem or a timezone problem.

What timezone do you have set on the machine? What do 'date' and 'date
-u' output?

What timezone are you using in Evolution?


You could try running 'wombat' and 'evolution-calendar' in separate
terminals before starting Evolution and see if they output any warnings.

Damon



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Undo'ing searches...

2001-12-14 Thread Andre Truter

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 01:07, Zot O'Connor wrote:
> On that thread, anyone else get annoyed that the field clears itself
> when you change criteria?
> 
> I regular search for "sender" then realize I mean "CC:, TO:" and have to
> switch searches.  Evolution deletes the field... WHY?
> 
> 
Yip, very anoying.  Would be a good feature to keep the contents of the
search field for all options until you change it, or select 'Clear'
-- 

Andre Truter
Software Engineer

<->
< The box said: Requires Windows 95 or better...  >
< So I installed Linux>
<->



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] IMAP comments

2001-12-14 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast

I'm going to look at rewriting a bunch of the IMAP code this weekend
(and next weekend and the weekend after that and so on until it's
usable) but my biggest concern right now is that Evolution already
exposes a number of bugs in various imap servers because we use some of
the more advanced features of the imap protocol that most other imap
mail clients don't use. I have a bad feeling that if we try to do stuff
async, we'll catch a lot more imap server bugs and get even more
complaints about not being able to work with server xyz and server zxy
and so on.

That said, the goals of the rewrite should address your concerns (except
the \Recent flag thing... we *could* do it but we'd need to have some
way of showing the difference in the UI and no other gui client makes
the distinction between a \Recent message and a non \Recent message - if
mutt does it, then it's the *only* client that does).

Jeff

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 15:57, Jules Bean wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Just trying evolution for the first time seriously.
> 
> It's still not ready to become my default mailer, but it has some
> definite excellent points.
> 
> Currently, I store all my mail on a permanently connected machine,
> which I ssh into from both home and work, and use mutt to read my
> mail.  Except for work mail which I leave on the work server, but read 
> using mutt's IMAP support.
> 
> So, what is really cool about evolution?  Well, it's really cool that
> I can directly view attachments inline (which is tricky in mutt!).
> It's really cool that I can use my GPG key to decrypt things (which is 
> hard in mutt because I don't trust my gpg key to the permanently
> connected machine, it's only here at home).  vFolders are pretty cool
> too.
> 
> Why won't I switch over to it for permanent use?
> 
> 1) It doesn't support my personal mail-reading style, which relies on
> the difference between \Recent and 'not \Seen' in IMAP-speak.  mutt
> calls these 'New' and 'Old'.  Basically I distinguish between Unread
> messages I already know about, and unread messages I've never even
> seen (I don't know how mutt handles this, since it isn't using IMAP,
> but evolution could do it using IMAP). I often mark a message unread
> to remind myself to go back to it.
> 
> And mutt gives me the super-handy ability to move between folders
> containing unseen (new) messages using the space bar. I have around 25 
> folders for my various mailing lists.
> 
> Having watched evo's IMAP-trace, I see that it doesn't even ask for
> the 'Recent' flag.  It would be easy enough to change it's STATUS
> command from 
> 
> sending : A00198 STATUS "mail/debian-devel" (UNSEEN)
> 
> to STATUS "mail/debian-devel" (UNSEEN RECENT)
> 
> 
> 2) It's too slow.  My IMAP server is a slow old machine, and my
> mailboxes are big. The STATUS command takes a non-trivial time for any 
> mailbox, and a really long time for the big ones; and evolution won't
> even let me see my folder list until it's run all the STATUSes.
> 
> Evolution could improve this solution in two ways.  One is by issuing
> STATUS commands before the last one has come back; IMAP is an
> asynchronous protocol.  You can send of a bunch of status commands and 
> watch them all come shooting back.  (I'm sure this works, I've tested
> it by hand).
> 
> Secondly (more importantly), as soon as evolution has downloaded the
> folder list, it should allow me to browse, while it waits for the
> STATUS commands to complete in the background.  Evolution does already 
> do this when you click Send/Receive mail (i.e. run the STATUS commands 
> in the background) but it won't do it in the background on initial
> log-in. This is really annoying: it takes around 90 seconds or more to 
> log on initially.
> 
> 
> 3) This isn't a recent I wouldn't use evo, but it's a definite
> wishlist: Don't download non-text-plain parts of a multipart message
> until I ask for it.  Possibly an option to set a size threshold above
> which no message part would be download, whatever the mime-type..
> Look at this conversation:
> 
> sending : A00307 UID FETCH 4554 BODY
> received: * 1559 FETCH (UID 4554 BODY (("TEXT" "PLAIN" ("CHARSET"
> "iso-8859-1") NIL NIL "QUOTED-PRINTABLE" 5285 135)("IMAGE" "JPEG"
> ("NAME" "=?iso-8859-1?Q?arrivo_troncone_prua_a_genova.jpg?=") NIL
> "JPEG File Interchange" "BASE64" 2690230) "MIXED"))
> received: A00307 OK UID FETCH completed
> sending : A00308 UID FETCH 4554 BODY.PEEK[1.MIME]
> received: * 1559 FETCH (UID 4554 BODY[1.MIME] {93}
> received: )
> received: A00308 OK UID FETCH completed
> sending : A00309 UID FETCH 4554 BODY.PEEK[2.MIME]
> received: * 1559 FETCH (UID 4554 BODY[2.MIME] {265}
> received: )
> received: A00309 OK UID FETCH completed
> sending : A00310 UID FETCH 4554 BODY.PEEK[1]
> received: * 1559 FETCH (UID 4554 BODY[1] {5285}
> received: )
> received: A00310 OK UID FETCH completed
> sending : A00311 UID FETCH 4554 BODY.PEEK[2]
> received: * 1559 FETCH (UID 4554 BODY[2] {2690230}
> 
> Aaagh!  No, pleasse don't d

Re: [Evolution] Undo'ing searches...

