Re: [Evolution] Feature Request: IMAP Folders on the Summary page
On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 10:40, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 06:22, Alec Edworthy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Would it be possible to allow the adding of IMAP folders onto the
> > Summary page like you can add normal folders now?
>
> This is implemented on the unstable version on CVS.
>
Um, it may be implemented, but right now the mail summary doesn't work
at all for me. Even local folders don't show up. I'm attaching a patch
to the shell and summary which gets things kinda-sorta working, but
there are still issues:
* Folders with counts of -1/-1 show up
* The folder selector shows noselect folders wrong
* I need to change the sort style of the folder selector in order to
see any folders there
* Folder names are weird
* Probably other stuff that I forget or haven't realized.
Peter
--
Peter Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Why should I have to change my name? He's the one who
sucks!" -- Michael Bolton
Index: shell/ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/evolution/shell/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.904
diff -u -r1.904 ChangeLog
--- shell/ChangeLog 10 Apr 2002 19:01:08 - 1.904
+++ shell/ChangeLog 16 Apr 2002 23:29:29 -
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2002-04-16 Peter Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * e-corba-storage-registry.c (impl_StorageRegistry_addStorage): Notify
+ listeners when a storage is added.
+
2002-04-10 Dan Winship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* e-shell-config.c: Shell config page routines. Right now
Index: shell/e-corba-storage-registry.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/evolution/shell/e-corba-storage-registry.c,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -r1.17 e-corba-storage-registry.c
--- shell/e-corba-storage-registry.c9 Apr 2002 14:59:26 - 1.17
+++ shell/e-corba-storage-registry.c16 Apr 2002 23:29:29 -
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@
ECorbaStorageRegistryPrivate *priv;
EStorage *storage;
GNOME_Evolution_StorageListener listener_interface;
+ GSList *iter;
bonobo_object = bonobo_object_from_servant (servant);
storage_registry = E_CORBA_STORAGE_REGISTRY (bonobo_object);
@@ -123,6 +124,12 @@
}
gtk_object_unref (GTK_OBJECT (storage));
+
+ /* FIXME: if we remove a listener while looping through the list we can
+* crash. Yay CORBA reentrancy. */
+
+ for (iter = priv->listeners; iter; iter = iter->next)
+ listener_notify (iter->data,
+GNOME_Evolution_StorageRegistry_STORAGE_CREATED, name);
listener_interface = CORBA_Object_duplicate
(e_corba_storage_get_StorageListener
(E_CORBA_STORAGE (storage)), ev);
Index: my-evolution/ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/evolution/my-evolution/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.180
diff -u -r1.180 ChangeLog
--- my-evolution/ChangeLog 9 Apr 2002 15:06:10 - 1.180
+++ my-evolution/ChangeLog 16 Apr 2002 23:29:29 -
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+2002-04-16 Peter Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * e-summary-mail.c (e_summary_folder_register_storage): Use
+ correct signal names: new-folder -> new_folder, same for
+ removed_folder.
+ (e_summary_mail_generate_html): Loop through folder_store->shown,
+ not mail->shown.
+ (struct _ESummaryMail): the shown member is unused.
+ (new_folder_cb): Don't restrict ourselves to vfolders and locally
+ stored folders. Try to guess the toplevel URI of the storage
+ if possible.
