[Evolution-hackers] RFC 2445 libical
My original point: RFC 2445 states that the FREEBUSY times _should_ not must be in sorted order start,end. Evolution doesn't seem to sort but rather gives it back in creation order, any body got problems with that? Ok I looked through the code last night and came to the conclusion the best or right way to fix this is in libical. Question: will evolution use it's own libical, or are you going to use the new libical when it comes out? If you use and maintain your own version then we have to fix it there. Otherwise we have to talk to the people from the libical project, they may even have fixed the problem. I haven't looked at the cvs version. It can also be fixed in a not so clean way by creation the vfb calendar component and then extracting and removing the freebusy properties and putting them back in sorted order, will be a little slower :-). Or by rewriting some function and api's in pcs cal-backend-file to collect the properties in a sorted glist before putting them into the icalcomponent, not very clean but workable. Comments? Ronald PS. I will take a look at the cvs libical when I have time and let you know. ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution] [v1.0.8]: empty trash on exit does not work?
hy, running redhat 7.3 with evo 1.0.8 here and checked in evo's mailoptions empty trash on exit. when i now delete a message it gets crossed out and appears in the trash-folder - so far, so good. problem: when i exit evo and restart it again (even if i have logged out an in meanwhile) and i first go into the trash folder, the messages seem to be delete. but if i then go to the folder where the message used to be, it is still there - crossed out. returning to the trash folder the message is here back again also. bug? already fixed in the dev-version? tobias ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Message Headers
lol ... what resolution are you running that makes those 6 lines so important? 1024x768 and sometimes at 1280x960. Not that it matters anyway, removal of headers from e-mail displaying is a feature in every mailer out there, good, and even bad ones. Well its not a feature of evolution, and its a mailer. So its obviuosly not in every mailer is it? I can't recall it being a feature of elm either. :-) That's a fallacy and you know it. Let's set back the corporate world to 10 corporations, all CEO's sign up one their accounts and say: This is the normal procedure. Then one gets up and says No it's not, there's one of us who doesn't, so, that's acceptable. Oh, by the way, that one is me We can have it two ways : Elm Evolution, standing proud. Evolution, Mozilla, Outlook, etc ... What if i don't even want to see any header ? Headers are already in the message browser, why should they be repeated redundantly in my message display, which, as the name would imply, is for *message* display ... ? Pretty much, apparently, every e-mail app author companies deem those 6 lines important, from Mozilla to Outlook, perhaps they are all wrong providing that basic feature to the user; i myself do not believe they are. whatever you reckon mate I just think the Mozilla guys and MS aren't wrong :). I don't think that's silly, or worthy of Whatever..., i could easily take the Well, we like it this way, so you'll just have to deal with it or the At this point we don't really have the time to do it. Those would be counter arguments. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] upgrading
Hi, I am new to this list. I use RHL7.2 with Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 . I am upgrading to RHL7.3. Could any one point me the procedure to import my mails/contacts/filters/virtual folders from my earlier Evolution to the current. The intelligent exporter doesnt detect my old settings. Is importing one folder at a time is the only solution. Any pointer / help appreciated. Thanks and Regards Balaji ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Saving Drafts : Is this a bug ?
.Procedure: Create e-mail, or simply reply, save draft, then immediately close the window. .Result: Even though it was unchanged and saved, it asks you again to save it. Furthermore - it saves it as a new draft, creating a duplicate message. .Expected result: Not ask to save when document is unchanged - Check changes. When actually saving, updating the draft, not creating a duplicate. -- Is this a bug ? Maybe it's fixed in the dev versions ? ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Re: Note system in Evolution
That would be nice if I didn't get a cannot update object every time I tried creating a task. (Yes I have filed a bugzilla) What version of Evo are you using, Richard? What Platform? Are these categories supplied with the version you have? /anton Subject: Re: [Evolution] Note system in Evolution From: Richard Bemrose [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Carlos 'Fjrb' Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Evolution Users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 13 Aug 2002 14:52:07 +0100 Hi, On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 13:55, Carlos 'Fjrb' Almeida wrote: Is there any chance there'll ever be a, small as it might be, system of keeping small notes, sticky notes, etc ... ? It'd be very nice to have something available to record occasional ideas and thoughts as well as comments, and have it integrated with the rest of the events instead of simply having to fire up Gedit or something. Have you tried the Ideas or Goals/Objectives categories of the Tasks function? ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] RPMS for Palm m500 series
I've built a set of rpms for RH7.3 with Ximian (up to date) with a recent pilot-link package that supports the m500 and friends correctly over USB. The evolution package also supports LDAP (untested - and it uses the system dynamic LDAP libraries unlike the Ximian package) and SSL. All the evo functionality I use works OK - ie a large imap over SSL folder tree and SMTP to send). Packages are at ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/evolution_with_newpalm/rpms/ Source packages are also available (at ../sources ) The pilot-link package is the RH rawhide 0.11.2 package updated for 0.11.3 The gnome-pilot gnome-pilot-conduits package is the Ximian RH73 one rebuilt for the new pilot-link (with as few other changes as I could get away with). The evolution package is the RH rawhide package, modified with the compile settings from the Ximian RH73 package. The RH package was used because it has fewer external build requirements than the Ximian one, specifically it does not need external static packages for db3 and openldap to build. The modifications made to the package build were:- - rehash paths and dependancies for mozilla 1.0.0 (was moz 1.0.1) since this is whats provided by Ximian - link the mozilla nss nspr libraries static (because ximian does not put these in a run time link path) (RH put them in /usr/lib, Ximian put them in /usr/lib/mozilla-1.0.0) - few deps changes because ximian and RH naming conventions are different. Much as I like the Ximian stuff, the evo RPM build is a mess since it requires that a lot of undocumented stuff is put on the build machine). Many thanks to frb (of ximian) who answered a number of dumb questions on IRC whilst I was building this. Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] [v1.0.8]: empty trash on exit does not work?