2001-12-14 Thread Luis Villa

It has been filed a number of times, though I don't have the number
offhand. 
Luis

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 17:32, Ben FrantzDale wrote:
> I hate that too. The same thing happens in the analaogus fields in the
> vFolder editor. I seem to remember putting that in a bug report but I
> can't find it. Shall I enter a bug report?
> 
> --Ben
> 
> On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 15:07, Zot O'Connor wrote:
> > On that thread, anyone else get annoyed that the field clears itself
> > when you change criteria?
> > 
> > I regular search for "sender" then realize I mean "CC:, TO:" and have to
> > switch searches.  Evolution deletes the field... WHY?
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 12:07, Anna Marie Dirks wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 14:42, Sean M Alderman wrote:
> > > > Is there an easier way to go back to viewing all messages in a folder
> > > > than clearing the search criteria and hitting find now?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Sean, 
> > > 
> > > I can only respond to your first question. If you click on the "Search"
> > > button, a drop-down menu will appear. "Clear" is the first item
> > > in this menu. Selecting "Clear" will undo your search.
> > > 
> > > Hope this helps!
> > > Anna
> > > 
> > > ___
> > > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> > 
> 


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Undo'ing searches...

2001-12-14 Thread Ben FrantzDale

I hate that too. The same thing happens in the analaogus fields in the
vFolder editor. I seem to remember putting that in a bug report but I
can't find it. Shall I enter a bug report?

--Ben

On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 15:07, Zot O'Connor wrote:
> On that thread, anyone else get annoyed that the field clears itself
> when you change criteria?
> 
> I regular search for "sender" then realize I mean "CC:, TO:" and have to
> switch searches.  Evolution deletes the field... WHY?
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 12:07, Anna Marie Dirks wrote:
> > On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 14:42, Sean M Alderman wrote:
> > > Is there an easier way to go back to viewing all messages in a folder
> > > than clearing the search criteria and hitting find now?
> > > 
> > 
> > Sean, 
> > 
> > I can only respond to your first question. If you click on the "Search"
> > button, a drop-down menu will appear. "Clear" is the first item
> > in this menu. Selecting "Clear" will undo your search.
> > 
> > Hope this helps!
> > Anna
> > 
> > ___
> > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> > 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> ___
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> 




msg04305/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Evolution] editing spell checker dictionary

2001-12-14 Thread Jason Tackaberry

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 11:07, Arren Mund wrote:
> is there anyway that i can remove a word from the dictionary?  say i
> added a word i didn't want in there, or i don't agree with one of the
> words. 

One way would be to edit ~/.aspell.english.pws (or similarly named file
depending on your locale).  There may be a GUI front-end for that, but I
don't know of one.

Cheers,
Jason.


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Evolution] IMAP comments

2001-12-14 Thread Jules Bean

Hi all,

Just trying evolution for the first time seriously.

It's still not ready to become my default mailer, but it has some
definite excellent points.

Currently, I store all my mail on a permanently connected machine,
which I ssh into from both home and work, and use mutt to read my
mail.  Except for work mail which I leave on the work server, but read 
using mutt's IMAP support.

So, what is really cool about evolution?  Well, it's really cool that
I can directly view attachments inline (which is tricky in mutt!).
It's really cool that I can use my GPG key to decrypt things (which is 
hard in mutt because I don't trust my gpg key to the permanently
connected machine, it's only here at home).  vFolders are pretty cool
too.

Why won't I switch over to it for permanent use?

1) It doesn't support my personal mail-reading style, which relies on
the difference between \Recent and 'not \Seen' in IMAP-speak.  mutt
calls these 'New' and 'Old'.  Basically I distinguish between Unread
messages I already know about, and unread messages I've never even
seen (I don't know how mutt handles this, since it isn't using IMAP,
but evolution could do it using IMAP). I often mark a message unread
to remind myself to go back to it.

And mutt gives me the super-handy ability to move between folders
containing unseen (new) messages using the space bar. I have around 25 
folders for my various mailing lists.

Having watched evo's IMAP-trace, I see that it doesn't even ask for
the 'Recent' flag.  It would be easy enough to change it's STATUS
command from 

sending : A00198 STATUS "mail/debian-devel" (UNSEEN)

to STATUS "mail/debian-devel" (UNSEEN RECENT)


2) It's too slow.  My IMAP server is a slow old machine, and my
mailboxes are big. The STATUS command takes a non-trivial time for any 
mailbox, and a really long time for the big ones; and evolution won't
even let me see my folder list until it's run all the STATUSes.

Evolution could improve this solution in two ways.  One is by issuing
STATUS commands before the last one has come back; IMAP is an
asynchronous protocol.  You can send of a bunch of status commands and 
watch them all come shooting back.  (I'm sure this works, I've tested
it by hand).

Secondly (more importantly), as soon as evolution has downloaded the
folder list, it should allow me to browse, while it waits for the
STATUS commands to complete in the background.  Evolution does already 
do this when you click Send/Receive mail (i.e. run the STATUS commands 
in the background) but it won't do it in the background on initial
log-in. This is really annoying: it takes around 90 seconds or more to 
log on initially.


3) This isn't a recent I wouldn't use evo, but it's a definite
wishlist: Don't download non-text-plain parts of a multipart message
until I ask for it.  Possibly an option to set a size threshold above
which no message part would be download, whatever the mime-type..
Look at this conversation:

sending : A00307 UID FETCH 4554 BODY
received: * 1559 FETCH (UID 4554 BODY (("TEXT" "PLAIN" ("CHARSET"
"iso-8859-1") NIL NIL "QUOTED-PRINTABLE" 5285 135)("IMAGE" "JPEG"
("NAME" "=?iso-8859-1?Q?arrivo_troncone_prua_a_genova.jpg?=") NIL
"JPEG File Interchange" "BASE64" 2690230) "MIXED"))
received: A00307 OK UID FETCH completed
sending : A00308 UID FETCH 4554 BODY.PEEK[1.MIME]
received: * 1559 FETCH (UID 4554 BODY[1.MIME] {93}
received: )
received: A00308 OK UID FETCH completed
sending : A00309 UID FETCH 4554 BODY.PEEK[2.MIME]
received: * 1559 FETCH (UID 4554 BODY[2.MIME] {265}
received: )
received: A00309 OK UID FETCH completed
sending : A00310 UID FETCH 4554 BODY.PEEK[1]
received: * 1559 FETCH (UID 4554 BODY[1] {5285}
received: )
received: A00310 OK UID FETCH completed
sending : A00311 UID FETCH 4554 BODY.PEEK[2]
received: * 1559 FETCH (UID 4554 BODY[2] {2690230}

Aaagh!  No, pleasse don't download a 2.6M JPEG down my poor 112K line
;-)  Not until I've really decided I want to see it, anyhow.