+
2002-04-08 Dan Winship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* component-factory.c (create_view): Add view_info arg but don't
Index: my-evolution/e-summary-mail.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/evolution/my-evolution/e-summary-mail.c,v
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -u -r1.37 e-summary-mail.c
--- my-evolution/e-summary-mail.c 4 Apr 2002 12:10:36 - 1.37
+++ my-evolution/e-summary-mail.c 16 Apr 2002 23:29:29 -
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
GHashTable *folders;
#endif
- GList *shown;
+ /*GList *shown;*/
ESummaryMailMode mode;
char *html;
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@
g_free (s);
g_string_append (string, "");
- for (p = mail->shown; p; p = p->next) {
+ for (p = folder_store->shown; p; p = p->next) {
folder_gen_html (summary, p->data, string);
}
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@
{
/* Only regenerate HTML when it's needed */
e_summary_mail_generate_html (summary);
-
+
if (summary->mail == NULL) {
return NULL;
}
@@ -216,11 +216,8 @@
GList *p;
/* Don't care about non mail */
- if (strcmp (fold
Re: [Evolution] Feature Request: IMAP Folders on the Summary page
On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 15:40, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 06:22, Alec Edworthy wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Would it be possible to allow the adding of IMAP folders onto the > > Summary page like you can add normal folders now? > > This is implemented on the unstable version on CVS. Well, sort of. While if you were to edit the file by hand it would be possible, the gui isn't in place yet for it. iain -- "No offence to them, but forty years from now, who's going to remember the Chemical Brothers?" - Steve Vai ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] contact list problems
Bobby, Yes, there are some reports in http://bugzilla.ximian.com on this. Gerardo Marín On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 13:50, Bobby wrote: > Hi! > > I've been having an odd issue with Evolution's contact list and the > 2.5.x development kernels in linux. has anyone else had this? > > i fire up evo 1.0.3 under a 2.5.8 kernel and when I either click on > "Contacts" or start to type in any recipient field on a new message (or > reply or forward, for that matter), evo locks up and i have to killev > it. I'm running 2.4.19-pre2 and evo works just fine. > > is this a known issue? i searched through the list archives but could > not find any other mention of this issue... > > thanks! > -- > c'est tout. > > ___ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] contact list problems
Hi! I've been having an odd issue with Evolution's contact list and the 2.5.x development kernels in linux. has anyone else had this? i fire up evo 1.0.3 under a 2.5.8 kernel and when I either click on "Contacts" or start to type in any recipient field on a new message (or reply or forward, for that matter), evo locks up and i have to killev it. I'm running 2.4.19-pre2 and evo works just fine. is this a known issue? i searched through the list archives but could not find any other mention of this issue... thanks! -- c'est tout. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] tasks
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 12:29, Marc Williams wrote: > Not sure if this is a usability problem on my part or something I'm > overlooking or a bug. But there's two issues with tasks that I've > found: > > 1) When I complete a task (checkbox) that's been assigned by some other > Evo user, that user (the assigner) isn't notified. I think he should > be. Absolutely correct. In fact we should be offering to send updates when anything is changed in the table view (just changes in the editor do this now). > 2) When I complete a task, I would like that task to be hidden, and not > just crossed out. A la hidden read messages. In the settings you can hide the completed tasks after a number of minutes, hours or days (zero in your case). -JP -- -- === JP Rosevear [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ximian Inc. http://www.ximian.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] evolution-addressbook-export requires display?