known issue not fixed yet workaround: take a few seconds from your life and hit empty trash manually On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 20:05, Tobias Schleinkofer wrote: hy, running redhat 7.3 with evo 1.0.8 here and checked in evo's mailoptions empty trash on exit. when i now delete a message it gets crossed out and appears in the trash-folder - so far, so good. problem: when i exit evo and restart it again (even if i have logged out an in meanwhile) and i first go into the trash folder, the messages seem to be delete. but if i then go to the folder where the message used to be, it is still there - crossed out. returning to the trash folder the message is here back again also. bug? already fixed in the dev-version? tobias ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Acceptable UI speed?
I thought that was a bug in OAF and they fixed it? On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 05:45, Not Zed wrote: usually the composer coming up slow is an oaf problem, that is often solved by: - log out - login to console as root - rm -rf /tmp/orbit-* - login normally, and run 'oaf-slay' first On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 07:24, Greg Macek wrote: What's a good measure of Evolution's UI responsiveness? A friend of mine just started using it and mentioned that the Compose window is slow in coming to the screen (on new messages or replies). I've attributed some of my own experience with that to having 10+ programs/windows open at all times. My avg window response is usually under a sec, sometimes closer to 2 sec. Is this normal? PIII/600 notebook 512MB RAM, SuSE 7.3 Pro. My initial thought was that it's a GTK issue, not Evo's fault. Any ideas? - Greg ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] 8/5 snapshot: one dead account blocks another'soutbounds
sounds good to me. On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 09:55, Kenneth Porter wrote: On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 02:48, Not Zed wrote: Personally i disagree, if yfou want this, install a local smpt server and have it handle this. If you're gonna impose that constraint, then you might as well take out per-account send servers and force the user to use only a single SMTP server for all outbounds. If you're going to allow per-account send servers, then one downed account shouldn't bring down all the others. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] ldap problems
Hi, when i add an ldap server and apply, there is no entry in the folderlist. when i restart evo the ldap entry is gone. when i look at addressbook-sources.xml, my server is there. any idea thanks tom -- byte.box - matzken rupp gbr frankfurter strasse 135 - 63303 dreieich fon: 07000.bytebox - fax: 06103.310369.1 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.bytebox.de ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Filter Feature
I sent this once before but the List Manager said it was too big and not delivered ( so if you get this twice sorry ) ... I cut the image size down a bit I just got another one ... I attached a screen shot .. I am not crazy ... really ... :) I will start leaving the mail on the server so I can take a look at the header before Evo sees it ... On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 08:49, Tom wrote: me to ... yet in Evo under the date field it shows as a '?' On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 05:51, Not Zed wrote: looks like a valid date to me. On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 23:09, Tom wrote: These are the headers from one of the emails ...The next time I get one in I will look at it on the server before I trash it but I see a date ... unless there is a Date header missing that I am not aware of. Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 17788 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2002 09:18:57 - Received: from mta04bw.bigpond.com (139.134.6.87) by sam.iop.com with SMTP; 11 Aug 2002 09:18:57 - Received: from mx.nstu.ru ([144.135.24.87]) by mta04bw.bigpond.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 mta04bw May 23 2002 23:53:28) with SMTP id H0O9VE00.J5W; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 19:18:50 +1000 Received: from CPE-144-137-100-109.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([144.137.100.109]) by bwmam07.mailsvc.email.bigpond.com(MailRouter V3.0n 56/36761082); 11 Aug 2002 19:18:49 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Amy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Inbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Pick a Winner MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Evolution-Source: pop:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/inbox Date: 11 Aug 2002 11:02:59 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 04:39, Not Zed wrote: On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 01:06, Tom wrote: Like everyone on this list I get a ton of Spam every day ... and a good portion of them have no date .. I am not sure if it is blank or if evo can not figure it out .. but it shows up as a '?' ... Is there a way to create a filter that will catch messages with no valid date? you could try specific header is rule, ho im not sure it would work. or maybe header regex is not ^Date:. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] attachment: 2002_08_14_085213_shot.jpg
Re: [Evolution] Saving Drafts : Is this a bug ?