I don't see any of those three on the wishlist bit of bugzilla, but
I'm not very confident at using bugzillas. Shall I submit them? Are
any of them already 'in-hand' for 1.2?

Congratulations on an excellent product,

Best wishes,

Jules

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Evolution] Strange calendar bug(s)

2001-12-14 Thread Randy Orrison

It's strange, because it's so obvious, but I can't find it in bugzilla. 
Here's my repro script:
Go to the calendar folder
Click Week view
Click New Appointment
Enter Test for Summary
Enter today and 6pm for Start Time
Enter today and 7pm for End Time
Click Save and Close
Observe that the Start Time as displayed in today's box on the calendar
is 559pm

This is 100% reproducable for me.  It happened with 0.99.2, and is still
happening now with 1.0.  I'm using the package from debian unstable.

I would report this in bugzilla, but since it's so obvious I have to
suspect that it's something wrong with my installation, rather than a
real bug.  Any suggestions?

(There are a host of other similar little calendar bugs, as well.  Such
as: Click Day View on the Toolbar, click Go To on the Toolbar, click Go
To Today, get Wednesday (it's Friday); or click on Saturday in the month
calendar on the main view and get Thursday, or the test appointment that
I just created in Week View on Friday shows up in day view on
Thursday...  What's going on???)



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Evolution] Evolution Torture tests?

2001-12-14 Thread demodchan

Has anyone ever performed and published the results of strenuous testing on Evolution?

I haven't found any yet, but I'm looking, and curious if anyone had a bookmark they 
could share.
TIA--



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Evolution] Kerberos Question

2001-12-14 Thread Jeremiah Stanley

With all the talk about krb4/5 I was wondering if anyone has links to
how the protocol works and how to set it up (spec. under RedHat 7.x) and
what links people have found useful.

I've fought with LDAP and SASL before and I would like a better
understanding of how all of this ties in with each other.

Thanks,
Jermiah Stanley




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Evolution] pilot conduits: help

2001-12-14 Thread Christopher Lee


I used the release candidates of evolution and found it very
useful---especially the ability to sync with my pilot.

However, since an upgrade to RedHat 7.2 (from 6.x), I've been unable to get
the pilot conduits to work again.  (I've tired recompiling all of gnome
from source; and I've tried redcarpet ximian-gnome subscriptiong and
various combinations of evolution-preview w/ ximian-gnome.  No luck so far
with gnome-pilot and the gnomecc pilot interface.  Everything else works
though :-).

Anyway, I'm having trouble figuring out how to debug the problem.  Is there
a procedure for sync'ing an evolution calendar "by hand"?

I use pilot-link with various packages like jpilot, PilotManager, pyrite,
etc.  Having a way to do things manually would make evolution useful to me
again and would help in understanding the sync process to see what's going
wrong.

The second thing that I need to figure out is how to debug a subcomponent,
but I haven't finished reading up on bonobo yet.

Many thanks, and congrats to  the Evolution team.

-chris

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] ical compilation problems

2001-12-14 Thread Dan Winship

> > $> bison --version
> > bison (GNU Bison) 1.30
> 
> I've got 1.28. I get the same output except for the 'Error 139' line.

Likewise. Maybe 1.30 turned that warning into an error?

Does it work for you if you remove the line

trigger:

from icalyacc.y?

-- Dan

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] kerberos WORKING

2001-12-14 Thread Dan Winship

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 08:19, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> Is there kerberos V support?

No, I never finished krb5 auth. (It's quite a bit more complicated than
the krb4 stuff, because it's all GSSAPI-based, and I didn't have a
server to test against anyway.)

-- Dan

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] ical compilation problems

2001-12-14 Thread Damon Chaplin

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 10:37, Paul Oliver wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I have no problem compiling evolution stable releases, but for some 
> reason I could never get the CVS version to compile for me.
> 
> Here's the problem.  I've been looking all over for help on this before 
> I wasted bandwidth on this mailing list, but no dice.  Anyway, it always 
> craps out on the bison file libical/src/libical/icalyacc.y, with the error:
> 
> 
> bison -y  -d -v -t -pical_yy icalyacc.y && mv y.tab.c icalyacc.c
> 1 rules never reduced
> icalyacc.y contains 1 useless nonterminal and 1 useless rule
> make[1]: *** [icalyacc.c] Error 139
> make[1]: Leaving directory 
> `/usr/local/sources/gnomecvs/evolution/libical/src/libical'
> make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> 
> I'm running:
> 
> $> bison --version
> bison (GNU Bison) 1.30

I've got 1.28. I get the same output except for the 'Error 139' line.

I don't really understand yacc stuff so can't really help much.

If you just run:

  bison -y  -d -v -t -pical_yy icalyacc.y

does it still output y.tab.c ?

Damon



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] kerberos WORKING

2001-12-14 Thread Austin Gonyou

Is there kerberos V support?

> > > ./configure --with-krb4=/opt/kerberos
> > > --with-db3=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.1 --prefix=/opt/evolutionkerb
-- 
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA 
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
"Have regard for your name, since it will remain for you longer than a
great store of gold."
Ecclesiastes, Aprocrypha



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Evolution] LDAP address auto-complete...more...

2001-12-14 Thread Jon Trowbridge

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 09:12, Sean M Alderman wrote:
> Is it possible to auto-complete addresses from first the ldap source and
> then from the contacts folder source?  After editing the
> ~/evolution/config.xmldb I'm still getting my contacts searched first.

As things stand, matching contacts from your local contact list will
always be at the top of the list.

The reason why is that the matches appear in the drop-down based on how
often you send them mail: people who are more frequently mailed will
appear first.  We track this information for local contacts but not for
LDAP contacts, so the LDAP contacts always end up at the end.

Right now, our support for LDAP completion is pretty thin.  We are
hoping to improve it for Evolution 1.2.

-JT



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] How can I use evolution to replace Outlook Expresswith SPA?

2001-12-14 Thread Dan Winship

> On the Outlook Express I had to click on SPA to allow the download of the
> emails from the pop3 server.  Is there way I can do the same with evolution?