On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 19:30, Dan Winship wrote: > On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 12:25, Chris Petersen wrote: > > That's annoying.. tried to run this from an ssh console from work.. Is > > there any way to work around this? > > Nope. Gtk 1.2 requires an X display, even if you're only using it for > the object system and not creating any widgets. That's fixed in glib/gtk > 2.0. > well, actually calling gtk_type_init instead of gtk_init does not require a X display. cheers -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.gnome-db.org/ - http://www.ximian.com/ ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Tools/Special Folders: RFE
We need a trailer... I'm thinking: - A closeup of Radek in shades - someone chasing danw - explosions - Nat soaring through the air - Coopers - "we need guns, lots of guns" - Ettore with his head shaved? - "whoa" - Miguel in one of his dramatic poses and then of course: "Evolution 1.2 comming this summer to theatres everywhere." Jeff On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 13:52, Dan Winship wrote: > On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 13:32, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > Now the age old question.. > > > > When is it coming out? > > "Summer" > > -- Dan > > > ___ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] POP, SSH port-forwarding, and deletes
While this is all quite true (and one of the main reasons I use IMAP instead of POP3), Netscape has implemented this using what they call 'compacting' folders. If anyone has used the Netscape Messenger using POP3, they will notice (if they pay any attention whatsoever) that messages are not actually DELETED (even from the local store) until you issue a 'compact folders' command. You will not SEE them, but your local (or remote) message store will get HUGE unless you periodically compact the folder. Of course, this doesn't help solve anyone's problem, but ... :-) dg Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: >Oh. You can't in Evolution, there was just a question about this >actually a few days ago. To sum up: > >There aren't any plans to implement it that i'm aware of. Mainly as >we'd need some mechanism to implement it without breaking through >abstraction layers. Its probably not that hard to do, but nobody's >given it enough thought. Any reasonable patches will be considered ... > >>POP was never really designed for leaving mail on the server at all, >> >let > >>alone keeping an index of all messages, and then comparing how long >>they've been in the cache or the timestamp in the header to determine >> >if > >>they should be deleted. Yes other mailers have pulled off this hack, >>but it's really just better to use IMAP if users plan to leave the >> >mail > >>on the server at all. >> > >This is so true. Its called Post _OFFICE_ Protocol for a reason. You >dont file and store your mail at your postoffice postbox (if you have >one), you just pick it up there. > >Jeff > >On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 12:35, Ian Forde wrote: > >>The problem is that I've found that if I uncheck "Leave Mail on Server", >>it'll download all the mail from the server and remove it all from the >>server. Thus, the only place my mail store will be is on my laptop... >>This I've verified from the stream of DELE commands going to the server >>(from watching sniffer dumps). >> >>How do I get it to only remove messages on the server when they're >>removed locally, yet maintain the message store on the server? >> >> -I >> >> Tue, 2002-04-16 at 08:46, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: >> >>>Ian, >>> >>>I'm not sure I understand. You have "leave-mail-on-server" checked, >>>right? That means that you don't want Evolution to delete mail from the >>>server. That is why it's not performing a DELE for the messages. If you >>>want it to DELE the messages, you have to turn off keep-mail-on-server. >>> >>>Jeff >>> >>>On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 00:24, Ian Forde wrote: >>> Hi all - I'm new to the list, though I've been using Evolution for well over a year now. I'm having a problem using Evolution with a POP account in that it won't delete any messages. Here's the setup: My machine: Linux Laptop (RH7.2, evolution1.0.3.99-various-snapshots-usually-the-latest-though-this-problem-has-persisted) I don't control the mailserver, and it's running Qpopper 4.0.3, with no APOP support. Thus, I port-forward over an ssh connection: ssh -2 -L 4510:mailhost:25 -L 4500:mailhost:110 me@mailhost So I point Evolution at that mailhost:4500 for receiving mail and mailhost:4510 for sending mail. I've turned on the "Leave messages on server" option, since unchecking that one sucks the mail off of the server and leaves me with no mail the when I'm done. (Sometimes I travel without my laptop and like to use pine.) So when I "empty trash" and "expunge" the messages leave my "Local Folders" but still stay on the server anyway. I've sniffed the connection and watched message downloads, but at no time has Evolution performed a "message delete" operation. Could the fact that evo sees this account as a "local folder" be relevant here? And just to be sure... Mozilla mail works fine in this regard, so it's not the server. (Evo is a better, nicer-looking email client, supports gpg/pgp, and doesn't die when my browser crashes, which is why I'm using it...) Any help here would be appreciated! Thanks! -Ian -- Ian Forde, RHCE, SCSA, SCNA, SCDME, CCSA CYTBeN, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>-- >> >> Ian Forde, RHCE, SCSA, SCNA, SCDME, CCSA >> CYTBeN, Inc. >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >___ >evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > -- David G. Simmons SCORPIO (Oct 23 - Nov 21) You are shrewd in business and cannot be trusted. You will achieve the pinnacle of success because of your total lack of ethics. Most Scorpio people are murdered.