sounds like a small bug doubt its fixed On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 20:33, Carlos 'Fjrb' Almeida wrote: .Procedure: Create e-mail, or simply reply, save draft, then immediately close the window. .Result: Even though it was unchanged and saved, it asks you again to save it. Furthermore - it saves it as a new draft, creating a duplicate message. .Expected result: Not ask to save when document is unchanged - Check changes. When actually saving, updating the draft, not creating a duplicate. -- Is this a bug ? Maybe it's fixed in the dev versions ? ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Filter Feature
me to ... yet in Evo under the date field it shows as a '?' On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 05:51, Not Zed wrote: looks like a valid date to me. On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 23:09, Tom wrote: These are the headers from one of the emails ...The next time I get one in I will look at it on the server before I trash it but I see a date ... unless there is a Date header missing that I am not aware of. Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 17788 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2002 09:18:57 - Received: from mta04bw.bigpond.com (139.134.6.87) by sam.iop.com with SMTP; 11 Aug 2002 09:18:57 - Received: from mx.nstu.ru ([144.135.24.87]) by mta04bw.bigpond.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 mta04bw May 23 2002 23:53:28) with SMTP id H0O9VE00.J5W; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 19:18:50 +1000 Received: from CPE-144-137-100-109.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([144.137.100.109]) by bwmam07.mailsvc.email.bigpond.com(MailRouter V3.0n 56/36761082); 11 Aug 2002 19:18:49 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Amy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Inbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Pick a Winner MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Evolution-Source: pop:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/inbox Date: 11 Aug 2002 11:02:59 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 04:39, Not Zed wrote: On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 01:06, Tom wrote: Like everyone on this list I get a ton of Spam every day ... and a good portion of them have no date .. I am not sure if it is blank or if evo can not figure it out .. but it shows up as a '?' ... Is there a way to create a filter that will catch messages with no valid date? you could try specific header is rule, ho im not sure it would work. or maybe header regex is not ^Date:. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Summary page mail refresh not working.
Hello there, I am running the latest development snap shot and have been for a while, but 3 days ago when I updated the snapshot my Summary paged stopped working for the E-mail summary, this component will only refresh when evolution starts. Should I submit a bugzilla report or there is something else going on here? Roberto Moral SR. UNIX Systems Administrator signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Summary page mail refresh not working.
Hi Roberto, This is known in bugzilla. BTW it seems to work in latest snaps. On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 11:01, Roberto Moral wrote: Hello there, I am running the latest development snap shot and have been for a while, but 3 days ago when I updated the snapshot my Summary paged stopped working for the E-mail summary, this component will only refresh when evolution starts. Should I submit a bugzilla report or there is something else going on here? Roberto Moral SR. UNIX Systems Administrator Gerardo Marin Ximian Evolution Bugmaster ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] upgrading
ons, 2002-08-14 kl. 13:05 skrev Balaji N: I am new to this list. Could any one point me the procedure to import my mails/contacts/filters/virtual folders from my earlier Evolution to the current. The intelligent exporter doesnt detect my old settings. Is importing one folder at a time is the only solution. Red Hat 7.2 with *many* updates, a lot of them self-compiled, Evo not. I don't remember how I originally installed Evo 1.0.0 on Red Hat 7.1. I think with Red Carpet. I've never heard about the Intelligent Exporter. I'm on 1.0.8 at the moment, and with a machine 2 generations later. But I've found that (having cpiod the data directory from machine to machine and installing the basic rpm and the necessary supporting libs has never given me trouble - 1.0.0 - 1.0.2 - 1.0.5 - 1.0.8. Just 'rpm -Fvh --nodeps --force' if it doesn't want to work at first and wonder if you're killing your machine while you're doing it. I never have yet :-) Best, Tony -- Tony Earnshaw The usefulness of RTFM is vastly overrated. e-post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www:http://www.billy.demon.nl gpg public key: http://www.billy.demon.nl/tonni.armor Telefoon: (+31) (0)172 530428 Mobiel: (+31) (0)6 51153356 GPG Fingerprint = 3924 6BF8 A755 DE1A 4AD6 FA2B F7D7 6051 3BE7 B981 3BE7B981 ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] RPMS for Palm m500 series
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 13:30, Nigel Metheringham wrote: I've built a set of rpms for RH7.3 with Ximian (up to date) with a recent pilot-link package that supports the m500 and friends correctly over USB. The evolution package also supports LDAP (untested - and it uses the system dynamic LDAP libraries unlike the Ximian package) and SSL. All the evo functionality I use works OK - ie a large imap over SSL folder tree and SMTP to send). Somehow it appears that the e_address conduit shared object is dynamically linked against the mozilla nss/nspr stuff, which isn't on the ld.so search list, thus it fails to load. The other conduits are OK. I'll see if I can work out what on earth its doing there and issue a fixed version. Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Summary page mail refresh not working.