No, but this is scheduled for 1.2.

-- Dan

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] ugly fonts from Outlook users

2001-12-14 Thread Dan Winship

> style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial'>I=
> 217;d say

OK, the problem here is that it's using the Unicode apostrophe character
(U+2019) instead of the standard ASCII/latin1 apostrophe. "Blah". (I'd
expect libiconv to translate that, but I guess it doesn't.)

> 
> J

That really ought to work if you have Wingdings installed and working. I
don't know enough about font stuff to be able to help figure out what's
wrong though.

-- Dan

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Package Dependencies

2001-12-14 Thread Alessio Bragadini

Dan Winship wrote:

> Yes, if you remove your existing pilot-link package, you ought to be
> able to install Evolution. But you'll have to remove kdepim too, since
> it depends on the old pilot-link.

I'm running Debian stable, and I installed Evo through apt-get from
red-carpet.ximian.com. The program works fine, but I've been unable so
far to have Palm synching working, while KPilot from KDE synchs fine.

I was wondering which are the exact package versions needed for Evo, and
if I am running into some conflict.

Package: gnome-pilot
Status: install ok installed
Maintainer: Ximian, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version: 0.1.63-ximian.2
 
Package: libpisock3
Status: install ok installed
Maintainer: Ximian, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version: 0.9.5-0pre3-ximian.1
 
Package: libpisock4
Status: install ok installed
Maintainer: Ximian, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version: 1:0.9.5-ximian.1
 
Package: pilot-link
Status: install ok installed
Maintainer: Ximian, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version: 1:0.9.5-ximian.2
 
Package: libgnome-pilot0
Status: install ok installed
Maintainer: Ximian, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version: 0.1.63-ximian.2
 
Package: kpilot
Status: install ok installed
Maintainer: Ivan E. Moore II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version: 4:2.1.1-0.potato1

-- 
Alessio F. Bragadini[EMAIL PROTECTED]
APL Financial Services  http://village.albourne.com
Nicosia, Cyprus phone: +357-22-755750

"It is more complicated than you think"
-- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] kerberos WORKING

2001-12-14 Thread Arren Mund

the solution:
don't use MIT kerb5.  you get that error.  if anyone has successfully
gotten it to work with kerb5 let me know what you did.

to install i did this:
downloaded, unpacked, and compiled krb4-1.1.  my configure was as so:
 ./configure --prefix=/opt/kerb4 --enable-shared=yes
(in case anyone reading this doesn't know, --prefix=(path) specifies a
different place to install the program then the default)

i believe the --enable-shared=yes is necessary, but even if it isn't 
it's worth having the shared as well as static libraries.

next, of course, you need to setup your /etc/krb.conf.  ask a friend or
look online for the exact syntax, and you'll have to talk to some from
your university/company/whatever to find out the info that goes in the
file.

that compiled just great, so then i moved on to evolution.  i downloaded
evolution-1.0, and BerkleyDB 3.1.17.  i just did a generic
configure/make/make install for Berkley DB.

then with the evolution configure i did as so:
./configure --with-krb4=/opt/kerb4 --with-db3=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.1
--prefix=/opt/evolutionkerb

it went along it's way.  i did notice in my config.log a whole bunch of
kerberos stuff related to des, but i'm not entirely sure why or whether
it matters, and for now i'm just glad it's working at all.

after a 'make "MAKE=make -j8" -j8" (the -j8 just for SMP compile) and a
good nights rest (it's a very long compile, even with two processors) i
got up, did a 'make install' and ran evolution.  in the mail settings
option i chose kerberos as my autentication type.

in order for it to work, you need to run 'kinit (username)' before you
check your mail or you'll get a "no kerberos tickets cached" or
something similar error. (have the developers maybe thought about adding
an option to have evolution run kinit?)

that's it.  about 2-3 weeks of hacking these programs summed up in one
e-mail.

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 11:01, iain wrote:
> Out of interest (in case anyone else is having trouble, then we can be
> of some help), what was the solution?
> >From the looks of the error posted below, there was something wrong with
> libkrb5.so
> 
> iain
> On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 15:05, Arren Mund wrote:
> > well, after about two weeks of trying this and that i've finally found a
> > solution and have evolution working with kerberos support.  i only wish
> > this list could have been more help, but oh well.
> > 
> > Arren Mund
> > 
> > On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 01:58, Arren Mund wrote:
> > > to expose my problem here are the specs of my system:
> > > i have a non-rpm based system.  openssl is installed but for some reason
> > > the evolution configure doesn't find it.  i have the MIT kerb5
> > > implementation of kerberos with kerb4 compiled with it.  for my
> > > configure line i put the following:
> > > 
> > > ./configure --with-krb4=/opt/kerberos
> > > --with-db3=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.1 --prefix=/opt/evolutionkerb
> > > 
> > > and here is the kerberos related error i get in config.log:
> > > 
> > > configure:11251: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -Wall -Wunused  
> > > -I/usr/local/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/local/lib/glib/include
> > > -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include  -L/opt/kerberos/lib -lkrb4
> > > -I/usr/local/ssl/include -L/usr/local/ssl/lib  -lcrypto -lcom_err
> > > -lroken conftest.c  1>&5
> > > /opt/kerberos/lib/libkrb5.so.3: undefined reference to `stat'
> > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > > configure: failed program was:
> > > #line 11240 "configure"
> > > #include "confdefs.h"
> > > /* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error.  */
> > > /* We use char because int might match the return type of a gcc2
> > > builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply.  */
> > > char krb_mk_req();
> > > 
> > > int main() {
> > > krb_mk_req()
> > > ; return 0; }
> > > 
> > > can anyone at least give me some idea as to what to do?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Arren Mund
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 01:43, Arren Mund wrote:
> > > > can anyone help he out with configuring/compiling kerberos support into
> > > > evolution?  specifically, has anyone successfully done it? if so, what
> > > > setup do you have?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Arren Mund
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ___
> > > > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ___
> > > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> 



___
evolution maillist  

[Evolution] editing spell checker dictionary

2001-12-14 Thread Arren Mund

is there anyway that i can remove a word from the dictionary?  say i
added a word i didn't want in there, or i don't agree with one of the
words. 