Re: [Evolution] Tools/Special Folders: RFE
On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 13:32, Larry Rosenman wrote: > Now the age old question.. > > When is it coming out? "Summer" -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] POP, SSH port-forwarding, and deletes
Which, of course, is the behavior I had gotten used to from Netscape. So, when moving to Evolution, upon seeing the "Expunge" menu option, I had (apparently mistakenly) assumed the same functionality. Apparently that's only true for IMAP... bummer... now to convince someone to install imapd... Is this an often-requested feature? Or am I in an unusual situation? I'm guessing that the recommended solution would be to install imapd... -Ian On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 10:45, David G. Simmons wrote: > > While this is all quite true (and one of the main reasons I use IMAP > instead of POP3), Netscape has implemented this using what they call > 'compacting' folders. If anyone has used the Netscape Messenger using > POP3, they will notice (if they pay any attention whatsoever) that > messages are not actually DELETED (even from the local store) until you > issue a 'compact folders' command. You will not SEE them, but your local > (or remote) message store will get HUGE unless you periodically compact > the folder. > > Of course, this doesn't help solve anyone's problem, but ... :-) > > dg > > Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > >Oh. You can't in Evolution, there was just a question about this > >actually a few days ago. To sum up: > > > >There aren't any plans to implement it that i'm aware of. Mainly as > >we'd need some mechanism to implement it without breaking through > >abstraction layers. Its probably not that hard to do, but nobody's > >given it enough thought. Any reasonable patches will be considered ... > > > >>POP was never really designed for leaving mail on the server at all, > >> > >let > > > >>alone keeping an index of all messages, and then comparing how long > >>they've been in the cache or the timestamp in the header to determine > >> > >if > > > >>they should be deleted. Yes other mailers have pulled off this hack, > >>but it's really just better to use IMAP if users plan to leave the > >> > >mail > > > >>on the server at all. > >> > > > >This is so true. Its called Post _OFFICE_ Protocol for a reason. You > >dont file and store your mail at your postoffice postbox (if you have > >one), you just pick it up there. > > > >Jeff > > > >On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 12:35, Ian Forde wrote: > > > >>The problem is that I've found that if I uncheck "Leave Mail on Server", > >>it'll download all the mail from the server and remove it all from the > >>server. Thus, the only place my mail store will be is on my laptop... > >>This I've verified from the stream of DELE commands going to the server > >>(from watching sniffer dumps). > >> > >>How do I get it to only remove messages on the server when they're > >>removed locally, yet maintain the message store on the server? > >> > >>-I > >> > >> Tue, 2002-04-16 at 08:46, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > >> > >>>Ian, > >>> > >>>I'm not sure I understand. You have "leave-mail-on-server" checked, > >>>right? That means that you don't want Evolution to delete mail from the > >>>server. That is why it's not performing a DELE for the messages. If you > >>>want it to DELE the messages, you have to turn off keep-mail-on-server . > >>> > >>>Jeff > >>> > >>>On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 00:24, Ian Forde wrote: > >>> > Hi all - I'm new to the list, though I've been using Evolution for well > over a year now. I'm having a problem using Evolution with a POP > account in that it won't delete any messages. Here's the setup: > > My machine: Linux Laptop (RH7.2, > >evolution1.0.3.99-various-snapshots-usually-the-latest-though-this-problem-has-persisted) > > I don't control the mailserver, and it's running Qpopper 4.0.3, with no > APOP support. Thus, I port-forward over an ssh connection: > > ssh -2 -L 4510:mailhost:25 -L 4500:mailhost:110 me@mailhost > > So I point Evolution at that mailhost:4500 for receiving mail and > mailhost:4510 for sending mail. I've turned on the "Leave messages on > server" option, since unchecking that one sucks the mail off of the > server and leaves me with no mail the when I'm done. (Sometimes I > travel without my laptop and like to use pine.) > > So when I "empty trash" and "expunge" the messages leave my "Local > Folders" but still stay on the server anyway. I've sniffed the > connection and watched message downloads, but at no time has Evolution > performed a "message delete" operation. > > Could the fact that evo sees this account as a "local folder" be > relevant here? And just to be sure... Mozilla mail works fine in this > regard, so it's not the server. (Evo is a better, nicer-looking email > client, supports gpg/pgp, and doesn't die when my browser crashes, which > is why I'm using it...) > > Any help here would be appreciated! > > Thanks! > -Ian > -- > > Ian Forde, RHCE, SCSA, SCNA, SCD
[Evolution] Is there a command-line switch to send/receive on startup?