Hi Gerardo, I am running the latest snapshot.. evolution-1.1.0.99-snap.ximian.200208141002 I guess I'll wait till tomorrow's snapshot. On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 12:08, Gerardo Marin wrote: Hi Roberto, This is known in bugzilla. BTW it seems to work in latest snaps. On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 11:01, Roberto Moral wrote: Hello there, I am running the latest development snap shot and have been for a while, but 3 days ago when I updated the snapshot my Summary paged stopped working for the E-mail summary, this component will only refresh when evolution starts. Should I submit a bugzilla report or there is something else going on here? Roberto Moral SR. UNIX Systems Administrator Gerardo Marin Ximian Evolution Bugmaster ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution Roberto Moral SR. UNIX Systems Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 609-514-8513 | cell: 609-346-5601 Quantiva, inc. 100 Village Blvd. 3rd Floor Princeton, NJ 08540 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] LDAP Address Book Setup
I have to agree. ldap lookups work for me, but it's schetchy. The only real reason why I want to have an ldap source configured is because I'd like to have it autocomplete. Netscape 4.x/Mozilla/Netscape 6.x both do this from ldap sources very nicely. We don't use Exchange/Outlook here, but the look/feel features of Evo are much nicer than any other Gnome email client, so that's why I use it. With more than 4000 people here, and email addresses being [EMAIL PROTECTED] it's a big pain to have to memorize addresses. On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 12:23, Tony Earnshaw wrote: ons, 2002-08-14 kl. 12:40 skrev Tong Eng Chiah: i'm using it. works fine. No it doesn't! Even if people do as you say. 1: There's no ldaps possibility (e.g. one can change the port, but not the service/protocol and TLS certificate verification); 2: and there's no Address list possibility - as there is in disk-based Evo Contacts - even given that you're using ldap objectClass EvolutionPerson and evolutionPersonList on your ldap server, which only source people know about anyway, because the binary rpm people - like me - don't even *know* about the Evolution schema. Without being told by people like Adam Williams. just need to key in the LDAP server hostname and a search base what problems u facing? The above. I have Openldap 2.1.3/Berkeley 4.0 BDB running on my Compaq Presario Evo notebook cum server and do TLS/ldaps for everything that I'm able to. Ditto TLS pop3 and TLS SMTP. Evo falls far short. I know it's being worked on, but nobody should think that 1.x is anywhere near good, yet. Moreover, using your own ldap server as a source for names for your message composer to contacts list needs special ldap indexing on your server. Everything that Evo (my chosen client, since Mozilla 1.0 makes no pretention of ever being an Exchange client contender), doesn't do at the moment, Mozilla 1.0 *does*. Properly. Without being an Exchange client contender, that is. And I'm neither a new Evo user nor Openldap user. Anybody using a LDAP connection as address book? Somehow I have problems to set that up. Posted the problem twice already, but it seems I put a stamp on it that says please ignore :-) I would be really glad if somebody can help me solving the problem. /izzy Didn't see your original posting, Izzy, 'cos I've been away for a while. Best, Tony -- Tony Earnshaw The usefulness of RTFM is vastly overrated. e-post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.billy.demon.nl gpg public key: http://www.billy.demon.nl/tonni.armor Telefoon: (+31) (0)172 530428 Mobiel: (+31) (0)6 51153356 GPG Fingerprint = 3924 6BF8 A755 DE1A 4AD6 FA2B F7D7 6051 3BE7 B981 3BE7B981 ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Sean M. Alderman ITRACK Systems Analyst PACE/NCI - NASA Glenn Research Center (216) 433-2795 Calling a windowed operating system Windows is like naming an automobile Wheels. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] gnome-pilot 1.65 and evolution 1.0.8 problem
I'm running the above packages on a debian box. gnome-pilot-0.1.65 is
being linked against...
libpisock.so.5 = /usr/lib/libpisock.so.5 (0x406dd000)
, while evolution's conduits are linked against...
libpisock.so.8 = /usr/lib/libpisock.so.8 (0x403a7000)
What is happening is that if I add a calendar event into evolution, then
sync with my pilot, the event gets added with no text. This is strictly
annoying. My debian packages are as follows for libpisock.