Thanks,
Arren Mund 


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] kerberos WORKING

2001-12-14 Thread iain

Out of interest (in case anyone else is having trouble, then we can be
of some help), what was the solution?
>From the looks of the error posted below, there was something wrong with
libkrb5.so

iain
On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 15:05, Arren Mund wrote:
> well, after about two weeks of trying this and that i've finally found a
> solution and have evolution working with kerberos support.  i only wish
> this list could have been more help, but oh well.  how do i unsubscribe?
> 
> Arren Mund
> 
> On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 01:58, Arren Mund wrote:
> > to expose my problem here are the specs of my system:
> > i have a non-rpm based system.  openssl is installed but for some reason
> > the evolution configure doesn't find it.  i have the MIT kerb5
> > implementation of kerberos with kerb4 compiled with it.  for my
> > configure line i put the following:
> > 
> > ./configure --with-krb4=/opt/kerberos
> > --with-db3=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.1 --prefix=/opt/evolutionkerb
> > 
> > and here is the kerberos related error i get in config.log:
> > 
> > configure:11251: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -Wall -Wunused  
> > -I/usr/local/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/local/lib/glib/include
> > -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include  -L/opt/kerberos/lib -lkrb4
> > -I/usr/local/ssl/include -L/usr/local/ssl/lib  -lcrypto -lcom_err
> > -lroken conftest.c  1>&5
> > /opt/kerberos/lib/libkrb5.so.3: undefined reference to `stat'
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > configure: failed program was:
> > #line 11240 "configure"
> > #include "confdefs.h"
> > /* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error.  */
> > /* We use char because int might match the return type of a gcc2
> > builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply.  */
> > char krb_mk_req();
> > 
> > int main() {
> > krb_mk_req()
> > ; return 0; }
> > 
> > can anyone at least give me some idea as to what to do?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Arren Mund
> > 
> > On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 01:43, Arren Mund wrote:
> > > can anyone help he out with configuring/compiling kerberos support into
> > > evolution?  specifically, has anyone successfully done it? if so, what
> > > setup do you have?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Arren Mund
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ___
> > > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Fwd: Re: [Evolution] ugly fonts from Outlook users]

2001-12-14 Thread Mike Dougherty

-Forwarded Message-

> From: Ben Steeves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Mike Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Evolution] ugly fonts from Outlook users
> Date: 14 Dec 2001 11:53:44 -0400
> 
> On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 11:44, Mike Dougherty wrote:
> > I've had the same kind of problem when working with documents on
> > Windoze. The best I can tell is that M$ uses something greater than 127
> > for some characters. Like the apostrophe in ASCII is 039 but they use
> > something like 0146. I'm not an expert in this area, but I don't think
> > there is anything you or Evolution can do about it. Except as you say,
> > curse Micro$oft. Just another one of those things were they are
> > purposefully being non-standard just to annoy people.
> 
> I suppose you could run the mail through your own filtration system to
> change known "out of bounds" characters into their viewable/portable
> equivalents.  You could also set it up to send a nasty e-mail to the
> person who sent you the junk :-)
> 
> It would be fairly easy to do in Perl -- you'd just have to make it
> smart enough to only touch text in the body of the message so that
> binary attachments aren't harmed.
> 
> > On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 06:47, John Klassa wrote:
> > > 
> > > When I get mail from Outlook users, it often contains *something* that
> > > makes for really ugly rendering.  The attached image shows what I mean. 
> 
> -- 
> Ben Steeves -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]   _
>   ( )  ASCII ribbon campaign
>  ICQ: 15105093 X   against HTML e-mail
>  PGP ID: DE06162D / \  
> 


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Evolution] LDAP Errors...

2001-12-14 Thread Sean M Alderman

For giggles, I turned on the debug option to see what I could see about
not getting LDAP address completion.  Here's what turned out - 

[smalder@salderman:smalder]$ more evo.debug 

EBook-WARNING **: e_book_unload_uri: No URI is loaded! 

evolution-addressbook-Message: using LDAP source for completion! 
evolution-addressbook-Message: using LDAP source for completion! 

Here are the lines I added to the ~/evolution/config.xmldb file - 

   
ldap://ldap.grc.nasa.gov:389/ou=People,ou=Lewis Research
Center,o=National Aeronautics and Space Administration,c=US?mail?one"/> 
   

-- 
Sean M. Alderman
ITRACK Systems Analyst
PACE/NCI - NASA Glenn Research Center
(216) 433-2795

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] ugly fonts from Outlook users

2001-12-14 Thread Mike Dougherty

I've had the same kind of problem when working with documents on
Windoze. The best I can tell is that M$ uses something greater than 127
for some characters. Like the apostrophe in ASCII is 039 but they use
something like 0146. I'm not an expert in this area, but I don't think
there is anything you or Evolution can do about it. Except as you say,
curse Micro$oft. Just another one of those things were they are
purposefully being non-standard just to annoy people.


/mike

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 06:47, John Klassa wrote:
> 
> When I get mail from Outlook users, it often contains *something* that
> makes for really ugly rendering.  The attached image shows what I mean. 
> The first "box" is really an apostrophe; the thing that looks like a
> capital "J" (or which may actually be a capital "J" :-)) is a smiley. 
> The filth that generated this is:
> 
>  color=3Dnavy=
>  face=3DArial> style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial'>I=
> 217;d say
> you are getting old and senile  class=3DEmailStyl=
> e17> size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DWingdings> style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;mso-=
> bidi-font-size:
> 12.0pt;font-family:Wingdings;mso-ascii-font-family:Arial;mso-hansi-font-fam=
> ily:
> Arial;mso-char-type:symbol;mso-symbol-font-family:Wingdings'> style=3D'mso-char-type:symbol;mso-symbol-font-family:Wingdings'>J pan> class=3DEmailStyle17> style=
> =3D'font-size:
> 10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial'> style=3D"mso-spac=
> erun:
> yes">  In any case, I have a number of questions
> concerning thi=
> s:
> 
> Microsoft be cursed! :-)
> 
> Anyway, any thoughts on what I can do to make this look nice?  This kind
> of stuff always comes through in a tiny font (per the attached; my
> default font is much larger), and with missing characters.  I do have
> the wingdings font available (I believe it's referred to in the junk I
> quoted), if you're wondering.
> 
> Thanks,
> John
> 
> -- 
> John Klassa / Cisco Systems, Inc. / RTP, NC / USA / [EMAIL PROTECTED] /
> <><
> [ Save bits!  Don't quote entire threads in your reply. ]
-- 
**
 Mike Dougherty -- Java Software Engineer
**
 Banacek's Eighteenth Polish Proverb:
The hippo has no sting, but the wise man would rather be sat upon
by the bee.