Is there a command-line switch to send/receive on startup? Just want to make korn work better... ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] evolution-addressbook-export requires display?
On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 12:25, Chris Petersen wrote: > That's annoying.. tried to run this from an ssh console from work.. Is > there any way to work around this? Nope. Gtk 1.2 requires an X display, even if you're only using it for the object system and not creating any widgets. That's fixed in glib/gtk 2.0. -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Tools/Special Folders: RFE
Now the age old question.. When is it coming out? On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 12:29, Dan Winship wrote: > On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 21:20, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > > Can the FULL path of the "Special" folders be put in the tabs in the > > account editor? > > > > I.E. If I have the SENT folder set to imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/SENT > > show this some how? > > This is fixed in 1.2 and since I happen to have a screenshot of it, I'll > just include it here: > > > > -- Dan -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Tools/Special Folders: RFE
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 21:20, Larry Rosenman wrote: > Can the FULL path of the "Special" folders be put in the tabs in the > account editor? > > I.E. If I have the SENT folder set to imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/SENT > show this some how? This is fixed in 1.2 and since I happen to have a screenshot of it, I'll just include it here: -- Dan
Re: [Evolution] POP, SSH port-forwarding, and deletes
Oh. You can't in Evolution, there was just a question about this actually a few days ago. To sum up: There aren't any plans to implement it that i'm aware of. Mainly as we'd need some mechanism to implement it without breaking through abstraction layers. Its probably not that hard to do, but nobody's given it enough thought. Any reasonable patches will be considered ... > POP was never really designed for leaving mail on the server at all, let > alone keeping an index of all messages, and then comparing how long > they've been in the cache or the timestamp in the header to determine if > they should be deleted. Yes other mailers have pulled off this hack, > but it's really just better to use IMAP if users plan to leave the mail > on the server at all. This is so true. Its called Post _OFFICE_ Protocol for a reason. You dont file and store your mail at your postoffice postbox (if you have one), you just pick it up there. Jeff On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 12:35, Ian Forde wrote: > The problem is that I've found that if I uncheck "Leave Mail on Server", > it'll download all the mail from the server and remove it all from the > server. Thus, the only place my mail store will be is on my laptop... > This I've verified from the stream of DELE commands going to the server > (from watching sniffer dumps). > > How do I get it to only remove messages on the server when they're > removed locally, yet maintain the message store on the server? > > -I > > Tue, 2002-04-16 at 08:46, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > Ian, > > > > I'm not sure I understand. You have "leave-mail-on-server" checked, > > right? That means that you don't want Evolution to delete mail from the > > server. That is why it's not performing a DELE for the messages. If you > > want it to DELE the messages, you have to turn off keep-mail-on-server. > > > > Jeff > > > > On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 00:24, Ian Forde wrote: > > > Hi all - I'm new to the list, though I've been using Evolution for well > > > over a year now. I'm having a problem using Evolution with a POP > > > account in that it won't delete any messages. Here's the setup: > > > > > > My machine: Linux Laptop (RH7.2, > > > >evolution1.0.3.99-various-snapshots-usually-the-latest-though-this-problem-has-persisted) > > > > > > I don't control the mailserver, and it's running Qpopper 4.0.3, with no > > > APOP support. Thus, I