ii libpisock5 0.10.99-6 Libraries for communicating with a PalmOS PD
ii libpisock8 0.11.3-2 Libraries for communicating with a PalmOS PD
So, I tried to rebuild gnome-pilot-0.1.65 from source, hoping to have it
link against libpisock8. I get the below errors
gcc -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -g
-DGNOMELOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -o .libs/gpilotd
gnome-pilot-common.o gnome-pilot-skels.o gnome-pilot-stubs.o gpilotd.o
manager.o queue_io.o orbit_daemon_glue.o gnome-pilot-structures.o
gpilot-gui.o -rdynamic -rdynamic -rdynamic -rdynamic
-Wl,--export-dynamic ./.libs/libgpilotdconduit.so
../libgpilotdCM/.libs/libgpilotdcm.so -L/usr/lib -lm -lm
-L/usr/X11R6/lib -lm -lz -lm -lz -lm -lm -lm -lm -ldb-3 -lz -lz -lz -ldl
-ldl /usr/lib/libgnorba.so -lm -lm -lm -lz -lm -lm
/usr/lib/libgnomeui.so -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -ldb-3 -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11
-lm -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm -ldl -ldl -lXi
-lXext -lX11 -lm -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm
-ldl -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm -lz -lm /usr/lib/libart_lgpl.so -lm
/usr/lib/libgdk_imlib.so -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm -lSM -lICE -ldl -lXi
-lXext -lX11 -lm -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm -ldl -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11
/usr/lib/libgnome.so -lm -lz -lm /usr/lib/libgnomesupport.so -lz -lm
/usr/lib/libesd.so -lm /usr/lib/libaudiofile.so -lm -lm -ldb-3
/usr/lib/libgnomevfs.so -ldl -ldl -lm -lm -lm -ldl -lm -lm -lz -lz -lz
-lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -ldl -lm -lm -ldl -lm -ldl -lm -ldl -lm -ldl -lm
-ldl -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm -lrt /usr/lib/libxml.so -lz -lz -lz
/usr/lib/libgconf-gtk-1.so -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11
-lm /usr/lib/libgconf-1.so -lm -ldl /usr/lib/liboaf.so -lm -ldl
/usr/lib/libpopt.so /usr/lib/libORBitCosNaming.so /usr/lib/libORBit.so
-lm /usr/lib/libIIOP.so -lwrap /usr/lib/libORBitutil.so
/usr/lib/libgtk.so -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm /usr/lib/libgdk.so -ldl
-lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm /usr/lib/libgmodule.so -ldl
/usr/lib/libgthread.so /usr/lib/libglib.so -lpthread -ldl
/usr/lib/libpisock.so -lpng -lcrypt -D__LIBTOOL_IS_A_FOOL__
./.libs/libgpilotdconduit.so: undefined reference to `sync_CopyToPilot'
./.libs/libgpilotdconduit.so: undefined reference to `sync_Synchronize'
./.libs/libgpilotdconduit.so: undefined reference to `sync_CopyFromPilot'
./.libs/libgpilotdconduit.so: undefined reference to `sync_MergeToPilot'
./.libs/libgpilotdconduit.so: undefined reference to `sync_MergeFromPilot'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [gpilotd] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/gideon/builds/gnome-pilot-0.1.65/gpilotd'
Can anyone (JP?) help me resolve this annoyance? Is there either a
patch for compiling gnome-pilot 0.1.65 against libpisock8? Or what is
the right answer? Hep!
Thanks.
--
,-//
| Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper :: Numbers 6:22-26
`
| All brontosauruses are thin at one end, much MUCH thicker
| in the middle, and then thin again at the far end. That is
| the theory that I have and which is mine, and what it is too.
,
| bash$ :(){ :|:};:
`--//
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Can Evolution send attachments that are not displayed in thesent-folder?