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Package Dependencies

2001-12-14 Thread Dan Winship

> I want to download just the Evolution package on my Red Hat 7.1 system using
> the Red-Carpet package manager. Selecting this package on the Install screen
> and clicking the install button gives me a failed dependencies error:
> 
> "Package kdepim needs package libpisock.so.3 which cannot be found"

What that really means is that in order to install Evolution, it's going
to need to upgrade your libpisock, and that will break kdepim. I'm not
sure why it words it like that...

> 1. Can I download just the Evolution package without downloading other
> Ximian packages (desktop, etc.)?

You need to download all of the libraries it depends on, but you don't
need the whole desktop.

> 3. The libpisock.so.3 library appears to be part of the pilot-link package,
> which is used for synching Palm Pilots with desktop tools. If I don't have a
> Palm Pilot, can I just uninstall the pilot-link package? Will that get rid
> of the dependency problem I have now?

Yes, if you remove your existing pilot-link package, you ought to be
able to install Evolution. But you'll have to remove kdepim too, since
it depends on the old pilot-link.

-- Dan

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Evo Sync with Sharp Zaurus and other handhelds

2001-12-14 Thread Ujwal S. Sathyam

Would you mind copying me on it too? I have a Zaurus, and I have been
contemplating writing some syncing software for Evolution in my copious
spare time.

Thanks,

Ujwal

On Wed, 2001-12-12 at 01:49, Erik Bågfors wrote:
> tis 2001-12-11 klockan 21.39 skrev Aaron Weber:
> > Erik Bågfors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned in another thread that he had
> > been working on syncing or exporting Evolution data to the sharp
> > Zaurus.  That's really cool, and I applaud him for it.
> 
> Well, That's half true.  I've created a small hack that exports the
> addressbook (and soon the calendar) to an xml-file that qpe/qtopia's
> addressbook (and soon calendar) can read and use.
> 
> I'm using it for an IPAQ but it should work equally well on a Zaurus. 
> 
> The code is not nice, it was really a prof-of-concept-thing for me and
> I'm not as good of a programmer (at least in C) as you guys :)
> 
> I wasn't planing on adding sync-support but there has been many people
> interested in it so I might.  But then the code really needs to be
> rewritten.  The reason I didn't want to work with syncing is that I'm
> hoping for a X/Gtk(/Gnome) based environment for the IPAQ instead of
> qpe. 
> 
> I also found some small problems with the different libraries and
> include-files that evolution uses.  
> 
> For example check out the file /usr/include/evolution/ebook/e-book.h.
> It tries to include files from "addressbook/backend/ebook/" which means
> you have to have the evolution source-code available.
> 
> I'll try to summarize them for you soon.
> 
> 
> > Erik, if you have a project page for the work you've been doing, we
> > could link to it from our Developer Zone.  If you'd like that, write to
> > me and I'll set that up for you.
> 
> Perhaps after christmas.  So far it's just an ugly hack :)
> 
> /Erik
> 
> -- 
> Erik Bågfors   | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Supporter of free software | GSM +46 733 279 273
> fingerprint:  A85B 95D3 D26B 296B 6C60 4F32 2C0B 693D 6E32
> 
> ___
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Only search option is "Advanced..."

2001-12-14 Thread Abe Fettig

Thanks, that fixed it.

Abe

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 08:30, Dan Winship wrote:
> On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 09:45, Abe Fettig wrote:
> > In all my mail folders, local and IMAP, the only option on the search
> > option menu is "Advanced...".  No "By Name", "By Subject", or anything
> > like that.
> 
> Your searches.xml file must have gotten corrupted (or erased) somehow.
> 
> >From the command line:
>   cp /usr/share/evolution/default_user/searches.xml ~/evolution/
> 
> (assuming you're on a distro where evolution is installed in /usr.)
> 
> -- Dan
> 
> ___
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Evolution dependencies

2001-12-14 Thread Dan Winship

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 05:40, Mike Barnes wrote:
> Hiho - I'm in the middle of trying to convince Evolution 1.0 to compile
> under OS X. I haven't even started on Evo itself yet - I'm still
> tweaking the Fink (http://fink.sourceforge.net/) packages around to try
> and meet all the dependencies.

One important bit: make sure you're on OS X 10.1 and not using
-flat_namespace, or you'll get linking errors later on.

> Anyway, the essence of this little essay is simple. Is there a good
> reason that Evolution MUST have 3.1.17, or will a later version do?

We really need to document this...

The issue is that libdb file formats change sometimes between versions.
We wanted to guarantee that you can just move your ~/evolution folder
between machines (or share it via NFS or whatever) and always have
things work. So we made it depend on a specific db version (which is
statically linked in, so it doesn't matter what any other programs on
your system are using).

-- Dan

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Evolution] ical compilation problems

2001-12-14 Thread Paul Oliver

Hi all,

I have no problem compiling evolution stable releases, but for some 
reason I could never get the CVS version to compile for me.

Here's the problem.  I've been looking all over for help on this before 
I wasted bandwidth on this mailing list, but no dice.  Anyway, it always 
craps out on the bison file libical/src/libical/icalyacc.y, with the error:


bison -y  -d -v -t -pical_yy icalyacc.y && mv y.tab.c icalyacc.c
1 rules never reduced
icalyacc.y contains 1 useless nonterminal and 1 useless rule
make[1]: *** [icalyacc.c] Error 139
make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/usr/local/sources/gnomecvs/evolution/libical/src/libical'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1

I'm running:

$> bison --version
bison (GNU Bison) 1.30

$> gcc --version
2.96

And the line I'm using to compile is:
./autogen.sh --with-pisock=/usr/local --enable-pilot-conduits=yes
   --with-db3-libs=/opt/berkeleydb-3.1.17/lib
   --with-db3-includes=/opt/berkeleydb-3.1.17/include;



Thanks in advance,


Paul Oliver


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Only search option is "Advanced..."