port-forward over an ssh connection: > > > > > > ssh -2 -L 4510:mailhost:25 -L 4500:mailhost:110 me@mailhost > > > > > > So I point Evolution at that mailhost:4500 for receiving mail and > > > mailhost:4510 for sending mail. I've turned on the "Leave messages on > > > server" option, since unchecking that one sucks the mail off of the > > > server and leaves me with no mail the when I'm done. (Sometimes I > > > travel without my laptop and like to use pine.) > > > > > > So when I "empty trash" and "expunge" the messages leave my "Local > > > Folders" but still stay on the server anyway. I've sniffed the > > > connection and watched message downloads, but at no time has Evolution > > > performed a "message delete" operation. > > > > > > Could the fact that evo sees this account as a "local folder" be > > > relevant here? And just to be sure... Mozilla mail works fine in this > > > regard, so it's not the server. (Evo is a better, nicer-looking email > > > client, supports gpg/pgp, and doesn't die when my browser crashes, which > > > is why I'm using it...) > > > > > > Any help here would be appreciated! > > > > > > Thanks! > > > -Ian > > > -- > > > > > >Ian Forde, RHCE, SCSA, SCNA, SCDME, CCSA > > >CYTBeN, Inc. > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- > >Ian Forde, RHCE, SCSA, SCNA, SCDME, CCSA >CYTBeN, Inc. >[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] POP, SSH port-forwarding, and deletes
The problem is that I've found that if I uncheck "Leave Mail on Server", it'll download all the mail from the server and remove it all from the server. Thus, the only place my mail store will be is on my laptop... This I've verified from the stream of DELE commands going to the server (from watching sniffer dumps). How do I get it to only remove messages on the server when they're removed locally, yet maintain the message store on the server? -I Tue, 2002-04-16 at 08:46, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > Ian, > > I'm not sure I understand. You have "leave-mail-on-server" checked, > right? That means that you don't want Evolution to delete mail from the > server. That is why it's not performing a DELE for the messages. If you > want it to DELE the messages, you have to turn off keep-mail-on-server. > > Jeff > > On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 00:24, Ian Forde wrote: > > Hi all - I'm new to the list, though I've been using Evolution for well > > over a year now. I'm having a problem using Evolution with a POP > > account in that it won't delete any messages. Here's the setup: > > > > My machine: Linux Laptop (RH7.2, > > >evolution1.0.3.99-various-snapshots-usually-the-latest-though-this-problem-has-persisted) > > > > I don't control the mailserver, and it's running Qpopper 4.0.3, with no > > APOP support. Thus, I port-forward over an ssh connection: > > > > ssh -2 -L 4510:mailhost:25 -L 4500:mailhost:110 me@mailhost > > > > So I point Evolution at that mailhost:4500 for receiving mail and > > mailhost:4510 for sending mail. I've turned on the "Leave messages on > > server" option, since unchecking that one sucks the mail off of the > > server and leaves me with no mail the when I'm done. (Sometimes I > > travel without my laptop and like to use pine.) > > > > So when I "empty trash" and "expunge" the messages leave my "Local > > Folders" but still stay on the server anyway. I've sniffed the > > connection and watched message downloads, but at no time has Evolution > > performed a "message delete" operation. > > > > Could the fact that evo sees this account as a "local folder" be > > relevant here? And just to be sure... Mozilla mail works fine in this > > regard, so it's not the server. (Evo is a better, nicer-looking email > > client, supports gpg/pgp, and doesn't die when my browser crashes, which > > is why I'm using it...) > > > > Any help here would be appreciated! > > > > Thanks! > > -Ian > > -- > > > >Ian Forde, RHCE, SCSA, SCNA, SCDME, CCSA > >CYTBeN, Inc. > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Ian Forde, RHCE, SCSA, SCNA, SCDME, CCSA CYTBeN, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Evolution] evolution-addressbook-export requires display?