Hi, I just received a warning of a mailing-list robot, that a message I sent might be infected with a virus. I'm using Evolution 1.0.8 on a RH7.3. The message did not (to my knowledge) contain ANY attachment (it wasn't signed either). Below is the warning I received followed by the full source of the message I sent as I found it in my sent folder -Forwarded Message- From: Daniel B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mertens Bram [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Possible virus deleted Date: 14 Aug 2002 16:50:15 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Everybuddy] Re: msn status incorrect References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is an auto-generated message The email referenced above, which was sent from your address, had a virus-vulnerable attachement (such as .EXE, .VBS, .PIF, etc). This mail server no longer accepts mail with virus-vulnerable attachments and the email has been quarantined. Please try resending your attachment in a safe format such as ZIP. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have any questions === included message === Subject: Re: [Everybuddy] Re: msn status incorrect From: Mertens Bram [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: everybuddy list [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 15 Aug 2002 00:33:14 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Evolution-Transport: smtp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Evolution-Account: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Evolution-Fcc: file:///home/M8ram/evolution/local/Sent X-Evolution-Format: text/plain Hi, The contacts is added to my contacts list CONTACT NAME=Ann DEFAULT_PROTOCOL=MSN LANGUAGE= TRIGGER_TYPE= TRIGGER_ACTION= TRIGGER_PARAM= ACCOUNT MSN NAME=[EMAIL PROTECTED] /ACCOUNT /CONTACT the address isn't @somewhere off course, but it isn't @hotmail or @msn either, but then again, so is my address and my contacts can see me online... Those addresses aren't case-sensitive right? When all the addresses get compared to each other at startup, they're all lower-case... Any other suggestions? BTW Isn't there a way to check a contact's account without opening the contacts file? I can only edit the name, the default protocol and the group a contact belongs to. but when a contact changes e-mail address or ICQ account or whatever, there appears to be no other way than to remove the old entry and replace it by a new one. Am I missing something? TIA On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 19:52, Adam Wolfe Gordon wrote: Make sure that the person is on your contact list. If an unknown user sends you a message, EB won't see them as online until they are added to your contact list. I don't know why this is, and it probably should be fixed, but I've found it to be true. -- #Mertens Bram M8ram [EMAIL PROTECTED]# # Registered [Red Hat] Linux User # 249103 since Octobre 2000 # # http://linux.be | http://www.redhat.com | http://counter.li.org # # Red Hat Linux 7.3 KDE 3.0.0-10 kernel 2.4.18-3 i686 128MB RAM # === included message === -- #Mertens Bram M8ram [EMAIL PROTECTED]# # Registered [Red Hat] Linux User # 249103 since Octobre 2000 # # http://linux.be | http://www.redhat.com | http://counter.li.org # # Red Hat Linux 7.3 KDE 3.0.0-10 kernel 2.4.18-3 i686 128MB RAM # ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] HELP: Newbie setup problem
Hi, Hoping someone has seen this before. I've just installed Evolution 1.0.8 with Connector 1.0.7 on a 2.4.7-10 Linux kernel (the file system started out as a Red Hat 7.2 install). I'm hoping that all these things are compatible. Evolution runs and I am able to view Pop mail accounts just fine. I have been trying now to set up an Exchange account. I have followed the same procedures as others in my company without success. The setup itself, of course, goes fine but when I actually try to connect to the server I get the following message. Error while 'Opening store exchange:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;filter;ad_server=nts-dagon.omegaband.com;enable_ad': Could not connect to Evolution Exchange backend process:Permission denied The only thing that appears to be different from other people's machines that have had success is that I am using a later version of the kernel. I don't know if that could be the source of the problem or if something else could be wrong (I need to be using this particular version of the kernel for other reasons). Anybody have any idea what the issue might be? Thanks. - Miguel -- Miguel R. Corazao Member Technical Staff OmegaBand, Inc. 9020-I Capital of Texas Hwy., Ste 270 Silicon Hills (Austin), TX 78759 Office: (512) 401-8208 x160, Fax: (512) 401-8268 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (http://www.omegaband.com)
Re: [Evolution] Can Evolution send attachments that are notdisplayed in the sent-folder?
are you signing your messages with gpg or something? could be it didn't know what the signature.asc is and reacted accordingly. On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 16:04, Mertens Bram wrote: Hi, I just received a warning of a mailing-list robot, that a message I sent might be infected with a virus. I'm using Evolution 1.0.8 on a RH7.3. The message did not (to my knowledge) contain ANY attachment (it wasn't signed either). Below is the warning I received followed by the full source of the message I sent as I found it in my sent folder -Forwarded Message- From: Daniel B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mertens Bram [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Possible virus deleted Date: 14 Aug 2002 16:50:15 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Everybuddy] Re: msn status incorrect References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is an auto-generated message The email referenced above, which was sent from your address, had a virus-vulnerable attachement (such as .EXE, .VBS, .PIF, etc). This mail server no longer accepts mail with virus-vulnerable attachments and the email has been quarantined. Please try resending your attachment in a safe format such as ZIP. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have any questions === included message === Subject: Re: [Everybuddy] Re: msn status incorrect From: Mertens Bram [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: everybuddy list [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 15 Aug 2002 00:33:14 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Evolution-Transport: smtp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Evolution-Account: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Evolution-Fcc: file:///home/M8ram/evolution/local/Sent X-Evolution-Format: text/plain Hi, The contacts is added to my contacts list CONTACT NAME=Ann DEFAULT_PROTOCOL=MSN LANGUAGE= TRIGGER_TYPE= TRIGGER_ACTION= TRIGGER_PARAM= ACCOUNT MSN NAME=[EMAIL PROTECTED] /ACCOUNT /CONTACT the address isn't @somewhere off course, but it isn't @hotmail or @msn either, but then again, so is my address and my contacts can see me online... Those addresses aren't case-sensitive right? When all the addresses get compared to each other at startup, they're all lower-case... Any other suggestions? BTW Isn't there a way to check a contact's account without opening the contacts file? I can only edit the name, the default protocol and the group a contact belongs to. but when a contact changes e-mail address or ICQ account or whatever, there appears to be no other way than to remove the old entry and replace it by a new one. Am I missing something? TIA On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 19:52, Adam Wolfe Gordon wrote: Make sure that the person is on your contact list. If an unknown user sends you a message, EB won't see them as online until they are added to your contact list. I don't know why this is, and it probably should be fixed, but I've found it to be true. -- #Mertens Bram M8ram [EMAIL PROTECTED]# # Registered [Red Hat] Linux User # 249103 since Octobre 2000 # # http://linux.be | http://www.redhat.com | http://counter.li.org # # Red Hat Linux 7.3 KDE 3.0.0-10 kernel 2.4.18-3 i686 128MB RAM # === included message === -- #Mertens Bram M8ram [EMAIL PROTECTED]# # Registered [Red Hat] Linux User # 249103 since Octobre 2000 # # http://linux.be | http://www.redhat.com | http://counter.li.org # # Red Hat Linux 7.3 KDE 3.0.0-10 kernel 2.4.18-3 i686 128MB RAM # ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://cryptochicken.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Evolution] Spell checking in Evolution using wrong language
Hi, I'm currently running evolution-1.0.8-1.ximian.1.i386.rpm on RH 7.3 I have noticed (ok, my spelling is that rubbish, that someone else pointed it out) that all my spelling corrections are in American, when they should be in English or British ( I reside in the united kingdom). The environment variable $LANG = en_GB.UTF.8 and on individual mails the properties are listed as 'en' for the spelling. The OS was installed English/British (not sure what the installer asks for, but its one of those two) After some reading of man pages and web searching , I have found that gnome-spell (which evo uses) uses aspell for it checking. So as a test I ran aspell (manually from the command line) on some words that I know have been spell checked as American and it corrects them correctly and only offers British suggestions. Is there a way that I can override evo at all? Mark -- --- To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; to steal from many is research. -- --- To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; to steal from many is research. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Can Evolution send attachments that are notdisplayed in the sent-folder?
A lot of virus software works merely on signatures (e.g. checksums) of the content or pattern matches, rather than a full content check. Perhaps the message is just misleading and the software is dumb? As far as i can rmemeber, the message in 'sent' should be what was actually sent. On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 08:34, Mertens Bram wrote: Hi, I just received a warning of a mailing-list robot, that a message I sent might be infected with a virus. I'm using Evolution 1.0.8 on a RH7.3. The message did not (to my knowledge) contain ANY attachment (it wasn't signed either). Below is the warning I received followed by the full source of the message I sent as I found it in my sent folder -Forwarded Message- From: Daniel B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mertens Bram [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Possible virus deleted Date: 14 Aug 2002 16:50:15 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Everybuddy] Re: msn status incorrect References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is an auto-generated message The email referenced above, which was sent from your address, had a virus-vulnerable attachement (such as .EXE, .VBS, .PIF, etc). This mail server no longer accepts mail with virus-vulnerable attachments and the email has been quarantined. Please try resending your attachment in a safe format such as ZIP. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have any questions === included message === Subject: Re: [Everybuddy] Re: msn status incorrect From: Mertens Bram [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: everybuddy list [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 15 Aug 2002 00:33:14 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Evolution-Transport: smtp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Evolution-Account: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Evolution-Fcc: file:///home/M8ram/evolution/local/Sent X-Evolution-Format: text/plain Hi, The contacts is added to my contacts list CONTACT NAME=Ann DEFAULT_PROTOCOL=MSN LANGUAGE= TRIGGER_TYPE= TRIGGER_ACTION= TRIGGER_PARAM= ACCOUNT MSN NAME=[EMAIL PROTECTED] /ACCOUNT /CONTACT the address isn't @somewhere off course, but it isn't @hotmail or @msn either, but then again, so is my address and my contacts can see me online... Those addresses aren't case-sensitive right? When all the addresses get compared to each other at startup, they're all lower-case... Any other suggestions? BTW Isn't there a way to check a contact's account without opening the contacts file? I can only edit the name, the default protocol and the group a contact belongs to. but when a contact changes e-mail address or ICQ account or whatever, there appears to be no other way than to remove the old entry and replace it by a new one. Am I missing something? TIA On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 19:52, Adam Wolfe Gordon wrote: Make sure that the person is on your contact list. If an unknown user sends you a message, EB won't see them as online until they are added to your contact list. I don't know why this is, and it probably should be fixed, but I've found it to be true. -- #Mertens Bram M8ram [EMAIL PROTECTED]# # Registered [Red Hat] Linux User # 249103 since Octobre 2000 # # http://linux.be | http://www.redhat.com | http://counter.li.org # # Red Hat Linux 7.3 KDE 3.0.0-10 kernel 2.4.18-3 i686 128MB RAM # === included message === -- #Mertens Bram M8ram [EMAIL PROTECTED]# # Registered [Red Hat] Linux User # 249103 since Octobre 2000 # # http://linux.be | http://www.redhat.com | http://counter.li.org # # Red Hat Linux 7.3 KDE 3.0.0-10 kernel 2.4.18-3 i686 128MB RAM # ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Send Later actually seems to be a Send Very Soon