2001-12-14 Thread Dan Winship

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 09:45, Abe Fettig wrote:
> In all my mail folders, local and IMAP, the only option on the search
> option menu is "Advanced...".  No "By Name", "By Subject", or anything
> like that.

Your searches.xml file must have gotten corrupted (or erased) somehow.

>From the command line:
cp /usr/share/evolution/default_user/searches.xml ~/evolution/

(assuming you're on a distro where evolution is installed in /usr.)

-- Dan

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] email that crashes Evo

2001-12-14 Thread Aaron Kemp

Have you tried clicking View -> Message Display -> Message Source before
selecting the message?

Or turning off the Preview Pane?

Aaron

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 09:34, Gil Hauer wrote:
> I received a (*&@#$-ing junk email this morning that crashes Evo
> whenever I select it. Can anyone think of a way to delete it without
> selecting it?
> 
> Gil



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] email that crashes Evo

2001-12-14 Thread Gil Hauer

Hi Luis,

Thanks for the advice. While this might generally be a good idea I'm a
little afraid of upgrading since the one machine that I do have running
1.0 cannot get the configuration database (see MANY earlier messages).

As a result I'm kind of forced to leave my production desktop (i.e., the
one I rely on) at 0.16 which at least continues to work.

BTW, does anyone know if there has there been any progress on this bug
(11740)?

Gil

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 09:46, Luis Villa wrote:
> Before deleting or submitting it, you might try upgrading to the latest
> snapshot and seeing if that fixes your problem. We've fixed two rather
> common spam-crashers in the past two days, and we'd definitely like to
> get a stack trace if yours /isn't/ one of those fixes.
> Luis
> 
> On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 02:47, Dan Hensley wrote:
> > You might want to provide the offending mail in a bug report to
> > bugzilla.ximian.com so Ximian can fix the problem.  To delete your
> > e-mail, try
> > View -> Message Display -> Show Email Source
> > 
> > Then select and delete it.
> > 
> > Dan
> > 
> > On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 14:34, Gil Hauer wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I received a (*&@#$-ing junk email this morning that crashes Evo
> > > whenever I select it. Can anyone think of a way to delete it without
> > > selecting it?
> > > 
> > > Gil
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ___
> > > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> 
> 
> ___
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Evolution] LDAP address auto-complete...more...

2001-12-14 Thread Sean M Alderman

Is it possible to auto-complete addresses from first the ldap source and
then from the contacts folder source?  After editing the
~/evolution/config.xmldb I'm still getting my contacts searched first.
-- 
Sean M. Alderman
ITRACK Systems Analyst
PACE/NCI - NASA Glenn Research Center
(216) 433-2795


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] email that crashes Evo - SOLVED

2001-12-14 Thread Gil Hauer

Sal,

Thanks for the info -- this did the trick.

Gil


On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 10:03, Sal Tepedino wrote:
> On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 09:34, Gil Hauer wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I received a (*&@#$-ing junk email this morning that crashes Evo
> > whenever I select it. Can anyone think of a way to delete it without
> > selecting it?
> > 
> The mailbox is just a plain text file (mbox format by default)
> ~/evolution/local/Inbox/mbox (although, if you use maildir format like I
> do, mbox is a directory). Use your favorite text editor, search using
> the subject name and just delete the message from the beginning of the
> header to the header of the next message, save and you're done. If your
> using maildir formay, just search in the mbox/cur/ folder for the
> message based on the subject line (grep for it) and delete the file
> itself... If you don't know if you're using mbox or maildir, then you're
> using mbox...
> 



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] email that crashes Evo

2001-12-14 Thread Mikael Wahlberg

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 15:34, Gil Hauer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I received a (*&@#$-ing junk email this morning that crashes Evo
> whenever I select it. Can anyone think of a way to delete it without
> selecting it?

Btw, it's probably fixed in the CVS-version of Evo. At least I can view
all emails that crashed 1.0 for me in the CVS from 12.12

/Mikael
-- 

 Mikael Wahlberg  | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 
 Månadsvägen 41   | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Tel. +46 (0)8 580
322 62 
 177 42  JÄRFÄLLA | http://www.acc.umu.se/~mikael | GSM  +46 (0)733 279
274


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] kerberos WORKING

2001-12-14 Thread Arren Mund

well, after about two weeks of trying this and that i've finally found a
solution and have evolution working with kerberos support.  i only wish
this list could have been more help, but oh well.  how do i unsubscribe?

Arren Mund

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 01:58, Arren Mund wrote:
> to expose my problem here are the specs of my system:
> i have a non-rpm based system.  openssl is installed but for some reason
> the evolution configure doesn't find it.  i have the MIT kerb5
> implementation of kerberos with kerb4 compiled with it.  for my
> configure line i put the following:
> 
> ./configure --with-krb4=/opt/kerberos
> --with-db3=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.1 --prefix=/opt/evolutionkerb
> 
> and here is the kerberos related error i get in config.log:
> 
> configure:11251: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -Wall -Wunused  
> -I/usr/local/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/local/lib/glib/include
> -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include  -L/opt/kerberos/lib -lkrb4
> -I/usr/local/ssl/include -L/usr/local/ssl/lib  -lcrypto -lcom_err
> -lroken conftest.c  1>&5
> /opt/kerberos/lib/libkrb5.so.3: undefined reference to `stat'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> configure: failed program was:
> #line 11240 "configure"
> #include "confdefs.h"
> /* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error.  */
> /* We use char because int might match the return type of a gcc2
> builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply.  */
> char krb_mk_req();
> 
> int main() {
> krb_mk_req()
> ; return 0; }
> 
> can anyone at least give me some idea as to what to do?
> 
> Thanks,
> Arren Mund
> 
> On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 01:43, Arren Mund wrote:
> > can anyone help he out with configuring/compiling kerberos support into
> > evolution?  specifically, has anyone successfully done it? if so, what
> > setup do you have?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Arren Mund
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> 



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] email that crashes Evo

2001-12-14 Thread Mikael Wahlberg

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 15:34, Gil Hauer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I received a (*&@#$-ing junk email this morning that crashes Evo
> whenever I select it. Can anyone think of a way to delete it without
> selecting it?
> 

Usually it is the rendering that crashes the mailer, so change the view
to "Show Email Source" which is located in View->Message Display.