That's annoying.. tried to run this from an ssh console from work.. Is there any way to work around this? (I'm just being mildly naiive and assuming that if it can't find a screen it won't run well from a cron task or called with `` from a bash/perl script). -Chris ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] POP, SSH port-forwarding, and deletes
Ian, I'm not sure I understand. You have "leave-mail-on-server" checked, right? That means that you don't want Evolution to delete mail from the server. That is why it's not performing a DELE for the messages. If you want it to DELE the messages, you have to turn off keep-mail-on-server. Jeff On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 00:24, Ian Forde wrote: > Hi all - I'm new to the list, though I've been using Evolution for well > over a year now. I'm having a problem using Evolution with a POP > account in that it won't delete any messages. Here's the setup: > > My machine: Linux Laptop (RH7.2, > >evolution1.0.3.99-various-snapshots-usually-the-latest-though-this-problem-has-persisted) > > I don't control the mailserver, and it's running Qpopper 4.0.3, with no > APOP support. Thus, I port-forward over an ssh connection: > > ssh -2 -L 4510:mailhost:25 -L 4500:mailhost:110 me@mailhost > > So I point Evolution at that mailhost:4500 for receiving mail and > mailhost:4510 for sending mail. I've turned on the "Leave messages on > server" option, since unchecking that one sucks the mail off of the > server and leaves me with no mail the when I'm done. (Sometimes I > travel without my laptop and like to use pine.) > > So when I "empty trash" and "expunge" the messages leave my "Local > Folders" but still stay on the server anyway. I've sniffed the > connection and watched message downloads, but at no time has Evolution > performed a "message delete" operation. > > Could the fact that evo sees this account as a "local folder" be > relevant here? And just to be sure... Mozilla mail works fine in this > regard, so it's not the server. (Evo is a better, nicer-looking email > client, supports gpg/pgp, and doesn't die when my browser crashes, which > is why I'm using it...) > > Any help here would be appreciated! > > Thanks! > -Ian > -- > >Ian Forde, RHCE, SCSA, SCNA, SCDME, CCSA >CYTBeN, Inc. >[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Feature Request: IMAP Folders on the Summary page
GREAT! Now if I can just get filters to work in any manner at all, I'll never have to see mailing list mail before I make the effort to go see it. Something about that bold type and the number telling me how many are new just makes me _have_ to go check out those messages. :) Chris Tooley On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 09:40, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 06:22, Alec Edworthy wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Would it be possible to allow the adding of IMAP folders onto the > > Summary page like you can add normal folders now? > > This is implemented on the unstable version on CVS. > > -- > Ettore > > ___ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Feature Request: IMAP Folders on the Summary page
On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 06:22, Alec Edworthy wrote: > Hi, > > Would it be possible to allow the adding of IMAP folders onto the > Summary page like you can add normal folders now? This is implemented on the unstable version on CVS. -- Ettore ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Feature Request: IMAP Folders on the Summary page
On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 05:22, Alec Edworthy wrote: > Hi, > > Would it be possible to allow the adding of IMAP folders onto the > Summary page like you can add normal folders now? Please? ME TOO -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Feature Request: IMAP Folders on the Summary page
Hi, Would it be possible to allow the adding of IMAP folders onto the Summary page like you can add normal folders now? Thanks, Alec ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] "Mark all as Read" - Query.
On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 07:41, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote: > On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 22:55, Michael-John Anthony wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:51, Not Zed wrote: > > > Ahh, if we had a scripting interface, you could do it yourself ... > > > > I wish I could. It took me about 1/2 an hour to go through all mail > > folders (about 70 odd folders in total) and make them all look as if the > > messages contained within were all read. Which was the case *before* I > > imported them into Evo. > > create a vfolder that has all local folders as it's source and status > unread. Go to the vfolder and select all and then mark as read. Hey, now there's some innovative thinking. I just might try that next time I'm importing mail (from pine that is). Now, can we have that as a menu item under "Edit"? :) -- Michael-John. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