fwiw i think this has been removed in 1.2, it was sort of an explicit offline mode thing i guess. On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 10:19, Scott Bronson wrote: Ah, operator error. I'm glad it's an easy answer. :) My previous email program called that exact function Send Later. I didn't even read the rest of the menu to see if there was a more suitable menu item... Thanks! On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 18:42, iain wrote: On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 01:22, Scott Bronson wrote: Well, it happened again. :( This all happened in the last hour: - I started writing a message for LKML - I decided to hang onto it and do some more research first, so I hit Send Later - An hour later, I check LKML and there's the incomplete message that I wanted to send later. And it's no longer in my Outbox. This is what Save to Drafts is for Send Later is Don't send now, send the next time we do a send/receive iain -- Miss Celine Dion sings lovesongs while our cities burn ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] RPMS for Palm m500 series
something to do with camel perhaps? (stab in the dark here, it just rings a bell, camel is used for address parsing). the nss/nspr libs need to be in ld_library_path or ld config anyway On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 02:10, Nigel Metheringham wrote: On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 13:30, Nigel Metheringham wrote: I've built a set of rpms for RH7.3 with Ximian (up to date) with a recent pilot-link package that supports the m500 and friends correctly over USB. The evolution package also supports LDAP (untested - and it uses the system dynamic LDAP libraries unlike the Ximian package) and SSL. All the evo functionality I use works OK - ie a large imap over SSL folder tree and SMTP to send). Somehow it appears that the e_address conduit shared object is dynamically linked against the mozilla nss/nspr stuff, which isn't on the ld.so search list, thus it fails to load. The other conduits are OK. I'll see if I can work out what on earth its doing there and issue a fixed version. Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Send Later actually seems to be a Send Very Soon
On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 14:26, Greg Macek wrote: Are there any plans to incorporate an option to Just receive, or just send? I've seen this option in other mailers (Send/Receive/Send and Not that i know of. Receive). Sometimes it would be nice to just grab mail, esp. if you have an email written up with a large attachment. But then again, I guess that's what the Drafts Folder is for, right? Just getting used to how different programs do things... I suppose you cold use drafts a bit like this. Most people just want to send mail when they send it though, unless your offline when you just want to queue it. On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 08:53, Not Zed wrote: fwiw i think this has been removed in 1.2, it was sort of an explicit offline mode thing i guess. On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 10:19, Scott Bronson wrote: Ah, operator error. I'm glad it's an easy answer. :) My previous email program called that exact function Send Later. I didn't even read the rest of the menu to see if there was a more suitable menu item... Thanks! On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 18:42, iain wrote: On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 01:22, Scott Bronson wrote: Well, it happened again. :( This all happened in the last hour: - I started writing a message for LKML - I decided to hang onto it and do some more research first, so I hit Send Later - An hour later, I check LKML and there's the incomplete message that I wanted to send later. And it's no longer in my Outbox. This is what Save to Drafts is for Send Later is Don't send now, send the next time we do a send/receive iain -- Miss Celine Dion sings lovesongs while our cities burn ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Evolution and SSL smtp servers
Hi! Should I report this un Evo's Bugzilla site, or is reporting it here sufficient? Two mail clients, Mozilla 1.0rc3 and Evolution 1.0.8-99. Mozilla does everything perfectly, Evo doesn't. I want to have all service traffic on the inside of my firewall run over TLS where possible. So I use ldaps, pop3s, ssh etc. for those services that need it. I check what does in fact happen with the service's (openldap, Exim etc) debug tools and with Ethereal 0.8.20 Evo can cope with pop3s on the standard port (995). But it makes a complete mess of smtps (without authentication) on port 465. It's supposed to give an ehlo me and when it sees STARTTLS, it's supposed to do STARTTLS, after which the certificate exchange and the rest of the smtp stuff happens. Mozilla does this. Evo sends F and 3 escaped octets and the rfc-compliant mail server (Exim 4.10) hangs with a 500 syntax error and eventally times out. Useless, obviously. Who should deal with this? Best, Tony -- Tony Earnshaw The usefulness of RTFM is vastly overrated. e-post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www:http://www.billy.demon.nl gpg public key: http://www.billy.demon.nl/tonni.armor Telefoon: (+31) (0)172 530428 Mobiel: (+31) (0)6 51153356 GPG Fingerprint = 3924 6BF8 A755 DE1A 4AD6 FA2B F7D7 6051 3BE7 B981 3BE7B981 ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