/Mikael
-- 

 Mikael Wahlberg  | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 
 Månadsvägen 41   | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Tel. +46 (0)8 580
322 62 
 177 42  JÄRFÄLLA | http://www.acc.umu.se/~mikael | GSM  +46 (0)733 279
274


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] email that crashes Evo

2001-12-14 Thread Gil Hauer

Yes, I'll certainly try to save the message an file a bug report.

View -> Message Display -> Show Email Source then select still causes
Evo to crash. Any way to hand-edit the file? Which?

Gil

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 02:47, Dan Hensley wrote:
> You might want to provide the offending mail in a bug report to
> bugzilla.ximian.com so Ximian can fix the problem.  To delete your
> e-mail, try
> View -> Message Display -> Show Email Source
> 
> Then select and delete it.
> 
> Dan
> 
> On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 14:34, Gil Hauer wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I received a (*&@#$-ing junk email this morning that crashes Evo
> > whenever I select it. Can anyone think of a way to delete it without
> > selecting it?
> > 
> > Gil
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> 
> 



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] email that crashes Evo

2001-12-14 Thread Luis Villa

Before deleting or submitting it, you might try upgrading to the latest
snapshot and seeing if that fixes your problem. We've fixed two rather
common spam-crashers in the past two days, and we'd definitely like to
get a stack trace if yours /isn't/ one of those fixes.
Luis

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 02:47, Dan Hensley wrote:
> You might want to provide the offending mail in a bug report to
> bugzilla.ximian.com so Ximian can fix the problem.  To delete your
> e-mail, try
> View -> Message Display -> Show Email Source
> 
> Then select and delete it.
> 
> Dan
> 
> On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 14:34, Gil Hauer wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I received a (*&@#$-ing junk email this morning that crashes Evo
> > whenever I select it. Can anyone think of a way to delete it without
> > selecting it?
> > 
> > Gil
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] email that crashes Evo

2001-12-14 Thread Dan Hensley

You might want to provide the offending mail in a bug report to
bugzilla.ximian.com so Ximian can fix the problem.  To delete your
e-mail, try
View -> Message Display -> Show Email Source

Then select and delete it.

Dan

On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 14:34, Gil Hauer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I received a (*&@#$-ing junk email this morning that crashes Evo
> whenever I select it. Can anyone think of a way to delete it without
> selecting it?
> 
> Gil
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Evolution] ugly fonts from Outlook users

2001-12-14 Thread John Klassa


When I get mail from Outlook users, it often contains *something* that
makes for really ugly rendering.  The attached image shows what I mean. 
The first "box" is really an apostrophe; the thing that looks like a
capital "J" (or which may actually be a capital "J" :-)) is a smiley. 
The filth that generated this is:

I=
217;d say
you are getting old and senile J  In any case, I have a number of questions
concerning thi=
s:

Microsoft be cursed! :-)

Anyway, any thoughts on what I can do to make this look nice?  This kind
of stuff always comes through in a tiny font (per the attached; my
default font is much larger), and with missing characters.  I do have
the wingdings font available (I believe it's referred to in the junk I
quoted), if you're wondering.

Thanks,
John

-- 
John Klassa / Cisco Systems, Inc. / RTP, NC / USA / [EMAIL PROTECTED] /
<><
[ Save bits!  Don't quote entire threads in your reply. ]



evolution.gif
Description: GIF image


[Evolution] email that crashes Evo

2001-12-14 Thread Gil Hauer

Hi,

I received a (*&@#$-ing junk email this morning that crashes Evo
whenever I select it. Can anyone think of a way to delete it without
selecting it?

Gil




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Evolution] Only search option is "Advanced..."

2001-12-14 Thread Abe Fettig

In all my mail folders, local and IMAP, the only option on the search
option menu is "Advanced...".  No "By Name", "By Subject", or anything
like that.  It's been that way since, oh, probably 0.15 - I don't search
that much, and I've kept hoping the problem would go away with the next
release.  But it's stuck around.  I couldn't find anything in Bugzilla. 
Any suggestions?

Thanks,

Abe


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Localisation bug in Evo 1.0

2001-12-14 Thread Ken Guest

On Aoine, 2001-12-14 at 19:55, Kjartan Maraas wrote:
> ons, 2001-12-12 kl. 10:57 skrev Ken Guest:
> > hi,
> > with LANG exported to be ga_IE, I've noticed that
> > the caption Feilire is used in the Folder Bar, for getting
> > to the calendar view, but the similar entry in the Shortcut bar
> > has not yet been translated - the caption is still "Calendar" 
> > rather than "Feilire".
> > 
> 
> Probably a case of this string not being translated in the .po file.

I've checked http://cvs.gnome.org/lxr/source/evolution/po/ga.po
which is the latest version, and it seems that it has been translated.
The problem seems to be that the caption is picked out from
shortcuts.xml, which really isn't a problem if someone might want to
edit/rename it.
So I'm not really sure if this is a bug anymore (as I don't think 
Evo should attempt to translate user input data), but it might be an
idea for Evo to catch on to the fact that the name of the shortcut
hasn't been edited and to display the localised translation of the
caption rather than the original caption.

k.

-- 
The duck quacks.


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Evolution] Evolution dependencies

2001-12-14 Thread Mike Barnes

Hiho - I'm in the middle of trying to convince Evolution 1.0 to compile
under OS X. I haven't even started on Evo itself yet - I'm still
tweaking the Fink (http://fink.sourceforge.net/) packages around to try
and meet all the dependencies. So far so good - currently working on
GConf 1.0.7, then I should be able to build gtkhtml 1.0 ...

One minor snag is the Berkeley DB library. The Evolution configure
script checks for version 3.1.17 specifically. I've built myself a
3.1.17 package to use while I'm testing, and it seems to work fine, but
there's a 4.0.14 package in unstable that'll go in as the main db
package sometime in the near future.

Anyway, the essence of this little essay is simple. Is there a good
reason that Evolution MUST have 3.1.17, or will a later version do? Is
it just a matter of things not being tested, or will patching the
configure script cause my computer to explode? :)

Any info would be good.

Thanks,
Mike.


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution